Table 2: Generalised linear models explaining variation in chick losses (upper panel) in study areas of South Ostrobotnia and Oulu area in western Finland during 1985–2007. LRT denotes log ratio test for model effect.

ModelAICcΔAICcLRTdfPDeviance

4Goshawk2.1290.0006.96110.0081.077
5Goshawk, area3.6321.5038.41720.0151.011
6Goshawk, voles4.3592.2307.68920.0211.104
1Voles7.4315.3021.65810.1981.357
8Goshawk, voles, weather7.6655.5367.69030.0531.044
9Weather8.9276.7980.16210.6871.448
7Goshawk, voles, area, area*voles9.2087.0799.86840.0430.949
2Voles, area9.8737.7442.17520.3371.326
3Voles, area, voles*area10.7148.5854.64230.2001.191
10Global model17.97715.84810.13560.1190.938