- About this Journal
- Abstracting and Indexing
- Aims and Scope
- Article Processing Charges
- Articles in Press
- Author Guidelines
- Bibliographic Information
- Citations to this Journal
- Contact Information
- Editorial Board
- Editorial Workflow
- Free eTOC Alerts
- Publication Ethics
- Reviewers Acknowledgment
- Submit a Manuscript
- Subscription Information
- Table of Contents
International Journal of Nephrology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 419524, 13 pages
Vitamin D Receptor Activators and Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease
1Specialty School of Nephrology, DMCO, University of Milano Via di Rudini 8, 20142 Milano, Italy
2Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Via Pio II 3, 20153 Milano, Italy
Received 13 March 2011; Accepted 14 March 2011
Academic Editor: Biagio Raffaele Di Iorio
Copyright © 2011 Luciana Gravellone et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Vitamin D deficiency appears to be an underestimated risk factor for cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. Evidence from both basic science and clinical studies supports the possible protective role of vitamin D beyond its effect on mineral metabolism. Toxicity of pharmacologic doses of active vitamin D metabolites, in particular calcitriol, is mainly due to the possibility of positive calcium and phosphorus balance. Therefore, vitamin D analogs have been developed, which suppress PTH secretion and synthesis with reduced calcemic and phosphatemic effects. Observational studies suggest that in hemodialysis patients the use of a vitamin D receptor (VDR) activator, such as calcitriol, doxercalciferol, paricalcitol, or alfacalcidol, is associated with a reduced mortality when compared with nonusers of any VDR activator. In this article the existing literature on the topic is reviewed, although a more robust answer to the question of whether or not VDR activators have beneficial effects in hemodialysis patients will hopefully come from a randomized controlled trial.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased cardiovascular events and mortality when the glomerular filtration rate declines below 60 mL/min [1–3]. One significant event in CKD patients is the development of calcitriol deficiency secondary to the reduction/absence of kidney α1-hydroxylase which mediates the final hydroxylation step of 25(OH)vitamin-D to 1,25-(OH)2vitamin-D, or calcitriol [4, 5]. 1,25-(OH)2vitamin-D deficiency causes parathyroid hyperplasia and increased parathyroid hormone ; the consequent hyperparathyroidism and hyperphosphatemia are important risk factors for mortality in CKD patients [4, 7]. Accordingly, vitamin D treatment is associated with a reduced rate of cardiovascular diseases and mortality [5, 8].
Several studies also underline the side effects of calcitriol treatment, such as hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia, which carry an increased risk of cardiovascular calcifications. Compared to calcitriol, vitamin D analogs, such as paricalcitol, cause less hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia because of less bone resorption and less intestinal absorption [9, 10]. Calcitriol and vitamin D analogs are better identified as Vitamin D receptor activators.
In addition to suppression of PTH, use of vitamin D receptor activators has been associated with other effects: reduced hospitalization and mortality, prevention of cardiovascular diseases, vascular calcification and atherosclerosis, inhibition of the rennin-angiotensin system, preservation form cellular senescence, improved endothelial function, reduced tubular interstitial fibrosis, and reduced inflammatory status.
Studies about vitamin D receptor activators and clinical outcomes (Table 1) in chronic kidney disease are reviewed in this article.
2. Materials and Methods
We researched on PubMed (US National Center for Biotechnology Information) all the articles about “paricalcitol and outcomes,” “doxercalciferol and outcomes,” and “maxacalcitol and outcomes” and we found 41 articles: 29 studies on paricalcitol (8 randomized controlled trial, 3 observational studies, 1 open label study, 5 retrospective studies, 1 review, and 10 experimental studies in animals), 4 studies on doxercalciferol (3 randomized controlled studies, 1 observational study), 7 studies on maxacalcitol (6 observational studies and 1 experimental study on mice), and 1 experimental study comparing two vitamin D analogs, paricalcitol and doxecalciferol.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Suppression of PTH: Effects on Calcium and Phosphate Levels
3.1.1. Comparing Paricalcitol and Placebo (Table 2)
Coyne et al.  found that 91% of patients treated with paricalcitol reached two consecutive PTH level reductions of 30% or greater versus 13% of placebo patients (), while incidences of hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia were not significantly different between two groups. Martin et al.  demonstrated that 68% of patients treated with paricalcitol had a 30% decrease in serum PTH for 4 consecutive weeks—without evidence of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia—versus 8% of patients treated with placebo () (12). Lindberg et al.  showed, in an open-label study, that PTH levels fell into target range by month 5 without episodes of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia.
3.1.2. Comparing Paricalcitol and Calcitriol (Table 2)
A multicenter, double-blind RCT conducted by Sprague et al.  demonstrated that paricalcitol patients have ≥50% and faster reduction in baseline PTH versus calcitriol patients; they also showed that hypercalcemic episodes were 18% for paricalcitol versus 33% for calcitriol (). In a retrospective study, Mittman et al.  found that PTH levels were significantly lower for paricalcitol versus calcitriol (247 versus 190 pg/mL) while episodes of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia were significantly fewer for paricalcitol versus calcitriol. A crossover study conducted by Coyne et al.  demonstrated that suppression of PTH at 36 hours was significantly greater after administration of 160 μg of paricalcitol (63.6% ± 2.3%) versus calcitriol (but similar after administration of 160 μg of paricalcitol), while the increase of serum calcium is greater in calcitriol group. Lund et al.  in a single-center, double-blind, active-controlled, randomized, crossover trial observed that fractional intestinal calcium absorption was significantly lower after paricalcitol versus calcitriol. Finally, Mittman et al.  in a 2-year, single-center crossover study demonstrated that conversion from calcitriol to paricalcitol resulted in lower serum calcium (), lower serum phosphorus (), reduced PTH () and serum alkaline phosphatase ().
In a crossover study comparing paricalcitol and doxercalciferol, Joist et al.  observed a similar suppression of PTH, while serum phosphorus was significantly higher using doxercalciferol. In a double-blind randomized study, Frazão et al. , in an open-label doxercalciferol treatment (16 weeks), and randomized, double-blinded treatment with doxercalciferol or placebo (8 weeks), found that 80% of doxercalciferol patients showed a 70% reduction in PTH levels from baseline, although serum calcium and phosphate levels increased respectively from 9.2 to 9.7 mg/dL and from 5.4 to 5.9 mg/dL. Coburn et al.  in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in 55 patients with stage 3 or 4 CKD showed that iPTH levels decreased more in doxercalciferol treatment versus placebo (); no significant differences in mean serum calcium or phosphorus were observed between the two groups. In a randomized study, Zisman et al.  demonstrated that in patients on a maintenance dose of paricalcitol, dosing doxercalciferol at 55–60% of the paricalcitol dose results in comparable inhibition of PTH, with similar incidences of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia. Comparing maxacalcitol and calcitriol, Hayashi et al.  found no significant differences between the two groups in serum iPTH and phosphorus concentration, while serum calcium was significantly higher in the maxacalcitol versus calcitriol group during early treatment, but not at the end of treatment. Shiizaki et al. , in a study conducted in 5/6 nephrectomized rats treated by a direct injection of maxacalcitol into the parathyroid gland, found a significant decrease of PTH versus rats treated by vehicle, along with upregulation of both VDR and CaSR in the parathyroid tissue; no differences in calcium and phosphorus levels were observed between two groups. Kazama et al.  found that both maxacalcitol and calcitriol significantly decreased plasma intact PTH levels and increased serum Ca levels, but PTH levels were significantly lower in the maxacalcitol group after 24 weeks of treatment. In addition, serum phosphate levels were significantly higher in the calcitriol group. Thus, these authors proposed maxacalcitol as a possible less phosphatemic active vitamin D agent which might reduce the risk of extraskeletal calcification . Oyama et al.  treated patients with maxacalcitol intravenously and found that lower pretreatment plasma iPTH and calcium levels, but not phosphorus levels, were predictor of the response to treatment with maxacalcitol. On the other hand, serum levels of phosphorus did not significantly increase during treatment.
3.1.4. Parathyroid Hyperplasia (Table 5)
Several studies addressed the issue of parathyroid hyperplasia (Table 5). Okuno et al.  demonstrated that the responsiveness to maxacalcitol therapy of secondary hyperparathyroidism is dependent on parathyroid gland size and that the simple measurement of maximum parathyroid gland diameter by ultrasonography may be useful for predicting responsiveness to maxacalcitol treatment. They suggest that glands larger than 11 mm do not adequately respond to treatment. Shiizaki et al.  also studied 20 patients with SHPT and enlarged parathyroid glands treated by percutaneous maxacalcitol injection therapy, which significantly decreased the serum intact-PTH level and parathyroid gland volume for at least 12 weeks. Akizawa and Kurokawa , in a trial on the long-term administration of maxacalcitol, found that PTH levels fell promptly and were well controlled for one year, with doses ranging from 2.5 to 20 mg per dialysis. Serum calcium levels rose significantly, but within a physiological range; episodes of hypercalcemia were present in 33% of patients. Saito et al.  proposed an outpatient treatment regimen using percutaneous maxacalcitol injection therapy on a weekly basis for 4–6 weeks following dialysis. They found no major complications and intact parathyroid hormone decreased from 797 ± 178 pg/mL to 253 ± 25 pg/mL, while the parathyroid gland volume gradually decreased from 1.27 ± 1.06 cm3 to 0.24 ± 0.15 cm3.
3.2. Vitamin D Receptor Activators, Mineral Metabolism, and Bone Disorders (Table 6)
Activation of the vitamin D receptor plays a role in bone metabolism and treatment with VDR activators may favorably affect bone disease. Slatopolsky et al.  studied uremic rats to assess the efficacy of paricalcitol in prevention and treatment of renal osteodystrophy. Paricalcitol resulted effective in preventing and suppressing hyperparathyroidism induced by uremia and enhanced by a high phosphorus diet. In addition paricalcitol ameliorated the histomorphometric changes induced by uremia and high phosphorus diet, improving bone histology in uremic rats affected by severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. Kazama et al.  treated 50 patients with hyperparathyroidism (serum PTH > 300 pg/mL) with 10 μg of maxacalcitol intravenously injected thrice a week. They observed, along with a reduction of PTH levels, a significant decrease of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteoprotegerin levels. Osteoprotegerin is a natural glycoprotein which plays a critical role in osteoclast physiology. Elevated levels of circulating osteoprotegerin may account for the development of bone and mineral metabolic abnormalities in uremia.
3.3. Hospitalization and Mortality (Table 7)
There are studies which demonstrate that VDR activators are able to reduce hospitalization and mortality. Dobrez et al.  observed in 11 443 hemodialysis patients receiving at least 10 doses of vitamin D therapy that paricalcitol group had a lower risk of first all-cause hospitalization (14% less, ), fewer hospitalizations per year (0.642 fewer, ), and fewer hospital days per year (6.84 fewer, ) versus calcitriol. Vervloet and Twisk  analyzed the observational studies on the association between use of VDR activators and mortality. They underscored the absence of randomized controlled trials but considered the available observational studies “quite robust and consistent”. The hypothesis of a positive, clinically significant effect of treatment with VDR activators is supported by the presence of plausible mechanisms that might explain their observed benefit in patients on dialysis, beyond their classic role in bone and mineral metabolism. Specifically, these include inhibition of renin biosynthesis, modulation of arterial function, positive effects on left ventricular hypertrophy, attenuation of insulin resistance, potential positive impact on immune function, reduced incidence of cancer, and other potential mechanisms . A seminal study on the possible relationship between paricalcitol treatment and reduced mortality was published by Teng et al. . They designed a historical cohort study to compare the 36-month survival rate among hemodialysis patients receiving treatment with paricalcitol versus calcitriol: mortality rate among patients receiving paricalcitol was significantly lower versus patients receiving calcitriol (). Tentori et al. , conduced on 7731 patients to compare calcitriol, paracaclcitol and doxercalciferol. They demonstrated that mortality rates were similar in patients treated with doxercalciferol and paricalcitol, while higher in patients treated with calcitriol (). Thus, the survival benefit in chronic kidney disease patients, independent of the effects on parathyroid hormone and calcium levels, appears to be better with the use of vitamin D analogs (paricalcitol and doxercalciferol), followed by the use of calcitriol, and the worst survival is associated with no VDR activation therapy. The mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular and survival benefit of VDR activators are still under active investigation. Several different potential factors could play a role, as VDR has been identified in more than 30 different tissues in the human body, including the vasculature .
3.4. Cardiovascular Protection (Table 8)
One hypothesis derived from the available observational studies suggests that systemic activation of VDRs may have direct effects on the cardiovascular system to decrease mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease . Vitamin D and its analogs may play a role in preserving the cardiovascular system and reducing vascular calcification. In accordance with this concept, Levin and Li  suggested that Vitamin D deficiency might be an underestimated risk factor for cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease. They also underscore that evidence from both basic science and clinical studies supports the possible protective role of vitamin D beyond its effect on mineral metabolism. Bodyak et al.  studied Dahl salt-sensitive rats fed a high-salt diet (6% NaCl for 6 weeks) and receiving paricalcitol, showing lower heart and lung weights, reduced left ventricular mass, posterior wall thickness and end diastolic pressures, and increased fractional shortening. Xiang et al.  studied VDR knockout mice and they showed that cardiac renin mRNA levels were significantly increased, suggesting that the cardiac hypertrophy in VDR knock-out mice is a consequence of the activation of both the systemic and cardiac rennin angiotensin system and that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 regulates cardiac functions. In another gene knock-out study by Zhou et al. , ablation of the 1alpha-hydroxylase gene in mice led to hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, and systolic dysfunction, and this cardiac phenotype was rescued with exogenous 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D administration. The authors concluded that calcitriol plays a protective role in the cardiovascular system by repressing the renin-angiotensin system independent of extracellular calcium or phosphorus. In humans, the PRIMO study (Paricalcitol Capsules Benefits in Renal Failure Induced Cardiac MOrbidity Study), a multinational, randomized, double-blinded trial with oral paricalcitol compared to placebo, is ongoing : its primary outcome measure is to investigate the effects of paricalcitol on progression or regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in Stage 3B/4 chronic kidney disease subjects, through the evaluation of changes in left ventricular mass index, in a time frame of 48 weeks.
Mizobuchi et al.  studied uremic rats treated with calcitriol, paricalcitol, or doxercalciferol and found that calcitriol and doxercalciferol, but not paricalcitol, increase vascular calcification in uremic rats; in particular the different effects of VDR activators on vascular calcification appear to be independent of serum calcium and phosphate levels.
3.5. Prevention of Atheroscleroisis (Table 9)
Husain et al.  conducted a study in atherosclerotic mice to investigate the protective effect of paricalcitol combined with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (by enalapril) on aortic oxidative injury. They found that ApoE-deficient mice developed hypertension, which was prevented by enalapril or by the combined enalapril and paricalcitol treatment, but not by paricalcitol alone. On the other hand, atherosclerotic plaque in the aorta of ApoE-deficient mice was prevented by paricalcitol, enalapril, and paricalcitol + enalapril treatments. Combination therapy afforded greater protection against aortic inflammatory and oxidative injury in atherosclerosis than monotherapy. This observation underscores the role of VCR activators not only as PTH suppressors but also as an essential treatment in patients with chronic kidney diseases, which are notoriously more exposed to cardiovascular diseases and atherosclerosis.
3.6. Renal Protection and Reduction of Proteinuria (Table 10)
Agarwal et al.  in three double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled studies in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3 and 4, found a reduction in proteinuria in 51% of paricalcitol patients versus 25% of placebo patients (). The demonstration of a reduction in proteinuria associated with paricalcitol treatment, independent of concomitant use of agents that block the renin angiotensin system RAA, suggests that paricalcitol is a potential pharmacologic means of reducing proteinuria in chronic kidney disease. As a consequence, de Zeeuw et al.  designed a multinational, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial (VITAL study): patients affected by type 2 diabetes and albuminuria receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers were randomized to receive placebo, 1 μg/day paricalcitol, or 2 μg/day paricalcitol. They demonstrated that patients treated with 2 μg of paricalcitol showed an early and sustained reduction in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio versus placebo (). In another, smaller double-blind randomized study, Fishbane et al.  randomized 61 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate from 15 to 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 and protein excretion greater than 400 mg/24 h to receive paricalcitol, 1 mcg/day, or placebo: changes in protein excretion from baseline to last evaluation were +2.9% for controls and −17.6% for the paricalcitol group (). Zhang et al.  studied streptozotocin- (STZ-) induced diabetic mice and discovered that treatment with losartan and paricalcitol completely prevented albuminuria, restored glomerular filtration barrier structure, and markedly reduced glomerulosclerosis, preventing renal injury in diabetic nephropathy. Thus, evidence is available suggesting that inhibition of the rennin angiotensin system with combination of vitamin D analogs and rennin angiotensin system inhibitors effectively prevents renal injury in diabetic nephropathy and it may be associated with improved renal protection.
3.7. Renal Protection and Inhibition of the Renin-Angiotensin System (Table 11)
Paricalcitol inhibits the rennin-angiotensin system. Freundlich et al. , in a study in remnant kidney model of chronic renal failure (5/6 nephrectomy) mice, administrated paricalcitol and found that paricalcitol decreases angiotensinogen, renin, renin receptor, and vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA levels in the remnant kidney by 30–50 percent versus untreated animals. Bodyak et al.  also found that paricalcitol significantly reduced cardiac renin expression in Dahl salt-sensitive rats.
3.8. Renal Protection and Tubular Interstitial Fibrosis (Table 12)
Tan et al. , using a mouse model of obstructive nephropathy, found that paricalcitol attenuates renal tubulo-interstitial fibrosis. Paricalcitol reduced infiltration of T cells and macrophages in the obstructed kidney and this inhibition of inflammatory cell infiltration was accompanied by a decreased expression of RANTES and TNF-alpha. Their results suggest that paricalcitol inhibits renal inflammatory infiltration and RANTES expression by promoting VDR-mediated sequestration of NF-kappaB signaling. Wang et al.  treated with the VDR agonist doxercalciferol diet-induced obese mice, presenting proteinuria, renal mesangial expansion, accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins, and activation of oxidative stress. Treatment with doxercalciferol decreased proteinuria, podocyte injury, mesangial expansion, and extracellular matrix protein accumulation. The VDR agonist also decreased macrophage infiltration, oxidative stress, proinflammatory cytokines, and profibrotic growth factor. In addition, it prevented the activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system including the angiotensin II type 1 receptor and the mineralocorticoid receptor. An additional novel finding of this study is that the VDR activator decreased the accumulation of neutral lipids (triglycerides and cholesterol) and the expression of enzymes that mediate fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis.
3.9. Anti-Inflammatory Action (Table 13)
In a pilot trial, Alborzi et al.  randomized patients in 3 groups receiving oral paricalcitol 0, 1, or 2 mcg/day. They observed a reduction of high sensitivity C-reactive protein and of albuminuria in patients treated with paricalcitol, with a mechanism independent of its effects on hemodynamics or PTH suppression, as no differences were observed in iothalamate clearance, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, or PTH levels. Eleftheriadis et al.  also found that basal TNF-alpha concentration and basal IL-8 concentration were reduced by paricalcitol. These studies therefore suggest that paricalcitol also has immunomodulatory properties, another reason for administration of paricalcitol in patients with chronic renal failure. Indeed, patients with chronic kidney disease have chronic inflammation in the cardiovascular system and a reduced immunity to infections.
3.10. Endothelial Function (Table 14)
VDR activators have been shown to modulate inflammation, thrombosis, and vasolidation, which are associated with endothelial dysfunction , and they have a potential for treatment of cardiovascular disease, including the improvement of endothelial dysfunction, which increases cardiovascular disease risk in chronic kidney disease . Wu-Wong et al.  suggest that VDR activation improves endothelial function. They studied uremic rats (5/6 nephrectomized rat) and demonstrated that the uremia-impaired aortic relaxation was improved by paricalcitol (with a short duration of treatment, 2 weeks), in a dose-dependent manner, independent of serum PTH levels or blood pressure. PTH suppression alone did not improve endothelial function since in a separate experiment cinacalcet suppressed PTH without affecting endothelial-dependent vasorelaxation. The role of phosphate in uremic subjects is important to consider. In the study by Wu-Wong et al.  uremic rats had normal serum phosphate levels. In a previous study, Karavalakis et al.  reported that, in the 5/6 nephrectomized rats fed a special diet that induced severe hyperphosphatemia, paricalcitol at 0.2 μg/kg reduced vasoconstriction but increased vascular calcification.
The improvement of endothelial function by VDR activators may be one of the mechanisms responsible for the cardiovascular benefit associated with these agents in chronic kidney disease.
L. Gravellone and M. A. Rizzo contributed equally to the preparation of this paper.
- A. S. Go, G. M. Chertow, D. Fan, C. E. McCulloch, and C. Y. Hsu, “Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 13, pp. 1296–1305, 2004.
- M. J. Sarnak, B. E. Coronado, T. Greene et al., “Cardiovascular disease risk factors in chronic renal insufficiency,” Clinical Nephrology, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 327–335, 2002.
- R. Vanholder, Z. Massy, A. Argiles et al., “Chronic kidney disease as cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 20, pp. 1048–1056, 2005.
- G. A. Block, T. E. Hulbert-Shearon, N. W. Levin, and F. K. Port, “Association of serum phosphorus and calcium x phosphate product with mortality risk in chronic hemodialysis patients: a national study,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 607–617, 1998.
- M. Teng, M. Wolf, M. N. Ofsthun et al., “Activated injectable vitamin D and hemodialysis survival: a historical cohort study,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1115–1125, 2005.
- F. Llach and F. Velasquez Forero, “Secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic renal failure: pathogenic and clinical aspects,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 38, no. 5, supplement 5, pp. S20–S33, 2001.
- G. A. Block, P. S. Klassen, J. M. Lazarus, N. Ofsthun, E. G. Lowrie, and G. M. Chertow, “Mineral metabolism, mortality, and morbidity in maintenance hemodialysis,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 2208–2218, 2004.
- D. L. Andress, “Vitamin D in chronic kidney disease: a systemic role for selective vitamin D receptor activation,” Kidney International, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 33–43, 2006.
- R. J. Lund, D. L. Andress, M. Amdahl, L. A. Williams, and R. P. Heaney, “Differential effects of paricalcitol and calcitriol on intestinal calcium absorption in hemodialysis patients,” American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 165–170, 2010.
- L. A. Greenbaum, N. Benador, S. L. Goldstein et al., “Intravenous paricalcitol for treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in children on hemodialysis,” American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 97–106, 2008.
- D. Coyne, M. Acharya, P. Qiu et al., “Paricalcitol capsule for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in stages 3 and 4 CKD,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 263–276, 2006.
- K. J. Martin, E. A. González, M. Gellens, L. L. Hamm, H. Abboud, and J. Lindberg, “19-nor-1-α-25-dihydroxyvitamin D (paricalcitol) safely and effectively reduces the levels of intact parathyroid hormone in patients on hemodialysis,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1427–1432, 1998.
- J. Lindberg, K. J. Martin, E. A. González, S. R. Acchiardo, J. R. Valdin, and C. Soltanek, “A long-term, multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol in end-stage renal disease,” Clinical Nephrology, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 315–323, 2001.
- S. M. Sprague, F. Llach, M. Amdahl, C. Taccetta, and D. Batlle, “Paricalcitol versus calcitriol in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism,” Kidney International, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1483–1490, 2003.
- N. Mittman, R. Khana, S. Rani, et al., “Comparison of paricalcitol and calcitriol therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients on maintenance dialysis,” in Proceedings of the American Society of Nephrology Renal Week Conference, St. Louis, Mo, USA, October-November 2004.
- D. W. Coyne, M. Grieff, S. N. Ahya, K. Giles, K. Norwood, and E. Slatopolsky, “Differential effects of acute administration of 19-nor-1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D on serum calcium and phosphorus in hemodialysis patients,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1283–1288, 2002.
- R. J. Lund, D. L. Andress, M. Amdahl, L. A. Williams, and R. P. Heaney, “Differential effects of paricalcitol and calcitriol on intestinal calcium absorption in hemodialysis patients,” American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 165–170, 2010.
- N. Mittman, B. Desiraju, K. B. Meyer, J. Chattopadhyay, and M. M. Avram, “Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in ESRD: a 2-year, single-center crossover study,” Kidney International Supplement, no. 117, pp. S33–S36, 2010.
- H. E. Joist, S. N. Ahya, K. Giles, K. Norwood, E. Slatopolsky, and D. W. Coyne, “Differential effects of very high doses of doxercalciferol and paricalcitol on serum phosphorus in hemodialysis patients,” Clinical Nephrology, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 335–341, 2006.
- J. M. Frazão, L. Elangovan, H. M. Maung et al., “Intermittent doxercalciferol (1α-hydroxyvitamin d) therapy for secondary hyperparathyroidism,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 550–561, 2000.
- J. W. Coburn, H. M. Maung, L. Elangovan et al., “Doxercalciferol safely suppresses PTH levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism associated with chronic kidney disease stages 3 and 4,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 877–890, 2004.
- A. L. Zisman, W. Ghantous, P. Schinleber, L. Roberts, and S. M. Sprague, “Inhibition of parathyroid hormone: a dose equivalency study of paricalcitol and doxercalciferol,” American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 591–595, 2005.
- M. Hayashi, Y. Tsuchiya, Y. Itaya et al., “Comparison of the effects calcitriol and maxacalcitol on secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients on chronic haemodialysis: a randomized propective multicenter trial,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 2067–2073, 2004.
- K. Shiizaki, S. Negi, I. Hatamura et al., “Biochemical and cellular effects of direct maxacalcitol injection into parathyroid gland in uremic rats,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 97–108, 2005.
- J. J. Kazama, H. Maruyama, I. Narita, and F. Gejyo, “Maxacalcitol is a possible less phosphatemic vitamin D analog,” Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 352–354, 2005.
- Y. Oyama, J. J. Kazama, K. Omori et al., “Pretreatment plasma intact parathyroid hormone and serum calcium levels, but not serum phosphate levels, predict the response to maxacalcitol therapy in dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism,” Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 142–147, 2005.
- S. Okuno, E. Ishimura, K. Kitatani et al., “Relationship between parathyroid gland size and responsiveness to maxacalcitol therapy in patients with secodary hyperparathyroidism,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2613–2621, 2003.
- K. Shiizaki, I. Hatamura, S. Negi et al., “Percutaneous maxacalcitol injection therapy regresses hyperplasia of parathyroid and induces apoptosis in uremia,” Kidney International, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 992–1003, 2003.
- T. Akizawa and K. Kurokawa, “Long-term clinical effect of maxacalcitol on hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism,” Clinical Calcium, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 781–788, 2002.
- A. Saito, Y. Matsumoto, Y. Oyama, M. Asaka, and H. Yokoyama, “Effectiveness of weekly percutaneous maxacalcitol injection therapy in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism,” Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 98–103, 2010.
- E. Slatopolsky, M. Cozzolino, Y. Lu et al., “Efficacy of 19-Nor-1,25-(OH)2D2 in the prevention and treatment of hyperparathyroid bone disease in experimental uremia,” Kidney International, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 2020–2027, 2003.
- J. J. Kazama, K. Omori, N. Takahashi et al., “Maxacalcitol therapy decreases circulating osteoprotegerin levels in dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism,” Clinical Nephrology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 64–68, 2005.
- D. G. Dobrez, A. Mathes, M. Amdahl, S. E. Marx, J. Z. Melnick, and S. M. Sprague, “Paricalcitol-treated patients experience improved hospitalization outcomes compared with calcitriol-treated patients in real-world clinical settings,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1174–1181, 2004.
- M. G. Vervloet and J. W.R. Twisk, “Mortality reduction by vitamin D receptor activation in end-stage renal disease: a commentary on the robustness of current data,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 703–706, 2009.
- M. Teng, M. Wolf, E. Lowrie, N. Ofsthun, J. M. Lazarus, and R. Thadhani, “Survival of patients undergoing hemodialysis with paricalcitol or calcitriol therapy,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 349, no. 5, pp. 446–456, 2003.
- F. Tentori, W. C. Hunt, C. A. Stidley et al., “Mortality risk among hemodialysis patients receiving different vitamin D analogs,” Kidney International, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 1858–1865, 2006.
- N. Bodyak, J. C. Ayus, S. Achinger et al., “Activated vitamin D attenuates left ventricular abnormalities induced by dietary sodium in Dahl salt-sensitive animals,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 43, pp. 16810–16815, 2007.
- W. Xiang, J. Kong, S. Chen et al., “Cardiac hypertrophy in vitamin D receptor knockout mice: role of the systemic and cardiac renin-angiotensin systems,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 288, no. 1, pp. E125–E132, 2005.
- C. Zhou, F. Lu, K. Cao, DI. Xu, D. Goltzman, and D. Miao, “Calcium-independent and 1,25(OH)2D3-dependent regulation of the renin-angiotensin system in 1alpha-hydroxylase knockout mice,” Kidney International, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 170–179, 2008.
- The PRIMO Study—Paricalcitol Capsules Benefits in Renal Failure Induced Cardiac Morbidity in Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 and 4 (ongoing), http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00497146.
- M. Mizobuchi, J. L. Finch, D. R. Martin, and E. Slatopolsky, “Differential effects of vitamin D receptor activators on vascular calcification in uremic rats,” Kidney International, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 709–715, 2007.
- K. Husain, E. Suarez, A. Isidro, and L. Ferder, “Effects of paricalcitol and enalapril on atherosclerotic injury in mouse aortas,” American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 296–304, 2010.
- R. Agarwal, M. Acharya, J. Tian et al., “Antiproteinuric effect of oral paricalcitol in chronic kidney disease,” Kidney International, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 2823–2828, 2005.
- D. De Zeeuw, R. Agarwal, M. Amdahl et al., “Selective vitamin D receptor activation with paricalcitol for reduction of albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes (VITAL study): a randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 376, no. 9752, pp. 1543–1551, 2010.
- S. Fishbane, H. Chittineni, M. Packman, P. Dutka, N. Ali, and N. Durie, “Oral paricalcitol in the treatment of patients with CKD and proteinuria: a randomized trial,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 647–652, 2009.
- Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, G. Ning, D. K. Deb, J. Kong, and C. L. Yan, “Combination therapy with AT1 blocker and vitamin D analog markedly ameliorates diabetic nephropathy: blockade of compensatory renin increase,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 41, pp. 15896–15901, 2008.
- M. Freundlich, Y. Quiroz, Z. Zhang et al., “Suppression of renin-angiotensin gene expression in the kidney by paricalcitol,” Kidney International, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 1394–1402, 2008.
- X. Tan, X. Wen, and Y. Liu, “Paricalcitol inhibits renal inflammation by promoting vitamin D receptor-mediated sequestration of NF-κB signaling,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1741–1752, 2008.
- X. X. Wang, T. Jiang, Y. Shen, et al., “Vitamin D receptor agonist doxercalciferol modulates dietary fat-induced renal disease and renal lipid metabolism,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 300, no. 3, pp. F801–F810, 2011.
- P. Alborzi, N. A. Patel, C. Peterson et al., “Paricalcitol reduces albuminuria and inflammation in chronic kidney disease a randomized double-blind pilot trial,” Hypertension, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 249–255, 2008.
- T. Eleftheriadis, G. Antoniadi, V. Liakopoulos, C. Kartsios, I. Stefanidis, and G. Galaktidou, “Paricalcitol reduces basal and lipopolysaccharide-induced (LPS) TNF-α and IL-8 production by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells,” International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 181–185, 2010.
- J. R. Wu-Wong, W. Noonan, M. Nakane et al., “Vitamin D receptor activation mitigates the impact of uremia on endothelial function in the 5/6 nephrectomized rats,” International Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 2010, Article ID 625852, 2010.
- E. Karavalakis, A. Eräranta, T. I. Vehmas et al., “Paricalcitol treatment and arterial tone in experimental renal insufficiency,” Nephron Experimental Nephrology, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. e84–e93, 2008.
- A. Levin and Y. C. Li, “Vitamin D and its analogues: do they protect against cardiovascular disease in patients with kidney disease?” Kidney International, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1973–1981, 2005.
- R. Ebert, N. Schütze, J. Adamski, and F. Jakob, “Vitamin D signaling is modulated on multiple levels in health and disease,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 248, no. 1-2, pp. 149–159, 2006.
- J. R. Wu-Wong, “Potential for vitamin D receptor agonists in the treatment of cardiovascular disease,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 395–412, 2009.