Review Article

Pre-, Pro-, and Synbiotics: Do They Have a Role in Reducing Uremic Toxins? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Published studies on the effectiveness of probiotics on reducing indoxyl sulphate and p-cresyl sulphate.

Author
(year)
Study
design
PatientsSupplement total dose/day (CFU or g) number of doses/dayDurationAnalysis methodMain results (preintervention and postintervention (mean difference))CommentsGrade benefit

Ling et al.,
(1994) [25]
healthy femaleLactobacillus rhamnosus GG administered in yogurt0–4 wks Heat and acid deproteinisation, HPLC, FS Urinary PC mg/24 hr (i) Subgroup from a larger study Moderate
Placebo-controlled non-randomised experimental trial treatment(within group, wk 0–4)(ii) 2 week runout period levels increased towards baseline levels 41.5 mg/24 hr
placebo1 dose/dayTx grp: 45.0–35.5 (−9.5) (<0.05)(iii) Both groups were also given 9 g fibre from aleuronic layer of whole-grain rye dailyPC+
Placebo: 46.5–43.1 (−3.4) (ns)(iv) 3 day food records were analysed for macro nutrients and fibre questionnaire for total fibre intake. No significant difference between groups was reported

Tohyama et al., (1981)
[26]
healthy (all male)Lactobacillus casei 90241 
administered in milk
0–3 wk control
4–9 wk
intervention
Heat and acid deproteinisation, GC, FID Urinary (percentage of reduction (±SD)) (i) Urine was analysed at different times of the day between baseline and postVery Low
Interrupted time series without a parallel control group(within group, wk 4–9)(ii) Included rat study which showed significant reductions also
PC − 42.6 (±33.7) (<0.05)(iii) Strong correlation between fecal tryptophanase activity and urinary IS ( )
1 dose/dayIS − 29.3 (±15.9) (<0.05)(iv) 2 week run-out period concentrations returned to initial levels post feeding—data not shownPC+
(v) No dietary restrictionsIS+

Fujiwara et al., (2001)
[27]
Case series healthy Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055SR-lyophilized administrated in milk
1 dose/day
0-1 wkDeprotinisation method was not disclosed, HPLC, UV-VIS Fecal mg/g
(wk 0-1)
PC 0.064–0.022* (− 0.045) (0.01)
Indole (not reported) (ns)
(i) Subgroup of another study
(ii) Decreased staphylococcus
(iii) By 5 day run-out PC levels returned to baseline* 
(iv) Usual diet with restriction on fermented milk, pickles, and natto
Low
PC+
IS−

Takayama et al., (2003)
[33]
Nonrandomised-placebo controlled experimental trial hemodialysis ( male)Probiotic: Bifidobacterium longum strain JCM008 administered in gastroresistant capsules 3 1090–5 wksDeproteinization (not disclosed)
Reverse-phase HPLC, FS
Serum IS (mg/L)
(within group, wk 0−5)
(i) Placebo has different dose and strainLow
treatmentPlacebo: Bifidobacterium (powder form) 2 107Tx group: 49.0–35.0 (−14.0) (<0.005)(ii) 2 week runout period levels increased towards baseline levels 44 mg/LIS+
placeboDose/day not disclosedPlacebo: 48.0–52.0 (+4.0) (ns)(iii) No monitoring of diet

Taki et al., (2005)
[34]
hemodialysis ( male)Bifidobacterium longum 0–12 wksNot disclosed Serum IS (mg/L) (i) Strain not disclosedVery low
0–4 wks: 3 × 109(wk 0–4)
35.1–31.0 (−4.1) (<0.01)
(ii) Analysis methods not described
Case series4–8 wks: 6 × 109
8–12 wk: 12 × 109
(wk 0–8)
35.1–31.7 (−3.4) (<0.05)
(iii) No dose response effect
Administered in gastroresistant capsule(wk 0–12)
35.1–31.9 (−3.2) (<0.05)
(iv) No runout period
Dose/day not disclosed(v) Monitoring of diet (not disclosed)IS+

Hida et al., (1996) [35] hemodialysis ( male)Bifidobacterium infantis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Enterococcus faecalis 2 108 of each strain administered in a capsule0–4 wksPlasma: reverse-Phase HPLC, UV detection Plasma (mg/L)
(wk 0–4)
(i) Strain not disclosedVery low
Case seriesFecal: steam distilled, GC, FIDIS 45.2–31.1 (−14.1) (<0.01)(ii) Fecal analysis included 10 patients only from 0–2 weekIS+
PC 17.8–18.3*(+0.5) (ns)(iii) Decreased enterobacteria PC+ (fecal)
2 dose/day Fecal (mg/g)  (wk 0–4)
PC 102.0–70.0* (−32.0 ) (<0.01)
(iv) No runout periodPC− (serum)
Indole 45.0–32.0* (−13.0) (<0.05)(v) No monitoring of diet