|
Topic | Information derived | Reference |
|
Forest regrowth | (i) Identifying forest regenerating processes using temporal AGB comparison | [28, 29, 37, 38, 88, 104–106] |
(ii) Forest structure and AGB changing across forest successional gradient |
(iii) Secondary forest detection |
|
Human impact on forest biomass | (i) AGB differences due to disturbance regimes | [26, 28, 49, 86, 102] |
(ii) Effect of invasive tree species on the stored AGB and forest structure |
|
Forest responses to ecological conditions | (i) AGB differences between vegetation physiognomies | [12, 13, 53, 73, 94, 104] |
(ii) Forest structure differences related to topoedaphic gradients, climatic conditions, or past land use |
|
Carbon sink, source, and storage | (i) Carbon sequestration | [12, 26, 29, 30, 102, 106–111] |
(ii) Carbon amount before specific human impact |
(iii) Identifying management action that can improve carbon storage |
|
Modeling evaluation | (i) Testing modeling approach | [17, 18, 30, 37, 41, 78, 87, 88, 98, 102, 112–121] |
(ii) Image processing techniques |
(iii) Influence of different spatial scale |
(iv) Simulation approach |
|
Sensor evaluation | (i) Testing the performance of specific satellite data to estimate biomass and forest structure | [28, 50, 104, 105, 107, 111–113, 116, 118, 121–131] |
(ii) Testing the AGB accuracy between successional stages |
(iii) Testing performance of specific satellite data to temporal comparison |
|