About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Ecology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 629246, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/629246
Research Article

Effects of Intraguild Predation: Evaluating Resource Competition between Two Canid Species with Apparent Niche Separation

1Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA
2U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Logan, UT 84322, USA
3AGEISS Environmental, 1617 Ontario Street SE, Olympia, WA 98501, USA

Received 23 May 2011; Accepted 25 August 2011

Academic Editor: Andrew Sih

Copyright © 2012 Adam J. Kozlowski et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. Volterra, “Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically,” Nature, vol. 118, no. 2972, pp. 558–560, 1926. View at Scopus
  2. A. J. Lotka, “The growth of mixed populations: two species competing for a common food supply,” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, vol. 22, pp. 461–469, 1932.
  3. D. Lack, Darwin's Finches, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1944.
  4. J. D. Olden and N. L. Poff, “Toward a mechanistic understanding and prediction of biotic homogenization,” The American Naturalist, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 442–460, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  5. T. Day and K. A. Young, “Competitive and facilitative evolutionary diversification,” BioScience, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 2004. View at Scopus
  6. R. A. Armstrong and R. McGehee, “Competitive exclusion,” The American Naturalist, vol. 115, pp. 151–170, 1980.
  7. P. Abrams, “The theory of limiting similarity,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 14, pp. 359–376, 1983. View at Scopus
  8. T. J. Case and M. E. Gilpin, “Interference competition and niche theory,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 3073–3077, 1974. View at Scopus
  9. T. K. Fuller and L. B. Keith, “Non-overlaping ranges of coyotes and wolves in northeastern Alberta,” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 62, pp. 403–405, 1981.
  10. D. R. Voigt and B. D. Earle, “Avoidance of coyotes by red fox families,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 47, pp. 852–857, 1983.
  11. S. M. Durant, “Competition refuges and coexistence: an example from Serengeti carnivores,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 370–386, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W. M. Arjo and D. H. Pletscher, “Behavioral responses of coyotes to wolf recolonization in northwestern Montana,” The Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 1919–1927, 1999. View at Scopus
  13. C. M. Thompson and E. M. Gese, “Food webs and intraguild predation: community interactions of a native mesocarnivore,” Ecology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 334–346, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. W. M. Arjo, E. M. Gese, T. J. Bennett, and A. J. Kozolowski, “Changes in kit fox-coyote-prey relationships in the Great Basin Desert, Utah,” Western North The American Naturalist, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 389–401, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. W. Neu, C. R. Byers, and J. M. Peek, “A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 38, pp. 541–545, 1974.
  16. D. H. Johnson, “The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference,” Ecology, vol. 61, pp. 65–71, 1980.
  17. A. J. Kozlowski, E. M. Gese, and W. M. Arjo, “Niche overlap and resource partitioning between sympatric kit foxes and coyotes in the Great Basin Desert of Western Utah,” The American Midland Naturalist, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 191–208, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. J. Egoscue, “Ecology and life history of the kit fox in Tooele County, Utah,” Ecology, vol. 43, pp. 481–497, 1962.
  19. H. J. Egoscue, “Population dynamics of the kit fox in Western Utah,” Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Science, vol. 74, pp. 122–127, 1975.
  20. W. M. Arjo, T. J. Bennett, and A. J. Kozlowski, “Characteristics of current and historical kit fox (Vulpes macrotis) dens in the Great Basin Desert,” The Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 96–102, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. AGEISS Environmental, “Natural resources at U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground 1952–1998: wildlife and habitat descriptions, historic and recent study summaries, conclusions, and future management recommendations,” Directorate of Environmental Programs, U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground, Utah, USA, 1998.
  22. V. Emrick and A. Hill, “Classification of great basin plant communities on dugway proving ground, Utah,” Tech. Rep. number 99/30, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, 1999.
  23. M. W. Barrett, J. W. Nolan, and L. D. Roy, “Evaluation of a hand-held net-gun to capture large animals,” Wildlife Society Bulletin, vol. 10, pp. 108–114, 1982.
  24. E. M. Gese, O. J. Rongstad, and W. R. Mytton, “Manual and net-gun capture of coyotes from helicopters,” Wildlife Society Bulletin, vol. 15, pp. 444–445, 1987.
  25. A. J. Kozlowski, T. J. Bennett, E. M. Gese, and W. M. Arjo, “Live capture of denning mammals using an improved box-trap enclosure: kit foxes as a test case,” Wildlife Society Bulletin, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 630–633, 2003. View at Scopus
  26. E. M. Gese, O. J. Rongstad, and W. R. Mytton, “Home range and habitat use of coyotes in southeastern Colorado,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 640–646, 1988. View at Scopus
  27. R. K. Swihart and N. A. Slade, “Testing for independence of observations in animal movements,” Ecology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1176–1184, 1985. View at Scopus
  28. R. K. Swihart and N. A. Slade, “Influence of sampling interval on estimates of home-range size,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1019–1025, 1985. View at Scopus
  29. E. M. Gese, D. E. Andersen, and O. J. Rongstad, “Determining home-range size of resident coyotes from point and sequential locations,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 501–506, 1990. View at Scopus
  30. D. L. Kramer and M. Bonenfant, “Direction of predator approach and the decision to flee to a refuge,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 289–295, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Louis and M. Le Berre, “Adjustment of flight distances in Marmota marmota,” The Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 556–563, 2000. View at Scopus
  32. J. A. Bissonette, S. S. Sherburne, and D. R. Ramsey, “Analyzing telemetry data with a GIS-based vector structure,” International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, vol. 8, pp. 533–543, 1994.
  33. L. E. T. Ostro, T. P. Young, S. C. Silver, and F. W. Koontz, “A geographic information system method for estimating home range size,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 748–755, 1999. View at Scopus
  34. D. R. Griffin, Animal Minds, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1992.
  35. R. C. Jennings, “A philosophical consideration of awareness,” Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 57, no. 3-4, pp. 201–211, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. A. Elgar, “Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence,” Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 13–33, 1989. View at Scopus
  37. A. Frid and L. M. Dill, “Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk,” Conservation Ecology, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 11, 2002. View at Scopus
  38. P. S. Morey, E. M. Gese, and S. Gehrt, “Spatial and temporal variation in the diet of coyotes in the Chicago metropolitan area,” The American Midland Naturalist, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 147–161, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Cherry, “A comparison of confidence interval methods for habitat use-availability studies,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 653–658, 1996. View at Scopus
  40. F. A. Leban, Resource Selection for Windows, Version: Beta 8, University of Idaho, Idaho, Moscow, Russia, 1999.
  41. M. Elbroch, Mammal Tracks and Sign: A Guide to North American Species, Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg, Pa, USA, 2003.
  42. K. Ralls and D. A. Smith, “Latrine use by san joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica) and coyotes (Canis latrans),” Western North The American Naturalist, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 544–547, 2004. View at Scopus
  43. R. F. W. Barnes and S. C. Tapper, “A method for counting hares by spotlight,” Journal of Zoology, vol. 206, pp. 273–276, 1985.
  44. K. Ralls and L. L. Eberhardt, “Assessment of abundance of San Joaquin kit foxes by spotlight surveys,” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 65–73, 1997. View at Scopus
  45. R. B. Bury and P. S. Corn, “Evaluation of pitfall trapping in northwestern forests: trap arrays with drift fences,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 51, pp. 112–119, 1987.
  46. J. E. Funderburk, D. C. Herzog, T. P. Mack, and R. E. Lynch, “Sampling lesser cornstalk borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) adults in several crops with reference to adult dispersion patterns,” Environmental Entomology, vol. 14, pp. 452–458, 1985.
  47. S. L. Pimm and M. L. Rosenzweig, “Competitors and habitat use,” Oikos, vol. 37, pp. 1–6, 1981.
  48. R. H. MacArthur and E. L. Pianka, “On optimal use of a patchy environment,” The American Naturalist, vol. 100, pp. 603–609, 1966.
  49. M. E. Power, “Top-down and bottom-up forces in food webs: do plants have primacy?” Ecology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 733–746, 1992. View at Scopus
  50. R. T. Golightly and R. D. Ohmart, “Water economy of two desert canids: coyote and kit fox,” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 1984. View at Scopus
  51. G. D. Warrick, J. H. Scrivner, and T. P. O'Farrell, “Demographic responses of kit foxes to supplemental feeding,” Southwestern Naturalist, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 367–374, 1999. View at Scopus
  52. P. J. White and R. A. Garrott, “Population dynamics of kit foxes,” The Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 486–493, 1999. View at Scopus
  53. J. H. Brown, “Two decades of homage to santa rosalia: toward a general theory of diversity,” The American Zoologist, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 877–888, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. G. E. Hutchinson, “Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals?” The American Naturalist, vol. 93, pp. 145–159, 1959.
  55. R. H. MacArthur, “On the relative abundance of bird species,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 43, pp. 293–295, 1957.
  56. R. E. ricklefs, Ecology, W.H. Freeman, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1990.
  57. P. Ekerholm, L. Oksanen, T. Oksanen, and M. Schneider, “The impact of short-term predator removal on vole dynamics in an arctic-alpine landscape,” Oikos, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 457–468, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. S. E. Henke and F. C. Bryant, “Effects of coyote removal on the faunal community in western Texas,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1066–1081, 1999. View at Scopus
  59. S. M. Karki, E. M. Gese, and M. L. Klavetter, “Effects of coyote population reduction on swift fox demographics in southeastern Colorado,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 2707–2718, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. R. E. Hoare, “Determinants of human-elephant conflict in a land-use mosaic,” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 689–700, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus