- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
International Journal of Molecular Imaging
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 714021, 9 pages
Diffusion MR Imaging of the Brain in Patients with Cancer
Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, FCT16.024, Unit 1482, Houston, TX 77030, USA
Received 1 June 2011; Revised 19 August 2011; Accepted 19 August 2011
Academic Editor: Weibo Cai
Copyright © 2011 J. Matthew Debnam and Dawid Schellingerhout. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Over the last several years, there has been significant advancement in the molecular characterization of intracranial diseases, particularly cerebral neoplasms. While nuclear medicine technology, including PET/CT, has been at the foreground of exploration, new MR imaging techniques, specifically diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor imaging, have shown interesting applications towards advancing our understanding of cancer involving the brain. In this paper, we review the fundamentals and basic physics of these techniques, and their applications to patient care for both general diagnostic use and in answering specific questions in selection of patients in terms of expected response to treatment.
1. Diffusion MR Imaging: Fundamentals and Physics
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MR) utilizes the Brownian motion of molecules to derive images. Robert Brown first described the motion bearing his name in 1827  after observing the random motion of pollen grains suspended in water. Movement caused by the random movements of water molecules has endlessly fascinated scientists, even Einstein, who in 1907 speculated that the speed of the particles subject to Brownian motion would be dependent only on temperature, and not on the size and nature of the particle or on its environment . Einstein speculated that this prediction would be impossible to verify experimentally due to the technical challenges involved in taking measurements on extremely short time scales and microscopic spatial scales. Recent work though, using laser tweezers to measure a silicon dioxide microsphere’s motion in air, has measured instantaneous velocities of the particle following a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution; a mean square displacement velocity of 0.422 mm/s has been determined . However, the technical demands for such measurements in water rather than air are still beyond current technical capabilities, confirming Einstein’s prediction after more than a century. This primal kinetic activity of fluid molecules is responsible for the diffusion and intermixing of fluids and dissolved substances and is the process targeted for measurement with diffusion MR imaging. Through carefully designed MR sequences, much can be learned about the diffusion of water molecules, and by implication, the structure of the organ or substrate the water is in.
In MR imaging, the local magnetic field determines the rate of precession, or wobbling, of hydrogen nuclei. With diffusion MR imaging, a gradient is applied and precession is induced by an applied radiofrequency pulse. The gradient is then reversed and an equal and opposite radiofrequency pulse applied. The purpose of this is to “null” or decrease the signal from the stationary protons, while the mobile protons, which have changed position during time period between the two radiofrequency pulses, will not be nulled perfectly.
Measuring the signal of the mobile protons allows determination of the amount of diffusion which has occurred, and this is represented as a mathematical equation. By rearranging this mathematical equation to isolate the diffusion coefficient, information about diffusion within each voxel can be obtained. The magnitude of diffusion within the voxel is measured by the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), and this information can be used to create an image called an ADC map. A low value for ADC indicates that molecular movement in the sampled tissue is restricted (dark signal), while a high value for ADC indicates that the tissue has free diffusion (bright signal).
1.1. Application: Stroke
Some of the earliest applications of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in humans were to diagnose cerebral infarction . It was found that ADC values dropped quickly after infarction, with a nadir reached at about 24 hours, and that infarcts could be diagnosed earlier on the DWI sequence than on T2-weighted images. Diffusion imaging rapidly became the new standard of imaging care in stroke and was soon augmented by perfusion-based imaging strategies .
The mechanism of why stroke shows restricted diffusion of water is still unclear, but is thought to be due to ischemia causing failure of the ionic pumps which usually maintain ion gradients across the cell membrane; water then diffuses into the cells, which become swollen. This net shift of water from the extracellular environment, where it can diffuse relatively freely, to the intracellular environment, where diffusion is relatively restricted, is thought to be the mechanism for restricted diffusion. It also explains the transient nature of the ADC abnormality, as the cytotoxic cells eventually lyse; this rupture and destruction of organized matrix again lets water molecules diffuse freely. ADC typically returns to normal as the infarct evolves to encephalomalacia .
When evaluating for acute ischemic stroke, one first interprets the trace DWI sequence, looking for signal hyperintensity. A limitation of the DWI sequence is that it is sensitive, but not specific for the detection of restricted diffusion. If there is signal hyperintensity present on a routine T2-weighted images, such as from cytotoxic edema, this signal hyperintensity may be present on the DWI sequence, an effect referred to as “T2 shine-through”. To determine if the signal hyperintensity seen on the DWI sequence truly represents decreased diffusion, an ADC sequence is reviewed. The ADC sequence is not as sensitive as the DWI sequence for restricted diffusion, but is more specific, as the ADC images are not susceptible to the “T2 shine-through” effect. Ischemic brain parenchyma will show a low ADC value and associated edema will not. Therefore, an acute stroke will have signal hyperintensity on the DWI sequence and low signal intensity on ADC sequence (Figure 1).
1.2. Application: Diffusion Imaging in Abscess and Tumors
As diffusion-weighted imaging provides information about the mobility of water molecules in, for example, brain parenchyma, tumors, pus, and cysts (Figure 2), it can be classified as a type of molecular imaging . Ebisu et al.  first reported high signal intensity of abscess pus on the DWI sequence with a corresponding low ADC value consistent with restricted diffusion (Figure 3).
Given that cell death seems to induce restricted diffusion in stroke, there has been much interest in utilizing this principle for imaging cancer, where cell death of the malignancy is the desired therapeutic outcome. Several authors [9, 10] have described that tumor cellularity is a major determinate of ADC values in brain tumors. Solid tumors are generally more water-rich than normal brain and are thus brighter on T2-weighted images and have a higher ADC. Surrounding edema, unfortunately shares these same attributes, making the DWI sequence less valuable in the distinction of tumor borders.
While diffusion-weighted imaging shows restricted diffusion in certain tumor types, such as epidermoid, lymphoma (Figure 4), and primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) (Figure 5), the sequence has had limited success in grading brain tumors, and in distinguishing between histological subtypes. Guo et al.  reported a lower mean ADC value as a relative aid in differentiating primary cerebral lymphoma from high-grade astrocytoma. Rumboldt et al.  used ADC maps to differentiate types of childhood tumors. They found that ADC values were significantly higher in pilocytic astrocytomas than in ependymomas and medulloblastomas.
Diffusion imaging has been described in the evaluation of cystic tumors; these tumors tend to show low signal on the DWI sequence and high signal on the ADC sequence [12–15]. However, this description may be confusing, as ring enhancing metastasis of adenocarcinoma have been reported with high signal on the DWI sequence and low signal on the ADC sequence, mimicking restricted diffusion of an abscess [16, 17]. Restricted diffusion has been described in squamous cell carcinoma metastasis, radiation necrosis , and glioblastomas . Several studies demonstrate that the ADC sequence can help differentiate primary cerebral lymphoma (PCL) from high-grade gliomas [9, 10, 20–22], and brain metastasis  from PCL; however, other studies have reported overlap between these tumor types [23, 24]. The diffusion sequences should, therefore, be interpreting with caution, and in the context of reviewing the entire MR study and clinical history.
2. Diffusion Tensor Imaging and White Matter Tracking
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) represents a further development of diffusion-weighted imaging , investigating more than just the diffusion coefficient. DTI measures both the direction and magnitude of proton movement within the voxel for multiple dimensions of movement, using a mathematical construct, the diffusion tensor, to represent this information. Water in cerebrospinal fluid in a ventricle is essentially free to diffuse unimpeded in all directions and would be represented as a sphere. Water molecules along the axons of white matter tracts are in a highly structured environment and thus the diffusion becomes highly directional along the length of the tract . Displaying this type of structured diffusion would be represented by an ellipsoid, or even multiple ellipsoids, if more than one white matter tract were interdigitating.
Multiple ways have been devised to display these complex datasets. One of the simpler methods is the Fractional Anisotropy (FA) map, which is simply a measure of how distorted the diffusion spheroid has become at the point of measurement. A scalar value between 0 and 1 describes the degree of anisotropy or restricted movement. A value closer to 0 is assigned if the voxel is spherical, and a value near 1, if the voxel is an ellipsoid tending to a line. In other words, the value of 0 means that diffusion is isotropic, that is, it is unrestricted or free to move in all directions. A value of 1 means that diffusion occurs along a single axis, that is, not free to move in other directions. Therefore, white matter, which has diffusion ellipsoids oriented along the course of fiber tracts, has a high FA value, whereas cerebrospinal fluid has low FA values, indicative isotropic diffusion .
FA has been used in the study of brain neoplasms [24, 27]. However, in contrast to ADC, the relationship between FA and cellularity has not been substantiated . Toh et al.  reported significantly decreased FA values in highly cellular PCL compared with glioblastomas, while Kinoshita et al.  demonstrated high FA values in the PCLs in their series. Further study is needed in this area.
More sophisticated measures involve the use of color coding to communicate and display information about the direction of white matter tracts. Typically, one color will encode the front-to-back direction, and other will encode colors the two other cardinal directions (Figure 6). The colorful maps thus generated are very useful for portraying the complexities of white matter anatomy more faithfully than possible with FA maps alone. Given that diffusion anisotropy and white matter structure are tightly linked, it makes sense that white matter tracts could be mapped with this information .
Having knowledge of the dominant vectors (eigenvectors) of diffusion for a particular voxel allows one to use these as input values for probabilistic algorithms. Such an algorithm, given a seedpoint in a cerebral diffusion map, will be able to propagate itself through the space in a manner that might closely approximate the true anatomy of white matter tracts. Such methods are useful, and frequently combined with functional MR images to provide surgical guidance during surgeries near eloquent brain. These imaging methods have proven a very useful adjunct to intraoperative surgical stimulation. However, these methods have significant shortcomings when complex tracts cross through each other, and more sophisticated methods of navigating using these principles are under development [30, 31].
2.1. Application: Surgical Planning
The goal of brain tumor resection is to remove the maximal amount of tumor while preserving vital portions of brain. Diffusion tensor imaging allows mapping of white matter tracts and their relation to tumors can be demonstrated preoperatively. This can assist the neurosurgeon in planning the most appropriate approach to the tumor, maximizing the amount of tumor resected, and avoid vital structures, such as the corticospinal tract. The white matter tracts in the involved hemisphere can then be compared to the contralateral side, to determine the degree of displacement (Figure 6). Several sites in the United States have an MRI unit in the operative suite; this allows intraoperative imaging, including DTI. A recent report by Nimsky et al. describes the success of this technique in localization of shifting white matter tracts during neurosurgical procedures .
3. ADC Histogram Analysis
The technique of calculating the ADC coefficient for a given volume on a voxel by voxel basis for histogram analysis has been described by several authors [33–35]. Important differences exist between ADC analyses of these authors. Pope et al. [33, 34] used ADC values from regions of interest corresponding to the enhancing portion of the tumor only; they excluded regions of nonenhancing T2-weighted signal hyperintensity, which represent edema and/or infiltrative tumor [33, 34]; Murkami et al.  included these regions of T2 signal hyperintensity in their analysis.
3.2. Application: Predicting Glioblastoma Response to Bevacizumab (Avastin) Treatment and Progression-Free Survival in Bevacizumab-Treated Glioblastoma
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors are highly expressed in glioblastomas , an aggressive cerebral neoplasm. VEGF is a potential mediator of cerebrovascular permeability, hypothesized to promote new blood vessel formation as well as transformation into a more aggressive phenotype [37, 38].
Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets VEGF and prevents it binding to its tyrosine kinase receptors. Inhibiting the VEGF pathway improves survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) [39, 40]. However, the response is variable and there is no way to predict how patients will respond. Variable expression of VEGF could be related to the mixed response to bevacizumab. In regions of high cell density surrounding the necrotic areas, VEGF is upregulated . Diminished enhancement and edema, apparently related to inhibition of vessel permeability by VEGF, result from treatment with bevacizumab .
Necrosis caused by therapy or tumor growth degrades cellular integrity and is thought to increase the ADC of tissue [42, 43]. This is in contradistinction to areas of high cell density, where the ADC is low, since water molecules are more restricted in their movement within cells compared to the extracellular space [44, 45]. The ADC has been used to assess brain tumor response to therapy [45, 46] and to predict survival in patients with newly diagnosed GBM [35, 47, 48].
Pope et al.  hypothesized that bevacizumab treatment is more effective in a necrotic tumor. Utilizing the aforementioned technique, they calculated the ADC on a voxel by voxel basis for over the enhancing portion of the tumor mass and generated a histogram curve. Two peaks were present in the histogram curve analysis, and mean values were calculated for the lower (ADCL) and upper peaks (ADCH), and average ADC (Figure 7). Tumors were separated by using a cut-off for mean ADCL of 1200 10−6 mm2/sec. Tumors with ADCL less than 1200 10−6 mm2/sec were referred to as “low ADC tumors”, whereas tumors with mean ADCL value greater or equal to 1201 10−6 mm2/sec were referred to as “high ADC tumors”. The low ADC component is thought to represent tumors with tightly packed cells and minimal edema. This is in contradistinction to the high ADC component which may represent viable and necrotic tumor cells and associated edema.
Pope et al.  found that bevacizumab extends progression-free survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma by a greater degree, if a high ADCL is present in the enhancing portion of the tumor. The authors speculate that the higher ADCL component might be related to intratumoral necrosis, as patients with a higher necrotic component seemed to benefit most from bevacizumab.
In a second study, Pope et al.  found for patients treated initially with bevacizumab, a lower ADCL was associated with longer progression-free survival compared to high ADCL. More research is clearly required, but there are tantalizing indications that diffusion MR might be helpful in stratifying patients into clinical risk groups and predicting the outcomes of therapies. Further indications are that patients with significantly low ADC components on their histograms may be overexpressors of O 6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT), a DNA repair mechanism that imparts sensitivity to temozolomide, a standard therapeutic in brain tumor therapy .
This article presents an overview of the current state of diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain in patients with cancer. In acute stroke, DWI demonstrates decreased diffusion in a vascular territory affected by ischemia. Similarly, decreased diffusion is present in the center of pyogenic abscesses and aids in the MR diagnosis of a ring-enhancing cerebral mass. In addition, tumors such as lymphoma and PNET also demonstrate decreasing diffusion, adding valuable information to the radiologist when formulating a differential diagnosis of a cerebral mass lesion. There are also growing applications in differentiating tumors such as glioblastoma, primary cerebral lymphoma, and metastasis. Diffusion tensor imaging helps the neurosurgeon in planning the surgical approach to a cerebral neoplasm by demonstrating the location of white matter fiber tracts in relation to the tumor; intraoperatively fiber tract displacement can be assessed. Of great interest is the use of histogram analysis in patients with glioblastoma to stratify patients into clinical risk groups and to predict the outcomes of therapies. We anticipate that as research continues, both diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor MR imaging will have an impact on both diagnosis as well as treatment of this patient with cerebral neoplasms.
Conflict of Interests
The authors have no disclosures of possible conflict of interests or commercial involvement.
- R. Brown, “A brief account of microscopical observations made in the months of June, July and August, 1827, on the particles contained in the pollen of plants; and on the general existence of active molecules in organic and inorganic bodies,” Philosophical Magazine, vol. 4, pp. 161–173, 1828.
- A. Einstein, “Theoretical remarks on brownian motion,” Zeitschrift für Elektrochemie und Angewandte Physikalische Chemie, vol. 13, pp. 41–42, 1907.
- T. Li, S. Kheifets, D. Medellin, and M. G. Raizen, “Measurement of the instantaneous velocity of a brownian particle,” Science, vol. 328, no. 5986, pp. 1673–1675, 2010.
- S. Warach, D. Chien, W. Li, M. Ronthal, and R. R. Edelman, “Fast magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of acute human stroke,” Neurology, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1717–1723, 1992.
- A. G. Sorensen, F. S. Buonanno, R. G. Gonzalez et al., “Hyperacute stroke: evaluation with combined multisection diffusion-weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 199, no. 2, pp. 391–401, 1996.
- G. Schlaug, B. Siewert, A. Benfield, R. R. Edelman, and S. Warach, “Time course of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) abnormality in human stroke,” Neurology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 113–119, 1997.
- W. Reiche, V. Schuchardt, T. Hagen, K. A. Il'yasov, P. Billmann, and J. Weber, “Differential diagnosis of intracranial ring enhancing cystic mass lesions-Role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI),” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 218–225, 2010.
- T. Ebisu, C. Tanaka, M. Umeda et al., “Discrimination of brain abscess from necrotic or cystic tumors by diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1113–1116, 1996.
- A. C. Guo, T. J. Cummings, R. C. Dash, and J. M. Provenzale, “Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics,” Radiology, vol. 224, no. 1, pp. 177–183, 2002.
- F. Yamasaki, K. Kurisu, K. Satoh et al., “Apparent diffusion coefficient of human brain tumors at MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 235, no. 3, pp. 985–991, 2005.
- Z. Rumboldt, D. L. A. Camacho, D. Lake, C. T. Welsh, and M. Castillo, “Apparent diffusion coefficients for differentiation of cerebellar tumors in children,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1362–1369, 2006.
- R. D. Tien, G. J. Felsberg, H. Friedman, M. Brown, and J. MacFall, “MR imaging of high-grade cerebral gliomas: value of diffusion-weighted echoplanar pulse sequences,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 671–677, 1994.
- Y. J. Kim, K. H. Chang, I. C. Song et al., “Brain abscess and necrotic or cystic brain tumor: discrimination with signal intensity on diffusion-weighted MR imaging,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 171, no. 6, pp. 1487–1490, 1998.
- B. Desprechins, T. Stadnik, G. Koerts, W. Shabana, C. Breucq, and M. Osteaux, “Use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differential diagnosis between intracerebral necrotic tumors and cerebral abscesses,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1252–1257, 1999.
- K. Noguchi, N. Watanabe, T. Nagayoshi et al., “Role of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MRI in distinguishing between brain abscess and tumour: a preliminary report,” Neuroradiology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 171–174, 1999.
- S. Holtås, B. Geijer, L. G. Strömblad, P. Maly-Sundgren, and I. M. Burtscher, “A ring-enhancing metastasis with central high signal on diffusion-weighted imaging and low apparent diffusion coefficients,” Neuroradiology, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 824–827, 2000.
- M. Hartmann, O. Jansen, S. Heiland, C. Sommer, K. Münkel, and K. Sartor, “Restricted diffusion within ring enhancement is not pathognomonic for brain abscess,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1738–1742, 2001.
- G. A. Tung, P. Evangelista, J. M. Rogg, and J. A. Duncan, “Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of rim-enhancing brain masses: is markedly decreased water diffusion specific for brain abscess?” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 709–712, 2001.
- J. S. Reddy, A. M. Mishra, S. Behari et al., “The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of intracranial cystic mass lesions: a report of 147 lesions,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 246–250, 2006.
- R. N. Al-Okaili, J. Krejza, J. H. Woo et al., “Intraaxial brain masses: MR imaging-based diagnostic strategy—initial experience,” Radiology, vol. 243, no. 2, pp. 539–550, 2007.
- S. Wang, S. Kim, S. Chawla et al., “Differentiation between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases using diffusion tensor imaging,” NeuroImage, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 653–660, 2009.
- C. H. Toh, M. Castillo, A. M. C. Wong et al., “Primary cerebral lymphoma and glioblastoma multiforme: differences in diffusion characteristics evaluated with diffusion tensor imaging,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 471–475, 2008.
- A. Batra and R. P. Tripathi, “Atypical diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance findings in glioblastoma multiforme,” Australasian Radiology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 388–391, 2004.
- C. H. Toh, Y. L. Chen, T. C. Hsieh, S. M. Jung, H. F. Wong, and S. H. Ng, “Glioblastoma multiforme with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging characteristics mimicking primary brain lymphoma: case report,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 132–135, 2006.
- D. Le Bihan, “Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 469–480, 2003.
- M. E. Moseley, Y. Cohen, J. Kucharczyk et al., “Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion in cat central nervous system,” Radiology, vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 439–445, 1990.
- T. Beppu, T. Inoue, Y. Shibata et al., “Measurement of fractional anisotropy using diffusion tensor MRI in supratentorial astrocytic tumors,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 109–116, 2003.
- M. Kinoshita, N. Hashimoto, T. Goto et al., “Fractional anisotropy and tumor cell density of the tumor core show positive correlation in diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of malignant brain tumors,” NeuroImage, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2008.
- C. F. Westin, S. E. Maier, H. Mamata, A. Nabavi, F. A. Jolesz, and R. Kikinis, “Processing and visualization for diffusion tensor MRI,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 93–108, 2002.
- E. Ozarslan, T. M. Shepherd, B. C. Vemuri, S. J. Blackband, and T. H. Mareci, “Fast orientation mapping from HARDI,” Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 156–163, 2005.
- I. Aganj, C. Lenglet, G. Sapiro, E. Yacoub, K. Ugurbil, and N. Harel, “Multiple Q-shell ODF reconstruction in Q-ball imaging,” Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 423–431, 2009.
- C. Nimsky, O. Ganslandt, P. Hastreiter et al., “Intraoperative diffusion-tensor MR imaging: shifting of white matter tracts during neurosurgical procedures—initial experience,” Radiology, vol. 234, no. 1, pp. 218–225, 2005.
- W. B. Pope, H. J. Kim, J. Huo et al., “Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: ADC histogram analysis predicts response to bevacizumab treatment,” Radiology, vol. 252, no. 1, pp. 182–189, 2009.
- W. B. Pope, A. Lai, R. Mehta et al., “Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis stratifies progression-free survival in newly diagnosed bevacizumab-treated glioblastoma,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 882–889, 2011.
- R. Murakami, T. Sugahara, H. Nakamura et al., “Malignant supratentorial astrocytoma treated with postoperative radiation therapy: prognostic value of pretreatment quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 243, no. 2, pp. 493–499, 2007.
- H. Huang, J. Held-Feindt, R. Buhl, H. M. Mehdorn, and R. Mentlein, “Expression of VEGF and its receptors in different brain tumors,” Neurological Research, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 371–377, 2005.
- I. Fischer, J. P. Gagner, M. Law, E. W. Newcomb, and D. Zagzag, “Angiogenesis in gliomas: biology and molecular pathophysiology,” Brain Pathology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 297–310, 2005.
- D. J. Hicklin and L. M. Ellis, “Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1011–1027, 2005.
- T. N. Kreisl, L. Kim, K. Moore et al., “Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 740–745, 2009.
- H. S. Friedman, M. D. Prados, P. Y. Wen et al., “Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 28, pp. 4733–4740, 2009.
- D. J. Brat and E. G. Van Meir, “Vaso-occlusive and prothrombotic mechanisms associated with tumor hypoxia, necrosis, and accelerated growth in glioblastoma,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 397–405, 2004.
- W. B. Pope, A. Lai, P. Nghiemphu, P. Mischel, and T. F. Cloughesy, “MRI in patients with high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab and chemotherapy,” Neurology, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 1258–1260, 2006.
- Y. Mardor, Y. Roth, A. Ocherashvilli et al., “Pretreatment prediction of brain tumors' response to radiation therapy using high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI,” Neoplasia, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 136–142, 2004.
- T. Sugahara, Y. Korogi, M. Kochi et al., “Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 1999.
- J. Chen, J. Xia, Y. C. Zhou et al., “Correlation between magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging and cell density in astrocytoma,” Zhonghua Zhong Liu za Zhi, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 309–311, 2005.
- N. Tomura, K. Narita, J. I. Izumi et al., “Diffusion changes in a tumor and peritumoral tissue after stereotactic irradiation for brain tumors: possible prediction of treatment response,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 496–500, 2006.
- A. M. Babsky, S. K. Hekmatyar, H. Zhang, J. L. Solomon, and N. Bansal, “Predicting and monitoring response to chemotherapy by 1,3-bis(2- chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea in subcutaneously implanted 9L glioma using the apparent diffusion coefficient of water and 23Na MRI,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 132–139, 2006.
- J. Oh, R. G. Henry, A. Pirzkall et al., “Survival analysis in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: predictive value of choline-to-N-acetylaspartate index, apparent diffusion coefficient, and relative cerebral blood volume,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 546–554, 2004.