About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Nephrology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 304135, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/304135
Research Article

Morphological Characterization of the Polyflux 210H Hemodialysis Filter Pores

1College of Dentistry, University of Saskatchewan, 105 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5E4
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5A9
3Saskatchewan Transplant Program, St. Paul’s Hospital, 1702, 20th Street West, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7M 0Z9
4Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 0W8

Received 20 August 2012; Accepted 9 October 2012

Academic Editor: Vladimír Tesař

Copyright © 2012 A. Hedayat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B.-H. Sue, Y. Shi, P. Fu, Y. Tao, S. Nie, and C.-S Zhao, “Clinical evaluation of polyethersulfone high-flux hemodialysis membrane compared to other membranes,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 124, pp. E91–E98, 2012.
  2. A. Rastogi and A. R. Nissenson, “Technological advances in renal replacement therapy: five years and beyond,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 4, supplement 1, pp. S132–S136, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Klinkmann, P. Ivanovich, and D. Falkenhagen, “Biocompatibility: the need for a systems approach,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 40–42, 1993. View at Scopus
  4. K. Opatrný, “Clinical importance of biocompatibility and its effect on haemodialysis treatment,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 18, supplement 5, pp. V41–V44, 2003. View at Scopus
  5. S. Subramanian, R. Venkataraman, and J. A. Kellum, “Influence of dialysis membranes on outcomes in acute renal failure: a meta-analysis,” Kidney International, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1819–1823, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Chanard, S. Lavaud, C. Randoux, and P. Rieu, “New insights in dialysis membrane biocompatibility: relevance of adsorption properties and heparin binding,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 252–257, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. E. Bloembergen, R. M. Hakim, D. C. Stannard et al., “Relationship of dialysis membrane and cause-specific mortality,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1999. View at Scopus
  8. G. Eknoyan and T. Greene, “Hemo study group: primary results from the HEMO study,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 13, article 421A, 2002.
  9. R. Deppisch, M. Storr, R. Buck, and H. Göhl, “Blood material interactions at the surfaces of membranes in medical applications,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 14, no. 1–3, pp. 241–254, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Lee, G. Park, G. Amy et al., “Determination of membrane pore size distribution using the fractional rejection of nonionic and charged macromolecules,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 201, no. 1-2, pp. 191–201, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. H. She, K. L. Tung, and L. X. Kong, “Calculation of effective pore diameters in porous filtration membranes with image analysis,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 427–434, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Mey-Marom and M. G. Katz, “Measurement of active pore size distribution of microporous membranes—a new approach,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 119–130, 1986. View at Scopus
  13. C. C. Ho and A. L. Zydney, “Measurement of membrane pore interconnectivity,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 101–112, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Emsley, B. Lohkamp, W. G. Scott, and K. Cowtan, “Features and development of Coot,” Acta Crystallographica Section D, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 486–501, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Bernard, A. Ouled Amor, and R. Lauwerys, “Charge-dependent renal uptake of beta2-microglobulin in conscious rats,” Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 415–423, 1992. View at Scopus
  16. P. A. Peterson, P. E. Evrin, and I. Berggård, “Differentiation of glomerular, tubular, and normal proteinuria: determinations of urinary excretion of beta-2-macroglobulin, albumin, and total protein,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1189–1198, 1969. View at Scopus
  17. J. Han, J. Fu, and R. B. Schoch, “Molecular sieving using nanofilters: past, present and future,” Lab on a Chip, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. P. Broek, H. A. Teunis, D. Bargeman, E. D. Sprengers, and C. A. Smolders, “Characterization of hollow fiber hemodialysis membranes: pore size distribution and performance,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 73, no. 2-3, pp. 143–152, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. A. Ward, “Protein-leaking membranes for hemodialysis: a new class of membranes in search of an application?” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 2421–2430, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Ronco, S. Kumar Bowry, A. Brendolan et al., “Hemodialyzer: from macro-design to membrane nanostructure; the case of the FX-class of hemodialyzers,” Kidney International, Supplement, vol. 61, no. 80, pp. S126–S142, 2002. View at Scopus