Soft Schemes for Earthquake-Geotechnical Dilemmas

<table class="table-group" width="800px"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><img alt="986202.fig.0036a" src="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ijge/volume-2013/986202/figures/986202.fig.0036a.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(a) </b>Training stage</td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><img alt="986202.fig.0036b" src="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ijge/volume-2013/986202/figures/986202.fig.0036b.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(b) </b>Testing stage</td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<table>Comparison between NEFLAS and measured lateral spread, Imperial Valley, USA. (a) Training stage and (b) testing stage.</table>

International Journal of Geophysics

fig36

Figure 36

Figure 36: Soft Schemes for Earthquake-Geotechnical Dilemmas 