- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences

Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 342895, 7 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/342895

## Stability of Admissible Functions

School of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, UKM, 43600 Bangi, Malaysia

Received 2 June 2011; Accepted 16 July 2011

Academic Editor: Nak Cho

Copyright © 2011 Rabha W. Ibrahim. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

By using the concept of the weak subordination, we examine the stability (a class of analytic functions in the unit disk is said to be stable if it is closed under weak subordination) for a class of admissible functions in complex Banach spaces. The stability of analytic functions in the following classes is discussed: Bloch class, little Bloch class, hyperbolic little Bloch class, extend Bloch class , and Hilbert Hardy class .

#### 1. Introduction

We denote by the unit disk and by the space of all analytic functions in . A function , analytic in , is said to be an inner function if and only if such that almost everywhere. We recall that an inner function can be factored in the form where is a Blaschke product and is a singular inner function takes the form where is a finite positive Lebesgue measure.

Let and represent complex Banach spaces. The class of admissible functions , consists of those functions that satisfy

If and are analytic functions with , then is said to be weakly subordinate to , written as if there exist analytic functions , with an inner function , so that . A class of analytic functions in is said to be stable if it is closed under weak subordination, that is, if whenever and are analytic functions in with and .

By making use of the above concept of the weak subordination, we examine the stability for a class of admissible functions in complex Banach spaces . The stability of analytic functions appears in Bloch class, little Bloch class, hyperbolic little Bloch class, extend Bloch class , and Hilbert Hardy class .

#### 2. Stability of Bloch Classes

If *f* is an analytic function in , then is said to be a Bloch function if
The space of all Bloch functions is denoted by . The little Bloch space consists of those such that
The hyperbolic Bloch class is defined by using the hyperbolic derivative in place of the ordinary derivative in the definition of the Bloch space, where the hyperbolic derivative of an analytic self-map of the unit disk is given by . That is, if it is analytic and
Similarly, we say , the hyperbolic little Bloch class, if and
Note that, for the function , we replace by in the above definitions.

Theorem 2.1. *Let be a complex Banach space. If contains all inner functions in , then is stable.*

*Proof. *Suppose that contains all inner functions . Take and . Then, and are inner functions and . Hence, , and . Thus, *X* is stable.

Theorem 2.2. *Let be a space of analytic functions in which satisfies . Then, is stable.*

*Proof. *Suppose that and . Let and . Since is a countable subset of , it has capacity zero and therefore the universal covering map from onto is an inner function (see, e.g., Chapter 2 of [1]). Set , then the image of is contained in . Consequently, see [2], is a Bloch function. Since , we have that even though . Thus, is stable.

Theorem 2.3. *Let be a space of analytic functions in and . If satisfying (the zero element in ) and , then is stable.*

*Proof. *Assume that , and with . Then (see [3])
hence is an inner function in . By putting , we obtain that even though . Thus, is stable and consequently yields the stability of .

Next we discuss the stability of the spaces and . An analytic self-map of induces a linear operator , defined by . This operator is called the composition operator induced by .

Recall that a linear operator is said to be bounded if the image of a bounded set in is a bounded subset of , while is compact if it takes bounded sets to sets with compact closure. Furthermore, if is a bounded linear operator, then it is called weakly compact, if takes bounded sets in to relatively weakly compact sets in . By using the operator , we have the following result.

Theorem 2.4. *If is compact, then it is stable.*

*Proof. *Assume the analytic self-map of and ; thus, we have the linear operator , defined by . By the assumption, we obtain that is compact function in . Hence, is an inner function [4, Corollary 1.3] which implies the stability of .

Theorem 2.5. *Let be holomorphic self-map of such that
**
Then, is stable.*

*Proof. *Assume the analytic self-map of and ; hence, in virtue of [5, Theorem 4.7], it is implied that the composition operator on is compact. Thus we pose that is stable.

Theorem 2.6. *Consider is a holomorphic self-map of , satisfying the following condition: for every such that
**
when . Then, is stable.*

*Proof. *Assume the analytic self-map of and ; hence, in virtue of [5, Theorem 4.8], it is yielded that the composition operator on is compact. Hence, we obtain that is stable.

Theorem 2.7. *If is weakly compact in , then is stable.*

*Proof. *According to [5, Theorem 4.10], we have that is compact in and, consequently, is stable.

Theorem 2.8. *Let be holomorphic self-map of . If the function
**
is bounded, then is stable.*

*Proof. *Assume the analytic self-map of and . Since is bounded, then in virtue of [4, Theorem 1.2], it is yielded that is an inner function. By putting , where , we have the desired result.

Theorem 2.9. *If , then is stable.*

*Proof. *Following [4], it will be shown that there are inner functions ; then, is compact (see [4, 5]). Thus, is stable.

Theorem 2.10. *Let be self-map in and be continuous with satisfying
**
then is stable.*

*Proof. *According to [5, Theorem 5.15], we pose that is inner. Thus, in view of [4, Corollary 1.3], is compact; hence, is stable.

*Remark 2.11. *The Schwarz-Pick Lemma implies

(i) ;

(ii) ;

(iii) .

#### 3. Stability of the Hilbert Hardy Space

In this section, we assume that , where is the Hilbert Hardy space on , that is, the set of all analytic functions on with square summable Taylor coefficients. It is well known that each such (self-map in ) induces a bounded composition operator on . Moreover, Joel Shapiro obtained the following characterization of inner functions [6]: the function is inner if and only if where denotes the essential norm of .

Theorem 3.1. *Let be self-map of and . If (1.1) holds, then is stable.*

*Proof. *Assume the analytic self-map of and . Condition (1.1) implies that is an inner function. By setting and, consequently, , it is yielded that is stable.

Next we will show that the compactness of introduces the stability of . Two positive (or complex) measures and defined on a measurable space are called singular if there exist two disjoint sets and in whose union is such that is zero on all measurable subsets of while is zero on all measurable subsets of .

Theorem 3.2. *If the composition operator is compact, then is stable.*

*Proof. *Since is compact, all the Aleksandrov measures of are singular absolutely continuous with respect to the arc-length measure (see [7, 8]). Thus, in view of [4, Remark 1], is inner. By letting , and, consequently, , it is yielded that is stable.

Theorem 3.3. *If has values never approach the boundary of , then is stable.*

*Proof. *Assume the composition operator . Since has values never approach the boundary of is compact on (see [9, 10]). Hence, is an inner function and is stable.

*Remark 3.4. *(i) It is well known that if is compact on , then it is compact on for all (see [9, Theorem 6.1]).

(ii) is compact on if and only if (see [10, Theorem 2.8]).

Theorem 3.5. *If is univalent then, is stable, where are the classical Bergman and Hardy spaces.*

*Proof. *Since is univalent, is compact for all (see [11, Theorem 6.4]). In view of Remark 3.4, we obtain that is an inner function; hence, is stable.

Next, we use the angular derivative criteria to discuss the stability of admissible functions. Recall that has angular derivative at if the nontangential exists and if converges to some as nontangentially.

Theorem 3.6. *If satisfies both the angular derivative criteria and
**
where is the number of points in with multiplicity counted, then is stable.*

*Proof. *According to [12, Corollary 3.6], we have that is compact on . Again in view of Remark 3.4, we obtain that is inner and, consequently, is stable.

#### 4. Stability of Class

For , an analytic function in is said to belong to the space if where is the Lebesgue area measure and denotes the Green function for the disk given by The spaces are conformally invariant. In [13], It was shown that for all , while , the space of those whose boundary values have bounded mean oscillation on (see [14]). For is the Lipschitz space, consisting of those , which are continuous in and satisfy for some . In this section, we will show the stability of functions belong to the spaces and .

Theorem 4.1. *If , then is stable.*

*Proof. *In the similar manner of Theorem 2.2, we pose an inner function on . Now, in view of [15, Theorem H], yields , even though . Thus, is stable.

Theorem 4.2. *If such that
**
for some , then is stable.*

*Proof. *Again as in Theorem 2.2, we obtain an inner function on . Now in view of [15, Theorem K], yields , even though . Thus, is stable.

#### 5. Conclusion

From above, we conclude that the composition operator , of admissible functions in different complex Banach spaces, plays an important role in stability of these spaces. It was shown that the compactness of this operator implied the stability, when is an inner function on the unit disk . Furthermore, weakly compactness imposed the stability of Bloch spaces. In addition, noncompactness leaded to the stability for some spaces such as -spaces and Lipschitz spaces.

#### References

- E. F. Collingwood and A. J. Lohwater,
*The Theory of Cluster Sets*, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, No. 56, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1966. - J. M. Anderson, J. Clunie, and Ch. Pommerenke, “On Bloch functions and normal functions,”
*Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik*, vol. 270, pp. 12–37, 1974. View at Google Scholar - Gr. Şt. Sălăgean and H. Wiesler, “Jack's lemma for holomorphic vector-valued functions,”
*Cluj. Mathematica*, vol. 23(46), no. 1, pp. 85–90, 1981. View at Google Scholar - W. Smith, “Inner functions in the hyperbolic little Bloch class,”
*The Michigan Mathematical Journal*, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 103–114, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - A. Fletcher, “Bloch functions,”
*Essay*, vol. 3, pp. 1–38, 2002. View at Google Scholar - J. H. Shapiro, “What do composition operators know about inner functions?”
*Monatshefte für Mathematik*, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 57–70, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - J. A. Cima and A. L. Matheson, “Essential norms of composition operators and Aleksandrov measures,”
*Pacific Journal of Mathematics*, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 1997. View at Google Scholar - D. Sarason,
*Sub-Hardy Hilbert Spaces in the Unit Disk*, University of Arkansas Lecture Notes in the Mathematical Sciences, 10, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1994. - J. H. Shapiro and P. D. Taylor, “Compact, nuclear, and Hilbert-Schmidt composition operators on
*H*^{2},”*Indiana University Mathematics Journal*, vol. 23, pp. 471–496, 1973. View at Google Scholar - H.J. Schwartz,
*Composition operators on*, thesis, Univ. of Toledo, 1969.*H*^{p} - W. Smith, “Composition operators between Bergman and Hardy spaces,”
*Transactions of the American Mathematical Society*, vol. 348, no. 6, pp. 2331–2348, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - J. H. Shapiro, “The essential norm of a composition operator,”
*Annals of Mathematics. Second Series*, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 375–404, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - R. Aulaskari and P. Lappan, “Criteria for an analytic function to be Bloch and a harmonic or meromorphic function to be normal,” in
*Complex Analysis and Its Applications (Hong Kong, 1993)*, vol. 305 of*Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser.*, pp. 136–146, Longman Scientic and Technical, Harlow, UK, 1994. View at Google Scholar - D. Girela, “Analytic functions of bounded mean oscillation,” in
*Complex Function Spaces (Mekrijärvi, 1999)*, R. Aulaskari, Ed., vol. 4 of*Univ. Joensuu Dept. Math. Rep. Ser.*, pp. 61–170, Univ. Joensuu, Joensuu, Finland, 2001. View at Google Scholar - J. A. Peláez, “Inner functions as improving multipliers,”
*Journal of Functional Analysis*, vol. 255, no. 6, pp. 1403–1418, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar