Department of Mathematical Sciences, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30458, USA
A Rademacher-type formula for the Fourier coefficients of the generating function for the partitions of where no odd part is repeated is presented.
1. Partitions
A partition of a positive integer is a representation of as a sum of positive integers where order of summands (parts) does not matter. Let represent the number of partitions of . In 1937, Rademacher [1, 2] was able to express as a convergent series:
where
is a Kloosterman sum and
is a Dedekind sum.
In 2011, Bruinier and Ono [3] announced a new formula that expresses as a finite sum.
1.1. Formula for
Let
be Euler's generating function for . H. Rademacher used the classical circle method to find the coefficients of . There are many other infinite products to which this method could be applied. We introduce one of these infinite products here and derive the formula for the coefficients of . Define
Let denote the coefficient of in the expansion of , that is,
We will find a closed expression for . Note that
where equals the number of partitions of where no odd part is repeated. Thus
which is simpler than the one given by Sills [4, page 4, Equation (1.13)] in 2010:
where is defined as
2. Evaluation of the Path Integral
2.1. Convergence and Cauchy Residue Theorem
Considering as a complex variable in
we see from the right-hand side that infinite product and thus also infinite series are convergent for since
is a geometric series which converges for for any fixed .
Next, we note that from
we get that
The series on the right side of (2.4) is a Laurent series of . It has a pole of order at with residue . Applying Cauchy's Residue Theorem we get that
where is any positively oriented simple closed countour lying inside the unit circle.
2.2. Change of the Variable
The change of the variable maps the unit disk into an infinite vertical strip of width 1 in the -plane. To see this we note that from we get , so . Choosing the branch cut to be , we get
As traverses a circle centered at of radius in the positive direction, the point varies from to along a horizontal segment as could be easly deduced from (2.6).
Replacing the segment by the Rademacher path composed of upper arcs of the Ford circles formed by the Farey series , (2.5) becomes
which simplifies to
The above can be written as
where is the upper arc of the Ford circle .
2.3. Another Change of the Variable
Consider another change of variable
so that
Under this transformation the Ford circle in the -plane with center at and radius is mapped to a negatively oriented circle in the -plane with center at and radius . This follows from the fact that any point on the Ford circle is given by
Substitution of (2.13) into (2.11) gives
which is a circle centered at with radius . Now we make change of variable in (2.9). This gives
where
are initial and terminal points, respectively.
2.4. Modular Transformation
Next, we note that
where is the Dedekind eta function. Rewriting modular functional equation [5, page 96] for in terms of we get
with , .
To evaluate (2.15) we would like to express
in the same way we did for above. Two cases have to be considered: and . When we will replace by and by , and when , will be replaced by in order to obtain from . Hence, we have
which simplifies to
where and for .
We return to evaluation of (2.15). To proceed we note that
Rewriting (2.15) in terms of (2.21) and (2.22) we obtain
where
2.5. Estimation of the First Term
We will estimate the first term in (2.23) and will show that it is small for large . To do this we change variable again by letting . Then the first term in (2.23) becomes
where
are initial and terminal points obtained from (2.16), respectively. Under this change of variable circle in -plane with center at and radius is mapped to a circle in -plane centered at with radius . Note also that the mapping maps the circle and its interior onto a half-plane (where denotes the real part of complex variable and is the imaginary part). From elementary complex analysis we have that and , where . It is readily seen that the segment in the -plane is mapped to an infinite strip in the -plane. So, it follows that inside and on the circle we have that and . We now show that on the circle . To see this note that in the polar form on , . From this we get that
So, .
Furthermore, we may move path of integration from the arc joining and to a segment connecting these two points on the circle . By [5, page 104], Theorem 5.9 the length of the path of integration is bounded by , and on the segment connecting and , .
Next, let us define by
which is a part of the integrand in (2.25). Then, estimating the integrand in (2.25) we get
where
Note that does not depend on or . It depends on , but remains fixed in the above analysis. So,
for some constant , and we have that
This completes the estimation of the first term in (2.23). We proceed to the second term.
2.6. Estimation of the Second Term
First, we will show that
is small for large . Making change of variable as before, we get that
where and are as in (2.26), respectively. As before, we define by
Then, estimating the integrand, we see that
where
Note that does not depend on or . It depends on , but is fixed. It follows, therefore, that
for some constant . Then we have that
Combining the results from (2.33) and (2.40) we have that
Finally, we turn our attention to
We note that
where is a circle in the -plane centered at with radius , as before. It is easily seen that the length of the arc connecting 0 and is less then
From the discussion above we know that and on . So, the integrand in could be estimated as
2.7. Combining the Results
We combine the results in (2.44) and (2.45) to get
where is a constant. We can obtain similar estimate for and, as before, we get an error term in the formula for . Therefore, we can write
Letting we have that
We introduce another change of variable
Then (2.48) becomes
Let in (2.50), then the above becomes
2.8. Bessel Function
In Watson's Treatise on Bessel functions [6, page 181], we find a formula equivalent to the following:
Let
and . Then we have
Note that Bessel functions of this order can be expressed as
Expanding (2.55) we have that
Substituting (2.53) into (2.56), we get
Multiplying (2.57) by
we get
2.9. Final Form
Finally, we rewrite (2.54) in terms of (2.59) to get
Thus,
or equivalently
Acknowledgment
The authors wishes to express gratitude and appreciation to Dr. A. Sills for his suggestions and criticism.