Phenotypic and Genotypic Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of <i>Campylobacter jejuni</i> Isolated from Cattle, Sheep, and Free-Range Poultry Faeces

Oporto, Beatriz; Juste, Ramón A.; Hurtado, Ana

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/456573

International Journal of Microbiology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2009 | Article ID 456573 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/456573

Phenotypic and Genotypic Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Campylobacter jejuni Isolated from Cattle, Sheep, and Free-Range Poultry Faeces

Beatriz Oporto,¹Ramón A. Juste,¹and Ana Hurtado¹

Academic Editor: Todd R. Callaway

Received20 Aug 2009

Accepted03 Dec 2009

Published08 Mar 2010

Abstract

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of 13 antimicrobial agents were determined by broth microdilution for 72 Campylobacter jejuni strains from livestock. Twenty-three (31.9%) isolates were fully susceptible; all isolates were susceptible to erythromycin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole, and meropenem, and all but one to kanamycin. Resistance to quinolones was highest (52.8%), reaching similar values among poultry, dairy cattle, and sheep, but lower in beef cattle. Resistance to tetracyclines (48.6%) was mainly associated to dairy cattle and -lactams (26.4%) to poultry. Multidrug resistance was mainly detected in dairy cattle (28.6%) and poultry (21.0%), whereas beef cattle had the highest percentage of fully susceptible isolates. Two real-time PCR assays to detect point mutations associated to quinolone (C257T in the gyrA gene) and macrolide (A2075G in the 23S rRNA genes) resistance were developed and validated on these strains. The analysis of a further set of 88 isolates by real-time PCR confirmed the absence of macrolide resistance and demonstrated the reproducibility and processability of the assay.

1. Introduction

Campylobacters are asymptomatically present in the intestinal tract of a wide range of mammals and birds, including domestic farm animals, which constitute potential sources for human infection via contamination of food and water. The incidence of Campylobacter jejuni has increased during the last decade, and today it is the leading cause of bacterial enteritis in most developed countries [1, 2]. Although the majority of Campylobacter infections are self-limiting, complicated cases may warrant antimicrobial therapy. Antimicrobial susceptibility data show an increase in the number of fluoroquinolone-resistant and, to a lesser extent, macrolide-resistant Campylobacter strains causing human infections. Resistance problems in human medicine are mainly linked to human misuse of antimicrobial agents, but there is accumulating evidence that antimicrobial resistance originating from the use of antimicrobials in food animals might complicate therapy of human infections [3, 4]. Antimicrobials used therapeutically or prophylactically in animal husbandry can also exert selective pressure on bacteria that infect food animals and reach humans via food products [5]. Local and international committees have highlighted the need for better control of antibiotics usage in human medicine and veterinary husbandry [2]. In this sense, systematic monitoring of the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in C. jejuni originating from animals can serve as an indicator of the selective pressure these bacteria are undergoing and help in early detection of resistance development.

A prevalence study recently carried out in the Basque Country (Northern Spain) identified 28.3% (34/120) of ovine and 18.0% (37/206) of bovine farms positive for C. jejuni [6], and even higher values (38.2%, 13/34) in free-range poultry farms [7]. The high incidence of human Campylobacter infections in the Basque Country (114 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2006) and the relatively high prevalence in primary production units of this foodborne pathogen prompted us to determine the antimicrobial resistance profiles of a selection of C. jejuni isolated from animal faeces in the Basque Country over two years [6, 7].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Selection of Isolates

C. jejuni isolates were selected from a prevalence study of thermophilic campylobacters in livestock carried out in the Basque Country (Northern Spain) between October 2003 and May 2005 [6, 7]. To avoid bias, isolates were selected on the basis of isolation source (host, farm, and flock). Hence, the 72 isolates analysed by broth microdilution included 19 isolates from 12 poultry farms (18 flocks), 25 from dairy sheep (21 farms), and 28 isolates from cattle (14 beef cattle and 11 dairy cattle farms). When isolates were related epidemiologically, that is, originating from the same flock/herd, previous flaA PCR-RFLP and PFGE typing data [6, 7] were considered to select genetically unrelated strains. Thus, the 72 isolates could be discriminated into 50 PFGE and 28 flaA PCR-RFLP types. With the exception of isolates from beef cattle, some of the additional 88 isolates analysed by real-time PCR were in some manner related to the initial set of 72 isolates (isolated from animals in the same herd/flock) and therefore not used to estimate prevalence rates of resistance.

C. jejuni strains from the CAMPYNET collection (strain CNET-015 susceptible to both macrolides and quinolones; strain CNET-077 resistant to quinolones) and Campylobacter coli strain 0402587 (resistant to macrolides) were used as controls for SNP detection by real-time PCR.

2.2. Broth Microdilution Test

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined for 72 strains isolated from poultry (19), dairy sheep (25), and cattle (28) by broth microdilution using a custom-designed Susceptibility Plate (Sensititre, Trek Diagnostic Systems) containing serial two-fold dilutions of 13 antimicrobial agents (Table 1). C. jejuni inocula for MIC were prepared from overnight growth on Columbia agar incubated in microaerobic atmosphere (10% CO₂, 5% O₂, 85% N₂) at °C by suspension in 5 mL of Sensititre Standardization Broth (turbidity equivalent to 0.5 McFarland standard). One hundred microlitres of the suspension were transferred into 11 mL of cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood, and 100 were then used to inoculate the 96-well panel to give a final concentration of 10⁵ cfu/mL. After microaerobic incubation for 24 hours at °C, growth in each well was compared with that of the positive control (well with no antimicrobial drug) and MICs recorded as the lowest concentration of the antimicrobial that completely inhibited growth, except for sulfamethoxazole, for which MICs were set to the lowest concentration that inhibited 80% of growth. Results were interpreted using epidemiological cut-off values based on the distribution of MICs of wild type susceptible populations as developed by the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST, http://www.eucast.org), except for kanamycin, meropenem, and sulfamethoxazole, where CLSI breakpoints between susceptible and intermediate for Enterobacteriaceae strains were used [8] as indicated in Table 1.

2.3. SNP Discrimination by Real-Time PCR

Two TaqMan real-time PCR assays were developed to detect point mutations associated to quinolone (C257T in the gyrA gene, Thr-86-Ile) and macrolide (A2075G mutation in the 23S rRNA genes) resistance. Different Minor Grove Binding (MGB) and Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) probes were tested, and those combinations providing the best mismatch discrimination (based on net fluorescent difference between maximal and minimal fluorescent signals and the beginning of the exponential growth phase of the reaction) were selected. Ten reactions included 900 nM of each primer, 100–200 nM of probe (Table 2), 1 TaqMan Universal Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and Ampli-Taq Gold DNA polymerase, and 5 ng of template DNA. PCR reactions were run on an ABI Prism 7500 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) using the following program: 10 minutes at 95°C, and 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, and 1 minute at 60°C. SNP discrimination by real-time PCR was initially performed on the 72 isolates analysed phenotypically and then used to genotypically characterise a further set of 88 isolates, adding up to a total of 160 isolates distributed as follows: 36 poultry isolates from 13 farms (21 flocks), 44 ovine isolates from 35 farms, and 80 cattle isolates from 38 farms.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Comparison of frequencies of resistance/susceptibility among host species was carried out using Fisher exact test, and quantitative MIC values were transformed into a base 2 logarithm to reduce variability and to have a two-fold scale for the final units, and then submitted to analysis of variance and comparison of least square means in a factorial design for antibiotic and host species using the GLM procedure on the SAS statistical package version 8.0 (SAS Institute, USA). P-values less than .05 were considered significant.

3. Results

Distribution of MICs for the 72 C. jejuni strains analysed by broth microdilution are shown in Table 1. Twenty-three (31.9%) isolates were susceptible to all the 13 antimicrobial agents. In addition, all isolates were susceptible to erythromycin (MICs not higher than 0.5 mg/L), chloramphenicol, streptomycin, gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole, and meropenem, and most of them (83.3%) had MIC values of 2–4 mg/L for kanamycin, with only one isolate from dairy cattle resistant. Resistance to quinolones and tetracyclines was the most common trait. Hence, 38 isolates (52.8%) were resistant to both ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid, while the remaining 34 (47.2%) were susceptible to both (MIC 0.25 and 8, respectively). Resistance to tetracycline was observed for 35 (48.6%) isolates, with MIC 16 mg/L for 30 of them. All but one of the isolates resistant to tetracycline were also resistant to doxycycline, the one exception being an ovine isolate with an MIC value of 8 for tetracycline and 0.5 for doxycycline. Nineteen (26.4%) isolates were resistant to ampicillin and amoxicillin. Multidrug resistance defined as resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobial agents, was present in 10 C. jejuni isolates (Table 3), mainly associated to dairy cattle (28.6%), closely followed by poultry (21.0%). Another 23 isolates were resistant to two classes of antibiotics, most of them to quinolones and tetracyclines.

It was interesting to note that the overall resistance prevalence found for isolates from beef cattle was lower compared to sheep, dairy cattle, and poultry. Hence, beef cattle were the host species with the highest percentage of isolates sensitive to all 13 tested antimicrobial agents (50.0%), whereas sheep had the lowest (24.0%) (Table 3). The number of isolates tested phenotypically was too small to provide any statistical resolution when comparing the frequencies of resistance/susceptibility among host species. However, comparison of MIC values showed a different distribution for isolates from different host species (Figure 1). Analysis of variance and comparison of log-transformed mean MIC values detected significantly lower values for quinolones among C. jejuni from beef cattle compared to all other three host species () which did not differ among themselves (Figure 1(a)). Similarly, values for tetracyclines and -lactams also differed between species (Figures 1(b) and 1(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 1

Box Plots representing log₂-transformed MIC values distribution among host species for (a) Quinolones, (b) Tetracyclines, (c) -lactams. To standardise MIC values for all antimicrobials, MICs were divided by the lowest value tested for each antimicrobial before log transformation. The boundary of the box closest to zero indicates the 25th percentile; the continuous line within the box marks the median; a dashed line marks the mean and the boundary of the box farthest from zero indicates the 75th percentile. Error bars above and below the box indicate the 90th and 10th percentiles. Outlying points are represented as closed dots. Significant differences () are indicated with their corresponding P values.

Since fluoroquinolones and macrolides are the drugs of choice for the treatment of Campylobacter infections, two real-time PCR assays were developed to rapidly determine the distribution of genetic determinants associated to resistance to these antimicrobials: point mutations in the gyrA gene encoding the GyrA subunit of the DNA gyrase associated to quinolone resistance (C257T in the gyrA gene, Thr-86-Ile) and in the domain V of the 23S rRNA gene (A2075G mutation) that mediates resistance to macrolides. SNP discrimination by real-time PCR was initially performed on the 72 C. jejuni strains phenotypically analysed by broth microdilution. When compared with phenotypic results, real-time PCR detected the gyrA gene nucleotide point mutation in all the strains identified as resistant to ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid by broth microdilution, but none of the susceptible ones. Also in fully agreement with the phenotypic antimicrobial sensitivity test, none of the strains had the A2075G mutation in the 23S rRNA genes that confers resistance to macrolides, as shown by real-time PCR. Once established the 100% concordance between broth microdilution and real-time PCR, a further set of 88 isolates was then genotypically analysed by real-time PCR. Again, all of them were susceptible to macrolides but resistance to quinolones was observed. Overall, 89 of 160 isolates had the quinolone-resistant mutation in the gyrA gene, with a similar distribution among different host to that observed by broth microdilution. Comparison of frequencies of resistance/susceptibility to quinolones as determined by real-time PCR among different hosts showed significantly lower resistance rates in beef cattle than in the other species ().

4. Discussion

The use of different antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods, antimicrobial panels, and breakpoints hampers comparison of antimicrobial resistance distribution data between studies. Agar dilution is the method most often recommended for Campylobacter spp. (CLSI), but it is labour-intensive and difficult to perform in routine laboratories. Broth microdilution is a fast and easy-to-perform method that yields reproducible MIC results for C. jejuni [9, 10], it is commercially available, and the standardised method was approved by CLSI in 2006 [11]. Antimicrobials and dilution ranges used in the study herein included those defined by the EU as a minimum requirement (tetracycline, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and streptomycin) and the additional recommendations (ampicillin, amoxicillin and nalidixic acid) [12], along with others commonly used in clinical practice or in animal productions as such or their derivatives (Table 1). Since the purpose of this study was to monitor for antimicrobial resistance surveillance and detect the development of microbiological resistance, MIC epidemiological cut-off values rather than clinical breakpoints were used, which in some cases resulted in a higher proportion of isolates categorized as resistant. When compared with the 2006 European Community report on trends and sources of zoonotic agents and antimicrobial resistance [2] using the same cut-offs, our results showed a high proportion of poultry strains resistant to ciprofloxacine, above the estimates reported by most countries. Resistance to tetracycline was within the ranges estimated for several Member States. These, along with the absence of erythromycin, streptomycin. and gentamicin resistance represent a situation similar to that reported by the Netherlands or Germany, but significantly different to Spain, that reported much higher resistance levels to all these antimicrobials. Also in broilers, in a survey carried out from 1997 to 1998 in slaughterhouses in a nearby region in Spain (La Rioja) using agar disk diffusion [13], approximately 99% of C. jejuni isolates were fluoroquinolone resistant; resistance to gentamicin was also higher than in the present study, but comparable for tetracycline and ampicillin. The poultry strains analysed in the study herein had been isolated from free-range chicken farms [7] where antibiotics are rarely used and entirely confined to therapeutic treatment of diseased animals, whereas in the abovementioned studies strains originated from broilers. Although the results of studies comparing the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Campylobacter recovered from poultry raised in different production systems (conventionally reared versus free-range chickens) are somewhat inconclusive, it does appear that fluoroquinolone resistance is more frequently reported in isolates from conventionally reared poultry [14]. However, recent studies suggest that fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter, once evolved, may continue to persist in chicken flocks regardless of the use of fluoroquinolones. Luo et al. [15] examined the effect of a resistance-conferring C257T mutation in the gyrA gene on the fitness of fluoroquinolone-resistant C. jejuni in chicken. Their results demonstrated enhanced in vivo fitness of fluoroquinolone-resistant C. jejuni in chicken in the absence of antibiotic selection pressure, suggesting that fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates may be able to persist in the chicken reservoirs even without the usage of fluoroquinolone antimicrobials. Epidemiological studies also showed the persistence of fluoroquinolone-resistant C. jejuni in chicken flocks after ceasing on-farm fluoroquinolone use [16]. In this study, all the fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates had the C257T mutation in the gyrA gene.

In dairy cattle, resistance was higher to tetracyclines followed by fluoroquinolones, a similar pattern to that found by Englen et al. [17] in US dairy cattle despite differences in the method and breakpoints used. Contrary to our results, the same authors [18] had reported similar levels of tetracycline resistance in feedlot cattle. In Europe, resistance is highly variable from country to country [19, 20], with either tetracyclines or quinolones as the antimicrobials towards resistance are higher among C. jejuni isolated from beef cattle. Macrolide resistance, absent in this study, was reported albeit at low levels in USA and Europe [17–19]. Despite the high prevalence of C. jejuni in sheep, few investigations on antimicrobial resistance have been conducted in ovine isolates and comparable data is scarcely available. Zweifel et al. [21] found very low rates of resistance in Swiss ovine campylobacters using disk diffusion and the NCCLS standards. In the present study, along with quinolones, resistance was also high to tetracyclines. Interestingly, a recent study reported the emergence of a tetracycline-resistant C. jejuni clone associated with outbreaks of ovine abortion in the USA [22]. In our region, Campylobacter infection is not among the main causes of ovine abortion [23].

The developed gyrA and 23S rRNA genes SNP detection assays by real-time PCR were able to detect the correct genotype in all cases providing a rapid and reproducible screening method for quinolone and macrolide resistance detection, which allowed the analysis of a larger set of strains. Other molecular methods commonly used to detect the point mutation at the 86-codon of the gyrA gene are mismatch amplification mutation assay PCR (MAMA-PCR) [24], single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis [25], the latter having the advantage of detecting mutations at neighbouring positions, but both difficult to standardize or automate. Real-time PCR has also been used, either using TaqMan probes [26] or by means of melting peak analysis [27], also used to detect the A2075G mutation in the 23S rRNA genes associated to macrolide resistance in Campylobacter spp. [28]. The real-time PCR designs presented herein for gyrA and 23S rRNA genes SNP detection take advantage of probe modifications that provide increased thermal stability allowing shorter probes to be used, and therefore, conferring increased sequence-specificity compared to ordinary DNA probes, that is, TaqMan probes conjugated with MGB ligands at the end and probes with LNA nucleotides at different positions. This characteristic allowed us to design probes that avoid the polymorphic site described by Wilson el al. [26] in the third position of their gyrA probe, thus obtaining better allelic discrimination. Also important are other possible mutations within the sequences recognised by the probes described for both the gyrA gene (A256G, associated to nalidixic acid resistance, but not ciprofloxacin resistance) and the 23S rRNA gene (A2058C, associated to higher erythromycin MICs) of a few C. jejuni isolates [29, 30]. These mutations would most likely produce a negative or inconclusive result by real-time PCR and would require sequencing analysis. Nevertheless, this was never the case in the study herein, where cross-resistance between nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin was found in all isolates, in agreement to other studies in Spain [13, 31], and erythromycin MICs were low. Here, real-time PCR detected the correct genotype in all cases providing a rapid and reproducible screening method for quinolone and macrolide resistance detection, which allowed the analysis of a larger set of strains. Thus, whereas the number of isolates tested phenotypically was too small to provide any statistical resolution, significantly lower quinolone resistance rates in beef cattle than in the other species could be observed when analysing results obtained by real-time PCR.

Resistance to fluoroquinolones has increased over the past years in many parts of the world [1–3]. In Spain, fluoroquinolone-resistant C. jejuni isolated from humans were first reported in 1988 [32] and resistance prevalence has increased since then to high levels [13, 31, 33]. The activity of erythromycin against C. jejuni human isolates, the antibiotic of choice for the treatment of diarrhea caused by Campylobacter strains (especially in infants), seems to remain stable at rates below 5% [13, 31]. This stable macrolide activity is in agreement with the absence of resistance among animal isolates observed in this study. This susceptibility is reassuring but active and more extensive antimicrobial surveillance in campylobacters from animals is needed to allow future informed decisions about how macrolide antibiotics could be used in food animals while still safeguarding human health. The real-time SNP discrimination protocols presented herein provide the processability required for such purposes. The analysis of large number of isolates, performed in combination with MIC determination on a smaller selection, should help in early detection of resistance development.

Conflict of Interest Statement

None of the authors have any conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. van der Wal (Central Veterinary Institute Wageningen UR, The Netherlands) for kindly providing the CNET strains. This work was funded by the Basque Government (Department of Agriculture and Fisheries), the Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria INIA (RTA2006-00105-00-00), and FEDER.

References

B. M. Allos, “Campylobacter jejuni infections: update on emerging issues and trends,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1201–1206, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
EFSA, “The community summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents, antimicrobial resistance and foodborne outbreaks in the European Union in 2006,” The EFSA Journal, vol. 130, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Engberg, F. M. Aarestrup, D. E. Taylor, P. Gerner-Smidt, and I. Nachamkin, “Quinolone and macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli: resistance mechanisms and trends in human isolates,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 24–34, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Nelson, K. E. Smith, D. J. Vugia et al., “Prolonged diarrhea due to ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter infection,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 190, no. 6, pp. 1150–1157, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. E. van den Bogaard and E. E. Stobberingh, “Epidemiology of resistance to antibiotics: links between animals and humans,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 327–335, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Oporto, J. I. Esteban, G. Aduriz, R. A. Juste, and A. Hurtado, “Prevalence and strain diversity of thermophilic campylobacters in cattle, sheep and swine farms,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 977–984, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. I. Esteban, B. Oporto, G. Aduriz, R. A. Juste, and A. Hurtado, “A survey of food-borne pathogens in free-range poultry farms,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 123, no. 1-2, pp. 177–182, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
CLSI, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Seventeenth Informational Supplement, CLSI, Wayne, Pa, USA, 2007, Document M100-S17.
P. Luber, E. Bartelt, E. Genschow, J. Wagner, and H. Hahn, “Comparison of broth microdilution, E test, and agar dilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1062–1068, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. F. McDermott, S. M. Bodeis-Jones, T. R. Pritsche, R. N. Jones, and R. D. Walker, “Broth microdilution susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and the determination of quality control ranges for fourteen antimicrobial agents,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 6136–6138, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
CLSI, Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria; Approved Guideline, CLSI, Wayne, Pa, USA, 2006, Document M45-A.
EFSA, “Report of the Task Force of Zoonoses Data Collection including a proposal for a harmonized monitoring scheme of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella in fowl (Gallus gallus), turkeys, and pigs and Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli in broilers,” The EFSA Journal, vol. 96, pp. 1–46, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Saenz, M. Zarazaga, M. Lantero, M. J. Gastanares, F. Baquero, and C. Torres, “Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from animals, foods, and humans in Spain in 1997-1998,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 267–271, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Jacob, J. T. Fox, S. L. Reinstein, and T. G. Nagaraja, “Antimicrobial susceptibility of foodborne pathogens in organic or natural production systems: an overview,” Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 721–730, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Luo, S. Pereira, O. Sahin et al., “Enhanced in vivo fitness of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in the absence of antibiotic selection pressure,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 541–546, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. B. Price, L. G. Lackey, R. Vailes, and E. Silbergeld, “The persistence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter in poultry production,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 115, no. 7, pp. 1035–1039, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Englen, A. E. Hill, D. A. Dargatz, S. R. Ladely, and P. J. Fedorka-Cray, “Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in US dairy cattle,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 1570–1577, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Englen, P. J. Fedorka-Cray, S. R. Ladely, and D. A. Dargatz, “Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Campylobacter from feedlot cattle,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 285–291, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Bywater, H. Deluyker, E. Deroover et al., “A European survey of antimicrobial susceptibility among zoonotic and commensal bacteria isolated from food-producing animals,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 744–754, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. de Jong, R. Bywater, P. Butty et al., “A pan-European survey of antimicrobial susceptibility towards human-use antimicrobial drugs among zoonotic and commensal enteric bacteria isolated from healthy food-producing animals,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 733–744, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zweifel, M. A. Zychowska, and R. Stephan, “Prevalence and characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. isolated from slaughtered sheep in Switzerland,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 45–53, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Sahin, P. J. Plummer, D. M. Jordan et al., “Emergence of a tetracycline-resistant Campylobacter jejuni clone associated with outbreaks of ovine abortion in the United States,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1663–1671, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Oporto, J. F. Barandika, A. Hurtado, G. Aduriz, B. Moreno, and A. L. Garcia-Perez, “Incidence of ovine abortion by Coxiella burnetii in northern Spain,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1078, pp. 498–501, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Zirnstein, Y. Li, B. Swaminathan, and F. Angulo, “Ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacter jejuni isolates: detection of gyrA resistance mutations by mismatch amplification mutation assay PCR and DNA sequence analysis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 3276–3280, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
L. J. V. Piddock, V. Ricci, L. Pumbwe, M. J. Everett, and D. J. Griggs, “Fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter species from man and animals: detection of mutations in topoisomerase genes,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Wilson, S. R. Abner, T. C. Newman, L. S. Mansfield, and J. E. Linz, “Identification of ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter jejuni by use of a fluorogenic PCR assay,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 3971–3978, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
A. M. Dionisi, I. Luzzi, and A. Carattoli, “Identification of ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter jejuni and analysis of the gyrA gene by the LightCycler mutation assay,” Molecular and Cellular Probes, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 255–261, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Vacher, A. Menard, E. Bernard, A. Santos, and F. Megraud, “Detection of mutations associated with macrolide resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter spp. by real-time PCR,” Microbial Drug Resistance, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 40–47, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. W. Jesse, M. D. Englen, L. G. Pittenger-Alley, and P. J. Fedorka-Cray, “Two distinct mutations in gyrA lead to ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid resistance in Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni isolated from chickens and beef cattle,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 682–688, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Ladely, R. J. Meinersmann, M. D. Englen, P. J. Fedorka-Cray, and M. A. Harrison, “23S rRNA gene mutations contributing to macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli,” Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Prats, B. Mirelis, T. Llovet, C. Muñoz, E. Miró, and F. Navarro, “Antibiotic resistance trends in enteropathogenic bacteria isolated in 1985–1987 and 1995–1998 in Barcelona,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1140–1145, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Reina, I. Blanco, A. Català, and P. Alomar, “Aislamiento de Campylobacter jejuni resistente al acido nalidixico,” Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 288–289, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Reina, M. J. Ros, and A. Serra, “Susceptibilities to 10 antimicrobial agents of 1,220 Campylobacter strains isolated from 1987 to 1993 from feces of pediatric patients,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2917–2920, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2009 Beatriz Oporto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1959

Downloads

1629

Citations