International Journal of Evolutionary Biology / 2014 / Article / Tab 2 / Research Article
Individual Genetic Contributions to Genital Shape Variation between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana Table 2 Tibia length, posterior lobe area, lobe length, and lobe width measurements.
Genotype Tibia length (mm) Lobe area (×103 mm2 ) Lobe width (mm) Lobe length (mm) D. simulans FC0.3743 ± 0.0167 4.432 ± 0.112 0.0882 ± 0.0024 0.0593 ± 0.0035 SM(62) 1 0.3800 ± 0.0235 3.401 ± 0.137*** 0.0769 ± 0.0025** 0.0517 ± 0.0045* SM(82) 4 0.3842 ± 0.0132 3.534 ± 0.162*** 0.0731 ± 0.0042*** 0.0552 ± 0.0060 SM(98) 1 0.3837 ± 0.0100 3.942 ± 0.112*** 0.0860 ± 0.0025 0.0534 ± 0.0033* SM(98) 5 0.3568 ± 0.0165 4.266 ± 0.207 0.0861 ± 0.0027 0.0546 ± 0.0020 D. mauritiana SYN0.3742 ± 0.0123 0.832 ± 0.053 0.0127 ± 0.0010 0.0566 ± 0.0022 MS(62) 3 0.3551 ± 0.0151 0.847 ± 0.041 0.0135 ± 0.0007 0.0564 ± 0.0017 MS(82) 6 0.3915 ± 0.0081 1.033 ± 0.053** 0.0152 ± 0.0012* 0.0630 ± 0.0035 MS(98) 1 0.3760 ± 0.0080 0.743 ± 0.050 0.0130 ± 0.0003 0.0582 ± 0.0036
Comparison to D. simulans FC (for SM ) or D. mauritiana SYN (for MS ): , , and . All values were adjusted for body size by dividing by tibia length prior to statistical analysis.