Copyright © 2009 K. Flydal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

1. S. M. Murphy and J. A. Curatolo, “Activity budgets and movement rates of caribou encountering pipelines, roads, and traffic in Northern Alaska,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 2483–2490, 1987. View at Scopus
2. S. A. Wolfe, B. Griffith, and C. A. G. Wolfe, “Response of reindeer and caribou to human activities,” Polar Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 63–73, 2000. View at Scopus
3. I. Vistnes, C. Nellemann, P. Jordhøy, and O. Strand, “Wild reindeer: impacts of progressive infrastructure development on distribution and range use,” Polar Biology, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 531–537, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
4. I. Vistnes and C. Nellemann, “Avoidance of cabins, roads, and power lines by reindeer during calving,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 915–925, 2001. View at Scopus
5. I. Vistnes, C. Nellemann, P. Jordhøy, and O. Strand, “Effects of infrastructure on migration and range use of wild reindeer,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 101–108, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
6. C. Nellemann, I. Vistnes, P. Jordhoy, and O. Strand, “Winter distribution of wild reindeer in relation to power lines, roads and resorts,” Biological Conservation, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 351–360, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
7. C. Nellemann, I. Vistnes, P. Jordhøy, O. Strand, and A. Newton, “Progressive impact of piecemeal infrastructure development on wild reindeer,” Biological Conservation, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 307–317, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
8. E. Reimers, B. Dahle, S. Eftestøl, J. E. Colman, and E. Gaare, “Effects of a power line on migration and range use of wild reindeer,” Biological Conservation, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 484–494, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
9. J. G. J. Goodwin, Big Game Movement Near a 500-kV Transmission Line in Northern Idaho, Bonneville Power Administration, Engineering and Construction Division, Portland, Ore, USA, 1975.
10. S. Takatsuki, “A case study on the effects of a transmission-line corridor on Sika deer habitat use at the foothills of Mt Goyo, northern Honshu, Japan,” Ecological Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 141–146, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
11. J. M. J. Lee and G. L. Reiner, “Transmission line electric fields and the possible effects on livestock and honeybees,” Transactions of the ASAE, vol. 26, pp. 279–286, 1983.
12. L. E. Rogers, J. L. Warren, N. R. Hinds, K. A. Gano, R. E. Fitzner, and G. F. Piepel, “Environmental studies of a 1100-kV prototype transmission line, an annual report for the 1981 study period,” Transactions of the ASAE, vol. 25, pp. 279–286, 1982.
13. E. Reimers and J. E. Colman, “Reindeer and caribou (Rangifer) response to human activity,” Rangifer, vol. 26, pp. 55–71, 2006.
14. E. Reimers, Rein og menneskelig aktivitet: en litteraturstudie, NVE-Vassdragsdirektoratet, Natur- og Landskapsavdelingen, Oslo, Norway, 1986.
15. C. Nellemann and R. D. Cameron, “Cumulative impacts of an evolving oil-field complex on the distribution of calving caribou,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 1425–1430, 1998. View at Scopus
16. J. Altman, “Observational study of behavior: sampling methods,” Behaviour, vol. 49, pp. 227–267, 1974.
17. F. M. Mörschel and D. R. Klein, “Effects of weather and parasitic insects on behavior and group dynamics of caribou of the Delta Herd, Alaska,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 75, no. 10, pp. 1659–1670, 1997. View at Scopus
18. J. E. Colman, C. Pedersen, D. Ø. Hjermann, Ø. Holand, S. R. Moe, and E. Reimers, “Twenty-four-hour feeding and lying patterns of wild reindeer Rangifer tarandus tarandus in summer,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 79, no. 12, pp. 2168–2175, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
19. J. E. Colman, C. Pedersen, D. Ø. Hjermann, Ø. Holand, S. R. Moe, and E. Reimers, “Do wild reindeer exhibit grazing compensation during insect harassment?” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2003. View at Scopus
20. M. O. Hill, DECORANA—A Fortran Program for Detrended Correspondence Analysis and Reciprocal Averaging, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA, 1979.
21. R. Sørlie, Ectomycorrhiza on Salix herbacea L. in the glacier foreland of Midtdalsbreen, Finse, Norway, M.S. thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 2001.
22. C. S. Gillies, M. Hebblewhite, S. E. Nielsen, et al., “Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 887–898, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
23. J. C. Pinheiro and D. M. Bates, Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
24. R. D. C. Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2005.
25. D. Bates, “Fitting linear mixed models,” R.R. News, vol. 5, pp. 27–30, 2005.
26. H. Akaike, “A new look at statistical model identification,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 19, pp. 716–723, 1974.
27. T. Skogland, Villrein—Fra Urinnvåner til Miljøbarometer, Teknologisk, Oslo, Norway, 1994.
28. J. E. Colman, Behaviour patterns of wild reindeer in relation to sheep and parasitic flies, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 2000.
29. K. Flydal, S. Eftestøl, E. Reimers, and J. E. Colman, “Effects of wind turbines on area use and behaviour of semi-domesticated reindeer in enclosures,” Rangifer, vol. 24, pp. 55–66, 2004.
30. R. I. M. Hagemoen and E. Reimers, “Reindeer summer activity pattern in relation to weather and insect harassment,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 883–892, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
31. K. P. Burnham and D. R. Anderson, Model Selection and Multimodel Inference—A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
32. E. Reimers, “Activity pattern; the major determinant for growth and fattening in Rangifer?” in Second International Reindeer/Caribou Symposium, Røros, Norway, 1979, E. Reimers, E. Gaare, and S. Skjenneberg, Eds., pp. 466–474, Direktoratet for Vilt og Ferskvannsfisk, Trondheim, Norway, 1980.
33. J. Trudell and R. G. White, “The effect of forage structure and availability on food intake, biting rate, bite size and daily eating time of reindeer,” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 18, pp. 63–81, 1981.
34. S. M. Murphy and J. A. Curatolo, “Activity budgets and movement rates of caribou encountering pipelines, roads, and traffic in northern Alaska,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 2483–2490, 1987. View at Scopus
35. C. J. A. Bradshaw, S. Boutin, and D. M. Hebert, “Energetic implications of disturbance caused by petroleum exploration to woodland caribou,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 76, no. 7, pp. 1319–1324, 1998. View at Scopus
36. E. Wiklund, A. Andersson, G. Malmfors, and K. Lundström, “Muscle glycogen levels and blood metabolites in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus L.) after transport and lairage,” Meat Science, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 133–144, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
37. E. Wiklund, L. Johansson, and G. Malmfors, “Sensory meat quality, ultimate pH values, blood parameters and carcass characteristics in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus L.) grazed on natural pastures or fed a commercial feed mixture,” Food Quality and Preference, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 573–581, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
38. P. S. Bøving and E. Post, “Vigilance and foraging behaviour of female caribou in relation to predation risk,” Rangifer, vol. 17, pp. 55–63, 1997.
39. E. Reimers and S. Svela, “Vigilance behaviour in wild reindeer and semi-domestic reindeer in Norway,” Alces, vol. 37, pp. 1–11, 2002.
40. J. M. J. Lee and D. B. Griffith, “Transmission line audible noise and wildlife,” in Effects of Noise on Wildlife, J. L. Fletcher and R. G. Busnel, Eds., pp. 105–168, Academic Press, London, UK, 1978.
41. B. J. Maddock, Electric Power Transmission and the Environment: Fields, Noise, and Interference, National Grid Research and Development Centre, Letterhead, UK, 1990.
42. S. Begall, J. Červený, J. Neef, O. Vojtěch, and H. Burda, “Magnetic alignment in grazing and resting cattle and deer,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 36, pp. 13451–13455, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
43. H. Burda, S. Begall, J. Červený, J. Neef, and P. Němec, “Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields disrupt magnetic alignment of ruminants,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 14, pp. 5708–5713, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
44. B. Algers and K. Hennichs, “Biological effects of electromagnetic fields on vertebrates. A review,” Veterinary Research Communications, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 265–279, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
45. M. Waskaas, Elektriske felt i høyspenningsanlegg, Statens Institutt for Strålevern, Oslo, Norway, 1982.
46. M. G. Comber and L. E. Zaffanella, “Audible noise,” in Transmission Line Reference Book 345 kV and Above, pp. 192–238, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif, USA, 1975.
47. Z. Engel and T. Wszolłek, “Audible noise of transmission lines caused by the corona effect: analysis, modelling, prediction,” Applied Acoustics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 149–163, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
48. K. Flydal, A. Hermansen, P. S. Enger, and E. Reimers, “Hearing in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus),” Journal of Comparative Physiology A, vol. 187, no. 4, pp. 265–269, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
49. K. Flydal, I. R. Kilde, P. S. Enger, and E. Reimers, “Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) perception of noise from power lines,” Rangifer, vol. 23, pp. 21–24, 2003.
50. C. J. A. Bradshaw, S. Boutin, and D. M. Hebert, “Effects of petroleum exploration on woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1127–1133, 1997. View at Scopus
51. F. Berntsen, Reinens reaksjon på lavtflyvende luftfartøy, NINA Oppdragsmelding no. 390, Norsk Institutt for Naturforskning, Trondheim, Norway, 1996.
52. F. H. Harrington and A. M. Veitch, “Short-term impacts of low-level jet fighter training on caribou in Labrador,” Arctic, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 318–327, 1991. View at Scopus
53. J. A. K. Maier, S. M. Murphy, R. G. White, and M. D. Smith, “Responses of caribou to overflights by low-altitude jet aircraft,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 62, supplement 2, pp. 752–766, 1998. View at Scopus
54. J. A. Curatolo and S. M. Murphy, “The effects of pipelines, roads, and traffic on the movement of caribou, Rangifer tarandus,” Canadian Field-Naturalist, vol. 100, pp. 218–224, 1986.
55. L. E. Noel, R. H. Pollard, W. B. Ballard, and M. A. Cronin, “Activity and use of active gravel pads and tundra by caribou, Rangifer tarandus granti, within the Prudhoe Bay oil field, Alaska,” Canadian Field-Naturalist, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 400–409, 1998. View at Scopus
56. R. H. Pollard, W. B. Ballard, L. E. Noel, and M. A. Cronin, “Parasitic insect abundance and microclimate of gravel pads and tundra within the Prudhoe Bay oil field, Alaska, in relation to use by caribou, Rangifer tarandus granti,” Canadian Field-Naturalist, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 649–658, 1996. View at Scopus
57. S. G. Fancy, “Movements and activity budgets of caribou near oil drilling sites in the Sagavanirktok river floodplain, Alaska,” Arctic, vol. 36, pp. 193–197, 1983.
58. R. L. Jefferies, D. R. Klein, and G. R. Shaver, “Vertebrate herbivores and northern plant communities: reciprocal influences and responses,” Oikos, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 193–206, 1994. View at Scopus