About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Geophysics
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 608037, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/608037
Review Article

Sensitivity and Resolution Capacity of Electrode Configurations

Department of Geology and Applied Geophysics, Faculty of Science, Adekunle Ajasin University, PMB 001, Akungba-Akoko, Ondo State, Nigeria

Received 10 June 2013; Revised 26 July 2013; Accepted 25 August 2013

Academic Editor: Francesco Soldovieri

Copyright © 2013 Cyril Chibueze Okpoli. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. A. Ahzegbobor, Acquisition geometry and inversion of 3D geoelectrical resistivity imaging data for environmental and engineering investigations [Ph.D. thesis], Physics Department, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria, 2010.
  2. R. D. Barker, “Signal contribution sections and their use in resistivity studies,” Geophysical Journal, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 123–129, 1979. View at Scopus
  3. M. Muskat and H. H. Evinger, “Current penetration in direct current prospecting,” Geophysics, vol. 6, pp. 397–427, 1941.
  4. H. M. Evjen, “Depth factor and resolving power of electrical measurements,” Geophysics, vol. 3, pp. 78–85, 1938.
  5. A. Roy and A. Apparao, “Depth of investigation in direct current methods,” Geophysics, vol. 36, pp. 943–959, 1971.
  6. A. Roy, “Depth of investigation in Wenner, three-electrode and dipole-dipole DC resistivity methods,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 329–340, 1972. View at Scopus
  7. O. Koefoed, “Discussion on “Depth of investigation in direct current methods” by A. Roy and A. Apparao,” Geophysics, vol. 37, pp. 703–704, 1972.
  8. D. S. Parasnis, “More comments on “A theorem for Dc regimes and some of its consequences” by A. Roy,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 32, pp. 139–141, 1984.
  9. S. C. Guerreiro, “Comment on “A theorem for direct current regimes and some of its consequences” by A. Roy and some related papers and comments,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 192–195, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. B. Banerjee and B. P. Pal, “A simple method for determination of depth of investigation characteristics in resistivity prospecting,” Exploration Geophysics, vol. 17, pp. 93–95, 1986.
  11. M. N. Nabighian and C. L. Elliot, “Negative induced polarization effects from layered media,” Geophysics, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1236–1255, 1976. View at Scopus
  12. K. K. Roy and H. M. Elliot, “Some observations regarding depth of exploration in D.C. electrical methods,” Geoexploration, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 1981. View at Scopus
  13. L. S. Edwards, “A modified pseudosection for resistivity and induced polarization,” Geophysics, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1020–1036, 1977. View at Scopus
  14. R. D. Barker, “Depth of investigation of collinear symmetrical four-electrode arrays,” Geophysics, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1031–1037, 1989. View at Scopus
  15. T. Dahlin and B. Zhou, “A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 379–398, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. H. Loke, “Tutorial: 2D and 3D electrical imaging surveys,” 2004, http://www.geotomosoft.com/.
  17. O. Pazdirek and V. Blaha, “Examples of resistivity imaging using ME-100 resistivity field acquisition system,” in Proceedings of the EAGE 58th Conference and Technical Exhibition Extended Abstracts, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996.
  18. M. H. Loke, “Electrical Imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies: a practical guide to 2D and 3D surveys,” 2001, http://www.geotomosoft.com/.
  19. P. Stummer, H. Maurer, and A. G. Green, “Experimental design: electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information,” Geophysics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 120–139, 2004. View at Scopus
  20. P. B. Wilkinson, P. I. Meldrum, J. E. Chambers, O. Kuras, and R. D. Ogilvy, “Improved strategies for the automatic selection of optimized sets of electrical resistivity tomography measurement configurations,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 167, no. 3, pp. 1119–1126, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Furman, T. P. A. Ferré, and G. L. Heath, “Spatial focusing of electrical resistivity surveys considering geologic and hydrologic layering,” Geophysics, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. F65–F73, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. Hennig, A. Weller, and M. Möller, “Object orientated focussing of geoelectrical multielectrode measurements,” Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 57–64, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Chambers, R. Ogilvy, P. Meldrum, and J. Nissen, “3D resistivity imaging of buried oil- and tar-contaminated waste deposits,” European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 1999. View at Scopus
  24. T. Dahlin, On the Automation of 2D Resistivity Surveying for Engineering and Environmental Applications, Lind University, 1993.
  25. Y. Sasaki, “Resolution of resistivity tomography inferred from numerical simulation,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 453–463, 1992. View at Scopus
  26. T. Dahlin and M. H. Loke, “Resolution of 2D Wenner resistivity imaging as assessed by numerical modelling,” Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 237–249, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. I. Olayinka and U. Yaramanci, “Assessment of the reliability of 2D inversion of apparent resistivity data,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 293–316, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. Militzer, R. Rosler, and W. Losch, “Theoretical and experimental investigations for cavity research with geoelectrical resistivity methods,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 640–652, 1979. View at Scopus
  29. G. M. Habberjam, “Apparent resistivity anisotropy and strike measurements,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 211–247, 1975. View at Scopus
  30. G. M. Habberjam, “The effects of anisotropy on square array resistivity measurements,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 249–266, 1972. View at Scopus
  31. R. G. Van Nostrand and K. L. Cook, “Interpretation of resistivity data,” U. S. Geological Survey Professional, 499 pages, 1966, http://books.google.com/.
  32. K. Spitzer and H.-J. Kümpel, “3D FD resistivity modelling and sensitivity analyses applied to a highly resistive phonolitic body,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 963–982, 1997. View at Scopus
  33. P. R. McGillivray and D. W. Oldenburg, “Methods for calculating Frechet derivatives and sensitivities for the non-linear inverse problem: a comparative study,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 499–524, 1990. View at Scopus
  34. D. E. Boerner and G. F. West, “Frechet derivatives and single scattering theory,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 385–390, 1989. View at Scopus
  35. D. W. Oldenburg, “The interpretation of direct current measurements,” Geophysics, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 610–625, 1978. View at Scopus
  36. Y. Sasaki, “3-D resistivity inversion using the finite-element method,” Geophysics, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1839–1848, 1994. View at Scopus
  37. M. Noel and B. X. Biwen Xu, “Archaeological investigation by electrical resistivity tomography: a preliminary study,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 95–102, 1991. View at Scopus
  38. S. K. Park and G. P. Van, “Inversion of pole-pole data for 3-D resistivity structure beneath arrays of electrodes,” Geophysics, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 951–960, 1991. View at Scopus
  39. K. Spitzer, “The three-dimensional DC sensitivity for surface and subsurface sources,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 736–746, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1941.
  41. R. F. Harrinton, Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields, Electrical and Electronic Engineering Series, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1961.
  42. F. S. Grant and G. F. West, Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1965.
  43. S. H. Ward and G. W. Hohmann, “Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications,” in Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Investigations in Geophysical Series, M. N. Nabighian, Ed., vol. 1, pp. 131–312, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, Okla, USA, 1987.
  44. G. V. Keller and F. C. Frischknecht, Methods in Geophysical Prospecting, Pergamo Press, 1966.
  45. W. M. Telford, L. P. Geldart, R. E. Sheriff, and D. A. Keys, Applied Geophysics, Cambridge University Press, Lodon, UK, 1976.
  46. T. Dahlin and M. H. Loke, “Quasi-3D resistivity imaging-mapping of three-dimensional structures using two-dimensional DC resistivity techniques,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Meeting of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, pp. 143–146, 1997.
  47. D. H. Griffiths, J. Turnbull, and A. I. Olayinka, “Two-dimensional resistivity mapping with a complex controlled array,” First Break, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 121–129, 1990.
  48. E. S. Robinson and C. Coruh, Exploration Geophysics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1988.
  49. R. A. V. Overmeeren and I. L. Ritsema, “Continuous vertical electrical sounding,” First Break, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 313–324, 1988.
  50. O. Koefoed, Geosounding Principles 1: Resistivity Sounding Measurements, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1979.
  51. H. M. Mooney, E. Orellana, H. Pickett, and L. Tornheim, “A resistivity computation method for layered earth models,” Geophysics, vol. 31, pp. 192–203, 1966.
  52. D. P. Ghosh, “The application of linear filter theory to the direct interpretation of geoelectrical resistivity sounding measurements,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 19, pp. 192–217, 1971.
  53. J. R. Inman, J. Ryu, and S. H. Ward, “Resistivity inversion,” Geophysics, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1088–1108, 1973.
  54. A. A. R. Zohdy, “A new method for the automatic interpretation of Schlumberger and Wenner sounding curves,” Geophysics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 245–253, 1989. View at Scopus
  55. P. Furness, “Gradient array profiles over thin resistive veins,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 113–130, 1993. View at Scopus
  56. A. Dey and H. F. Morrison, “Resistivity modelling for arbitrarily shaped three- dimensional structure,” Geophysics, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 753–780, 1979. View at Scopus
  57. R. S. Varga, Matrix Iteration Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1962.
  58. K. S. Cheng, S. J. Simske, D. Isaacson, J. C. Newell, and D. G. Gisser, “Errors due to measuring voltage on current-carrying electrodes in electric current computed tomography,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 60–65, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus