International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 640948, 10 pages
doi:10.1155/2009/640948
Research Article

Unbounded Conditional Expectations for Partial O -Algebras

Department of Applied Mathematics, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan

Received 18 September 2008; Accepted 26 January 2009

Academic Editor: Ingo Witt

Copyright © 2009 Mayumi Takakura. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to generalize studies of unbounded conditional expectations for O -algebras to those for partial O -algebras.

1. Introduction

In probability theory, conditional expectations play a fundamental role. Conditional expectations for von Neumann algebra have been studied in noncommutative probability theory. In particular, Takesaki [1] characterized the existence of conditional expectation using Tomita's modular theory. Thus a conditional expectation does not necessarily exist for a general von Neumann algebra. The study of conditional expectations for O -algebras was begun by Gudder and Hudson [2]. After that, in [3, 4] we have investigated an unbounded conditional expectation which is a positive linear map of an O -algebra onto a given O -subalgebra 𝒩 of . In this paper we will consider conditional expectations for partial O -algebras. Suppose that is a self-adjoint partial O -algebra containing identity 𝐼 on dense subspace 𝒟 of Hilbert space with a strongly cyclic vector 𝜉 0 , and 𝒩 is a partial O -subalgebra of such that ( 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) ) 𝜉 0 is dense in 𝒩 𝒩 𝜉 0 , where 𝑅 w ( ) is the set of all right multiplier of . The definitions of (self-adjoint) partial O -algebra and a strongly cyclic vector are stated in Section 2. A map of onto 𝒩 is said to be a weak conditional-expectation of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 if it satisfies ( 𝐴 𝑋 𝜉 0 𝑌 𝜉 0 ) = ( ( 𝐴 ) 𝑋 𝜉 0 𝑌 𝜉 0 ) , f o r a l l 𝐴 , f o r a l l 𝑋 , 𝑌 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) ; but, the range ( 𝐴 ) of the weak conditional-expectation is not necessarily contained in 𝒩 , and so we have considered a map of onto 𝒩 satisfying the following:

(i)the domain 𝐷 ( ) of is a -invariant subspace of containing 𝒩 ;(ii) is a projection; that is, it is hermitian ( ( 𝐴 ) = ( 𝐴 ) , f o r a l l 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) ) and ( 𝑋 ) = 𝑋 , f o r a l l 𝑋 𝒩 ;(iii) ( 𝐴 𝑋 ) = ( 𝐴 ) 𝑋 , f o r a l l 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) , f o r a l l 𝑋 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) , ( 𝑋 𝐴 ) = 𝑋 ( 𝐴 ) , f o r a l l 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) 𝑅 w ( 𝒩 ) , f o r a l l 𝑋 𝒩 ;(iv) 𝜔 𝜉 0 ( ( 𝐴 ) ) = 𝜔 𝜉 0 ( 𝐴 ) , f o r a l l 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) , where 𝜔 𝜉 0 is a state on defined by 𝜔 𝜉 0 ( 𝐴 ) = ( 𝐴 𝜉 0 𝜉 0 ) , 𝐴 ; and call it an unbounded conditional expectation of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 . In particular, if 𝐷 ( ) = , then is said to be a conditional expectation of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 .

Finally, we will investigate the scale of the domain of unbounded conditional expectations of partial G W -algebra which is unbounded generalizations of von Neumann algebras.

2. Preliminaries

In this section we review the definitions and the basic theory of partial O -algebras, partial G W -algebras and partial E W -algebras. For more details, refer to [5].

A partial -algebra is a complex vector space 𝔄 with an involution 𝑥 𝑥 and a subset Γ 𝔄 × 𝔄 such that

(i) ( 𝑥 , 𝑦 ) Γ implies ( 𝑦 , 𝑥 ) Γ ;(ii) ( 𝑥 , 𝑦 1 ) , ( 𝑥 , 𝑦 2 ) Γ implies ( 𝑥 , 𝜆 𝑦 1 + 𝜇 𝑦 2 ) Γ , for all 𝜆 , 𝜇 ;(iii) whenever ( 𝑥 , 𝑦 ) Γ , there exists a product 𝑥 𝑦 𝔄 with the usual properties of the multiplication: 𝑥 ( 𝑦 + 𝜆 𝑧 ) = 𝑥 𝑦 + 𝜆 ( 𝑥 𝑧 ) and ( 𝑥 𝑦 ) = 𝑦 𝑥 for ( 𝑥 , 𝑦 ) , ( 𝑥 , 𝑧 ) Γ and 𝜆 . The element 𝑒 of the 𝔄 is called a unit if 𝑒 = 𝑒 , ( 𝑒 , 𝑥 ) Γ for all 𝑥 𝔄 , and 𝑒 𝑥 = 𝑥 𝑒 = 𝑥 , for all 𝑥 𝔄 . Notice that the partial multiplication is not required to be associative. Whenever ( 𝑥 , 𝑦 ) Γ , 𝑥 is called a left multiplier of 𝑦 and 𝑦 is called a right multiplier of 𝑥 , and we write 𝑥 𝐿 ( 𝑦 ) and 𝑦 𝑅 ( 𝑥 ) . For a subset 𝔄 , we write 𝐿 ( ) = 𝑥 𝐿 ( 𝑥 ) , 𝑅 ( ) = 𝑥 𝑅 ( 𝑥 ) . ( 2 . 1 )

Let be a Hilbert space with inner product ( ) and 𝒟 a dense subspace of . We denote by ( 𝒟 , ) the set of all closable linear operators 𝑋 such that 𝒟 ( 𝑋 ) = 𝒟 , 𝒟 ( 𝑋 ) 𝒟 . The set ( 𝒟 , ) is a partial -algebra with respect to the following operations: the usual sum 𝑋 + 𝑌 , the scalar multiplication 𝜆 𝑋 , the involution 𝑋 𝑋 ( = 𝑋 𝒟 ) , and the weak partial multiplication 𝑋 𝑌 𝑋 𝑌 , defined whenever 𝑌 is a weak right multiplier of 𝑋 ( 𝑋 𝐿 w ( 𝑌 ) or 𝑌 𝑅 w ( 𝑋 ) ), that is, if and only if 𝑌 𝒟 𝒟 ( 𝑋 ) and 𝑋 𝒟 𝒟 ( 𝑌 ) . A partial -subalgebra of ( 𝒟 , ) is called a partial O -algebra on 𝒟 .

Let be a partial O -algebra on 𝒟 . The locally convex topology on 𝒟 defined by the family { 𝑋 ; 𝑋 } of seminorms 𝜉 𝑋 = 𝜉 + 𝑋 𝜉 , 𝜉 𝒟 is called the graph topology on 𝒟 and denoted by 𝑡 . The completion of 𝒟 [ 𝑡 ] is denoted by 𝒟 [ 𝑡 ] . If the locally convex space 𝒟 [ 𝑡 ] is complete, then is called closed. We also define the following domains: 𝒟 ( ) = 𝑋 𝒟 ( 𝑋 ) , 𝒟 ( ) = 𝑋 𝒟 ( 𝑋 𝒟 ) , ( ) = 𝑋 𝒟 ( 𝑋 𝒟 ( ) ) , ( 2 . 2 ) and then 𝒟 𝒟 ( ) 𝒟 ( ) 𝒟 ( ) 𝒟 ( ) . ( 2 . 3 ) The partial O -algebra is called fully closed if 𝒟 = 𝒟 ( ) , self-adjoint if 𝒟 = 𝒟 ( ) , essentially self-adjoint if 𝒟 ( ) = 𝒟 ( ) , and algebraically self-adjoint if 𝒟 ( ) = 𝒟 ( ) .

We defined two weak commutants of . The weak bounded commutant w of is the set w = 𝐶 ( ) ; ( 𝐶 𝑋 𝜉 𝜂 ) = ( 𝐶 𝜉 𝑋 𝜂 ) f o r e v e r y ; 𝑋 , 𝜉 , 𝜂 𝒟 ( 2 . 4 ) but the partial multiplication is not required to be associative, so we define the quasi-weak bounded commutant q w of as the set q w = 𝐶 w ; 𝐶 𝑋 1 𝜉 𝑋 2 𝜂 = 𝐶 𝜉 ( 𝑋 1 𝑋 2 ) 𝜂 𝑋 1 𝐿 ( 𝑋 2 . ) , 𝜉 , 𝜂 𝒟 ( 2 . 5 ) In general, q w w .

A -representation of a partial -algebra 𝔄 is a -homomorphism of 𝔄 into ( 𝒟 , ) , satisfying 𝜋 ( 𝑒 ) = 𝐼 whenever 𝑒 𝔄 , that is,

(i) 𝜋 is linear;(ii) 𝑥 𝐿 w ( 𝑦 ) in 𝔄 implies 𝜋 ( 𝑥 ) 𝐿 w ( 𝜋 ( 𝑦 ) ) and 𝜋 ( 𝑥 ) 𝜋 ( 𝑦 ) = 𝜋 ( 𝑥 𝑦 ) ;(iii) 𝜋 ( 𝑥 ) = 𝜋 ( 𝑥 ) f o r e v e r y 𝑥 𝔄 .

Let 𝜋 be a -representation of a partial -algebra 𝔄 into ( 𝒟 , ) . Then we define 𝒟 ( 𝜋 ) : t h e c o m p l e t i o n o f 𝒟 w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e g r a p h t o p o l o g y 𝑡 𝜋 ( 𝔄 ) , 𝜋 ( 𝑥 ) = 𝜋 ( 𝑥 ) 𝒟 ( 𝜋 ) , 𝑥 𝔄 ; 𝒟 ( 𝜋 ) = 𝑥 𝔄 𝒟 ( 𝜋 ( 𝑥 ) ) , 𝜋 ( 𝑥 ) = 𝒟 𝜋 ( 𝑥 ) 𝒟 ( 𝜋 ) , 𝑥 𝔄 ; ( 𝜋 ) = 𝑥 𝔄 𝒟 ( 𝜋 ( 𝑥 ) 𝜋 ) , ( 𝑥 ) = 𝜋 ( 𝑥 ) 𝒟 ( 𝜋 ) , 𝑥 𝔄 . ( 2 . 6 )

We say that 𝜋 is closed if 𝒟 = 𝒟 ( 𝜋 ) ; fully closed if 𝒟 = 𝒟 ( 𝜋 ) ; essentially self-adjoint if 𝒟 ( 𝜋 ) = 𝒟 ( 𝜋 ) ; and self-adjoint if 𝒟 = 𝒟 ( 𝜋 ) .

We introduce the weak and the quasi-weak commutants of a -representaion 𝜋 of a partial -algebra 𝔄 as follows: 𝜋 ( 𝔄 ) w = = 𝐶 ( ) ; 𝐶 𝜉 𝜋 ( 𝑥 ) 𝜂 𝐶 𝜋 ( 𝑥 , 𝒞 ) 𝜉 𝜂 , 𝑥 𝔄 , 𝜉 , 𝜂 𝒟 ( 𝜋 ) q w ( 𝜋 ) = { 𝐶 𝜋 ( 𝔄 ) w ; 𝐶 𝜋 ( 𝑥 1 ) 𝜉 𝜋 ( 𝑥 2 = ) 𝜂 𝐶 𝜉 𝜋 ( 𝑥 1 𝑥 2 , ) 𝜂 𝑥 1 , 𝑥 2 𝔄 s u c h t h a t 𝑥 1 𝐿 ( 𝑥 2 ) , a n d a l l 𝜉 , 𝜂 𝒟 ( 𝜋 ) } , ( 2 . 7 ) respectively.

We define the notion of strongly cyclic vector for a partial O -algebra on 𝒟 in . A vector 𝜉 0 in 𝒟 is said to be strongly cyclic if 𝑅 w ( ) 𝜉 0 is dense in 𝒟 [ 𝑡 ] , and 𝜉 0 is said to be separating if w 𝜉 0 = , where 𝑅 w ( ) = { 𝑌 ; 𝑋 𝑌 i s w e l l - d e n e d , f o r a l l 𝑋 } .

We introduce the notion of partial G W -algebras and partial E W -algebras which are unbounded generalizations of von Neumann algebras. A fully closed partial O -algebra on 𝒟 is called a partial 𝐺 𝑊 -algebra if there exists a von Neumann algebra 0 on such that 0 𝒟 𝒟 and = [ 0 𝒟 ] 𝑠 . A partial O -algebra on 𝒟 is said to be a partial E W -algebra if 𝑏 { 𝐴 ( ) ; 𝐴 𝒟 } is a von Neumann algebra, 𝑏 𝒟 𝒟 and 𝑏 𝒟 𝒟 .

3. Weak Conditional Expectations

In this section, let be a self-adjoint partial O -algebra containing the identity 𝐼 on 𝒟 in with a strongly cyclic vector 𝜉 0 and let 𝒩 be a partial O -subalgebra of such that

(N) ( 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) ) 𝜉 0 is dense in 𝒩 𝒩 𝜉 0 .

The following is easily shown.

Lemma 3.1. Put 𝒟 ( 𝜋 𝒩 ) = ( 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) ) 𝜉 0 , 𝜋 𝒩 ( 𝑋 ) 𝑌 𝜉 0 = ( 𝑋 𝑌 ) 𝜉 0 , 𝑋 𝒩 , 𝑌 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) . ( 3 . 1 ) Then 𝜋 𝒩 is a -representations of 𝒩 in the Hilbert space 𝒩 𝒟 ( 𝜋 𝒩 ) .

We denote by 𝑃 𝒩 the projection of onto 𝒩 𝒟 ( 𝜋 𝒩 ) . This projection 𝑃 𝒩 plays an important role in this reserch. First we have the following.

Lemma 3.2. It holds that 𝑃 𝒩 𝒟 𝒟 ( 𝜋 𝒩 ) and 𝜋 𝒩 ( 𝑋 ) 𝑃 𝒩 𝜉 = 𝑃 𝒩 𝑋 𝜉 , f o r a l l 𝑋 𝒩 a n d f o r a l l 𝜉 𝒟 .

Proof. Take arbitrary 𝑋 𝒩 and 𝜉 𝒟 . For any 𝑌 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) , we have 𝜋 𝒩 ( 𝑋 ) 𝑌 𝜉 0 𝑃 𝒩 𝜉 = ( 𝑋 𝑌 ) 𝜉 0 𝑃 𝒩 𝜉 = 𝑋 𝑌 𝜉 0 = 𝜉 𝑌 𝜉 0 = 𝑋 𝜉 𝑌 𝜉 0 𝑃 𝒩 , 𝑋 𝜉 ( 3 . 2 ) and so 𝑃 𝒩 𝒟 𝒟 ( 𝜋 𝒩 ) and 𝜋 𝒩 ( 𝑋 ) 𝑃 𝒩 𝜉 = 𝑃 𝒩 𝑋 𝜉 .

Definition 3.3. A map of into ( 𝒟 ( 𝜋 𝒩 ) , 𝒩 ) is said to be a weak conditional-expectation of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 if it satisfies 𝐴 𝑋 𝜉 0 𝑌 𝜉 0 = ( 𝐴 ) 𝑋 𝜉 0 𝑌 𝜉 0 , 𝐴 , 𝑋 , 𝑌 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) . ( 3 . 3 )

For weak conditional-expectation we have the following.

Theorem 3.4. There exists a unique weak conditional-expectation ( 𝒩 ) of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 , and ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) = 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝒟 ( 𝜋 𝒩 ) , 𝐴 . ( 3 . 4 ) The weak conditional-expectation ( 𝒩 ) of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 satisfies the following:
(i) ( 𝒩 ) is linear,(ii) ( 𝒩 ) is hermitian, that is, ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) = ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) , f o r a l l 𝐴 ,(iii) ( 𝑋 𝒩 ) = 𝑋 𝒟 ( 𝜋 𝒩 ) , f o r a l l 𝑋 𝒩 ,(iv) ( 𝐴 𝐴 𝒩 ) 0 , f o r a l l 𝐴 s . t . 𝐴 𝐴 is well-defined,(v) ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) ( 𝐴 𝐴 𝒩 ) , f o r a l l 𝐴 s . t . 𝐴 𝐴 and ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) are well-defined,(vi) ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) 𝜋 𝒩 ( 𝑋 ) is well-defined for any 𝐴 and 𝑋 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) , and ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) 𝜋 𝒩 ( 𝑋 ) = ( 𝐴 𝑋 𝒩 ) ,(vii) 𝜋 𝒩 ( 𝑋 ) ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) is well-defined for any 𝐴 𝑅 w ( 𝒩 ) and f o r a l l 𝑋 𝒩 , and 𝜋 𝒩 ( 𝑋 ) ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) = ( 𝑋 𝐴 𝒩 ) ,(viii) 𝜔 𝜉 0 ( ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) ) = 𝜔 𝜉 0 ( 𝐴 ) , f o r a l l 𝐴 .

Proof. We put ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) = 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝒟 ( 𝜋 𝒩 ) , 𝐴 . ( 3 . 5 ) By Lemma 3.2, ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) is a linear map of 𝒟 ( 𝜋 𝒩 ) into 𝒟 ( 𝜋 𝒩 ) for any 𝐴 , and furthermore we have ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) = ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) , f o r a l l 𝐴 , so ( 𝒩 ) is a map of into ( 𝒟 ( 𝜋 𝒩 ) , 𝒩 ) .
Since ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) 𝑋 𝜉 0 𝑌 𝜉 0 = 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝑋 𝜉 0 𝑌 𝜉 0 = 𝐴 𝑋 𝜉 0 𝑌 𝜉 0 ( 3 . 6 ) for each 𝐴 , 𝑋 , 𝑌 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) , ( 𝒩 ) is a weak conditional-expectation of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 . It is easily shown that if is a weak conditional-expectation of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 , ( 𝐴 ) = ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) for each 𝐴 . Thus the existence and uniqueness of weak conditional-expectations is shown. The statements (iii)–(viii) follow since ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) = 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝒟 ( 𝜋 𝒩 ) , f o r a l l 𝐴 . This completes the proof.

4. Unbounded Conditional Expectations for Partial O -Algebras

Let be a self-adjoint partial O -algebra containing 𝐼 on 𝒟 in and let 𝜉 0 𝒟 be a strongly cyclic and separating vector for and suppose that 𝒩 𝐼 is a partial O -subalgebra of satisfying (N): ( 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) ) 𝜉 0 is dense in 𝒩 . We introduce unbounded conditional expectations of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 .

Definition 4.1. A map of onto 𝒩 is said to be an unbounded conditional expectation of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 if
(i) the domain 𝐷 ( ) of is a -invariant subspace of containing 𝒩 ;(ii) is a projection; that is, it is hermitian ( ( 𝐴 ) = ( 𝐴 ) , f o r a l l 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) ) and ( 𝑋 ) = 𝑋 , f o r a l l 𝑋 𝒩 ;(iii) ( 𝐴 𝑋 ) = ( 𝐴 ) 𝑋 , f o r a l l 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) , f o r a l l 𝑋 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) , ( 𝑋 𝐴 ) = 𝑋 ( 𝐴 ) , f o r a l l 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) 𝑅 w ( 𝒩 ) , f o r a l l 𝑋 𝒩 ;(iv) 𝜔 𝜉 0 ( ( 𝐴 ) ) = 𝜔 𝜉 0 ( 𝐴 ) , f o r a l l 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) . In particular, if 𝐷 ( ) = , then is said to be a conditional expectation of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 .

For unbounded conditional expectations we have the following.

Lemma 4.2. Let be an unbounded conditional expectation of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 . Then, ( 𝐴 ) 𝑋 𝜉 0 = 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝑋 𝜉 0 = ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) 𝑋 𝜉 0 , 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) , 𝑋 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) . ( 4 . 1 )

Proof. For all 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) and 𝑋 , 𝑌 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) , we have ( 𝐴 ) 𝑋 𝜉 0 𝑌 𝜉 0 = ( 𝐴 𝑋 ) 𝜉 0 𝑌 𝜉 0 = ( 𝑌 𝐴 𝑋 ) 𝜉 0 𝜉 0 = 𝑌 𝐴 𝑋 ) 𝜉 0 𝜉 0 = 𝐴 𝑋 𝜉 0 𝑌 𝜉 0 = 𝐴 𝑋 𝜉 0 𝑃 𝒩 𝑌 𝜉 0 = 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝑋 𝜉 0 𝑌 𝜉 0 . ( 4 . 2 ) Hence, ( 𝐴 ) 𝑋 𝜉 0 = 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝑋 𝜉 0 = ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) 𝑋 𝜉 0 , f o r a l l 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) , f o r a l l 𝑋 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) .

Let 𝔈 be the set of all unbounded conditional expectations of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 . Then 𝔈 is an ordered set with the following order : 1 2 i 𝐷 ( 1 ) 𝐷 ( 2 ) , 1 ( 𝐴 ) = 2 ( 𝐴 ) , 𝐴 𝐷 ( 1 ) . ( 4 . 3 )

Theorem 4.3. There exists a maximal unbounded conditional expectation of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 , and it is denoted by 𝒩 .

Proof. We put 𝐷 ( 0 ) 𝐴 ; 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 ( 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) ) 𝜉 0 𝒩 ( 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) ) 𝜉 0 . ( 4 . 4 ) Then, for any 𝐴 𝐷 ( 0 ) , there exists a unique map 0 such that 0 ( 𝐴 ) 𝑋 𝜉 0 = 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝑋 𝜉 0 = ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) 𝑋 𝜉 0 , 𝑋 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) . ( 4 . 5 ) It is easily shown that 0 is an unbounded conditional expectation of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 . Furthermore, 0 is maximal in 𝔈 . Indeed, let 𝔈 . Take an arbitrary 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) . Then by Lemma 4.2 we have ( 𝐴 ) 𝑋 𝜉 0 = 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝑋 𝜉 0 = ( 𝐴 𝒩 ) 𝑋 𝜉 0 , 𝑋 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) , ( 4 . 6 ) which implies ( 𝐴 ) 𝑋 𝜉 0 𝒩 ( 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) ) 𝜉 0 . Hence 0 and 0 is maximal in 𝔈 . This completes the proof.

5. Existence of Conditional Expectations for Partial O -Algebras

Let be a self-adjoint partial O -algebra containing 𝐼 on 𝒟 in , 𝜉 0 𝒟 be a strongly cyclic and separating vector for and 𝒩 𝐼 a partial O -subalgebra of such that

(N) ( 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) ) 𝜉 0 is dense in 𝒩 ,(N1) 𝒩 w 𝒟 ( 𝒩 ) 𝒟 ( 𝒩 ) ,(N2) ( 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) ) 𝜉 0 is essentially self-adjoint for 𝒩 ,(N3) Δ i t 𝜉 0 ( 𝒩 w ) Δ i t 𝜉 0 = ( 𝒩 w ) , f o r a l l 𝑡 , where Δ 𝜉 0 is the modular operator for the full Hilbert algebra ( w ) 𝜉 0 .

Lemma 5.1. It holds that 𝐷 ( 𝒩 ) = { 𝐴 ; 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝜉 0 𝒩 𝜉 0 } .

Proof. We put 𝐷 ( ) = 𝐴 ; 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝜉 0 𝒩 𝜉 0 . ( 5 . 1 ) By Lemma 4.2, we have 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝜉 0 = 𝒩 ( 𝐴 ) 𝜉 0 𝒩 𝜉 0 ( 5 . 2 ) for each 𝐴 𝐷 ( 𝒩 ) . Hence, 𝐷 ( 𝒩 ) 𝐷 ( ) . We show the converse inclusion. Since 𝜉 0 is separating vector for , it follows that for any 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) , there exists a unique element ( 𝐴 ) of 𝒩 such that 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝜉 0 = ( 𝐴 ) 𝜉 0 . Indeed, since 𝒩 is maximal in 𝔈 , it is sufficient to show that is an unbounded conditional expectation of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 . By assumption (N1) and [5, Proposition 2.3.5], we have 𝑋 i s a l i a t e d w i t h v o n N e u m a n n a l g e b r a ( 𝒩 w ) f o r e a c h 𝑋 𝒩 , ( 5 . 3 ) 𝒩 w = 𝒩 q w . ( 5 . 4 ) Since is self-adjoint and ( 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) ) 𝜉 0 is dense in 𝒩 , it follows that ( 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) ) 𝜉 0 is a reducing subspace for 𝒩 , that is, 𝒩 𝒩 𝑅 w 𝜉 ( ) 0 𝒩 𝑅 w 𝜉 ( ) 0 = 𝒩 𝜉 0 , ( 5 . 5 ) which implies by assumption (N2) and [5, Theorem 7.4.4] that 𝑃 𝒩 𝑁 𝑤 , 𝑃 𝒩 𝒟 ( 𝒩 ) 𝒟 ( 𝒩 ) . ( 5 . 6 ) Furthermore, by (5.3) and (5.6), we have 𝒩 𝜉 0 = ( 𝒩 w ) 𝜉 0 , t h a t i s , 𝒫 𝒩 = 𝒫 ( 𝒩 w ) . ( 5 . 7 ) Let 𝑆 𝜉 0 and 𝑆 𝜉 0 be the closures of the maps: 𝑆 𝜉 0 𝐴 𝜉 0 = 𝐴 𝜉 0 𝑆 , 𝐴 , 𝜉 0 𝐵 𝜉 0 = 𝐵 𝜉 0 , 𝐵 ( w ) . ( 5 . 8 ) By (5.3) we have 𝑆 𝜉 0 𝑆 𝜉 0 . ( 5 . 9 ) Takesaki proved in [1] that assumtion (N3 ) implies 𝑃 ( 𝒩 w ) 𝑆 𝜉 0 𝑆 𝜉 0 𝑃 ( 𝒩 w ) ( 5 . 1 0 ) and there exists a conditional expectation of the von Neumann algebra ( ( w ) , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, ( 𝒩 w ) .
By (5.6), (5.9), and (5.10), we have ( 𝐴 ) 𝜉 0 = 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝜉 0 = 𝑃 𝒩 𝑆 𝜉 0 𝐴 𝜉 0 = 𝑃 𝒩 𝑆 𝜉 0 𝐴 𝜉 0 = 𝑆 𝜉 0 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝜉 0 = 𝑆 𝜉 0 ( 𝐴 ) 𝜉 0 = 𝑆 𝜉 0 ( 𝐴 ) 𝜉 0 = ( 𝐴 ) 𝜉 0 ( 5 . 1 1 ) for each 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) , which implies by the separateness of 𝜉 0 that is hermitian.
It is clear that ( 𝑋 ) = 𝑋 , f o r a l l 𝑋 𝒩 . Take arbitrary 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) and 𝑋 𝒩 𝐿 w ( ) . Since 𝑃 𝒩 ( 𝑋 𝐴 ) 𝜉 0 𝑌 𝜉 0 = 𝑃 𝒩 𝐴 𝜉 0 𝑋 𝑌 𝜉 0 = ( 𝐴 ) 𝜉 0 𝑋 𝑌 𝜉 0 = ( 𝑋 ( 𝐴 ) ) 𝜉 0 𝑌 𝜉 0 ( 5 . 1 2 ) for each 𝑌 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) , it follows that 𝑋 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) and ( 𝑋 𝐴 ) = 𝑋 ( 𝐴 ) . Furthermore, since is hermitian, it follows that 𝐴 𝑋 𝐷 ( ) and ( 𝐴 𝑋 ) = ( 𝐴 ) 𝑋 for each 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) and 𝑋 𝒩 𝑅 w ( ) . It is clear that 𝜔 𝜉 0 ( ( 𝐴 ) ) = 𝜔 𝜉 0 ( 𝐴 ) for each 𝐴 𝐷 ( ) . Thus is an unbounded conditional expectation of ( , 𝜉 0 ) with respect to, 𝒩 . This completes that proof.

By Lemma 5.1, we have the following.

Theor