Review Article

The Gut Microbiota and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Friend or Foe?

Table 1

Summary of the studies on the alteration in gut microbiota in IBS subjects.

S. No.IBS ( )Healthy ( )Diagnostic criteriaMethodOutcomeReference

1118Rome IIPCR and DGGEDiversity of total bacteria along with Lacto bacillus was higher in IBS patients than healthy controlPonnusamy et al. [1]
22423Rome IINucleic acid fractionation according to GC content, cloning followed by sequencing and qPCRCollinsella aerofaciens, Clostridium cocleatum, and Coprococcus eutactus confirmed significant difference from that of healthy subjectsKassinen et al. [18]
31010Rome IIICulture and q PCRSignificantly decreased quantity of aerobic bacteria in IBS than healthy control and increased concentration of Lactobacillus species in D-IBS patients than healthy controlCarroll et al. [19]
43720Rome IIDGGE and q PCRSignificant increase in the amount of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in IBS patientsKerckhoffs et al. [33]
51616Rome IIRT-PCR-DGGE, Transcript analysis with the aid of affinity capture (TRAC)Significantly decreased amount Clostridium coccoides-E. rectale in IBS-CMaukonen et al. [106]
64126Rome IIFISH AnalysisSignificantly decreased quantity of Bifidobacterium catenulatum in faecal and duodenal samples of IBS patients than healthy controlKerckhoffs et al. [107]
74434Rome IICulture and PCRSignificantly increased quantity of Enteraggroegative Escherichia coli in IBS-DSobieszczańska et al. [108]
82015Rome IIq PCRDecreased quantity of Clostridium thermosuccinogens in IBS-D patients and increased quantity of Ruminococcus torque in IBS-D patients than healthy control. Ruminococcus bromii was more abundant in IBS-C than healthy controlLyra et al. [109]
91222Rome II% G + C profiling and fractioned DNA sequencing followed by q PCRSignificantly increased quantity of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes and reduced quantity of Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes in IBS-D patients than healthy controlKrogius-Kurikka et al. [110]
102525Rome IICultureSignificantly reduced number of Bifidobacterium and increased number of Enterobacteriaceae in IBS patients than healthy controlSi et al. [111]
114733Rome IIDGGE of 16S rRNASignificant difference in gut microbiota in IBS patients and healthy control along with more variation in the gut microbiota in control than IBS subjectsCodling et al. [112]
122626Rome IICulture and q PCRSignificantly increased quantity of Lactobacillus and Veillonella in IBS patients than controlTana et al. [113]
131010Rome IIIPCR and PyrosequencingSignificantly increased number of Bacteroidetes and Synergistetes and reduced number of Actinobacteria, Bacilli, Flavobacteria, and Epsilonproteobacteria in IBS than controlNg et al. [114]
142222Rome IIIMetagenomics of 16S rRNA gene followed by PhyloChip hybridization and PyrosequencingSignificantly greater abundance of class γ-Proteobacteria in IBS children than healthy control and Haemophilus parainfluenzae was prominentSaulnier et al. [35]
156246Rome IIq PCR and microarraySignificantly 2-fold increased ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes in IBS patients comparison with the healthy control Rajilić–Stojanović et al. [34]

IBS: irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-D: diarrhea predominant IBS; IBS-C: constipation predominant IBS; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; DGGE: denaturation gradient gel electrophoresis; q PCR: real time PCR; FISH: fluorescent in situ hybridization; TRAC: transcript analysis with the aid of affinity capture.