- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
International Journal of Electrochemistry
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 732749, 6 pages
Preparation and Investigation of a Novel Organic Polymer Consisting of 2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxy as a Cathode Active Material in Li-Ion Batteries
1TUBITAK Marmara Research Center, Energy Institute, Gebze 41470, Kocaeli, Turkey
2Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Ankara University, Tandogan, 06100 Ankara, Turkey
Received 24 March 2013; Accepted 1 July 2013
Academic Editor: Kenneth I. Ozoemena
Copyright © 2013 Emre Biçer and Atilla Öktemer. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
In the present study, a novel organic polymer consisting of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxyl group as an electroactive center is employed by synthesizing it from a commercially ready polymer. An investigation on electrochemical and battery properties of this material as a cathode active material in different electrolyte salts was conducted. A coin cell shows a discharge capacity of 40 mAh g−1 at 1 C which is 76% of its theoretical capacity. It is observed that there is no significant decrease in capacity value even at 2 C and 5 C which indicates that it is applicable for the high-power applications. Besides, a good cycle stability is obtained with the organic radical battery.
The use of conjugated polymers as electroactive material alternative to the inorganic insertion compounds has been extensively reported in the literature. However, no satisfactory results were obtained . Organic radical batteries bearing nitroxide group as an electroactive center appeared as a new concept in Li-ion batteries. Electrochemical oxidation and reduction properties of the nitroxide group enable it to act as an active center of the organic radical battery. In addition, the stability of TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxy) containing nitroxide group at ambient conditions makes the compound a perfect electroactive material. The nitroxide radical oxidized to oxyammonium cation by losing an electron, whereas it is reduced to aminoxy anion by gaining an electron (Figure 1). Electrochemical reactions occur by the single electron transfer caused by the radical active center of TEMPO molecule. TEMPO and PROXYL (2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-1-pyrrolidinyloxy) groups bearing nitroxide group substituted to polymer backbone as a repeating unit are synthesized as cathode active materials.
The first organic radical battery with poly(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyloxy methacrylate) (PTMA) polymerization of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxyl methacrylate containing a nitroxide group as an active center was reported by Nakahara and coworkers [2, 3]. In following years, different polymers substituted with TEMPO and PROXYL moieties were employed as cathode active materials in Li-ion batteries such as polyethers [4–6], polyacetylene , polynorbornene [8, 9], poly(7-oxanorbornene) , cellulose , DNA complexes , polythiophenes , and polyalkenes  illustrated in Figure 2.
While the electrochemical reaction occurs with nitroxide radical, during charging and discharging every different polymer substituted with TEMPO has to be of the same capacity. Nevertheless, different capacities were observed with different polymers. The difference in the mechanical aspects of the polymers constitutes the reason thereof.
The charge- and discharge-mechanism of the organic radical battery is illustrated in Figure 3. During the charging of organic radical battery the nitroxide radical oxidizes to oxoammonium cation, while forming an oxoammonium phosphorus hexafluoride compound with the PF6 counter ion contained in the electrolyte. During the discharge the reaction reverses, converting the oxoammonium cation into nitroxide radical. Meanwhile the phosphorus hexafluoride is returned to the electrolyte and forms LiPF6 salt.
The aim of this study was to synthesize a new class of compound from a commercially available starting material for employing it as cathode active material in organic radical battery. We report the investigation of electrochemical studies by cyclic voltammetry and impedance measurements and the charge/discharge characteristics of a Li/cathode active material coin cell. Also, the commercial availability of starting material combined with the fact of it being synthesized in high volumes makes it economically feasible compared to other cathode active materials. Besides, the ease of synthesis makes it a candidate active material among the others.
All solvents and PVdF (polyvinylidenfluoride) were purchased from Merck. Commercially available battery grade NMP (N-methyl pyrrolidone) and LiPF6 salt were purchased from Alfa Aeser. Super P carbon was purchased from Timcal Co. Also, commercially available polymer compound Uvinul 5045H (C32N58N2O2)n was purchased from BASF Turkey. Electrochemical measurements were conducted with PAR VersaSTAT multichannel potentiostat/galvanostat. Thermogravimetric analysis was performed on Mettler-Toledo TGA-851 with a heating rate of 5°C/min. Elemental Analysis was performed by Leco-932-CHNS-O instrument. Kurabo mixer was used for mixing/deaerating purposes. Fabrication of button cells was assembled in Vigor 1500GS glove box under Argon atmosphere. All electrochemical tests were conducted with CR2032 button cells purchased from MTI corp. All chemicals were used without further purification.
2.1. Synthesis of the Compounds
The cathode active material was synthesized by the oxidation of the commercially available polymer compound (C32N58N2O2)n. The starting polymer was dissolved in chloroform and methanol solution (1 : 1). To this solution, 0.01 g sodium tungstate was added as an oxidation catalyst and then 30% hydrogen peroxide was added dropwise carefully. The solution was stirred overnight at room temperature. The orange precipitate was filtered off and washed with chloroform three times to remove catalyst and other soluble side-products and then the residue was dried under reduced pressure at 50°C to afford the pure orange polymer whose color was due to the TEMPO radical. The obtained polymer was insoluble in common organic solvents. FTIR (KBr disc, cm−1): 2950 (), 2900 (), 1700 (), 1620, 1480 (). GPC: g/mol; . Analysis of C32H57N2O3 (517 g/mol): calcd. C = 74.23, H = 11.10, N = 5.41; found C = 74.82 H = 11.53 N = 5.62.
2.2. Preparation of the Composite Electrodes and Electrochemical Measurements
The composite electrodes were prepared as follows. A radical polymer (20%), Timcal Super P carbon (70%), and PVdF (10%) were mixed and added NMP to make a slurry. The suspension was dispersed in a mixer/deaerator. The dispersed slurry was pasted on a 15 mm diameter aluminum foil by using a spin-coater and then dried in an oven at 50°C. The composite electrode was hot-pressed and dried under vacuum at 50°C for 15 h. Then it was taken into the glove box in order to prepare a coin battery (CR2032). Cyclic voltammetry was performed fabricated for composite electrode/Super P in a voltage range of 3.0–4.2 V at scan rates of 1, 2, 5, and 10 mV s−1. 0.1 M LiAsF6, LiBF4, and LiPF6 solution of ethylene carbonate/diethyl carbonate (1 : 1, v/v) was used as electrolyte. Lithium metal was used as the reference and counter electrode and the composite electrode was used as the working electrode.
2.3. Fabrication of the Batteries and Battery Performance
The coin type (CR2032) cell was fabricated by stacking electrodes with Whatman glass fiber separator film in glove box. The cathode was set to a coin-type cell together with a lithium metal anode and a separator. A composite solution of ethylene carbonate and diethyl carbonate (1 : 1, v/v) containing 1 M of LiPF6 was used as an electrolyte (1 M solutions of LiAsF6 and LiBF4 are also used). The performance of the battery was tested by repeating galvanostatic charge/discharge at the scan rates of 1 C (50 mA g−1), 2 C (100 mA g−1), and 5 C (250 mA g−1). Also, theoretical capacity of the cathode active material was calculated from the literature .
3. Results and Discussion
The commercially available polymer (C32H58N2O2)n was used as starting material. The secondary amine group on the 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine substituted to the polymer backbone was converted into nitroxide through a basic reaction using H2O2 in conjunction with Na2WO4·2H2O catalyst and used as the cathode active material in the Li-ion battery (Figure 4). Since the nitrogen atom of the piperidine is oxidized to nitroxide, the solution is turned from yellow to orange. The reaction is kept overnight at room temperature in order to form nitroxide radical in the polymer backbone. The commercial availability of starting material of the cathode active material combined with the fact of it being synthesized in high volumes makes it economically feasible compared to other chemicals.
Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) of the organic radical polymer indicated that the weight average molar mass of the polymer () is 4221 g mol−1, while the number average molar mass is () 2953 g mol−1. In this case, the polydispersity of the polymer () is found to be 1.4 which indicates a homogenous polymer distribution. Furthermore, the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the organic radical polymer showed us that it is stable up to thermal decomposition temperature of 250°C. Besides, it is observed that 10% of the polymer decomposed around 315°C (Figure 5).
For the cyclic voltammogram of the compound, various electrolytes were used at 1 mV s−1 scan rate (Figure 6). Similar peak-to-peak separation values were observed for all electrolytes. While the separation value for LiAsF6 was found to be 148 mV, the values of 167 and 128 mV were observed for LiBF4 and LiPF6, respectively, which proves that the oxidation/reduction reaction of the nitroxide is independent of the electrolyte.
Additionally, when the electrolyte salt is LiPF6, the cyclic voltammogram of the composite electrode at different scan rates was shown in Figure 7. The anodic potential of the composite electrode appeared at 3.73 V, whereas the cathodic potential was 3.59 V. Thus, the peak-to-peak separation () was found as 128 mV at a scan rate of 1 mV s−1. The calculated peak-to-peak separation indicates fast electrode reaction kinetic of the electrochemical reaction. Additionally, an increase of the peak-to-peak separations was observed as the increase of the ratio of scan rates in the composite electrode.
AC impedance measurements were conducted in the range of 0.01 Hz to 1 kHz with an AC amplitude of 10 mV. The -axis of the Nyquist plot indicates the real part (), whereas the -axis indicates the imaginary part (). The resistances of the electrolyte () and the composite electrode () appeared on the -axis of the Nyquist plot of the composite electrode (Figure 8). The impedance of the organic radical polymer was comparatively investigated with electrolyte salts LiAsF6, LiBF4, and LiPF6. The and values of the radical battery with LiPF6 used as electrolyte salt were observed to be 8 and 41 ohms, respectively, whereas the same values turned out to be 10 and 35 ohms for LiAsF6 as the electrolyte salt. Finally in case of LiBF4 being used as electrolyte salt, and values were found to be 16 and 56 ohms, respectively. These results are in good agreement with the organic radical polymers . The lowest electrolyte resistance was achieved in case of LiAsF6, whereas the highest was that of LiBF4. The same ranking was observed for discharge potentials.
The cycle behavior of the cathode active polymer is also investigated versus lithium anode by using different electrolytes LiAsF6, LiBF4 and LiPF6. The determination of the capacity of the cathode active material was realized by chronocoulometry at a constant current density of 1 C (1 C is defined as the current density at which the charging and discharging of the cell take 1 hour) in a voltage range of 3.0–4.2 V. The initial discharge capacity of the cathode active material was shown in Figure 9. However in case of a different electrolyte use, the capacity was not found to vary. The results obtained were 40 mAh g−1 for LiPF6, 45 mAh g−1 for LiBF4, and 46 mAh g−1 for LiAsF6, whereas the theoretical capacity was found to be 52 mAh g−1. The plateau voltage of the organic radical battery was observed 3.66 V which is in good agreement with the formal redox potentials.
Concurrently, in an effort to determine the rate capability of the synthesized cathode active material the organic radical battery containing LiPF6 was discharged at 1 C (50 mA g−1), 2 C (100 mA g−1), and 5 C (250 mA g−1) current densities (Figure 10). The discharge capacity of the organic radical battery was found to be 40 mAh g−1 at 1 C while it was 35 mAh g−1 at 2 C and also 31 mAh g−1 at 5 C. Also, the charge capacities were given in Figure 10. The initial coulombic efficiency at 1 C was 76% whereas 92% at 2 C and 97% at 5 C. Although the observed capacity was not as good as we expected, no significant decrease was observed compared with conventional batteries even at high current densities.
The cycle performance of the organic radical battery is illustrated in Figure 11. During 75 cycles, the organic radical battery stored 97% of its initial capacity in the presence of electrolyte LiPF6 while 98% in LiAsF6 and 97% in LiBF4. But, no significant differences were observed on the cycle performance of the organic radical battery in case of different electrolyte salts. These results show us the cycle stability and the fast electron transfer character of the nitroxide group independent from different electrolyte salts.
Consequently, electrochemical reactions occur by the radical active center of TEMPO molecule by a single electron transfer. Even though the organic radical battery showed a good cyclability and high-power capability, it seems poor in terms of capacity. It could reach 88% of its theoretical capacity (52 mAh g−1). Additionally, various salts were employed as electrolyte to investigate the change in capacity of organic radical batteries. But no significant changes were observed. In this respect, our research group has an effort on increasing the capacity of the cathode active material due to economic superiority of the synthesis.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests with MTI corporation regarding the material discussed in the paper.
This work was partially supported by Ministry of Development Project “Research and Development Center for Electric Energy Storage Technologies (5092717).” The authors would like to thank BASF-Turkey/Doğanay Kimya for their support of commercially available polymer compound. The authors would like to thank the researchers of the Battery Research Group for their valuable discussions during the studies. They are also grateful to Dr. Günhan Kaytaz for detailed editing of the typescript. Emre Bıçer also would like to thank Mrs. Hilal Biçer for her encouragement during the preparation of this paper.
- P. Novák, K. Müller, K. S. V. Santhanam, and O. Haas, “Electrochemically active polymers for rechargeable batteries,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 207–281, 1997.
- K. Nakahara, S. Iwasa, M. Satoh et al., “Rechargeable batteries with organic radical cathodes,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 359, no. 5-6, pp. 351–354, 2002.
- H. Nishide, S. Iwasa, Y. Pu, T. Suga, K. Nakahara, and M. Satoh, “Organic radical battery: nitroxide polymers as a cathode-active material,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 50, no. 2-3, pp. 827–831, 2004.
- T. Suga, K. Yoshimura, and H. Nishide, “Nitroxide-substituted polyether as a new material for batteries,” Macromolecular Symposia, vol. 245-246, pp. 416–422, 2006.
- K. Oyaizu, T. Suga, K. Yoshimura, and H. Nishide, “Synthesis and characterization of radical-bearing polyethers as an electrode-active material for organic secondary batteries,” Macromolecules, vol. 41, no. 18, pp. 6646–6652, 2008.
- K. Oyaizu, T. Kawamoto, T. Suga, and H. Nishide, “Synthesis and charge transport properties of redox-active nitroxide polyethers with large site density,” Macromolecules, vol. 43, no. 24, pp. 10382–10389, 2010.
- J. Qu, T. Katsumata, M. Satoh et al., “Synthesis and charge/discharge properties of polyacetylenes carrying 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinoxy radicals,” Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 28, pp. 7965–7973, 2007.
- T. Katsumata, M. Satoh, J. Wada, M. Shiotsuki, F. Sanda, and T. Masuda, “Polyacetylene and polynorbornene derivatives carrying TEMPO. Synthesis and properties as organic radical battery materials,” Macromolecular Rapid Communications, vol. 27, no. 15, pp. 1206–1211, 2006.
- T. Katsumata, J. Qu, M. Shiotsuki et al., “Synthesis, characterization, and charge/discharge properties of polynorbornenes carrying 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxy radicals at high density,” Macromolecules, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1175–1183, 2008.
- J. Qu, T. Katsumata, M. Satoh, J. Wada, and T. Masuda, “Poly(7-oxanorbornenes) carrying 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxy (TEMPO) radicals: synthesis and charge/discharge properties,” Polymer, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 391–396, 2009.
- J. Qu, F. Z. Khan, M. Satoh et al., “Synthesis and charge/discharge properties of cellulose derivatives carrying free radicals,” Polymer, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1490–1496, 2008.
- J. Qu, R. Morita, M. Satoh et al., “Synthesis and properties of DNA complexes containing 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1- piperidinoxy (TEMPO) moieties as organic radical battery materials,” Chemistry, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 3250–3259, 2008.
- M. Aydin, B. Esat, Ç. Kili, M. E. Köse, A. Ata, and F. Yilmaz, “A polythiophene derivative bearing TEMPO as a cathode material for rechargeable batteries,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 2283–2294, 2011.
- X. Zhang, H. Li, L. Li et al., “Polyallene with pendant nitroxyl radicals,” Polymer, vol. 49, no. 16, pp. 3393–3398, 2008.
- J. Qu, T. Katsumata, M. Satoh, J. Wada, and T. Masuda, “Synthesis and properties of polyacetylene and polynorbornene derivatives carrying 2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-1-pyrrolidinyloxy moieties,” Macromolecules, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 3136–3144, 2007.
- J. Kim, G. Cheruvally, J. Choi et al., “Effect of radical polymer cathode thickness on the electrochemical performance of organic radical battery,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 178, no. 27-28, pp. 1546–1551, 2007.