Research Article
A Comparison of Three Dry Matter Forage Production Methods Used in South Africa
Table 1
Mean phytomass values (kg/ha) calculated for each sample site at three survey sites using the different techniques.
| Sample site |
Disc pasture meter (DPM) | Clipping and weighing |
Plant Number Scale (PNS) | Survey site | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 | 9 845 | | | 3 500 | | | 1 852 | | | 2 | 7 324 | | | 3 250 | | | 2 101 | | | 3 | 8 677 | | | 2 980 | | | 1 258 | | | 4 | | 7 774 | | | 2 060 | | | 3 972 | | 5 | | 8 511 | | | 2 560 | | | 2 627 | | 6 | | 5 361 | | | 1 600 | | | 3 480 | | 7 | | | 5 478 | | | 3 340 | | | 2 605 | 8 | | | 6 621 | | | 6 980 | | | 3 295 | 9 | | | 7 134 | | | 7 160 | | | 3 280 |
| Mean phytomass (kg/ha) | 8 615 | 7 215 | 6 411 | 3 243 | 2 073 | 5 827 | 1 737 | 3 360 | 3 060 |
|
|