About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Hepatology
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 253261, 13 pages
Review Article

Pathological Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Cellular Adenoma according to the Clinical Context

1Service d’Anatomie Pathologique, Hôpital Pellegrin, CHU Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France
2U1053 Université Bordeaux 2, 33076 Bordeaux, France
3Service d’Anatomie Pathologique, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
4Service d’Hépatologie, Gastroenterologie, Hôpital St André CHU Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
5Service de Radiologie, Hôpital St André CHU Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
6Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital St André CHU Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
7Service Hépatobiliare et Pancréatique, Hôpital Haut Lévêque CHU Bordeaux, 33604 Pessac, France

Received 10 December 2012; Accepted 1 March 2013

Academic Editor: Türkan Terkivatan

Copyright © 2013 Paulette Bioulac-Sage et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


In Europe and North America, hepatocellular adenomas (HCA) occur, classically, in middle-aged woman taking oral contraceptives. Twenty percent of women, however, are not exposed to oral contraceptives; HCA can more rarely occur in men, children, and women over 65 years. HCA have been observed in many pathological conditions such as glycogenosis, familial adenomatous polyposis, MODY3, after male hormone administration, and in vascular diseases. Obesity is frequent particularly in inflammatory HCA. The background liver is often normal, but steatosis is a frequent finding particularly in inflammatory HCA. The diagnosis of HCA is more difficult when the background liver is fibrotic, notably in vascular diseases. HCA can be solitary, or multiple or in great number (adenomatosis). When nodules are multiple, they are usually of the same subtype. HNF1α-inactivated HCA occur almost exclusively in woman. The most important point of the classification is the identification of β-catenin mutated HCA, a strong argument to identify patients at risk of malignant transformation. Some HCA already present criteria indicating malignant transformation. When the whole nodule is a hepatocellular carcinoma, it is extremely difficult to prove that it is the consequence of a former HCA. It is occasionally difficult to identify HCA remodeled by necrosis or hemorrhage.

1. Introduction

The diagnosis of hepatocellular adenomas (HCA) may occasionally be difficult for the following reasons.(i)The nodule is discovered in a context different to what we are used to see, such as in men, in women not exposed to oral contraceptives (OC), in older persons, or in children.(ii)The tumor per se may be difficult to identify due to the partial necrosis or to the major remodeling of the tumor leading to the presence of criteria seen mostly in focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and/or to difficulties in differentiation from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). (iii)The presence of an underlying liver disease such as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), vascular disorder, and fibrosis.(iv)HCA, HCC, and FNH or different HCA subtypes can be present in the same patient, some more prone to HCC transformation, with the difficult task, in some cases, to differentiate HCA from HCC.(v)Finally, HCA can be discovered unexpectedly in patients treated for other liver tumors or developed in the context of diseases affecting the liver or other organs.

In this paper, we review the clinical/epidemiological context of HCA, based on our experience (personal cases and consult cases); all these cases being classified according to the pathomolecular classification into four groups, as previously published are HNF1α-inactivated HCA (H-HCA), inflammatory HCA (IHCA), β-catenin activated HCA (b-HCA and b-IHCA) and unclassified HCA (UHCA).

2. HCA: Age, Gender, and Oral Contraceptives

(1) The great majority of HCA occurs in middle age women genitally active, taking OC (at least in many Northern European countries and in North America) [1]. The magnitude of the risk of HCA in OC users is yet defined but is considered to be dose and time dependent. The difference in the incidence of HCA between countries among women taking OC has not been evaluated but seems real. Our experience is presented in Table 1. The incidence seems higher in France than in the US. A possible explanation could be the youngest age of the women exposed to the contraceptive pills in France compared to the US. Less than 20% of women with HCA are not exposed to OC or are exposed for very short periods of time.

Table 1: Hepatocellular adenomas: Bordeaux cases.

If the role of OC in the development of HCA is certain, the individual susceptibility to the risk is of paramount importance. No particular HCA subtypes have been observed in women; however, HCA in very young women (in their twenties) taking or not OC without specific etiology are rare and found, in our experience, mainly in the b-HCA and UHCA subgroups.

(2) HCA in men are rare [28]. To the exception of HCA cases related to MODY3 (H-HCA) and male hormone administration (b-HCA), the immense majority are found in the IHCA and b-IHCA subgroups. They are usually solitary. Patients are often overweight with one or several features of the metabolic syndrome. As the risk of HCC is important, resection of the nodule is recommended even for nodules smaller than 5 cm [9, 10].

(3) HCA occurring in infants, adolescents, or young adults are mainly related to specific etiology such as vascular disorders, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), or MODY 3.

(4) HCA in patients over 65 are rare. We have observed 4 H-HCA cases, all in women.

(5) In addition to age, gender, OC, and background liver diseases (see below), the biological and radiological parameters are also good indicators of HCA subgroups. Radiologists are now able to identify with confidence typical H-HCA and IHCA. Furthermore, a raised CRP level in the blood is a strong argument to identify IHCA.

3. HCA and HCC

It is well admitted that HCA may transform into HCC [1125]. However, the risk of malignant transformation of HCA cannot be reliably quantified yet. Several series are concordant to show that approximately 5% of patients, whom HCA has been resected, had pathological evidence of HCC within their HCA. This figure, however, does not take into account fully transformed HCA where evidence of the preexisting benign lesion might have disappeared. The risk of malignant transformation is correlated with the b-catenin mutated subtype, and with the size of the HCA. HCA malignant transformation is unusual for nodules <5 cm. These results suggest that small HCA occurring in women could be safely observed, as they are also at low risk of bleeding.

HCC that developed on HCA are typically well differentiated without vascular extension or satellite nodules. AFP measurement is not reliable as it is usually normal. The prognosis is—compared to HCC in cirrhotic patients—relatively good if we consider that tumors are usually large tumors (>5 cm).

Prevalence of malignancy within HCA is 10 times more frequent in men than in women and management of HCA should primarily be based on gender. In addition to men, reported cases of HCC on HCA concern rare etiologies such as glycogenosis, male hormone administration, and vascular diseases. Metabolic syndrome also appears as an emerging condition associated with malignant transformation of HCA particularly in men and is the likely most frequent predisposing condition for HCC in this setting. For the pathologists, there are different degrees of difficulties to make the diagnosis of HCA transformation into HCC (see article Balabaud et al. in this issue).

(1) The tumor is definitively an HCC: malignant transformation of an HCA is likely when the HCC occurs in a specific context such as glycogenosis, male hormone administration, or when the diagnosis of HCA has been established several years before. The link exists but cannot be demonstrated when the cause of the putative HCA is not well documented (i.e., in patient exposed to anticonvulsive drugs), or when there are areas in the tumor, particularly at the border, looking benign but that could correspond to a very well-differentiated HCC.

(2) The tumor is benign but there are foci with cytological/architectural criteria in favor of premalignant changes (i.e., rosette formation, increased CD34 staining, irregular/decreased reticulin network).

(3) The tumor is possibly malignant, at least in part (i.e., areas with loss of reticulin, diffuse CD34 staining positivity, GPC3 even mild and focal, etc.). In many occasions, the diagnosis of true malignancy remains impossible to assert and the term “borderline tumor HCA/HCC” can be used. In our own series, we observed 17 cases of HCC possibly linked to HCA with 2 deaths (Figure 1).

Figure 1: b-IHCA (with discovery of an HCC 12 years later). A woman born in 1959. Discovery of a nodule 17 cm. Oral contraceptives 4 years, BMI 21.5. Surgery 1984: right hepatectomy but incomplete resection. Followup refused by the patient: 2 pregnancies. Patient seen 12 years later with numerous liver nodules of a well-differentiated HCC. Death occurred few months later. (a) H&E—proliferation of hepatocytes with some atypia (not visible at this magnification) and numerous dilated vessels; no arguments for overt malignancy; inset: a few inflammatory infiltrates (arrows). (b) Moderate expression of SAA by adenomatous hepatocytes. (c) Heterogenous, patchy expression of GS; inset: aberrant expression of a few hepatocytic nuclei (arrows).

4. HCA Occurring in the Context of Specific Etiology

4.1. Vascular Diseases

Many different types of hepatocellular nodules ranging from nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH), focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), and macroregenerative nodule (MRN)/FNH-like, to HCA and HCC have been described in different types of vascular disorders [2642] such as Budd Chiari syndrome [2631], hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia [32], agenesis of the portal vein, intrahepatic shunts (congenital or acquired) [3340], and the Fontan procedure [41, 42]. Unfortunately there is today no reliable data using modern techniques of identification of these nodules (imaging, histopathology, molecular biology). Recent data suggest that the majority of nodules are MRN/FNH-like and in addition, different HCA subtypes have been observed with possible malignant transformation [31]. In our personal experience (including consults), we have observed 4 cases (2 with HCC).

4.2. HCA and Genetic Disorders
4.2.1. Glycogenosis

In a large series of 43 patients published in 1997, 51.8% of patients with type 1 and 25% of patients with type 3 glycogen storage disease had HCA at the time of the study. The male to female ratio was 2 to 1 in type 1, and no female had adenomas in type 3 [43]. In a retrospective chart review performed in 117 patients with glycogenosis 1a, it was shown that metabolic control measured on the basis of serum triglyceride concentration may be related to HCA formation [44]. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been described in 2 large series of type 1 glycogenosis [45, 46]. IHCA was the main subtype; b-HCA has been also observed but not H-HCA [46]. In our series, we observed in 2 cases different HCA subtypes: IHCA, b-HCA, and b-IHCA. One male patient with type 3 glycogenosis and hepatic nodules detected at the age of 3 died at the age of 27 of HCC in our unit; the diagnosis of HCA and HCC was based on radiological criteria. HCC is a rare but major complication of glycogenosis [17].

4.2.2. Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

HCA in patients with FAP have been reported previously [15, 4750] with inactivation of HNF1α [48] as well as biallelic inactivation of the APC gene [49, 50]. Malignant transformation has also been described [15]. In our series we have observed 2 cases of b-IHCA associated with FAP (Figure 2).

Figure 2: b-IHCA in the context of a FAP. A man born in 1966. Familial adenomatous polyposis (surgery in 1990 and 1996). Liver nodule discovered by chance, 9 cm. BMI 32.3. Segmentectomies V and VI. (a) H&E: HCA with ill-defined border (arrows). (b) Strong and diffuse expression of GS, contrasting with normal GS staining limited to a few centrolobular hepatocytes in the nontumoral liver (NT). (c) Diffuse expression of SAA in adenomatous hepatocytes with sharp demarcation from the surrounding NT.
4.2.3. MODY3

The discovery of H-HCA in MODY3 is a great success of molecular biology with important clinical consequences [5155]. The diagnosis of MODY3 should be evoked in H-HCA in the following circumstances: young age of the patient, adenomatosis, history of familial HCA, and diabetes in young age. H-HCA in men are observed only in MODY3 patients. We have confirmed the diagnosis of H-HCA due to MODY3 in 2 families [53, 55].

4.2.4. Tyrosinemia

Cases of HCA have been reported in tyrosinemia [1]. The diagnosis of HCA, in cirrhotic patients, remains very difficult to establish.

4.3. Drugs

HCA and HCC have been reported in patients taking male hormones for medical purposes, that is, Danazol [5659], or to increase their muscular mass such as body builders [60, 61]. We had at least 2 cases of women taking OC and exposed also to Danazol; both were b-HCA. In one case there were multiple nodules, the largest one shrunk massively after stopping Danazol and all nodules presented features of involute HCC. The link between HCA and the long-term exposition to antiepileptic drugs is not well established [6266]. We saw 3 such cases possibly linked to antiepileptic drugs.

4.4. Overweight/Obesity

The number of HCA noticeably increased faster in the 2001–2011 period compared to the 1990–2000 period. This phenomenon concurred with an increasing number of patients overweight or obese [6769]. More overweight patients are found to harbor IHCA than H-HCA. Females still represent the great majority of overweight/obese patients with HCA. Overweight/obese male or female patients constitute a new entity in the IHCA and β-catenin activated IHCA subgroups. Overweight/obesity may soon represent a major risk of malignant transformation of HCA, possibly because of the activation of the IL-6 pathway. In HCA, the nontumoral liver is usually normal or subnormal. Steatosis (mild to severe) is quite often observed in overweight/obese patients with or without metabolic syndrome; NASH is rare [70]. Most of the time, there is a clear difference on gross pathology or under the microscope between the tumoral and nontumoral liver (Figure 3). The distinction may be difficult at first glance when the nontumoral liver is steatotic as well as the tumor. Steatosis in the nontumoral liver can also be observed in other instances such as in alcoholic liver disease, glycogenosis, or the Fanconi anemia.

Figure 3: HCA on the background of NASH. (a) A woman born in 1956. Several nodules in the liver, largest 8 cm. Oral contraceptives for 31 years; BMI 24.6. Surgery in 2007 (several tumorectomies and segmentectomies). H&E: IHCA (typical expression of SAA and CRP—not shown), very mild steatosis, contrasting with highly steatotic (60%) nontumoral liver (NT): NASH with mild activity, without fibrosis. (b-c) Woman born in 1973, metabolic syndrome (noninsulin-dependant diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia). Oral contraceptives 15 years, BMI 31.6. Two liver nodules, largest 26 mm in segment IV. Segmentectomy IVB plus radio frequency of the other nodule (1 cm) in segment VIII. (b) H&E: nonsteatotic HCA (without immunohistochemical characteristics), classified as UHCA; its limit contrast with severe steatotic non tumoral liver (NT). (c) H&E: nontumoral liver: NASH with severe steatosis (80%), mild activity, and septal fibrosis (stage 3).
4.5. Anemia

(1) Fanconi anemia. The Fanconi anemia is an autosomal recessive disease, causing secondary aplastic anemia and congenital abnormalities, associated with an increased risk of tumors [56, 71, 72]. In patients with the Fanconi anemia, androgen therapy and iron overload may contribute to the development of HCA and HCC; the latter may occur as a transformation of HCA. With prolongation of survival, continued development of liver tumors can be expected. Routine detection should therefore be considered in these patients.

(2) beta thalassemia. Hepatocellular adenoma has been reported [1].

(3) Anemia of chronic disease. In 2002, severe anemia of chronic disease was described in an unusual group of patients with glycogen storage disease type 1a. The anemia was directly related to the presence of large hepatic adenomas that inappropriately produced hepcidin [73, 74]. A similar mechanism was described in another case not related to glycogenosis [75]. In our experience at least 2 patients were investigated during several years for the diagnosis of inflammatory anemias without any clues until one or several liver nodules were discovered. The anemia was cured after resection of the IHCA [76]. In patients with IHCA, it is not rare to observe biological criteria of inflammatory anemia [10].

4.6. Endocrine Disorders

(1) Polycystic ovary syndrome. A case of a young woman with HCA in a context of polycystic ovary syndrome, associated with high levels of androgens and following a high dose hormonal therapy, has been described [77]. We observed a similar case (IHCA).

(2) Cushing’s syndrome. To our knowledge no case of HCA has been reported yet in Cushing syndrome patients. In our file, one b-HCA occurring in a patient with a Cushing syndrome became malignant years later; however, this old case was poorly documented.

4.7. Fibrotic Background Liver

In severe fibrosis/cirrhosis, the diagnosis of HCA was not reported until recently in alcoholic patients [78]. Here the difficulty is to differentiate an IHCA from a MRN/FNH-like expressing inflammatory proteins. In our experience MRN and MRN-FNH-like, which are frequently observed in cirrhotic background, can express CRP. Molecular data are necessary to identify with certainty HCA in cirrhotic patients.

5. Association of HCA with Other Tumors

5.1. Association of HCA with HCC and Nonhepatocellular Tumors

We have observed HCA associated with other tumors occurring elsewhere in the liver. In all these cases, HCA were in the H-HCA subgroup, associated with an HCC, an angiomyolipoma, and a mucinous cystadenoma, and one was associated with cysts in the context of a kidney polycystic disease (Figure 4). These associations are possibly fortuitous in the 2 first observations. We cannot, however, rule out the possibility of a common genetic parameter, at least in the last observation.

Figure 4: H-HCA associated with polycystic disease. Woman born in 1954. In 1991: kidney transplantation for polycystic kidney disease. In 2000: left hepatectomy for a 11 cm liver nodule. On oral contraceptives for 2 years, BMI 21.2. LFABP immunostaining: numerous biliary cysts with some areas of liver normally expressing LFABP (asterisk), contrasting with a portion of the H-HCA (upper) where LFABP is sharply decreased.
5.2. Association between Different Benign Hepatocellular Tumors

(i)Association of HCA and FNH. The association is probably not fortuitous. FNH are particularly frequent in adenomatosis, and it is not rare that small H-HCA could be fortutiously discovered on the resected specimen (Figure 5). It is well known that liver vascular diseases are prone to the development of FNH. As such they may also play a role in the development of HCA [79]. (ii)Association of different HCA subtypes. H-HCA and IHCA are rarely associated in the same liver; we have observed, however, a few cases presenting such association (Figure 6). This association supports the concept of an individual susceptibility to develop HCA, common to several subtypes. (iii)Association of IHCA and b-IHCA. In cases with multiple IHCA, some nodules can be in addition b-catenin activated indicating that b-catenin mutation could be a late event in the development of the nodule; indeed, in such cases large nodules were b-IHCA whereas the small ones were IHCA.

Figure 5: FNH associated with H-HCA. Woman born in 1966. Three FNH, largest 10 cm. Surgery in 2008 (segments V and VI). Discovery on the resected specimen of several small H-HCA. (a) Fresh specimen: typical FNH closed to a small yellow nodule (arrow). (b) Masson’s trichrome: typical aspect of FNH, nearby a small steatotic nodule (asterisk). (c) GS staining is negative in the nodule, contrasting with map-like positivity in FNH. (d) LFABP is lacking in the small nodule, whereas it is normally expressed in FNH (as in nontumoral liver, not shown).
Figure 6: H-HCA and IHCA. Woman born in 1965. Abnormal liver function tests. Hypertriglyceridemia. Multiple nodules largest 9.5 cm. BMI 21.5. 18-year oral contraceptives. Left hepatectomy in 2011. (a) Fresh specimen—the large reddish nodule is not well limited (black arrows), associated with numerous yellowish small nodules in the surrounding resected parenchyma, sometimes visible under the Glisson’s capsule (white arrows). (b) The small nodules are steatotic. (c) LFABP is lacking in all the small nodules (H-HCA), contrasting with normal expression in the nearby IHCA. (d) CRP is strongly expressed in IHCA, whereas it is negative in the small nodule of H-HCA.
5.3. Association of HCA with Extra Hepatic Tumors

(1) In 1989, Wanless et al. reported 13 cases with multiple FNH associated with other lesions such as hemangioma of liver meningioma, astrocytoma, telangiectasia of the brain, berry aneurysm, dysplastic systemic arteries, and portal vein atresia [80]. In the same paper, Wanless described the so-called “telangiectatic subtype of FNH” which occurs in this syndrome as well as in a minority of patients with solitary FNH. Today we know that the so-called telangiectatic FNH are IHCA [81, 82]. FNH with major sinusoidal dilatation, however, does exist [83]. We still have to clarify the association between the above brain tumors and benign hepatocellular nodules.

(2) HCA are so rare that patients with cancer (breast, colon, etc.) and a nodule in the liver are thought to have, a priori, a metastasis. We have encountered 3 patients already treated by chemotherapy where HCA were discovered by chance during the followup.

6. HCA with Rare or Misleading Features

6.1. Rare Findings in HCA

Iron [74] or other pigments such as lipofuscin granules, Dubin Johnson pigment [7, 8, 16, 84], hematopoiesis, calcifications [85], and inflammatory granulomas [8688] are occasionally observed in HCA. Iron is located in hepatocytes in the Fanconi anemia. Surprisingly no iron was observed in HCA with chronic anemia related to hepcidin production. In our experience, among our cases of HCA associated with chronic anemia, we did not observe iron overload except in 2 cases where iron was almost exclusively found in Kupffer cells (Figure 7(a)).

Figure 7: Rare, misleading cytological findings. (a) Woman born in 1964. Abnormal liver tests and anemia. No oral contraceptives, BMI 40.4. Alcohol (30 to 40 g per day), hypercholesterolemia, and type 2 diabetes. Biopsy: IHCA. Right hepatectomy 2006: IHCA. The anemia corrected several months after surgery. Perls staining: positivity in sinusoidal cells of the IHCA. (b) Woman born in 1936. Oral contraceptives 21 years. Several liver nodules. Tumorectomies in 1989. H&E: numerous epithelioid granulomas are widespread within the IHCA. (c-d): Woman born in 1947. Massive bleeding. No oral contraceptives, BMI 21.5. Right hepatectomy 2000. Massive liver necrosis. Pathological diagnosis: IHCA. H&E: areas with cytological abnormalities: dystrophic nuclei (irregular, hyperchromatic), nearby necrotic/hemorrhagic zones of the IHCA.
6.2. Cytological/Architectural Abnormalities Not Linked to Malignancy Transformation

Abnormalities such as mainly dystrophic nuclei or 2-3 cells thick hepatocytic plates are often seen when HCA exhibits large hemorrhagic/necrotic areas (Figure 7(b)). These misleading features are probably linked to a secondary regenerative process.

6.3. HCA Presenting Features of FNH

HCA can also be remodeled following necrosis/hemorrhage. Fibrotic bands and even scars can form so that HCA look like FNH; these changes are more frequently seen in IHCA subtypes (Figure 8). The arguments to favor one diagnosis over the other rely mainly on clinical, biological, and IHC data; this may not represent, however, strong enough arguments in some difficult cases.

Figure 8: HCA looking like FNH. Same as patient 7A. (a) Fresh specimen: large subcapsular reddish tumor, with a white stellate area of loose fibrosis in the center. (b) CK7 is expressed at the border of fibrotic bands delineating nodules. (c) H&E (αSMA insert). The overall aspect is in favor of an IHCA. (d) Ductular reaction around inflammatory pseudo-portal tracts. (e) CRP is diffusely expressed in the nodule. The diagnosis of IHCA was reinforced by the disappearance of the chronic anemia after resection of the nodule.
6.4. HCA Number and Size Variation

HCA are solitary or multiple (from few to many). Many HCA defined the so-called entity adenomatosis (arbitrarily more than 10 nodules). For surgeons, adenomatosis is defined also by the number of nodules whose size raises therapeutic decision. Therefore, we have to distinguish cases with a single large nodule accompanied by myriads of small millimetric nodules from cases with multiple large nodules. Adenomatosis is more frequently observed in H-HCA and to a lesser extent in IHCA [10]. Apart from metabolic disorders, adenomatosis is rare in b-HCA and UHCA. Interestingly enough in the immense majority of cases, HCA when detected seems to be already at their maximum size (for those not resected). During followup (and after OC stopped), size remains stable or decrease. The impression, that needs to be confirmed, is that H-HCA remains stable and that IHCA tends to decrease. It is necessary to remember that in HNF1α-inactivated adenomatosis, there are myriads of small HCA that tend to aggregates to form larger nodules [89]. We have observed 2 HNF1α adenomatosis where such large nodules were interpreted as increasing in size, requiring reintervention (Figure 9). It is not known if the hemorrhagic risk is linked to the apparent global size of the nodule or not.

Figure 9: H-HCA size increment. Woman born in 1952. Abnormal liver function tests. Oral contraceptives 13 years, BMI 25.4 MRI adenomatosis, largest nodule 6 cm. Segmentectomies IV and VI 2001. Follow-up: increase size of one nodule Segmentectomy III, 2010. (a–c) Phased-opposed T1 weighted MR images in 2001 (a), 2007 (b), and 2010 (c) showing multiple hepatocellular adenomas showing hypointense because of the massive fat component. The nodule located in segment II (arrow) gradually increases in diameter between 2001 and 2010. As the 13 mm nodule located in segment VIII (asterisk), other nodules did not change their size.

7. Recommendations and Conclusion

If it is tempting to publish rare cases, such as HCA with unusual cytological abnormalities, HCA in rare pathological context (beta thalassemia, tyrosinemia, etc.), HCA associated with rare hepatic or extrahepatic tumors, HCA have to be classified in subgroups with the help of IHC, to understand the pathophysiology of the disease and, in the long term, to better diagnose liver tumors and adapt the management of the patients. Not all HCA can be correctly classified with histological tools only. To prevent this limitation, it is recommended to freeze tissue, in order to perform molecular studies, that are particularly important to understand unusual and unclassified HCA cases. It is hoped that the pathomolecular classification of hepatocellular adenomas developed on normal as well as on fibrotic liver will help us to make progress in this field.


  1. “Hepatocellular Adenoma,” eMedicine Gastroenterology, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/170205-overview.
  2. T. P. Theruvath, B. Izar, J. McGillicuddy, E. Stewar, A. Reuben, and K. D. Chavin, “Hepatocellular adenoma in men: a rare cause for liver resection,” The American Surgeon, vol. 77, pp. 373–376, 2011.
  3. T. Monchal, L. Barbier, E. Hornez et al., “Ruptured liver cell adenoma in man: great fortune in misfortune,” Acta Chirurgica Belgica, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 555–557, 2010. View at Scopus
  4. Y. Goudard, D. Rouquie, C. Bertocchi et al., “Malignant transformation of hepatocellular adenoma in men,” Gastroenterologie Clinique et Biologique, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 168–170, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. A. Psatha, R. C. Semelka, D. Armao, J. T. Woosley, Z. Firat, and G. Schneider, “Hepatocellular adenomas in men: MRI findings in four patients,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 258–264, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Mamada, M. Onda, T. Tajiri et al., “Liver cell adenoma in a 26-year-old man,” Journal of Nippon Medical School, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 516–519, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. H. Bernard, J. F. Blanc, C. Paulusma et al., “Multiple black hepatocellular adenomas in a male patient,” European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1253–1257, 2000. View at Scopus
  8. N. Hasan, M. Coutts, and B. Portmann, “Pigmented liver cell adenoma in two male patients,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1429–1432, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Dokmak, V. Paradis, V. Vilgrain et al., “A single-center surgical experience of 122 patients with single and multiple hepatocellular adenomas,” Gastroenterology, vol. 137, no. 5, pp. 1698–1705, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Bioulac-Sage, H. Laumonier, G. Couchy et al., “Hepatocellular adenoma management and phenotypic classification: the Bordeaux experience,” Hepatology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 481–489, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. O. Farges, N. Ferreira, S. Dokmak, J. Belghiti, P. Bedossa, and V. Paradis, “Changing trends in malignant transformation of hepatocellular adenoma,” Gut, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 85–89, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. O. Farges and S. Dokmak, “Malignant transformation of liver adenoma: an analysis of the literature,” Digestive Surgery, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. H. Stoot, R. J. Coelen, M. C. De Jong, and C. H. Dejong, “Malignant transformation of hepatocellular adenomas into hepatocellular carcinomas: a systematic review including more than 1600 adenoma cases,” HPB, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 509–522, 2010. View at Scopus
  14. V. Paradis, S. Zalisnski, E. Chelbi et al., “Hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with metabolic syndrome often develop without significant liverfibrosis: a pathological analysis,” Hepatology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 851–859, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Toiyama, Y. Inoue, H. Yasuda et al., “Hepatocellular adenoma containing hepatocellular carcinoma in a male patient with familial adenomatous polyposis coli: report of a case,” Surgery Today, vol. 41, pp. 1442–1446, 2011.
  16. J. F. Hechtman, M. Raoufi, M. I. Fiel et al., “Hepatocellular carcinoma arising in a pigmented telangiectatic adenoma with nuclear β-catenin and glutamine synthetase positivity: case report and review of the literature,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 927–932, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Cassiman, L. Libbrecht, C. Verslype et al., “An adult male patient with multiple adenomas and a hepatocellular carcinoma: mild glycogen storage disease type Ia,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 213–217, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. L. Deneve, T. M. Pawlik, S. Cunningham et al., “Liver cell adenoma: a multicenter analysis of risk factors for rupture and malignancy,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 640–648, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. T. L. Micchelli, P. Vivekanandan, J. K. Boitnott, T. M. Pawlik, M. A. Choti, and M. Torbenson, “Malignant transformation of hepatic adenomas,” Modern Pathology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 491–497, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. Gorayski, C. H. Thompson, H. S. Subhash, and A. C. Thomas, “Hepatocellular carcinoma associated with recreational anabolic steroid use,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 74–75, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Gorayski, C. H. Thompson, H. S. Subhash, and A. C. Thomas, “Erratum: hepatocellular carcinoma associated with recreational anabolic steroid use, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(1):74–75, 2008,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 44, article e5, 2009.
  22. R. Colovic, N. Grubor, M. Micev, and V. Radak, “Hepatocellular adenoma with malignant alteration,” Hepato-Gastroenterology, vol. 54, no. 74, pp. 386–388, 2007. View at Scopus
  23. Y. Seyama, K. Sano, W. Tang et al., “Simultaneous resection of liver cell adenomas and an intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunt with elevation of serum PIVKA-II level,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 909–912, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. Arvind, D. Duraimurugan, and J. S. Rajkumar, “Hepatic adenomatosis—a rare double complication of multiple adenoma rupture and malignant transformation,” Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 209–210, 2006. View at Scopus
  25. E. Burri, M. Steuerwald, G. Cathomas et al., “Hepatocellular carcinoma in a liver-cell adenoma within a non-cirrhotic liver,” European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 437–441, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Moucari, P. E. Rautou, D. Cazals-Hatem et al., “Hepatocellular carcinoma in Budd-Chiari syndrome: characteristics and risk factors,” Gut, vol. 57, pp. 828–835, 2008.
  27. D. Cazals-Hatem, V. Vilgrain, P. Genin et al., “Arterial and portal circulation and parenchymal changes in Budd-Chiari syndrome: a study in 17 explanted livers,” Hepatology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 510–519, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Tanaka and I. R. Wanless, “Pathology of the liver in Budd-Chiari syndrome: portal vein thrombosis and the histogenesis of veno-centric cirrhosis, veno-portal cirrhosis, and large regenerative nodules,” Hepatology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 488–496, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. E. C. Oliveira, A. G. E. Duarte, I. F. S. F. Boin, J. R. S. Almeida, and C. A. F. Escanhoela, “Large benign hepatocellular nodules in cirrhosis due to chronic venous outflow obstruction: diagnostic confusion with hepatocellular carcinoma,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 4116–4118, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. N. Flor, M. Zuin, F. Brovelli et al., “Regenerative nodules in patients with chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome: a longitudinal study using multiphase contrast-enhanced multidetector CT,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 588–593, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. P. Bioulac-Sage, C. Sempoux, V. Paradis, et al., “Characterization of liver nodules in patients with Budd Chiari syndrome (BCS) and portal vein agenesis (PVA),” Hepatology, vol. 56, supplement 1, article 460A, 2012.
  32. R. Brenard, X. Chapaux, P. Deltenre et al., “Large spectrum of liver vascular lesions including high prevalence of focal nodular hyperplasia in patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia: the Belgian Registry based on 30 patients,” European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1253–1259, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. E. Alonso-Gamarra, M. Parrón, A. Pérez, C. Prieto, L. Hierro, and M. López-Santamaría, “Clinical and radiologic manifestations of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts: a comprehensive review,” Radiographics, vol. 31, pp. 707–722, 2011.
  34. Y. Tanaka, M. Takayanagi, Y. Shiratori et al., “Congenital absence of portal vein with multiple hyperplastic nodular lesions in the liver,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 288–294, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. S. Glatard, S. Hillaire, G. d'Assignies et al., “Obliterative portal venopathy: findings at CT imaging,” Radiology, vol. 263, pp. 741–750, 2012.
  36. S. Kobayashi, O. Matsui, T. Gabata et al., “Radiological and histopathological manifestations of hepatocellular nodular lesions concomitant with various congenital and acquired hepatic hemodynamic abnormalities,” Japanese Journal of Radiology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 53–68, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. Zeitoun, G. Brancatelli, M. Colombat et al., “Congenital hepatic fibrosis: CT findings in 18 adults,” Radiology, vol. 231, no. 1, pp. 109–116, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. F. Kondo, Y. Koshima, and M. Ebara, “Nodular lesions associated with abnormal liver circulation,” Intervirology, vol. 47, no. 3–5, pp. 277–287, 2004. View at Scopus
  39. M. Kawakatsu, V. Vilgrain, J. Belghiti, J. F. Flejou, and H. Nahum, “Association of multiple liver cell adenomas with spontaneous intrahepatic portohepatic shunt,” Abdominal Imaging, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 438–440, 1994. View at Scopus
  40. V. Dhalluin-Venier, M. Fabre, E. Jacquemin, A. S. Rangheard, G. Pelletier, and C. Buffet, “Liver cell adenomas and portosystemic shunt,” Gastroenterologie Clinique et Biologique, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 164–166, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. K. Babaoglu, F. K. Binnetoglu, A. Aydoğan et al., “Hepatic adenomatosis in a 7-year-old child treated earlier with a Fontan procedure,” Pediatric Cardiology, vol. 31, pp. 861–864, 2010.
  42. A. A. Ghaferi and G. M. Hutchins, “Progression of liver pathology in patients undergoing the Fontan procedure: chronic passive congestion, cardiac cirrhosis, hepatic adenoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 1348–1352, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. P. Labrune, P. Trioche, I. Duvaltier, P. Chevalier, and M. Odièvre, “Hepatocellular adenomas in glycogen storage disease type I and III: a series of 43 patients and review of the literature,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 276–279, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. D. Q. Wang, L. M. Fiske, C. T. Carreras, and D. A. Weinstein, “Natural history of hepatocellular adenoma formation in glycogen storage disease type I,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 159, pp. 442–446, 2011.
  45. S. Sakellariou, H. Al-Hussaini, A. Scalori et al., “Hepatocellular adenoma in glycogen storage disorder type I: a clinicopathological and molecular study,” Histopathology, vol. 60, pp. E58–E65, 2012.
  46. J. Calderaro, P. Labrune, G. Morcrette et al., “Molecular characterization of hepatocellular adenomas developed in patients with glycogen storage disease type I,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 350–357, 2012.
  47. Y. Okamura, A. Maeda, K. Matsunaga et al., “Hepatocellular adenoma in a male with familial adenomatous polyposis coli,” Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, vol. 16, pp. 571–574, 2009.
  48. E. Jeannot, D. Wendum, F. Paye et al., “Hepatocellular adenoma displaying a HNF1α inactivation in a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis coli,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 883–886, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. S. Bala, P. H. Wunsch, and W. G. Ballhausen, “Childhood hepatocellular adenoma in familial adenomatous polyposis: mutations in adenomatous polyposis coli gene and p53,” Gastroenterology, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 919–922, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. H. Bläker, C. Sutter, M. Kadmon et al., “Analysis of somatic APC mutations in rare extracolonic tumors of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli,” Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 93–98, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. O. Bluteau, E. Jeannot, P. Bioulac-Sage et al., “Bi-allelic inactivation of TCF1 in hepatic adenomas,” Nature Genetics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 312–315, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. Y. Reznik, T. Dao, R. Coutant et al., “Hepatocyte nuclear factor-1α gene inactivation: cosegregation between liver adenomatosis and diabetes phenotypes in two maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY)3 families,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 1476–1480, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. Y. Bacq, E. Jacquemin, C. Balabaud et al., “Familial liver adenomatosis associated with hepatocyte nuclear factor 1alpha inactivation,” Gastroenterology, vol. 125, no. 5, pp. 1470–1475, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. E. Jeannot, L. Mellottee, P. Bioulac-Sage et al., “Spectrum of HNF1A somatic mutations in hepatocellular adenoma differs from that in patients with MODY3 and suggests genotoxic damage,” Diabetes, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 1836–1844, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. E. Jeannot, G. Lacape, H. Gin et al., “Double heterozygous germline HNF1A mutations in a patient with liver adenomatosis,” Diabetes Care, vol. 35, article e35, 2012.
  56. I. Velazquez and B. P. Alter, “Androgens and liver tumors: Fanconi's anemia and non-Fanconi's conditions,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 77, pp. 257–267, 2004.
  57. K. Bork and V. Schneiders, “Danazol-induced hepatocellular adenoma in patients with hereditary angio-oedema,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 36, pp. 707–709, 2002.
  58. K. Bork, M. Pitton, P. Harten, and P. Koch, “Hepatocellular adenomas in patients taking danazol for hereditary angio-oedema,” The Lancet, vol. 353, no. 9158, pp. 1066–1067, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. H. Kahn, C. Manzarbeitia, N. Theise, M. Schwartz, C. Miller, and S. N. Thung, “Danazol-induced hepatocellular adenomas: a case report and review of the literature,” Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 115, no. 10, pp. 1054–1057, 1991. View at Scopus
  60. L. Socas, M. Zumbado, O. Pérez-Luzardo et al., “Hepatocellular adenomas associated with anabolic androgenic steroid abuse in bodybuilders: a report of two cases and a review of the literature,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 39, no. 5, p. e27, 2005. View at Scopus
  61. S. Bagia, P. M. Hewitt, and D. L. Morris, “Anabolic steroid-induced hepatic adenomas with spontaneous haemorrhage in a bodybuilder,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 686–687, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. A. Seki, T. Inoue, Y. Maegaki et al., “Polycystic ovary syndrome and hepatocellular adenoma related to long-term use of sodium valproate in a young woman,” No To Hattatsu, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 205–208, 2006. View at Scopus
  63. A. Ferko, J. Bedrna, and J. Nozicka, “Pigmented hepatocellular adenoma of the liver caused by long-term use of phenobarbital,” Rozhledy v Chirurgii, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 192–195, 2003. View at Scopus
  64. J. J. Vazquez and M. A. Marigil, “Liver-cell adenoma in an epileptic man on barbiturates,” Histology and Histopathology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 301–303, 1989. View at Scopus
  65. T. B. Lautz, M. J. Finegold, A. C. Chin, and R. A. Superina, “Giant hepatic adenoma with atypical features in a patient on oxcarbazepine therapy,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 751–754, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. K. Tazawa, M. Yasuda, Y. Ohtani, H. Makuuchi, and R. Y. Osamura, “Multiple hepatocellular adenomas associated with long-term carbamazepine,” Histopathology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 92–94, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. P. Bioulac-Sage, S. Taouji, L. Possenti, and C. Balabaud, “Hepatocellular adenoma subtypes: the impact of overweight and obesity,” Liver International, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1217–1221, 2012.
  68. C. Bunchorntavakul, R. Bahirwani, D. Drazek et al., “Clinical features and natural history of hepatocellular adenomas: the impact of obesity,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 34, pp. 664–674, 2011.
  69. V. Paradis, A. Champault, M. Ronot et al., “Telangiectatic adenoma: an entity associated with increased body mass index and inflammation,” Hepatology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 140–146, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. J. Watkins, C. Balabaud, P. Bioulac-Sage, D. Sharma, and A. Dhillon, “Hepatocellular adenoma in advanced-stage fatty liver disease,” European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 932–936, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. V. Ozenne, V. Paradis, M. P. Vullierme et al., “Liver tumours in patients with Fanconi anaemia: a report of three cases,” European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 20, pp. 1036–1039, 2008.
  72. C. Masserot-Lureau, N. Adoui, F. Degos et al., “Incidence of liver abnormalities in Fanconi anemia patients,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 87, pp. 547–549, 2012.
  73. C. N. Roy, D. A. Weinstein, and N. C. Andrews, “2002 E. Mead Johnson Award for research in pediatrics lecture: the molecular biology of the anemia of chronic disease: a hypothesis,” Pediatric Research, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 507–512, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. D. A. Weinstein, C. N. Roy, M. D. Fleming, M. F. Loda, J. I. Wolfsdorf, and N. C. Andrews, “Inappropriate expression of hepcidin is associated with iron refractory anemia: implications for the anemia of chronic disease,” Blood, vol. 100, no. 10, pp. 3776–3781, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. A. Y. F. Chung, K. W. Leo, G. C. Wong, K. L. Chuah, J. W. Ren, and C. G. L. Lee, “Giant hepatocellular adenoma presenting with chronic iron deficiency anemia,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 101, no. 9, pp. 2160–2162, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. A. Sa Cunha, J. F. Blanc, E. Lazaro et al., “Inflammatory syndrome with liver adenomatosis: the beneficial effects of surgical management,” Gut, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 307–309, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. C. Toso, L. Rubbia-Brandt, F. Negro, P. Morel, and G. Mentha, “Hepatocellular adenoma polycystic ovary syndrome,” Liver International, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 35–37, 2003. View at Scopus
  78. M. Sasaki, N. Yoneda, S. Kitamura, Y. Sato, and Y. Nakanuma, “A serum amyloid A-positive hepatocellular neoplasm arising in alcoholic cirrhosis: a previously unrecognized type of inflammatory hepatocellular tumor,” Modern Pathology, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1584–1593, 2012.
  79. C. Laurent, H. Trillaud, S. Lepreux, C. Balabaud, and P. Bioulac-Sage, “Association of adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: experience of a single French academic center,” Comparative Hepatology, vol. 2, article 6, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. I. R. Wanless, S. Albrecht, J. Bilbao et al., “Multiple focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver associated with vascular malformations of various organs and neoplasia of the brain: a new syndrome,” Modern Pathology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 456–462, 1989. View at Scopus
  81. P. Bioulac-Sage, S. Rebouissou, A. Sa Cunha et al., “Clinical, morphologic, and molecular features defining so-called telangiectatic focal nodular hyperplasias of the liver,” Gastroenterology, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 1211–1218, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. V. Paradis, A. Benzekri, D. Dargére et al., “Telangiectatic focal nodular hyperplasia: a variant of hepatocellular adenoma,” Gastroenterology, vol. 126, no. 5, pp. 1323–1329, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. H. Laumonier, N. Frulio, C. Laurent, C. Balabaud, J. Zucman-Rossi, and P. Bioulac-Sage, “Focal nodular hyperplasia with major sinusoidal dilatation: a misleading entity,” BMJ Case Reports, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  84. T. Masuda, T. Beppu, K. Ikeda et al., “Pigmented hepatocellular adenoma: report of a case,” Surgery Today, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 881–883, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. T. Ichikawa, M. P. Federle, L. Grazioli, and M. Nalesnik, “Hepatocellular adenoma: multiphasic CT and histopathologic findings in 25 patients,” Radiology, vol. 214, no. 3, pp. 861–868, 2000. View at Scopus
  86. B. Le Bail, H. Jouhanole, Y. Deugnier et al., “Liver adenomatosis with granulomas in two patients on long-term oral contraceptives,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 982–987, 1992. View at Scopus
  87. K. C. Kazi, R. Deshpande, R. Soman, M. Lala, and S. Shah, “Liver cell adenoma with co-existing hepatic granulomas in an HIV-positive patient,” Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 274–275, 2005. View at Scopus
  88. M. Bieze, P. Bioulac-Sage, J. Verheij, C. Balabaud, C. Laurent, and T. M. van Gulik, “Hepatocellular adenomas associated with hepatic granulomas: experience in five cases,” Case Reports in Gastroenterology, vol. 6, pp. 677–683, 2012.
  89. S. Lepreux, C. Laurent, J. F. Blanc et al., “The identification of small nodules in liver adenomatosis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 77–85, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus