About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Ecology
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 642412, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/642412
Research Article

Do Invasive Fire Ants Affect Habitat Selection within a Small Mammal Community?

1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, MS-170, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
2Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 250 Townsend Hall, Newark, DE 19716, USA
3Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2258, USA

Received 26 June 2010; Accepted 1 December 2010

Academic Editor: Andrew Sih

Copyright © 2010 Wendee N. Holtcamp et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. D. Fretwell and H. L. Lucas, “On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds,” Acta Biotheoretica, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 16–36, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. M. L. Rosenzweig, “Hummingbird isolegs in an experimental system,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 313–322, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. B. P. Kotler and R. D. Holt, “Predation and competition: the interaction of two types of species interactions,” Oikos, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 256–260, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  4. K. J. Halama and R. D. Dueser, “Of mice and habitats: tests for density-dependent habitat selection,” Oikos, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 107–114, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  5. G. Shenbrot, B. Krasnov, and S. Burdelov, “Density-independent habitat distribution caused by density-dependent habitat selection,” Evolutionary Ecology Research, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1277–1290, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. L. Oatway and D. W. Morris, “Do animals select habitat at small or large scales? An experiment with meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus),” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 479–487, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. G. Shenbrot, B. Krasnov, and S. Burdelov, “Long-term study of population dynamics and habitat selection of rodents in the Negev Desert,” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 776–786, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Sih, “Prey refuges and predator-prey stability,” Theoretical Population Biology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. S. Brown, “Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. R. D. Holt, “Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities,” Theoretical Population Biology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 197–229, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  11. J. H. Brown, “Patterns, modes, and extents of invasions by vertebrates,” in Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. Di Castri, et al., Eds., pp. 85–110, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  12. D. Simberloff, “Which insect introductions succeed and which fail,” in Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. Di Castri, et al., Eds., pp. 61–76, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  13. S. B. Vinson and A. A. Sorensen., Imported Fire Ants: Life History and Impact, Texas Department of Agriculture, Austin, Tex, USA, 1986.
  14. M. P. Masser and W. E. Grant, “Fire ant-induced trap mortality of small mammals in east-central Texas,” Southwestern Naturalist, vol. 31, pp. 540–542, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  15. C. R. Allen, D. M. Epperson, and A. S. Garmestani, “Red imported fire ant impacts on wildlife: a decade of research,” American Midland Naturalist, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 88–103, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  16. W. N. Holtcamp, W. E. Grant, and S. B. Vinson, “Patch use under predation hazard: effect of the red imported fire ant on deer mouse foraging behavior,” Ecology, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 308–317, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  17. J. L. Orrock and B. J. Danielson, “Rodents balancing a variety of risks: invasive fire ants and indirect and direct indicators of predation risk,” Behavioural Ecology, vol. 140, no. 4, pp. 662–667, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  18. E. L. Preisser, D. I. Bolnick, and M. F. Benard, “Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions,” Ecology, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 501–509, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  19. S. L. Lima and L. M. Dill, “Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 619–640, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  20. D. W. Morris, “Ecological scale and habitat use,” Ecology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 362–369, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  21. D. W. Morris, “Tests of density-dependent habitat selection in a patchy environment,” Ecological Monographs, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 269–281, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  22. M. L. Rosenzweig and Z. Abramsky, “Detecting density-dependent habitat selection,” American Naturalist, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 405–417, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  23. W. E. Grant, P. E. Carothers, and L. A. Gidley, “Small mammal community structure in the postoak savanna of east-central Texas,” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 66, pp. 589–594, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  24. M. J. Killion and W. E. Grant, “Scale effects in assessing the impact of imported fire ants on small mammals,” Southwestern Naturalist, vol. 38, pp. 393–396, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  25. M. J. Killion, W. E. Grant, and S. B. Vinson, “Response of Baiomys taylori to changes in density of imported fire ants,” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 141–147, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  26. D. K. Ferris, M. J. Killion, K. P. Ferris, W. E. Grant, and S. B. Vinson, “Influence of relative abundance of red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) on small mammal captures,” Southwestern Naturalist, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 97–100, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  27. E. K. Pedersen, T. L. Bedford, W. E. Grant et al., “Effect of red imported fire ants on habitat use by hispid cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus) and northern pygmy mice (Baiomys taylori),” Southwestern Naturalist, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 419–426, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  28. A. M. A. Callcott and H. L. Collins, “Invasion and range expansion of imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in North America from 1918–1995,” Florida Entomologist, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 240–248, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  29. R. H. Chabreck, B. U. Constantin, and R. H. Hamilton, “Use of chemical ant repellants during small mammal trapping,” Southwestern Naturalist, vol. 31, pp. 109–110, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  30. S. D. Porter and W. R. Tschinkel, “Foraging in Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): effects of weather and season,” Environmental Entomology, vol. 16, pp. 802–808, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  31. S. P. Kaluzny, S. C. Vega, T. P. Cardoso, and A. A. Shelly, “S+ Spatial Stats User's Manual,” Version 1.0, Seattle, Wash, USA, MathSoft. 226pp, 1996.
  32. K. P. Burnham and D. R. Anderson, Model Selection and Inference—A Practical Information Theoretic Approach, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  33. M. J. Killion, Small mammal response to red imported fire ant removal in a grassland community, M.S. thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, Tex, USA, 1992.
  34. G. G. Raun and B. J. Wilks, “Natural history of Baiomys taylori in southern Texas and competition with Sigmodon hispidus in a mixed population,” Texas Journal of Science, vol. 16, pp. 28–49, 1964. View at Google Scholar
  35. W. B. Kincaid and G. M. Cameron, “Effects of species removal on resource utilization in a Texas rodent community,” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 229–235, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  36. D. J. Schmidly, Texas Mammals East of the Balcones Fault Zone, Texas A&M University, College Station, Tex, USA, 1983.
  37. S. R. Spencer and G. N. Cameron, “Reithrodontomys fulvescens,” Mammalian Species, vol. 174, pp. 1–7, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  38. R. D. Holt and J. H. Lawton, “The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 25, pp. 495–520, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  39. H. H. Caswell, “Predator-mediated coexistence: a nonequilibrium model,” American Naturalist, vol. 112, pp. 127–154, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  40. I. Hanski, “Predator-mediated coexistence,” Annales Entomologica Fennici, vol. 42, pp. 33–35, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  41. E. E. Werner, J. F. Gilliam, D. J. Hall, and G. G. Mittelbach, “An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish,” Ecology, vol. 61, pp. 233–242, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  42. J. J. Hughes, D. Ward, and M. R. Perrin, “Predation risk and competition affect habitat selection and activity of Namib desert gerbils,” Ecology, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 1397–1405, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  43. M. D. Mills, R. B. Rader, and M. C. Belk, “Complex interactions between native and invasive fish: the simultaneous effects of multiple negative interactions,” Oecologia, vol. 141, no. 4, pp. 713–721, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed