About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Hepatology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 853175, 9 pages
Review Article

Oxidative Stress and Inflammation: Essential Partners in Alcoholic Liver Disease

Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 364 Plantation Street, Worcester, MA 01605, USA

Received 13 September 2011; Revised 18 December 2011; Accepted 19 December 2011

Academic Editor: Laura Schrum

Copyright © 2012 Aditya Ambade and Pranoti Mandrekar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a multifaceted disease that is characterized by hepatic steatosis or fat deposition and hepatitis or inflammation. Over the past decade, multiple lines of evidence have emerged on the mechanisms associated with ALD. The key mechanisms identified so far are sensitization to gut-derived endotoxin/lipopolysaccharide resulting in proinflammatory cytokine production and cellular stress due to oxidative processes, contributing to the development and progression of disease. While oxidative stress and inflammatory responses are studied independently in ALD, mechanisms linking these two processes play a major role in pathogenesis of disease. Here we review major players of oxidative stress and inflammation and highlight signaling intermediates regulated by oxidative stress that provokes proinflammatory responses in alcoholic liver disease.

1. Introduction

The pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a consequence of chronic alcohol abuse and approximately 44% of the 26,000 deaths from cirrhosis are due to ALD in the United States [1]. Alcoholic hepatitis, the clinical presentation of ALD, remains to be a common life threatening cause of liver failure, especially when it is severe. Chronic alcohol consumption has long been associated with progressive liver disease from steatosis to inflammation, development of hepatic cirrhosis, and the subsequent increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Several studies have attempted to identify the molecular pathways, direct or indirect, affected by alcohol exposure in the liver. These pathways range from oxidative stress, metabolism-related effects, and inflammation to apoptosis. Induction of oxidative stress and activation of the inflammatory cascade are identified as key elements in the pathophysiology of ALD [2]. While these intracellular mechanisms affected by alcohol are studied exclusively, the interplay of signaling molecules between pathways leading to alcoholic liver disease has received less attention. Unraveling these interactions of oxidative stress mediators and inflammatory signaling in the liver will aid in identification of new integrative approaches as it relates to alcoholic liver injury and provide potential new directions to develop therapeutic target intervention. The goal of this concise paper is to first review alcohol-induced reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress generated by alcohol metabolism, endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitochondrial ROS in the liver, protein adduct formation, and autophagy and chaperone function and then to describe stress-mediated activation of receptors, kinases, and transcription factors resulting in proinflammatory signaling in ALD.

2. Classical Mechanisms of Alcoholic Liver Disease

Research done, so far, on the effects of pathophysiological mechanisms of alcoholic liver disease suggests the involvement of two main liver cell types, resident macrophages, or Kupffer cells and hepatocytes. The role of gut-derived endotoxin and liver macrophage activation is clearly established in ALD by Thurman and colleagues [2]. The deleterious effects of alcohol, attributed to its metabolism, primarily occur in hepatocytes [3]. Alcohol metabolism pathway including induction of cytochrome P450 2E1 [3] results in adduct formation and generation of reactive oxygen radicals respectively creating an oxidative microenvironment and damage in the liver [2]. In the currently accepted model of ALD, chronic alcohol induces oxidative stress and sensitization to endotoxin, which activates the CD14/TLR4 pathway and downstream signaling resulting in proinflammatory cytokine production [4]. The proinflammatory cytokines, particularly TNFα, then provoke hepatocellular injury and death by extrinsic, via TNFR1 [5] and intrinsic death pathways [6] leading to ALD. While the role of oxidative stress and macrophage activation, the two main pathophysiological processes affected in ALD, were studied independently in the past, recent studies suggest that these pathways are interconnected in ALD improving our understanding of the disease.

3. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Alcohol

While activation of inflammatory responses are central to alcoholic liver injury, excessive generation of reactive oxygen species plays an equally significant role in alcohol-induced cellular damage [7]. Alcohol-induced liver disease is associated with a state of “oxidative stress”. The metabolism of alcohol by alcohol dehydrogenase [ADH] leads to formation of acetaldehyde. Further, the acetaldehyde is metabolized to acetate by acetaldehyde dehydrogenase [ALDH]. Acetaldehyde, a reactive intermediate has an ability to form adducts with DNA [8, 9]. Whether acute or chronic, alcohol metabolism increases production of acetaldehyde and enhances formation of DNA adducts leading to tissue injury. On the other hand, metabolism of alcohol via cytochrome P4502E1 induces production of reactive oxygen species which facilitates adduct formation, activates stress proteins, induces endoplasmic reticulum stress, and affects lysosomal function and autophagy leading to mitochondrial injury and hepatocellular death.

3.1. Alcohol Metabolism and ROS

Ethanol is primarily metabolized in the liver by oxidative enzymatic pathways. The classical pathway of alcohol metabolism involves enzymatic breakdown of alcohol by the enzyme, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and its subsequent conversion to acetaldehyde and formation of acetate. ADH is predominantly expressed in liver [10] but other tissues like gastric mucosa express ADH and contribute to metabolism of alcohol [10]. Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) contributes to oxidation of aldehyde intermediates resulting in acetate which is unstable and breaks down to water and carbon dioxide. The second major pathway for ethanol degradation is the microsomal system catalyzed by cytochrome P450 enzymes. The 2E1 isoform of the cytochrome P450 (CYP2E1) system is induced during chronic alcohol consumption. Activation of CYP2E1 leads to ROS generation and highly reactive free radicals including superoxide anions and hydroxyl radicals resulting in oxidative stress and cell death [11]. The role of CYP2E1 in hepatocyte injury has been elucidated using HEPG2 cells overexpressing CYP2E1 [12], CYP2E1 knockout mice, and transgenic mice [13]. Increased oxidative stress from induction of CYP2E1 in vivo sensitizes hepatocytes to LPS and TNFα toxicity [14] and CYP2E1 knock-in mice showed elevated hepatic steatosis and liver injury after alcohol feeding [13]. On the other hand, CYP2E1 knockout mice showed decreased oxidant stress, upregulation of PPARα and were protective to alcohol-induced liver injury. Peroxynitrite, activation of p38 and JNK MAP kinases, and mitochondrial dysfunction are downstream mediators of the CYP2E1-LPS/TNF potentiated hepatotoxicity [15]. Oxidation of ethanol by alcohol dehydrogenase and subsequent metabolism of acetaldehyde results in increased NADH/NAD+ ratio in the cytoplasm and mitochondria [16]. The increase in NADH results in inhibition of mitochondrial β-oxidation and accumulation of intracellular lipids [17]. Alcohol/CYP2E1-mediated ROS has the potential to peroxidize lipids and inhibit mitochondrial and peroxisomal β-oxidation enzymes such as acyl-CoA dehydrogenases, carnitine palmitoyl transferase-1 (CPT-1), and peroxisomal proliferator-inducing pathways, respectively [18]. This disruption leads to increased fatty acids, substrates of these enzymes, and their accumulation resulting in development of hepatic steatosis. Oxidative stress and ROS generation due to alcohol metabolism not only increase accumulation of lipids in hepatocytes but also sensitize the liver to subsequent insults by cytokines.

3.2. Mitochondria and Oxidative Stress

In mitochondria, ROSs are generated as undesirable side products of the oxidative energy metabolism. An excessive and/or sustained increase in ROS production has been implicated in the pathogenesis of ALD, ischemia/reperfusion injury, and other diseases [19]. Oxidative stress induced by alcohol is closely associated with alterations in mitochondrial function resulting in cellular death. Hepatic mitochondria either acutely or chronically exposed to ethanol generate increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [20]. The induction of mitochondrial dysfunction is also linked to the metabolism of alcohol by CYP2E1 and increased oxidative stress [11]. Primary hepatocytes and rat hepatoma cells when treated with ethanol led to an increase in ROS/RNS and loss of mitochondrial function due to damaged mitochondrial DNA and ribosomes and subsequent inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis [21, 22]. Studies have shown that alcohol-induced ROS generation leads to alteration in mitochondrial membrane permeability and transition potential that in turn initiates the release of proapoptotic factors such as cytochrome c [21]. Transition of mitochondrial permeability results in increased caspase-3 activation in hepatocytes and this depends on p38 MAPK activation but is independent of caspase-8 [5]. Various studies show that decreased ATP synthesis accompanied by reduced mitochondrial protein synthesis, inhibition of the oxidative phosphorylation system (OxPhos), and damage to mitochondrial DNA leads to dysfunctional mitochondria and oxidative stress in alcoholic liver disease [23]. Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ)-coactivator 1 alpha (PGC-1α), a transcription coactivator involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, is involved in defenses against ROS by inducing many ROS-mediated detoxifying enzymes. PGC-1 gene expression was lower in hepatic tissues of rats exposed to ethanol [24]. In vitro exposure of hepatoma cells to 500 mM ethanol significantly decreased hepatic SIRT-1; PGC-1α leads to ROS-induced mitochondrial and cellular injury [25]. Certain sirtuins, a family of protein deacetylases, were found to regulate glucose and fat metabolism in mammals [26, 27] and to enhance mitochondrial biogenesis in liver and muscle through PGC-1α and to influence cell survival [28].

Recent studies used an antioxidant peptide targeted to mitochondria to show that altered ROS metabolism facilitates enhanced expression of HIF-1alpha [29], which, in turn, increases TNF-alpha secretion. These findings provide in vivo evidence for the action of mitochondrial ROS on HIF-1alpha activity and demonstrate that changes in mitochondrial function within physiologically tolerable limits can modulate the immune response [29]. These studies suggest that alcohol-induced mitochondrial stress pathways set the stage for proinflammatory cytokine-induced cell death and liver injury.

3.3. Protein Adducts and Lysosomal Dysfunction

Alcohol metabolism and oxidative stress result in the formation of reactive aldehydes such as acetaldehyde, malondialdehyde (MDA), and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) that can bind to proteins to form adducts [30]. In vivo models of chronic alcohol consumption have shown that acetaldehyde, MDA, and HNE adduct formation are increased in various organs including the liver [30]. A strong corelation between 4-HNE adducts and expression of CYP2E1 in patients with ALD was recently shown [31]. Acetaldehyde and MDA react with proteins synergistically to form hybrid protein adducts called malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde (MAA) adducts [32]. Recognition of MAA-adducts by Kupffer cells, endothelial, and stellate cells via the scavenger receptor resulted in upregulation of cytokine and chemokine production and increased expression of adhesion molecules [32]. Circulating antibodies to MAA-adducts were detected in patients with alcoholic hepatitis and cirrhosis and correlated with the severity of liver injury [33]. Chronic alcohol feeding also induces formation of gamma-ketoaldehyde protein adducts in mouse livers [34]. These adducts are formed in a TNFR1/CYP2E1 dependent, but cyclooxygenase-independent manner in mouse liver [34]. Existence of protein adducts during chronic alcohol consumption and their identification in animal models has been challenging, limiting investigation of their precise role in ALD.

Increased ROS and lipid peroxidation rate in microsomal and lysosomal membranes with a simultaneous decrease in the levels of glutathione sulfhydryls and glutathione-S-transferase activity was observed during alcohol exposure [35]. Elevation of cathepsin B in hepatic cytosol fractions, indicating lysosomal leakage, was reported in ethanol-fed rats [36]. Lysosomal leakage was increased in alcohol-fed mice deficient in superoxide dismutase (SOD) indicating that oxidative stress correlated with loss of lysosomal function increased hepatic fat and inflammatory cell infiltration [37]. The exact mechanisms responsible for ethanol-induced changes in lysosomal function are not clear but there is evidence of enhanced lysosomal membrane fragility, which could result from either altered lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress, or both [38]. More recently, degradation of a cell’s own cytosolic components in the lysosomes as a protective mechanism against the damaging effects of oxidative stress has been described and is termed autophagy [38]. Alcoholic liver injury is associated with decreased autophagy resulting in accumulation of damaged proteins and liver cell death [38]. Recent studies show that macro-, micro- and chaperone-mediated autophagy is linked to innate and adaptive immune responses [39]. While autophagy acts as an effector and regulator of pattern recognition receptors including TLR4 signaling in macrophages, loss or defective autophagy results in accumulation of cytosolic components and chronic inflammatory responses [40]. How loss of autophagy after chronic alcohol consumption contributes to proinflammatory responses in alcoholic liver disease remains to be investigated.

3.4. Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress

The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a protective response of the cell also referred to as the ER stress response during pathological conditions. In alcoholic liver disease, increased expression of glucose regulatory protein (GRP)78, GRP94, CHOP, and caspase-12 indicated a UPR/ER stress response [41]. Upregulation and activation of ER-localized transcription factors such as SREBP-1c and SREBP-2 were associated with increased lipid accumulation and induction of fatty liver during chronic alcohol exposure [42]. Another important inducer of ER stress, homocysteine, was increased in alcoholic human subjects leading to hyperhomocysteinemia, also observed in alcohol feeding rodent models [43]. The role of ER stress in triglyceride accumulation and fatty liver comes from studies showing that betaine increases an enzyme, betaine homocysteine methyltransferase (BHMT) and reduces homocysteine levels to inhibit lipid accumulation [43]. Recent studies suggest that ER/UPR stress pathways intersect with innate immune signaling determining the duration and intensity of inflammatory response [44]. Additional mechanistic studies to link ER/UPR stress and innate immune responses as a pathophysiological contributor in ALD are warranted.

3.5. Alcohol, Stress, and Molecular Chaperones

Stress or heat shock proteins (hsps) are ubiquitous and highly conserved proteins, functioning as molecular chaperones, whose expression is induced by oxidative stress stimuli and in response to accumulation of unfolded cellular proteins. Oxidative stress induces heat shock proteins via activation of the heat shock transcription factor (HSF) [45]. Male Wistar rats fed with acute as well as chronic alcohol showed induction of hsp70 in the various regions of the brain and the liver [46, 47]. However, the intensity of induction of hsp70 in the liver, the principal organ of ethanol oxidation, was much lower than the hippocampus or striatal areas of the brain [47]. Hsp90 levels, on the other hand, were increased in cultured rat hepatocytes exposed to acute alcohol [47, 48]. Acute and chronic alcohol treatment of monocytes/macrophages showed alterations in hsp70 and hsp90 mRNA and protein levels based on the length of alcohol exposure [49]. Acute alcohol induces HSF and hsp70, whereas chronic alcohol induces hsp90 but not hsp70 protein, through activation of HSF [49]. Hsp90 functions as a molecular chaperone controlling activity of various kinases and signaling molecules of the LPS signaling pathway such as CD14 [50], IKK [51], and IRAK [52]. Comprehensive studies on the effect of acute and chronic alcohol exposure on chaperone function of hsps in inflammatory responses in the alcoholic liver could provide novel mechanistic insights in ALD.

4. Inflammatory Response and ALD

Extensive studies over the past two decades have identified the importance of macrophage activation in the liver by gut-derived endotoxin after prolonged alcohol consumption [2]. Central to this activation is the sensitization of macrophages due to alcohol exposure and is associated with mechanisms ranging from upregulation and engagement of surface receptors on innate immune cells, intracellular kinases and transcription factors contributing to induction of proinflammatory cytokines.

4.1. Pattern Recognition Receptors, Alcohol, and Immune Cells

Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) are expressed on liver nonparenchymal and parenchymal cells and function as sensors of microbial danger signals enabling the vertebrate host to initiate an immune response. The complexity of cellular expression of PRRs in the liver provides unique aspects to pathogen recognition and tissue damage in the liver [53]. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) that are membrane associated or endosomal recognize distinct microbial components and activate different signaling pathways by selective utilization of adaptor molecules [54]. TLRs such as TLR4 and TLR2 that detect PAMPs like LPS and lipoproteins, respectively, are located on the cell surface whereas; TLRs such as TLR3, TLR7, and TLR9 that detect viral RNA and DNA are located in the endosome [55]. The pivotal role of TLR4 as well as other TLRs has been extensively studied in alcoholic tissue injury [5659].

The interaction of oxidative stress and TLR signaling is emerging. TLR4 is capable of inducing ROS leading to oxidative stress [5961]. Kupffer cells or hepatic macrophages produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) in response to antigenic stimuli and chronic alcohol exposure as well as endotoxin [62, 63]. Alcohol-induced sensitization of macrophages to LPS has been attributed to ROS production [59, 60, 64]. Previous studies from Nagy and colleagues [64, 65] also show that chronic ethanol feeding increases the sensitivity of Kupffer cells to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), leading to increased tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) expression. NADPH oxidase and ROS generation exhibit direct interaction with the TLR4 receptor and activation of down-stream kinases and transcription factors [61]. Studies by Gustot et al. [59] show that oxidative stress regulates TLR 2, 4, 6, and 9 mRNA expression in alcoholic liver. Thus, it appears that TLR mRNA, protein expression, and immune signaling can be strongly influenced by oxidative stress in ALD making these two events dependent on each other and not mutually exclusive. Besides ROS, TLRs also mediate responses to host molecules including intracellular mediators [66]. Amongst the well-characterized DAMPs, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), S100 proteins, hyaluronan, and heat shock protein 60 (hsp60) are known to be recognized by TLR2 and TLR4 [66, 67]. In addition, necrotic or apoptotic cells are also recognized as DAMPs by TLRs [67]. In alcoholic liver injury, apoptotic bodies, generated due to alcohol-induced oxidative stress, could be recognized by DAMPs [68] and contribute to inflammatory responses in the liver.

Activation of TLR4 recruits IRAK-1 to the TLR4 complex via interaction with MyD88 and IRAK-4 [69]. The role of MyD88, the common TLR4 adaptor molecule, was evaluated in a mouse model of alcoholic liver injury [60]. These studies showed that MyD88 knockout mice were highly susceptible to alcohol-induced fatty liver [60]. While alcohol feeding in TLR4 deficient mice prevented activation of NADPH oxidase, alcohol-fed MyD88 deficient mice showed high NADPH oxidase activity and increased oxidative stress resulting in liver injury [60].

Increasing evidence suggests that downstream signaling components activated by TLRs as well as cytokines and chemokines produced can be regulated by oxidative stress pathways. These interactions of stress pathways leading to inflammation could contribute largely to initiation and perpetuation of alcohol-related injury in the liver. The cross-talk of stress regulated intracellular molecules with TLRs, intracellular kinases and transcription factors resulting in alterations in cytokines/chemokines in ALD are of great importance.

4.2. MAPKs and IKKs

LPS/TLR4-induced ROS activation [61] plays an important role in activation of downstream signaling molecules such as IRAK1/4, TRAF6 leading to activation of MAP kinases and NFκB during chronic alcohol exposure [69]. Mitogen-activated protein kinase [MAPK] signaling cascade plays an essential role in several cellular processes including proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Acute alcohol exposure results in activation of baseline p42/44 MAPK in hepatocytes [70] while chronic alcohol exposure causes potentiation of endotoxin-stimulated p42/44 MAPK, and p38 MAPK signaling in Kupffer cells leading to increased synthesis of TNFα [71, 72]. LPS stimulation of Kupffer cells in vitro exposed to chronic alcohol in vivo exhibited increased p38 activity and decreased JNK activity [71, 73]. Inhibition of p38 activation impaired alcohol-mediated stabilization of TNFα mRNA likely via interaction with tristetraprolin (TTP) [74]. On the other hand, ERK1/2 inhibition did not alter TNFα mRNA stability but affected mRNA transcription in chronic alcohol-exposed macrophages via Egr-1 binding to the promoter [75]. Whether alcohol-induced ROS plays a role in MAPK activation in ALD is not yet determined.

TLR4-induced MyD88-dependent and independent pathways lead to IKK kinase activation resulting in proinflammatory cytokine production [71]. Oxidative stress and ROS-mediated molecular chaperones such as hsp90 are shown to facilitate IKK kinase activity and downstream NFκB nuclear activation [51]. Studies show that chronic alcohol-induced NFκB activation in macrophages is due to increased hsp90 resulting in elevated IKK kinase activity [49]. Inhibition of hsp90 in chronic alcohol-exposed macrophages resulted in decreased IKK kinase activity and NFκB binding suggesting a cross-talk between cellular stress and inflammatory pathways [49].

4.3. Transcription Factors in ALD

The transcription factor NFκB is a ubiquitous transcription factor that can be activated by a large number of extracellular stimuli such as cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and bacterial or viral products [76]. NFκB activation triggers the induction of inflammatory genes and plays an important role in initiation and progression of alcoholic liver disease [69, 77]. While TLR-mediated activation of NFκB is well established, ROS-induced activation of NFκB occurs but remains poorly understood. Chronic alcohol exposure induces LPS/TLR4-mediated NFκB activation in human monocytes and macrophages contributing to production of proinflammatory cytokine, TNFα [77]. Whether ROS mediates activation of NFκB directly during ALD is unclear. TLR4-induced MyD88-independent signaling leads to activation of IKKε and interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and downstream Type I IFN activation [78, 79]. Previous studies show that ROS mediates LPS-induced IRF3 activation [80]. Investigators found that IRF3 binds to the TNFα promoter in macrophages after chronic alcohol administration [81] and induces TNFα production. Whether alcohol-induced ROS mediates IRF3 induction to increase proinflammatory cytokines and liver injury needs further investigation.

Alcohol-mediated fatty liver injury is associated with increased expression of genes regulating fatty acid synthesis and suppression of genes involved in fatty acid oxidation [82]. Transcription factors like SREBP and PPARα play a pivotal role in fatty acid metabolism and rodent models as well as in vitro treatment studies with alcohol show downregulation of PPARα mRNA [83]. Further, DNA-binding activity of PPARα is significantly reduced resulting in decreased expression of target genes involved in fatty acid metabolism after alcohol exposure [83]. Decreased PPARα activity was accompanied by increased oxidative stress in the liver resulting in increased sensitization of TNFα-induced liver injury [83].

Another transcription factor, STAT3, in alcoholic liver injury was recently investigated in hepatocyte-specific STAT3 knockout (H-STAT3KO) mice and macrophage/neutrophil-specific STAT3 KO (M/N-STAT3KO) and endothelial STAT3 mice [84]. Compared with wild-type mice, Kupffer cells from alcohol-fed hepatocyte-specific STAT3KO mice produced similar amounts of ROS and hepatic proinflammatory cytokines compared to control mice [85]. On the other hand, Kupffer cells from M/N-STAT3KO mice produced higher ROS and TNFα compared with wild-type controls. These results suggest that STAT3 in hepatocytes promotes ROS production and inflammation whereas myeloid cell STAT3 reduces ROS and hepatic inflammation during alcoholic liver injury [85]. Thus, STAT3 may regulate hepatic inflammatory cytokines via ROS production.

5. Stress and Immune Signaling: How Are They Linked in ALD?

Cellular stress responses during alcohol exposure include oxidative stress due to metabolism of alcohol in the liver, ER stress, mitochondrial imbalance, heat shock protein induction, and inflammatory processes. Numerous mouse models have been used to study the discrete role of each of the stress responses in alcohol-mediated liver pathology. Yet, accumulating evidence suggests that these pathways cannot be regarded separately and are tightly interrelated. Similar to other inflammatory diseases [86], alcoholic liver disease is multifactorial and it is important to take into account interactions between various cellular responses for a better understanding of the pathogenesis of ALD. Based on studies so far, a clear relationship between oxidative stress and inflammation is emerging in ALD. It is increasingly apparent that in addition to gut-derived endotoxin, alcohol-induced upregulation of oxidative stress mediators plays a major part in activation of receptors, intracellular kinases, and transcription factors in innate immune cells (Figure 1). Pathways described above that are interrelated in ALD include ROS-mediated activation of TLR4 in macrophages, mitochondrial ROS regulation of transcriptional activators such as PGC-1α and HIF-1α promoting TNFα induction, ROS and autophagy associated enhancement of proinflammatory cytokine production [86], ER stress-associated innate immune cell activation, hsp-mediated activation of proinflammatory signaling kinases, and finally direct activation of transcription factors such as NFκB and STAT3 by ROS. Alcoholic liver disease exhibits enhanced inflammatory responses and exaggerated TNFα production leading to liver injury. While TNFRI knockout mice are protected from alcohol-induced liver injury [87], alcohol-induced ROS production was unaffected in TNFRI knockout mice indicating that ROS predominantly serves as a redox signal for proinflammatory cytokine production and may not be a direct toxicant to hepatocytes [87]. These studies argue against the direct role of ROS or oxidative stress in alcoholic liver injury and in fact support the notion that oxidative stress/ROS primarily affects and is indispensable to proinflammatory activation and cytokine induction in ALD creating a vicious cycle of the two pathways (Figure 1). Thus, attempts to further clarify the importance of oxidative stress and its cross-talk with inflammatory pathways will provide an insight into pathogenesis of ALD and open avenues for novel therapeutic targets.

Figure 1: Oxidative stress and inflammation: interacting mechanisms in ALD. The development of alcoholic liver injury is a complex process involving oxidative stress microenvironment in the liver contributed by hepatocytes and macrophages. In addition to the activation of macrophages by gut-derived endotoxin, cellular stress responses contribute to proinflammatory cytokine production creating a tightly interrelated network in ALD.

6. Conclusion

This paper clearly implicates the role of oxidative stress in proinflammatory signaling and macrophage activation during liver injury providing a feed-forward mechanism in ALD. Therefore, targeting redox-sensitive inflammatory pathways and transcription factors offers great promise for treatment of ALD. Investigation of agents that interfere with oxidative stress mediators directly hampering inflammatory cytokine production is needed. Whether these agents will then alleviate alcoholic liver disease in patients should be tested.


This work was supported by the PHS Grant # AA017986 (to PM) and AA017545 (to PM) from the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and its contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the NIAAA.


  1. M. Amini and B. A. Runyon, “Alcoholic hepatitis 2010: a clinician's guide to diagnosis and therapy,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 16, no. 39, pp. 4905–4912, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. G. Thurman, B. U. Bradford, Y. Iimuro et al., “Mechanisms of alcohol-induced hepatotoxicity: studies in rats,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 4, pp. e42–e46, 1999. View at Scopus
  3. Y. Lu, J. Zhuge, X. Wang, J. Bai, and A. I. Cederbaum, “Cytochrome P450 2E1 contributes to ethanol-induced fatty liver in mice,” Hepatology, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1483–1494, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. M. D. Wheeler, “Endotoxin and kupffer cell activation in alcoholic liver disease,” Alcohol Research and Health, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 300–306, 2003. View at Scopus
  5. J. G. Pastorino, N. Shulga, and J. B. Hoek, “TNF-α-induced cell death in ethanol-exposed cells depends on p38 MAPK signaling but is independent of Bid and caspase-8,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 285, no. 3, pp. G503–G516, 2003. View at Scopus
  6. J. G. Pastorino and J. B. Hoek, “Ethanol potentiates tumor necrosis factor-α cytotoxicity in hepatoma cells and primary rat hepatocytes by promoting induction of the mitochondrial permeability transition,” Hepatology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1141–1152, 2000. View at Scopus
  7. T. Zima and M. Kalousová, “Oxidative stress and signal transduction pathways in alcoholic liver disease,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 110S–115S, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Balbo, M. Hashibe, S. Gundy et al., “N2-ethyldeoxyguanosine as a potential biomarker for assessing effects of alcohol consumption on DNA,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 3026–3032, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. P. J. Brooks and J. A. Theruvathu, “DNA adducts from acetaldehyde: implications for alcohol-related carcinogenesis,” Alcohol, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 187–193, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  10. C. S. Lieber, “Alcohol: its metabolism and interaction with nutrients,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 20, pp. 395–430, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Lu and A. I. Cederbaum, “CYP2E1 and oxidative liver injury by alcohol,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 723–738, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  12. A. I. Cederbaum, D. Wu, M. Mari, and J. Bai, “CYP2E1-dependent toxicity and oxidative stress in HepG2 cells,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1539–1543, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Lu, D. Wu, X. Wang, S. C. Ward, and A. I. Cederbaum, “Chronic alcohol-induced liver injury and oxidant stress are decreased in cytochrome P4502E1 knockout mice and restored in humanized cytochrome P4502E1 knock-in mice,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1406–1416, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  14. A. I. Cederbaum, L. Yang, X. Wang, and D. Wu, “CYP2E1 sensitizes the liver to LPS- and TNF α-induced toxicity via elevated oxidative and nitrosative stress and activation of ASK-1 and JNK mitogen-activated kinases,” International Journal of Hepatology, vol. 2012, Article ID 582790, 19 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  15. A. Cahill, C. C. Cunningham, M. Adachi et al., “Effects of alcohol and oxidative stress on liver pathology: the role of the mitochondrion,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 907–915, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. K. Mantena, A. L. King, K. K. Andringa, A. Landar, V. Darley-Usmar, and S. M. Bailey, “Novel interactions of mitochondria and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species in alcohol mediated liver disease,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 13, no. 37, pp. 4967–4973, 2007. View at Scopus
  17. D. Wu and A. I. Cederbaum, “Alcohol, oxidative stress, and free radical damage,” Alcohol Research and Health, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 277–284, 2003. View at Scopus
  18. J. K. Reddy and M. S. Rao, “Lipid metabolism and liver inflammation. II. Fatty liver disease and fatty acid oxidation,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 290, no. 5, pp. G852–G858, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  19. W. Dröge, “Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 47–95, 2002. View at Scopus
  20. C. C. Cunningham and S. M. Bailey, “Ethanol consumption and liver mitochondria function,” Biological Signals and Receptors, vol. 10, no. 3-4, pp. 271–282, 2001. View at Scopus
  21. B. R. Zelickson, G. A. Benavides, M. S. Johnson et al., “Nitric oxide and hypoxia exacerbate alcohol-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in hepatocytes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1807, no. 12, pp. 1573–1582, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  22. J. B. Hoek, A. Cahill, and J. G. Pastorino, “Alcohol and mitochondria: a dysfunctional relationship,” Gastroenterology, vol. 122, no. 7, pp. 2049–2063, 2002. View at Scopus
  23. K. K. Andringa, A. L. King, H. B. Eccleston et al., “Analysis of the liver mitochondrial proteome in response to ethanol and S-adenosylmethionine treatments: novel molecular targets of disease and hepatoprotection,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 298, no. 5, pp. G732–G745, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  24. W. W. Chaung, A. Jacob, Y. Ji, and P. Wang, “Suppression of PGC-1alpha by ethanol: implications of its role in alcohol induced liver injury,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 161–170, 2008.
  25. C. S. Lieber, M. A. Leo, X. Wang, and L. M. DeCarli, “Effect of chronic alcohol consumption on Hepatic SIRT1 and PGC-1α in rats,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 370, no. 1, pp. 44–48, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  26. F. Picard and L. Guarente, “Molecular links between aging and adipose tissue,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. S36–S39, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  27. J. T. Rodgers, C. Lerin, W. Haas, S. P. Gygi, B. M. Spiegelman, and P. Puigserver, “Nutrient control of glucose homeostasis through a complex of PGC-1α and SIRT1,” Nature, vol. 434, no. 7029, pp. 113–118, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  28. W. Dröge and H. M. Schipper, “Oxidative stress and aberrant signaling in aging and cognitive decline,” Aging Cell, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 361–370, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  29. D. Wang, D. Malo, and S. Hekimi, “Elevated mitochondrial reactive oxygen species generation affects the immune response via hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in long-lived Mclk1+/- mouse mutants,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 582–590, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  30. O. Niemela, S. Parkkila, S. Yla-Herttuala et al., “Covalent protein adducts in the liver as a result of ethanol metabolism and lipid peroxidation,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 537–546, 1994.
  31. Y. Wang, G. Millonig, J. Nair et al., “Ethanol-induced cytochrome P4502E1 causes carcinogenic etheno-DNA lesions in alcoholic liver disease,” Hepatology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 453–461, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  32. G. M. Thiele, M. J. Duryee, M. S. Willis, et al., “Malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde (MAA) modified proteins induce pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic responses by liver endothelial cells,” Comparative Hepatology, vol. 3, supplement 1, p. S25, 2004.
  33. D. J. Tuma, “Role of malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde adducts in liver injury,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 303–308, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Roychowdhury, M. R. McMullen, M. T. Pritchard, W. Li, R. G. Salomon, and L. E. Nagy, “Formation of γ-ketoaldehyde-protein adducts during ethanol-induced liver injury in mice,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 1526–1538, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  35. J. Jajte, J. Stetkiewicz, and T. Wrońska-Nofer, “Combined exposure to m-xylene and ethanol: oxidative stress in the rat liver,” International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 345–350, 2003. View at Scopus
  36. T. M. Donohue, T. V. Curry-McCoy, A. A. Nanji et al., “Lysosomal leakage and lack of adaptation of hepatoprotective enzyme contribute to enhanced susceptibility to ethanol-induced liver injury in female rats,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1944–1952, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  37. T. V. Curry-Mccoy, N. A. Osna, A. A. Nanji, and T. M. Donohue, “Chronic ethanol consumption results in atypical liver injury in copper/zinc superoxide dismutase deficient mice,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 251–261, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  38. T. M. Donohue, “Autophagy and ethanol-induced liver injury,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1178–1185, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. T. Saitoh and S. Akira, “Regulation of innate immune responses by autophagy-related proteins,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 189, no. 6, pp. 925–935, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  40. Y. Xu, C. Jagannath, X. D. Liu, A. Sharafkhaneh, K. E. Kolodziejska, and N. T. Eissa, “Toll-like receptor 4 is a sensor for autophagy associated with innate immunity,” Immunity, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 135–144, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  41. N. Kaplowitz and C. Ji, “Unfolding new mechanisms of alcoholic liver disease in the endoplasmic reticulum,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 21, supplement 3, pp. S7–S9, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  42. C. Ji, C. Chan, and N. Kaplowitz, “Predominant role of sterol response element binding proteins (SREBP) lipogenic pathways in hepatic steatosis in the murine intragastric ethanol feeding model,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 717–724, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  43. C. Ji and N. Kaplowitz, “Betaine decreases hyperhomocysteinemia, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and liver injury in alcohol-fed mice,” Gastroenterology, vol. 124, no. 5, pp. 1488–1499, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. F. Martinon and L. H. Glimcher, “Regulation of innate immunity by signaling pathways emerging from the endoplasmic reticulum,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  45. T. Finkel and N. J. Holbrook, “Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing,” Nature, vol. 408, no. 6809, pp. 239–247, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  46. V. Calabrese, M. Renis, A. Calderone, A. Russo, M. L. Barcellona, and V. Rizza, “Stress proteins and SH-groups in oxidant-induced cell damage after acute ethanol administration in rat,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 391–397, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. V. Calabrese, M. Renis, A. Calderone et al., “Stress proteins and SH-groups in oxidant-induced cellular injury after chronic ethanol administration in rat,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 24, no. 7-8, pp. 1159–1167, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. S. Ikeyama, K. Kusumoto, H. Miyake, K. Rokutan, and S. Tashiro, “A non-toxic heat shock protein 70 inducer, geranylgeranylacetone, suppresses apoptosis of cultured rat hepatocytes caused by hydrogen peroxide and ethanol,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 53–61, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. P. Mandrekar, D. Catalano, V. Jeliazkova, and K. Kodys, “Alcohol exposure regulates heat shock transcription factor binding and heat shock proteins 70 and 90 in monocytes and macrophages: implication for TNF-α regulation,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1335–1345, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  50. V. L. Vega and A. De Maio, “Geldanamycin treatment ameliorates the response to LPS in murine macrophages by decreasing CD14 surface expression,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 764–773, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  51. M. Broemer, D. Krappmann, and C. Scheidereit, “Requirement of Hsp90 activity for IκB kinase (IKK) biosynthesis and for constitutive and inducible IKK and NF-κB activation,” Oncogene, vol. 23, no. 31, pp. 5378–5386, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  52. D. De Nardo, P. Masendycz, S. Ho et al., “A central role for the Hsp90·Cdc37 molecular chaperone module in interleukin-1 receptor-associated-kinase-dependent signaling by Toll-like receptors,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 11, pp. 9813–9822, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  53. G. Szabo, A. Dolganiuc, and P. Mandrekar, “Pattern recognition receptors: a contemporary view on liver diseases,” Hepatology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 287–298, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  54. K. Takeda and S. Akira, “Toll-like receptors in innate immunity,” International Immunology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  55. S. Uematsu and S. Akira, “Toll-like receptors and type I Interferons,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 21, pp. 15319–15324, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  56. T. Uesugi, M. Froh, G. E. Arteel, B. U. Bradford, and R. G. Thurman, “Toll-like receptor 4 is involved in the mechanism of early alcohol-induced liver injury in mice,” Hepatology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 101–108, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  57. S. Yamashina, Y. Takei, K. Ikejima, N. Enomoto, T. Kitamura, and N. Sato, “Ethanol-induced sensitization to endotoxin in Kupffer cells is dependent upon oxidative stress,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 246S–250S, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. P. Mandal, P. H. Park, M. R. McMullen, B. T. Pratt, and L. E. Nagy, “The anti-inflammatory effects of adiponectin are mediated via a heme oxygenase-1-dependent pathway in rat kupffer cells,” Hepatology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1420–1429, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  59. T. Gustot, A. Lemmers, C. Moreno et al., “Differential liver sensitization to toll-like receptor pathways in mice with alcoholic fatty liver,” Hepatology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 989–1000, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  60. I. Hritz, P. Mandrekar, A. Velayudham et al., “The critical role of toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 in alcoholic liver disease is independent of the common TLR adapter MyD88,” Hepatology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1224–1231, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  61. H. S. Park, H. Y. Jung, E. Y. Park, J. Kim, W. J. Lee, and Y. S. Bae, “Cutting edge: direct interaction of TLR4 with NAD(P)H oxidase 4 isozyme is essential for lipopolysaccharide-induced production of reactive oxygen species and activation of NF-κB,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 6, pp. 3589–3593, 2004. View at Scopus
  62. M. Yin, B. U. Bradford, M. D. Wheeler et al., “Reduced early alcohol-induced liver injury in CD14-deficient mice,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 166, no. 7, pp. 4737–4742, 2001. View at Scopus
  63. H. Kono, I. Rusyn, M. Yin et al., “NADPH oxidase-derived free radicals are key oxidants in alcohol-induced liver disease,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 867–872, 2000. View at Scopus
  64. V. Thakur, M. T. Pritchard, M. R. McMullen, Q. Wang, and L. E. Nagy, “Chronic ethanol feeding increases activation of NADPH oxidase by lipopolysaccharide in rat Kupffer cells: role of increased reactive oxygen in LPS-stimulated ERK1/2 activation and TNF-α production,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 1348–1356, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  65. L. E. Nagy, “Recent insights into the role of the innate immune system in the development of alcoholic liver disease,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 228, no. 8, pp. 882–890, 2003. View at Scopus
  66. M. T. Lotze, H. J. Zeh, A. Rubartelli et al., “The grateful dead: damage-associated molecular pattern molecules and reduction/oxidation regulate immunity,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 220, no. 1, pp. 60–81, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  67. J. A. Sloane, D. Blitz, Z. Margolin, and T. Vartanian, “A clear and present danger: endogenous ligands of Toll-like receptors,” NeuroMolecular Medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 149–163, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  68. C. A. Casey, S. M. L. Lee, R. Aziz-Seible, and B. L. McVicker, “Impaired receptor-mediated endocytosis: its role in alcohol-induced apoptosis,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 23, supplement 1, pp. S46–S49, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  69. P. Mandrekar and G. Szabo, “Signalling pathways in alcohol-induced liver inflammation,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1258–1266, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  70. A. R. Aroor, Y. J. Lee, and S. D. Shukla, “Activation of MEK 1/2 and p42/44 MAPK by angiotensin II in hepatocyte nucleus and their potentiation by ethanol,” Alcohol, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 315–322, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  71. R. Kishore, M. R. McMullen, and L. E. Nagy, “Stabilization of tumor necrosis factor α mRNA by chronic ethanol: role of A+U-rich elements and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 45, pp. 41930–41937, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  72. L. Shi, R. Kishore, M. R. McMullen, and L. E. Nagy, “Chronic ethanol increases lipopolysaccharide-stimulated Egr-1 expression in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Contribution to enhanced tumor necrosis factor α production,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 17, pp. 14777–14785, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  73. A. Koteish, S. Yang, H. Lin, X. Huang, and A. M. Diehl, “Chronic ethanol exposure potentiates lipopolysaccharide liver injury despite inhibiting Jun N-terminal kinase and caspase 3 activation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 15, pp. 13037–13044, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  74. K. R. Mahtani, M. Brook, J. L. E. Dean, G. Sully, J. Saklatvala, and A. R. Clark, “Mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 controls the expression and posttranslational modification of tristetraprolin, a regulator of tumor necrosis factor alpha mRNA stability,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 21, no. 19, pp. 6461–6469, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. R. A. J. Kishore, J. R. Hill, M. R. Mcmullen, J. Frenkel, and L. E. Nagy, “ERK1/2 and Egr-1 contribute to increased TNF-α production in rat Kupffer cells after chronic ethanol feeding,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 282, no. 1, pp. G6–G15, 2002. View at Scopus
  76. S. Ghosh, M. J. May, and E. B. Kopp, “NF-κB and rel proteins: evolutionarily conserved mediators of immune responses,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 16, pp. 225–260, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  77. P. Mandrekar, S. Bala, D. Catalano, K. Kodys, and G. Szabo, “The opposite effects of acute and chronic alcohol on lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation are linked to IRAK-M in human monocytes,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 183, no. 2, pp. 1320–1327, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  78. T. Kawai, O. Takeuchi, T. Fujita et al., “Lipopolysaccharide stimulates the MyaD88-independent pathway and results in activation of IFN-regulatory factor 3 and the expression of a subset of lipopolysaccharide-inducible genes,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 167, no. 10, pp. 5887–5894, 2001.
  79. K. A. Fitzgerald, D. C. Rowe, B. J. Barnes et al., “LPS-TLR4 signaling to IRF-3/7 and NF-κB involves the toll adapters TRAM and TRIF,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 198, no. 7, pp. 1043–1055, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  80. E. Chiang, O. Dang, K. Anderson, A. Matsuzawa, H. Ichijo, and M. David, “Cutting edge: apoptosis-regulating signal kinase 1 is required for reactive oxygen species-mediated activation of IFN regulatory factor 3 by lipopolysaccharide,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 10, pp. 5720–5724, 2006. View at Scopus
  81. X. J. Zhao, Q. Dong, J. Bindas et al., “TRIF and IRF-3 binding to the TNF promoter results in macrophage TNF dysregulation and steatosis induced by chronic ethanol,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 5, pp. 3049–3056, 2008. View at Scopus
  82. D. W. Crabb and S. Liangpunsakul, “Alcohol and lipid metabolism,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 21, supplement 3, pp. S56–S60, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  83. M. Fischer, M. You, M. Matsumoto, and D. W. Crabb, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) agonist treatment reverses PPARα dysfunction and abnormalities in hepatic lipid metabolism in ethanol-fed mice,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 30, pp. 27997–28004, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  84. A. M. Miller, H. Wang, O. Park et al., “Anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic roles of endothelial cell STAT3 in alcoholic liver injury,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 719–725, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  85. N. Horiguchi, L. Wang, P. Mukhopadhyay et al., “Cell type-dependent pro- and anti-inflammatory role of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in alcoholic liver injury,” Gastroenterology, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 1148–1158, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  86. E. Naik and V. M. Dixit, “Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species drive proinflammatory cytokine production,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 208, no. 3, pp. 417–420, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  87. M. Yin, E. Gäbele, M. D. Wheeler et al., “Alcohol-induced free radicals in mice: direct toxicants or signaling molecules?” Hepatology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 935–942, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus