Comment on “Carbon in Trees in Tasmanian State Forest” : Table 2

Table 2: Carbon deficit and CCC for State forests based on data in Moroni et al. [1], accounting for wet eucalypt only. Values were rounded to 3 sig. fig. not during calculations but for presentation. ^a: “110wawr” = age≥110 yrs, with and without regrowth.


#	Carbon pool	Source	C density or stock	Area (Mha)

A	Potential, E1or2, 110wawr^a	Figure 3	303(±28.7) Mg ha⁻¹
B	Potential, E+3orX, 110wawr	Figure 3	188(±17.3) Mg ha⁻¹
C	Extant, E1or2 even-aged regrowth	Figure 3	7.39(±0.813) Tg	0.0950
D	Extant, E+3orX even-aged regrowth	Figure 3	2.22(±0.245) Tg	0.0520
E	Extant, native State-forests	Figure 3	164(±2) Tg	1.38
F	Potential, E1or2 even-aged regrowth, 110wawr	Area (C) × A	28.8(±2.87) Tg	0.0950
G	Potential, E+3orX even-aged regrowth, 110wawr	Area (D) × B	9.78(±0.948) Tg	0.0520
H	Deficit, E1or2 plus E+3orX	F+G-(C+D)	29.0(±4) Tg	0.147
	CCC, native State-forests	E+H	193(±23) Tg	1.38