About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Geophysics
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 484653, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/484653
Research Article

Azimuthally Anisotropic 3D Velocity Continuation

The University of Texas at Austin, TX 78712, Austin, USA

Received 28 October 2010; Accepted 5 March 2011

Academic Editor: Yu Zhang

Copyright © 2011 William Burnett and Sergey Fomel. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Fomel, “Method of velocity continuation in the problem of temporal seismic migration,” Russian Geology and Geophysics, vol. 35, pp. 100–111, 1994.
  2. S. Fomel, “Velocity continuation and the anatomy of residual prestack time migration,” Geophysics, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1650–1661, 2003. View at Scopus
  3. D. H. Rothman, S. A. Levin, and F. Rocca, “Residual migration: applications and limitations,” Geophysics, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 110–126, 1985. View at Scopus
  4. K. Larner and C. Beasley, “Cascaded migrations: improving the accuracy of finite-difference migration,” Geophysics, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 618–643, 1987, Errata in: Geophysics, vol. 52, no. 8, p. 1165. View at Scopus
  5. S. Fomel, “Time-migration velocity analysis by velocity continuation,” Geophysics, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1662–1672, 2003. View at Scopus
  6. J. Schleicher, J. C. Costa, and A. Novais, “Time-migration velocity analysis by image-wave propagation of common-image gathers,” Geophysics, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. VE161–VE171, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Novais, J. Costa, and J. Schleicher, “Velocity determination by image-wave remigration,” in Proceedings of the 68th European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers International Conference, pp. 157:1–157:4, Vienna, Austria, 2006.
  8. S. Fomel, E. Landa, and M. T. Taner, “Poststack velocity analysis by separation and imaging of seismic diffractions,” Geophysics, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. U89–U94, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. Hubral, M. Tygel, and J. Schleicher, “Seismic image waves,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 431–442, 1996. View at Scopus
  10. T. Alkhalifah and S. Fomel, “Residual migration in VTI media using anisotropy continuation,” Tech. Rep. SEP-94, pp. 327–337, Stanford Exploration Project, 1997.
  11. F. Adler, “Kirchhoff image propagation,” Geophysics, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 126–134, 2002. View at Scopus
  12. E. Iversen, “Velocity rays for heterogeneous anisotropic media: theory and implementation,” Geophysics, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. T117–T127, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Schleicher and R. Aleixo, “Time and depth remigration in elliptically anisotropic media using image-wave propagation,” Geophysics, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. S1–S9, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Schleicher, A. Novais, and J. C. Costa, “Vertical image waves in elliptically anisotropic media,” Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 101–122, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. A. Duchkov and M. V. de Hoop, “Velocity continuation in the downward continuation approach to seismic imaging,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 909–924, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. Sicking and S. Nelan, “Azimuthal attribute methodologies: comparison of NMO super gathers, sectored isotropic migration, iterative azimuthal migration,” in Proceedings of the 78th Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Convention, pp. 983–987, 2008.
  17. S. Crampin, “Effective anisotropic elastic constants for wave propagation through cracked solids,” Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 135–145, 1984. View at Scopus
  18. F. K. Levin, “Apparent velocity from dipping interface reflections,” Geophysics, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 2026–2032, 1985. View at Scopus
  19. C. Sicking, S. Nelan, and W. McLain, “3D azimuthal imaging,” in Proceedings of the 77th Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Convention, pp. 2364–2364, 2007, Expanded Abstracts.
  20. J. W. Dunkin and F. K. Levin, “Isochrons for a three-dimensional seismic system,” Geophysics, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1099–1137, 1971.
  21. E. Jenner, “Recognizing apparent P-wave azimuthal velocity anisotropy caused by lateral velocity variations,” in Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Workshop on Seismic Anisotropy, pp. 71–72, 2008.
  22. P. W. Cary, “Common-offset-vector gathers: an alternative to cross-spreads for wide-azimuth 3-D surveys,” in Proceedings of the 69th Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Convention, pp. 1496–1499, 1999.
  23. G. J. O. Vermeer, Fundamentals of 3-D seismic survey design, Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 1999.
  24. S. M. Deregowski, “Common-offset migrations and velocity analysis,” First Break, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 225–234, 1990. View at Scopus
  25. V. Grechka and I. Tsvankin, “3-D description of normal moveout in anisotropic inhomogeneous media,” Geophysics, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1079–1092, 1998. View at Scopus
  26. I. Tsvankin, Seismic Signatures and Analysis of Reflection Data in Anisotropic Media, Elsevier, Berlin, Germany, 2005.
  27. L. Thomsen, “Weak elastic anisotropy,” Geophysics, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1954–1966, 1986.
  28. I. Tsvankin, “Reflection moveout and parameter estimation for horizontal transverse isotropy,” Geophysics, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 614–629, 1997. View at Scopus
  29. R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1989.
  30. J. F. Claerbout, “Velocity extrapolation by cascaded 15 degree migration,” Tech. Rep. SEP-48, pp. 79–84, Stanford Exploration Project, 1986.
  31. W. S. Harlan, J. F. Claerbout, and F. Rocca, “Signal/ noise separation and velocity estimation,” Geophysics, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1869–1880, 1984. View at Scopus
  32. P. Fowler, “Velocity independent imaging of seismic reflectors,” in Proceedings of the 54th Annual International Meeting Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1984.
  33. R. A. Wiggins, “Minimum entropy deconvolution,” Geoexploration, vol. 16, no. 1-2, pp. 21–35, 1978. View at Scopus
  34. S. Fomel, “Local seismic attributes,” Geophysics, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. A29–A33, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. W. Mikulich and D. Hale, “Steep-dip v(z) imaging from an ensemble of Stolt-like migrations,” Geophysics, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 1992. View at Scopus
  36. P. Hargrove, Fault-related fracture systems in the Cambrian Eriboll formation, Northwest Scotland: a field and petrographic study of a tight gas sandstone analog, M.S. thesis, The University of Texas, Austin, Tex, USA, 2010.
  37. A. Al-Dajani and T. Alkhalifah, “Reflection moveout inversion for horizontal transverse isotropy: accuracy, limitation, and acquisition,” Geophysics, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 222–231, 2000. View at Scopus
  38. A. Al-Dajani and S. Fomel, “Fractures detection using multi-azimuth diffractions focusing measure: is it feasible?” in Proceedings of the 80th Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Convention, pp. 287–291, 2010.