Perchlorate-Reducing Bacteria from Hypersaline Soils of the Colombian Caribbean

Acevedo-Barrios, Rosa; Bertel-Sevilla, Angela; Alonso-Molina, Jose; Olivero-Verbel, Jesus

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6981865

International Journal of Microbiology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusions Abbreviations Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 | Article ID 6981865 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6981865

Perchlorate-Reducing Bacteria from Hypersaline Soils of the Colombian Caribbean

Rosa Acevedo-Barrios,^1,2Angela Bertel-Sevilla,¹Jose Alonso-Molina,³and Jesus Olivero-Verbel¹

Academic Editor: Hidetoshi Urakawa

Received24 Sept 2018

Revised24 Nov 2018

Accepted11 Dec 2018

Published17 Feb 2019

Abstract

Perchlorate (ClO₄⁻) has several industrial applications and is frequently detected in environmental matrices at relevant concentrations to human health. Currently, perchlorate-degrading bacteria are promising strategies for bioremediation in polluted sites. The aim of this study was to isolate and characterize halophilic bacteria with the potential for perchlorate reduction. Ten bacterial strains were isolated from soils of Galerazamba-Bolivar, Manaure-Guajira, and Salamanca Island-Magdalena, Colombia. Isolates grew at concentrations up to 30% sodium chloride. The isolates tolerated pH variations ranging from 6.5 to 12.0 and perchlorate concentrations up to 10000 mg/L. Perchlorate was degraded by these bacteria on percentages between 25 and 10. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that the strains were phylogenetically related to Vibrio, Bacillus, Salinovibrio, Staphylococcus, and Nesiotobacter genera. In conclusion, halophilic-isolated bacteria from hypersaline soils of the Colombian Caribbean are promising resources for the bioremediation of perchlorate contamination.

1. Introduction

Perchlorate pollution is a problem of global impact because it has a negative effect on ecosystems with a loss of environmental quality, which increases with anthropogenic activity. Perchlorate is an ubiquitous emerging contaminant produced from both natural and anthropogenic sources [1], particularly present in areas associated with the use and manufacture of rockets and ammunition. This compound is a potent endocrine disruptor that mainly affects the fixation of iodine by the thyroid gland, responsible for regulating metabolism, growth, and development [2, 3], thus being dangerous to infants and young children [4]. Acute, short-term exposure has been shown to affect the nervous, respiratory, immune, and reproductive systems [5]. It has also been related to thyroid cancer and teratogenesis during the first trimester of pregnancy [6].

Perchlorate is highly distributed in ecosystems and organisms; thus, it is frequently found in several matrices, including breast milk, fertilizers, plants, food, and human tissues. This scenario has led to the prioritization of studies that allows for the removal of this contaminant from polluted sites, as it is extremely toxic and persistent; therefore, efficient treatments for its degradation are needed in order to maintain the quality of soils from biodiversity hotspots. There are different physicochemical techniques commonly used for the environmental removal of this anion, such as ion exchange, but it is not selective and the process usually only separates the perchlorate from contaminated sources [7], also generating by-products, which requires subsequent treatment [7]. Perchlorate is persistent but possesses biodegradability [8]. However, enzymes such as the perchlorate reductase and superoxide chlorite carry out the reduction or elimination of perchlorate. A reductase enzyme is responsible for reducing perchlorate to chlorate and chlorate to chlorite, while the enzyme superoxide chlorite changes chlorite to chloride and molecular oxygen. Biological reduction through the use of bacteria completely degrades the perchlorate ions into Cl⁻ and O₂ (equation (1)) [9–11]. The perchlorate degradation pathway is as follows:

Marine soils usually contain bacterial species with biochemical versatility and ability to tolerate salt, being an interesting target for researchers due to the potential reduction of environmental perchlorate [10]. The reason for selecting this type of environment is that degradation of perchlorate may be carried out using salt-tolerant bacteria [12], although this perchlorate-reduction process could be impaired with increasing salinity [11, 13]. Moreover, these organisms are available in diverse environments, from Antarctica, saline lakes, and hot springs, even in hyperthermophilic and hypersaline soils [10, 11]. Additionally, perchlorate deposits in these environments may be formed by chemical reactions between sodium chloride from land or sea and ozone [14].

Pilot testing of biotechnologies using perchlorate-reducing bacteria has been studied and tuned in suspension, fixed-bed, fluidized, and biofilm reactors [15, 16], evaluating the effectiveness of treatments on soil and water contaminated with perchlorate [15]. Nowadays, the use of integrated systems, combining physicochemical treatments and perchlorate-reducing halophilic bacteria, is being studied to increase the efficiency of water treatment, allowing the handling of residual flows with high salinity and large perchlorate concentrations, simultaneously solving the waste disposal problem [17].

Colombia has a variety of ecosystems with different climatic and biogeochemical features, which facilitates the development of different halophilic bacteria. The aim of this study was the characterization of perchlorate-reducing bacteria recovered from hypersaline soils of the Colombian Caribbean.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sample Collection

Soil samples were obtained from salt mines of Colombia, specifically from Galerazamba-Bolivar (10°47′21″N, 75°15′41″W), Manaure-Guajira (11°46′30″N, 72°26′40″ W), and saline soils located in Salamanca Island-Magdalena (10°56′00″N, 75°15′00″W) (Figure 1). A sterile spatula was employed to collect approximately 100 g of soil from the upper 1–10 cm layer in May 2015. All samples were collected in 50 mL Falcon tubes, kept refrigerated at 4°C, and taken to the laboratory for processing. Salinity and pH were recorded for each sample according to Nozawa-Inoue et al. [18].

2.2. Isolation of Strains and Culture Conditions

Isolation, purification, and preservation techniques were used as described by Shimkets and Rafiee [19]. Samples were treated with amphotericin B (0.25 mg/mL) for 3 h until inoculation (50 µL) in the isolation media. Subsequently, samples were incubated in Petri dishes containing modified sterilized agar Luria-Bertani in seawater (LB NaCl) [20] and incubated at 37°C for 24 h under aerobic conditions [21]. Bacterial growth was monitored by observation of colonies. For preservation, a bacterial colony was transferred to modified LB broth and incubated at 37°C aerobically during 12 h, adjusting the cell density to 0.5 Mc-Farland turbidity standard. Then, 720 µL of each culture was transferred to a Cryovial with 80 µL glycerol and stored at −80°C.

2.3. Molecular Identification

2.3.1. 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

For 16S rRNA gene amplification, genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, CA, USA) as described by the manufacturer. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified from the total genomic DNA of the bacterial strains by PCR using the forward primer PF (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and the reverse primer 1492R (5′-ACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) [22, 23]. PCR was performed with an AmpliTaq Gold® 360 Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each 25 μL reaction mixture contained 0.4 μM of each primer and ∼100 ng of template DNA. The amplification was performed as follows: initial denaturation for 10 min at 95°C, 25 cycles of denaturation for 1 min at 94°C, annealing for 1 min at 43°C, and extension for 1.5 min at 72°C, and a final extension for 5.5 min at 72°C. All PCR products were checked by electrophoresis on 1.2% (w/v) agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide (10 mg/mL) and analyzed using a gel documentation system (IngGenius 3 System-Syngene).

The PCR product was purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Automated DNA sequencing was performed by the National Center for Genomic Sequencing (CNSG) (Medellin-Colombia) using PF and 1492R primers. Sequence readings were edited and assembled with the CAP3 software [24]. The resulting 16S rRNA gene sequences were compared to reference strains with validly published names using the EzTaxon-e server (http://www.ezbiocloud.net/eztaxon). After multiple alignments of the data via CLUSTAL_W, four methods, including neighbor joining (NJ) [25], maximum likelihood (ML) [26], minimum evolution (ME), and maximum parsimony (MP) [27], were used to perform phylogenetic analysis. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA version 6 [28]. Distances were calculated using the Kimura correction in a pair-wise deletion manner [29]. The topologies of the phylogenetic tree were evaluated by the bootstrap resampling method described by Felsenstein [30] with 1000 replicates. The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of isolated strains BBCOL-031, BBCOL-023, BBCOL-024, BBCOL-025, BBCOL-026, BBCOL-027, BBCOL-028, BBCOL-029, BBCOL-032, and BBCOL-033 are KX821664–KX821673, respectively.

2.4. Morphological Characterization

Strains were incubated on LB NaCl agar, and both growth and morphogenesis were observed under light microscopic examination (Olympus microscope BX41). Gram staining was conducted following Bergey’s Manual Taxonomic Key [31] and Koneman’s Microbiologic Atlas [32]. Samples were further processed by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) visualization as previously described [33].

2.5. Biochemical Characterization

Biochemical characteristics were investigated using the BBL Crystal™ Kit (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, USA) as described by the manufacturer. Catalase and oxidase tests were performed according to the reported methods [21].

2.6. Chloride Susceptibility Assay

All strains were assayed for perchlorate susceptibility in LB broth in the presence of NaCl (3.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 30% w/v) [20, 34]. The experiments started adding 20 µL of cell suspension, OD = 0.6, into 5 mL LB broth. The cultures were incubated at 37°C for 24 h, and after that, strains showing turbidity [35] were identified as resistant to NaCl. The experiments were carried out by triplicates and performed three times.

2.7. Perchlorate Susceptibility Assay

All strains were assayed for perchlorate susceptibility in LB broth in the presence of perchlorate at concentrations of 100, 250, 500, 750, 1000, 1250, 1500, 2000, 3000, 5000, 7500, and 10000 mg/L [20, 36, 37]. The experiments were carried out as described for the chloride susceptibility assay. After the incubation time (24 h), a culture of each isolate was tested on LB agar at their corresponding KClO₄ concentrations to confirm cell viability and purity of each of the bacterial strains.

2.8. Evaluation of Perchlorate Reduction by Isolates

The experiments were carried out using concentration of 10000 mg/L KClO₄ in LB with 3.5% NaCl, inoculating with the isolates as described in the chloride susceptibility assay and incubating for a 24-hour time period at 37°C. After incubation time, the final KClO₄ concentration was measured with a Thermo Scientific Orion 93 perchlorate electrode (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Beverly, MA), used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The difference in concentration after and before the incubation was employed to calculate the perchlorate reduction percentage elicited by each strain.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Molecular Identification

Almost-complete 16S rRNA gene sequences were obtained from strains BBCOL-023 to BBCOL-033 (GenBank accession numbers: KX821664–KX821673). The results of the phylogenetic analysis showed that these strains belonged to members of Bacillus, Vibrio, Salinivibrio, Nesiotobacter, and Staphylococcus. Strain BBCOL-023 presented 99% similarity with Nesiotobacter; strains BBCOL-024, BBCOL-028, BBCOL-029, and BBCOL-033 had 99% homology with Bacillus species; and strains BBCOL-025, BBCOL-026, BBCOL-027, and BBCOL-031 had 99% homology with members of the Vibrionaceae family, particularly Vibrio and Salinivibrio species. Strain BBCOL-032 presented 99% similarity to Staphylococcus spp.

The 16S rRNA gene sequence had similar values between strains BBCOL-024, BBCOL-028, BBCOL-029, and BBCOL-033, and validly named type strains of Bacillus were calculated by using the EzTaxon-e server. Strains BBCOL-024 and BBCOL-028 showed high 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities with Bacillus vallismortis DV1-F-3(T) (99.6 and 99.5%, respectively), Bacillus subtilis subsp. inaquosorum KCTC 13429(T) (99.6 and 99.4%, respectively), and Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii NRRL B-23049(T) (99.6 and 99.4%, respectively).

Levels of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between strains BBCOL-024 and BBCOL-028 and other current members of the genus Bacillus were below 99.0%. In the neighbor-joining (Figure 2) and the minimum-evolution phylogenetic dendrograms based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, strains BBCOL-024 and BBCOL-028 were placed in a cluster in Bacillus and were shown to be closely related to B. vallismortis, B. subtilis subsp. spizizenii TU-B-10, B. vanillea, and B. atrophaeus.

Strain BBCOL-029 shares high-sequence similarity with B. oryzaecorticis R1 (T), B. haikouensis C-89(T), B. aquimaris TF-12(T), and B. vietnamensis 15-1(T) with 98.2, 97.9, 97.9, and 97.9% respectively, and nucleotide differences of 20, 29, 30, and 29 nucleotides, respectively. The comparative analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences and phylogenetic relationships showed that the BBCOL-029 strain lies in a subclade in the tree with B. marisflavi, B. aquimaris, and B. vietnamensis (supported by a bootstrap value of 77% (Figure 2)), with which it shares the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. The affiliation of strain BBCOL-029 and its closest neighbors was also supported by the maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood algorithms with bootstrap values above 70%. EzTaxon-e server search analysis revealed that the BBCOL-033 strain is closely related to B. flexus FO 15715(T) (99.7%, 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity), B. paraflexus RC2 (T) (99%), B. megaterium NBRC 15308 = ATCC 14581(T) (98.5%), and other bacilli (<97%). The sequence similarities of strain BBCOL-033 with B. flexus using different clustering algorithms (100% in NJ tree; 100% in ME tree; and 100% in ML tree) along with the EzTaxon-e server analysis consistently indicated that B. flexus is the closest relative.

For strain BBCOL-023, 1329 nt of the 16S rRNA gene sequence was determined. Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that strain BBCOL-023 was most closely related to members of the genus Nesiotobacter. Strain BBCOL-023 shares the highest sequence similarity with Nesiotobacter exalbescens LA33B (T), Roseibium aquae DSG-S4-2 (T), and Pseudovibrio hongkongensis UST20140214-015B (T) with 99.8, 95.9, and 95.7% and nucleotide differences of 3, 55, and 57, respectively. The 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities to the type strains of other members of the family Rhodobacteraceae with validly published names were below 94%. In the phylogenetic tree based on the NJ algorithm (Figure 3), strain BBCOL-023 formed a single clade with Nesiotobacter exalbescens (supported by a bootstrap value of 100% (Figure 3)), with which it shares the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. The affiliation of strain BBCOL-023 and its closest neighbors was also supported by the MP and ML algorithms with above 90% bootstrap values.

The 16S rDNA sequences of strains BBCOL-025, BBCOL-026, BBCOL-027, and BBCOL-031 determined in this study comprised 1402, 1361, 1399, and 1389 nt, respectively, representing approximately 90% of the Escherichia coli 16S rRNA sequence. The results of phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that the isolated strains were related phylogenetically to members of the Vibrionaceae family and belong within the phyletic group classically defined as the genus Salinivibrio and Vibrio (Figure 4). Strain BBCOL-025 shows high 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities with Salinivibrio costicola subsp. vallismortis DSM 8285(T) (98.4%), Salinivibrio costicola subsp. costicola ATCC 33508(T) (97.8%), and Salinivibrio proteolyticus AF-2004(T) (97.7%). Levels of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between strain BBCOL-025 and the other current members of the genus Salinivibrio are below 97%. In the neighbor joining (Figure 4) and the minimum evolution phylogenetic dendrograms based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, strain BBCOL-025 was placed in a cluster in the Salinivibrio genus and was shown to be closely related to S. budaii and S. costicola subsp. alcaliphilus (supported by a bootstrap value of 75%). 16S rRNA gene sequence comparison between the BBCOL-026 strain and other members from the Vibrionaceae family by using the EzTaxon-e server indicated that the strain was closely related to members of Vibrio genus, showing 99.2% gene sequence similarity to V. antiquarius Ex25 (T), 99% to V. alginolyticus NBRC 15630(T), 98% to V. neocaledonicus NC470 (T), and 98.9% to V. natriegens DSM 759(T). Likewise, strains BBCOL-027 and BBCOL-031 show high 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities with V. alginolyticus NBRC 15630(T) (99.8 and 98.9%, respectively) and V. antiquarius Ex25(T) (99.5 and 98.9%, respectively). A phylogenetic tree, generated from the neighbor joining algorithm, showed that strains BBCOL-026 and BBCOL-031 both fell within the radiation of the cluster comprising Vibrio species and formed a coherent cluster that is supported by a bootstrap analysis at a confidence level of 98% (Figure 4). This cluster joins the phylogenetic clade comprising V. alginolyticus and V. parahaemolyticus, which is supported by a 71% bootstrap value. This topology was also found in trees generated with the ML and MP algorithms (not shown). The NJ and ME phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA gene sequence data showed that the strain BBCOL-027 forms a coherent cluster with Vibrio alginolyticus (a bootstrap value of 72%).

For strain BBCOL-032, 1416 nt of the 16S rRNA gene sequence was determined. Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that strain BBCOL-032 was more closely related to the Staphylococcus species. Strain BBCOL-032 shares highest sequence similarity with Staphylococcus haemolyticus ATCC 29970(T) (99.9%), Staphylococcus petrasii subsp. pragensis NRL/St 12/356(T), and Staphylococcus petrasii subsp. jettensis SEQ110 (T) (99.2%). The 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities to strains from other members of the Staphylococcaceae family were below 99%. In the phylogenetic tree based on the NJ algorithm (Figure 5), strain BBCOL-032 fell within a coherent cluster comprising S. haemolyticus, S. petrasii subsp. pragensis, S. petrasii subsp. jettensis, and S. lugdunensis. The sequence similarities of strain BBCOL-032 with S. haemolyticus using different clustering algorithms (100% in NJ tree; 99% in ME tree; and 100% in ML tree) along with the EzTaxon-e server analysis consistently indicated that S. haemolyticus is the closest relative.

3.2. Microscopic and Biochemical Characterization

The colonies of strains (BBCOL-023 to BBCOL-033) on LB agar were circular, convex, and smooth. Cells were facultative anaerobic, with an optimal growth at pH 6.5 to 7.5. Morphological features are observed by SEM (Figure 6), and biochemical characteristics of isolated bacteria strains are shown in Table 1. Morphological and biochemical characteristics detected in the isolated strain BBCOL-023 correspond to the species Nesiotobacter, as previously reported [38]. The strains were able to utilize lactose, mannose, galactose, sorbitol, and sucrose as carbon sources. Nitrate was reduced to nitrite. The strains were ONPG- and H₂S-negative.

Microscopic morphological results showed that isolates BBCOL-024, BBCOL-028, BBCOL-029, and BBCOL-033 correspond to the genus Bacillus [39]. When grown at 37°C during 24 h in LB, the cells were Gram-positive bacilli, with a size between 0.6-0.7 μm and 1.6-1.7 μm. Endospores were ellipsoidal. Cells were motile, aerobic, facultative anaerobic, and oxidase- and catalase-positive. Optimal growth conditions of BBCOL-024 were at pH 6.0–6.5 and 37°C. These isolates showed Voges–Proskauer and nitrate reduction activity. However, they were ONPG- and H₂S-negative.

The cells of strain BBCOL-025, Salinovibrio costicola, were Gram-negative, motile, nonsporulating, and curved, presenting an average bacterial size of 1.4 × 0.7 µm. In addition, these were motile, facultative anaerobic, and oxidase- and catalase-positive. Optimal growth conditions for BBCOL-025 were at pH 6.0–6.5 and 37°C. The isolates showed morphological differences regarding both curved size and growth. These differences may arise depending on environmental conditions at the sampling moment, laboratory procedures, and conservation techniques, among others [40, 41]. These strains presented positive activity for Voges–Proskeuer and nitrate reduction and negative activity against ONPG and H₂S production.

The isolates BBCOL-026, BBCOL-027, and BBCOL-031 shared the main properties of the genus Vibrio. They were motile, curved, facultative, Gram-negative and oxidase-positive and were able to reduce nitrate to nitrite. These bacteria also formed yellow colonies, as reported by several authors [42, 43]. Optimal growth conditions for BBCOL-025 were at pH 6.0–6.5 and 37°C. The isolates showed high phenotypical homogeneity although variable reactions were observed for aesculin hydrolysis, N-acetyl-glucosaminidase activity, and fermentation of galactose and lactose.

The cells of strain BBCOL-032 Staphylococcus spp. were Gram-positive, motile, and nonsporulated, presenting an average bacterial size of 1.28 × 0.68 µm. Cells were facultative and oxidase- and catalase-positive. Optimal growth conditions for BBCOL-025 were at pH 6.0–6.5 and 37°C. Isolated strains presented positive activity for the Voges–Proskauer test and nitrate reduction, and showed negative activity against ONPG and H₂S production, as previously reported [44, 45].

3.3. Sodium Chloride and Perchlorate Susceptibility Assay

All isolates showed growth in the culture medium with high concentrations of NaCl, reaching tolerance up to 30%. Strains BBCOL-023 to BBCOL-033 presented characteristics of moderately halophilic bacteria, according to what was reported by Acevedo-Barrios [20].

The ability of isolates to grow and tolerate concentrations of KClO₄ between 100 and 10000 mg/L is presented in Table 2. All isolates showed biofilm formation at the highest concentration. This barrier allows the bacteria to generate a concentration gradient as a means of protection against the toxicity of this chemical [2].

Other aspects evidenced in these strains are associations between NaCl and KClO₄ tolerance. These isolates have become interesting targets for this research, given the need to identify native bacteria with potential biotechnological and biochemical versatility, capable of degrading environmental contaminants such as KClO₄.

3.4. Evaluation of Perchlorate Reduction by Isolates

Perchlorate-reducing bacteria are phylogenetically diverse, and these include Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Deltaproteobacteria classes, with Betaproteobacteria being the most commonly detected class [46, 47]. In this work, bacterial strains BBCOL-023 to BBCOL-033 (Figure 7) showed biological capacity to reduce concentrations of KClO₄ on percentages between 10 and 25.

The genera Nesiotobacter and Salinivibrio showed the highest percentage (25%) of perchlorate reduction, while the genera Vibrio, Bacillus, and Staphylococcus presented a lowest proportion of KClO₄ reduction, with 14, 12, and 10%, respectively. Recent studies have shown that the amount of perchlorate reduced may be inversely proportional to increased salinity [13, 17]. Future studies should be carried out to describe the role of salinity on perchlorate reduction by these strains.

The ability of bacteria to grow in perchlorate polluted areas is determined by their degrading enzymes [48, 49]. The general metabolic reduction pathway widely accepted by researchers [9, 10] involves the reductase enzyme, as this is responsible to reduce perchlorate to chlorate and chlorate to chlorite, while the superoxide chlorite enzyme changes chlorite to chloride and molecular oxygen [9, 46, 50]. The optimal temperature range for perchlorate reduction is 28–37°C [46, 51, 52].

Perchlorate-reducing bacteria are usually anaerobic and some facultative, despite being the molecular oxygen produced as an intermediate of the microbial perchlorate reduction [46, 53], in a process that exudes nitrate [46]. In our study, isolated perchlorate-reducing bacteria were also anaerobic but facultative. Therefore, although these may undergo degradation processes in a wide range of environmental conditions, it is also probable that some critical anaerobic strains were missed during the aerobic treatment. In consequence, additional experiments should be carried out under anaerobic conditions, just to enrich some active microorganisms that may improve perchlorate degradation.

Perchlorate is an ubiquitous and persistent pollutant in the environment, causing toxic effects in biota and humans. Therefore, different technologies have been developed to remove and eliminate this chemical. One of the most promising, effective, and economic ones is the use of bacteria in biotechnological systems that are capable of reducing and eliminating perchlorate. The rates of perchlorate reduction obtained in this study were comparable to those reported by Wang et al. [54], suggesting their potential application in bioremediation of perchlorate contaminated areas.

4. Conclusions

The strains isolated from Galerazamba-Bolivar, Manaure-Guajira, and Salamanca Island-Magdalena, Colombia, were halotolerant organisms belonging to the Vibrio, Bacillus, Salinovibrio, Staphylococcus, and Nesiotobacter genera. These strains could reduce KClO₄ levels in aqueous solutions from 10 up to 25%. Bacteria-mediated remediation of perchlorate is a suitable process to control pollution by this toxic chemical.

Abbreviations

LB NaCl:	Luria-Bertani in seawater
ML:	Maximum likelihood
MP:	Maximum parsimony
ME:	Minimum evolution
NJ:	Neighbor joining
SEM:	Scanning electron microscopy
OD:	Optical density.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Institute of Water and Environmental Engineering, Polytechnic University of Valencia (Spain). This research received support from the Vice Presidency of Research, University of Cartagena; and Colciencias‐University of Cartagena (Grant: RC-758-2011/1107-521-29360).

References

J. Cole-Dai, K. M. Peterson, J. A. Kennedy, T. S. Cox, and D. G. Ferris, “Evidence of influence of human activities and volcanic eruptions on environmental perchlorate from a 300-year Greenland ice core record,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 52, no. 15, pp. 8373–8380, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Acevedo-Barrios, C. Sabater-Marco, and J. Olivero-Verbel, “Ecotoxicological assessment of perchlorate using in vitro and in vivo assays,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 25, no. 14, pp. 13697–13708, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. V. Maffini, L. Trasande, and T. G. Neltner, “Perchlorate and diet: human exposures, risks, and mitigation strategies,” Current Environmental Health Reports, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 107–117, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Knight, B. M. Shields, X. He et al., “Effect of perchlorate and thiocyanate exposure on thyroid function of pregnant women from South-West England: a cohort study,” Thyroid Research, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. N. Smith, in The Ecotoxicology of Perchlorate in the Environment BT-Perchlorate: Environmental Occurrence, Interactions and Treatment, B. Gu and J. D. Coates, Eds., Springer US, Boston, MA, USA, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site
C. Steinmaus, M. Pearl, M. Kharrazi et al., “Thyroid hormones and moderate exposure to perchlorate during pregnancy in women in southern California,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 124, no. 6, pp. 861–867, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ghosh, K. Pakshirajan, P. K. Ghosh, and N. K. Sahoo, “Perchlorate degradation using an indigenous microbial consortium predominantly Burkholderia sp,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 187, no. 1–3, pp. 133–139, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Nerenberg, B. E. Rittmann, and I. Najm, “Perchlorate reduction in a hydrogen-based membrane-biofilm reactor,” Journal-American Water Works Association, vol. 94, no. 11, pp. 103–114, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Xu and B. E. Logan, “Measurement of chlorite dismutase activities in perchlorate respiring bacteria,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 239–247, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. E. Logan, J. Wu, and R. F. Unz, “Biological perchlorate reduction in high-salinity solutions,” Water Research, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 3034–3038, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Matsubara, K. Fujishima, C. W. Saltikov, S. Nakamura, and L. J. Rothschild, “Earth analogues for past and future life on Mars: isolation of perchlorate resistant halophiles from Big Soda Lake,” International Journal of Astrobiology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 218–228, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. C. Okeke, T. Giblin, and W. T. Frankenberger, “Reduction of perchlorate and nitrate by salt tolerant bacteria,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 357–363, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Vijaya Nadaraja, P. G. P. Veetil, and K. Bhaskaran, “Perchlorate reduction by an isolated Serratia marcescens strain under high salt and extreme pH,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 339, no. 2, pp. 117–121, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. W. Murray and P. M. Bolger, “Environmental contaminants: perchlorate,” in Encyclopedia of Food Safety, Y. Motarjemi, Ed., pp. 337–341, Academic Press, Waltham, MA, USA, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Xu, Y. Song, B. Min, L. Steinberg, and B. E. Logan, “Microbial degradation of perchlorate: principles and applications,” Environmental Engineering Science, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 405–422, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Wang and D. J. Coates, “Biotechnological applications of microbial (per)chlorate reduction,” Microorganisms, vol. 5, no. 4, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Xiao and D. J. Roberts, “Kinetics analysis of a salt-tolerant perchlorate-reducing bacterium: effects of sodium, magnesium, and nitrate,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 47, no. 15, pp. 8666–8673, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Nozawa-Inoue, K. M. Scow, and D. E. Rolston, “Reduction of perchlorate and nitrate by microbial communities in vadose soil,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 3928–3934, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. J. Shimkets and H. Rafiee, “CsgA, an extracellular protein essential for Myxococcus xanthus development,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 172, no. 9, pp. 5299–5306, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Acevedo-Barrios, A. Bertel-Sevilla, J. Alonso-Molina, and J. Olivero-Verbel, “Perchlorate tolerant bacteria from saline environments at the Caribbean region of Colombia,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 259, p. S103, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. R. Boone, R. W. Castenholz, G. M. Garrity, D. J. Brenner, N. R. Krieg, and J. T. Staley, Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology, Springer Science & Business Media, Boston, MA, USA, 2005, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/0-387-29298-5.
T. Iizuka, M. Tokura, Y. Jojima, A. Hiraishi, S. Yamanaka, and R. Fudou, “Enrichment and phylogenetic analysis of moderately thermophilic myxobacteria from hot springs in Japan,” Microbes and Environments, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 189–199, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z.-H. Wu, D.-M. Jiang, P. Li, and Y.-Z. Li, “Exploring the diversity of myxobacteria in a soil niche by myxobacteria-specific primers and probes,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1602–1610, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Huang and A. Madan, “CAP3: a DNA sequence assembly program,” Genome Research, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 868–877, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Saitou and M. Nei, “The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 4, pp. 406–425, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Felsenstein, “Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 368–376, 1981.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. M. Fitch, “Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology,” Systematic Biology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 406–416, 1971.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Tamura, G. Stecher, D. Peterson, A. Filipski, and S. Kumar, “MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 2725–2729, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kimura, “A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 1980.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Felsenstein, “Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap,” Evolution, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 783–791, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. S. Breed, E. G. D. Murray, and N. R. Smith, Bergey’s Manual of, Determ. Bacteriol, Williams Wilkins Company, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 7th edition, 1957.
E. W. Koneman, S. D. Allen, W. M. Janda, P. C. Schreckenberger, and W. C. Winn Jr., Microbiological Diagnosis: Text and Color Atlas, Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 6th edition, 2008.
J. L. Alonso, G. Cuesta, G. W. Ramírez, J. J. Morenilla, I. Bernácer, and R. M. Lloret, Manual de Técnicas Avanzadas Para la Identificación y Control de Bacterias Filamentosas, EPSAR-Generalitat Valencia, València, Spain, 2009.
L. Bahamdain, F. Fahmy, S. Lari, and M. Aly, “Characterization of some Bacillus strains obtained from marine habitats using different taxonomical methods,” Life Science Journal, vol. 12, no. 4, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Albuquerque, I. Tiago, M. Taborda, M. F. Nobre, A. Verissimo, and M. S. da Costa, “Bacillus isabeliae sp. nov., a halophilic bacterium isolated from a sea salt evaporation pond,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 226–230, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Fernández, P. Zalba, M. A. Gómez, and M. A. Sagardoy, “Bacterias solubilizadoras de fosfato inorgánico aisladas de suelos de la región sojera,” Ciencia Del Suelo, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Gholamian, M. A. Sheikh-Mohseni, and M. Salavati-Niasari, “Highly selective determination of perchlorate by a novel potentiometric sensor based on a synthesized complex of copper,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1688–1691, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. P. Donachie, “Nesiotobacter exalbescens gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderately thermophilic alphaproteobacterium from an Hawaiian hypersaline lake,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 563–567, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ling, G. Zhang, H. Sun, Y. Fan, J. Ju, and C. Zhang, “Isolation and characterization of a novel pyrene-degrading Bacillus vallismortis strain JY3A,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 409, no. 10, pp. 1994–2000, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Romano, A. Gambacorta, L. Lama, B. Nicolaus, and A. Giordano, “Salinivibrio costicola subsp. alcaliphilus subsp. nov., a haloalkaliphilic aerobe from Campania Region (Italy),” Systematic and Applied Microbiology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 34–42, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ali Amoozegar, A. Zahra Fatemi, H. Reza Karbalaei-Heidari, and M. Reza Razavi, “Production of an extracellular alkaline metalloprotease from a newly isolated, moderately halophile, Salinivibrio sp. strain AF-2004,” Microbiological Research, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 369–377, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Dubert, J. L. Romalde, S. Prado, and J. L. Barja, “Vibrio bivalvicida sp. nov., a novel larval pathogen for bivalve molluscs reared in a hatchery,” Systematic and Applied Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 8–13, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Paek, J. H. Shin, Y. Shin et al., “Vibrio injenensis sp. nov., isolated from human clinical specimens,” Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 145–152, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. E. Kloos and K. H. Schleifer, “Simplified scheme for routine identification of human Staphylococcus species,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 82–88, 1975.
View at: Google Scholar
P. S. Kumar, M. G. Paulraj, S. Ignacimuthu, N. A. Al-Dhabi, and D. Sukumaran, “In vitro antagonistic activity of soil Streptomyces collinus Dpr20 against bacterial pathogens,” Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 317–324, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Bruce, L. A. Achenbach, and J. D. Coates, “Reduction of (per)chlorate by a novel organism isolated from paper mill waste,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 319–329, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Waller, E. E. Cox, and E. A. Edwards, “Perchlorate-reducing microorganisms isolated from contaminated sites,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 517–527, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Chaudhuri, S. M. O'Connor, R. L. Gustavson, L. A. Achenbach, and J. D. Coates, “Environmental factors that control microbial perchlorate reduction,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 4425–4430, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. G. Liebensteiner, M. J. Oosterkamp, and A. J. M. Stams, “Microbial respiration with chlorine oxyanions: diversity and physiological and biochemical properties of chlorate- and perchlorate-reducing microorganisms,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1365, no. 1, pp. 59–72, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Sellers, K. Weeks, W. R. Alsop et al., Perchlorate: Environmental problems and solutions, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006.
Y. Zhu, N. Gao, W. Chu, S. Wang, and J. Xu, “Bacterial reduction of highly concentrated perchlorate: kinetics and influence of co-existing electron acceptors, temperature, pH and electron donors,” Chemosphere, vol. 148, pp. 188–194, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Giblin and W. T. Frankenberger, “Perchlorate and nitrate reductase activity in the perchlorate-respiring bacterium perclace,” Microbiological Research, vol. 156, no. 4, pp. 311–315, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sevda, T. R. Sreekishnan, N. Pous, S. Puig, and D. Pant, “Bioelectroremediation of perchlorate and nitrate contaminated water: a review,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 255, pp. 331–339, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wang, L. Lippincott, and X. Meng, “Kinetics of biological perchlorate reduction and pH effect,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 153, no. 1-2, pp. 663–669, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2019 Rosa Acevedo-Barrios et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

5074

Downloads

1638

Citations