- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
International Journal of Photoenergy
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 108175, 7 pages
Synthesis of Mesoporous - Binary Oxides Photocatalyst by Sol-Gel Method Using PEG1000 as Template
1School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shenyang Ligong University, Shenyang 110159, China
2Institute of Applied Ecology, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
Received 16 March 2012; Revised 21 April 2012; Accepted 22 April 2012
Academic Editor: Feng Chen
Copyright © 2012 Wenjie Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The mesoporous TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides were prepared by sol-gel method using PEG1000 as template. The effects of PEG1000 concentration on the properties and photocatalytic activity of the materials were investigated. The binary oxides were composed of nanocrystallite anatase TiO2 and amorphous Al2O3. The surfaces of the samples prepared with PEG1000 were rough and had many long grooves on the surfaces. When PEG1000 concentration increased from 0 to 0.048 mol/L, the BET specific surface area of the samples changed from 99 to 140 m2·g−1, and the average pore size decreased from 22 to 11 nm. The TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides prepared at PEG1000 concentration of 0.03 mo/L had the maximum photocatalytic activity and high adsorption capacity. Methyl orange photocatalytic degradation and adsorption rates on 600 mg/l of TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides were 36.1% and 18.6% after 30 min, respectively. Total removal of the dye was achieved after 3 h of reaction.
TiO2 is regarded as the most powerful photocatalyst in recent years because of its prospective properties such as high photocatalytic activity, inexpensive, and nontoxic to human life [1–5]. However, photocatalytic activity of TiO2 cannot meet the demand of large-scale industrial application. Porous photocatalytic materials were used to promote photocatalytic activity and to improve the efficiency of photoelectron conversion because large surface area and porous structure are usually good for strong adsorption ability. Many microporous and mesoporous photocatalytic materials have been prepared accordingly [6–11].
In order to improve photocatalytic activity of porous TiO2, a popular route is to incorporate other inorganic oxides such as SiO2 , ZrO2 , WO3 , Cu2O , and Ta2O5  into the microstructure of porous TiO2. Although there are reports about TiO2-Al2O3 photocatalytic materials [17–20], these materials are the simple mixtures of TiO2 and Al2O3 particles prepared separately. The mechanical mixture of the two oxides has only limited interaction between external surfaces.
In the present work, mesoporous TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides were synthesized simultaneously by sol-gel method using a mixed precursor of tetrabutyl titanate and aluminum isopropoxide. Polyethylene glycol (PEG1000) was used as template. The effects of PEG1000 concentration on the physiochemical properties and photocatalytic activity of the materials were investigated. The samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), frontier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FT-IR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and N2-adsorption and desorption techniques. Adsorption capacity and photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange on the materials under UV-light irradiation were investigated to ascertain the enhanced activity of the mesoporous TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides.
2.1. Material Preparation
A given mass of tetrabutyl titanate, aluminum isopropoxide [n(Ti)/n(Al) = 12], polyethylene glycol (PEG1000), and concentrated hydrochloric acid were added into absolute ethanol under magnetic stirring. Another mixture of deionized water and absolute ethanol was dropped into the former solution at a constant speed. The volume ratio of constituents in the final solution was V[Ti(OC4H9)4] : V(C2H5OH) : V(HCl) : V(H2O) = 1 : 5 : 0.05 : 0.5. The solution was kept under stirring until the sol and gel formed. The gel was aged for 12 h at ambient temperature and dried at 80°C for 8 h. After that, the samples were grinded and calcinated at 500°C for 3 h. The prepared materials were grinded again before use.
The crystalline phase of the photocatalyst was measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with D/max-rB diffractometer using a Cu radiation in 2 range of 10°–80°. The surface morphology was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). FT-IR spectrum of the sample was recorded using a FT-IR spectrometer in the wavenumber range of 4000–400 cm−1. The elemental composition of the sample was investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Multilab 2000). The N2 adsorption and desorption of the sample was measured by F-Sorb 3400 specific surface area and pore size distribution analytical instrument. Specific surface areas and pore size distribution were calculated from the N2 desorption isotherms, according to Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) equation and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method, respectively.
2.3. Adsorption and Photocatalytic Activity
The adsorption and photocatalytic activity of the samples were investigated by measuring the decoloration rate of methyl orange (MO) in a lab-scale photocatalytic reactor. The reactor consisted of a 250 mL beaker and a UV lamp hanging over the beaker. The 20 W UV-light lamp with main irradiation wavelength at 253.7 nm was used as light source to trigger the photocatalytic reaction, and the average light intensity was about 1100 μW/cm2. The concentration of MO was calculated by Lambert-Beer law using 721E spectrophotometer and TU-1901 UV-Vis double-beam spectrophotometer. The absorbency of MO was measured at 468 nm corresponding to the maximum absorption wavelength. The decoloration rate of methyl orange was calculated by the following equation , where is the initial dye concentration, is the concentration after adsorption-desorption equilibrium, and is the concentration after certain time of irradiation.
The solution of MO and photocatalyst ( mL, mg/L) was mixed in the reactor. The adsorption of MO on photocatalyst was measured in the suspension before photocatalytic reaction. The solution was allowed to reach an adsorption-desorption equilibrium under 30 min of magnetic stirring in the dark. After that, 5 mL of suspension was taken out of the reactor and was filtered through a Millipore filter (pore size 0.45 μm) to remove the catalyst. The filtrated solution was measured for its absorbency. After that, the remaining MO and photocatalyst suspension was put under UV light irradiation. After a distinct time, 5 mL of suspension solution was removed and filtrated to measure the change of MO concentration. If not indicated, the irradiation time in the subsequent experiments was set to 30 min.
3. Results and Discussion
Sol-gel method with the advantages of reacting in low temperature and easily controlled homogeneous multicomposition system has become a popular method to prepare microporous and mesoporous photocatalytic materials in a relatively large scale. In order to obtain porous structure, suitable template needs to be used to bond with precursors in sol-gel system. There are some chemical compounds that have been used as templates, such as surfactants and copolymers. Polyethylene glycol [H–(O–CH2–CH2)n–OH] is one of nonionic templates and dissolves easily in polar solvents. In sol-gel system, three-dimensional structure of precursor is formed preferably by crosslink action among hydrolysates and PEG. Porous materials with arranged structure can be prepared by removing PEG template consequently.
XRD patterns of mesoporous TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides prepared using different concentration of PEG1000 are shown in Figure 1. All the diffraction peaks in the patterns indicate the formation of anatase TiO2 crystallite. The diffraction peaks turned from sharp and high to broad and low when PEG1000 concentration increased from 0 to 0.060 mol/L. The peaks relating to the characteristic peaks of Al2O3 were not found. It declares that Al2O3 was in its amorphous state in the materials. The anatase TiO2 crystalline sizes calculated based on Scherrer’s formula were 16.1, 12.8, 10.6, 8.8, and 7.6 nm along with increasing PEG1000 concentration. It indicates that the growth of TiO2 nanocrystals was hindered by PEG1000 addition during sol-gel preparation of the materials.
Template PEG1000 acted as pore forming reagent in sol-gel preparation of TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides. The precursor molecules were attached to PEG1000 molecules in the sol and formed a three-dimensional structure. After the PEG template was burned out during thermal treatment at high temperature, the resulting material was composed of porous TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides. The pores inside the oxides prohibited crystallite aggregation during calcination process. When high concentration of PEG1000 was used in the sols, more pores could form in the binary oxides, leading to small crystalline size of anatase TiO2 in the binary oxides.
The SEM images of the samples are shown in Figure 2. The surface morphology of the TiO2-Al2O3 oxides prepared without PEG1000 was quite smooth. The main surface was fairly flat with very slight roughness. Some particles in the size less than 1 μm scattered on the surface. These particles might be the residues of small particles produced during grinding. The surfaces of the samples prepared with PEG1000 were comparatively rough, and there were many long grooves on the surfaces. Many small particles formed during grinding also scattered over the surfaces.
Surface morphology is quite essential for photocatalytic activity of the materials. It is believed that rough and structured surface with high surface area is capable of providing more active centers. The rough surface of porous TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides clearly indicates the function of PEG template. There were no large pores existing on the surfaces of the binary oxides prepared with PEG. In other words, the surfaces were quite rough with obvious steps and grooves.
The FT-IR spectra of mesoporous TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides prepared using different concentration of PEG1000 are shown in Figure 3. The low-frequency absorption band at 499 cm−1 is attributed to the Ti–O–Ti vibration of the samples [22, 23]. The band at 1628 cm−1 corresponds to the bending vibration of O–H, and the band around 3392 cm−1 is assigned to the surface adsorbed water and hydroxyl groups [24, 25]. The broad band between 500 cm−1 and 800 cm−1 is attributed to Al–O–Al vibration of the samples . No evidence of Ti–O–Al vibration is found, indicating that the samples were composed of TiO2 and Al2O3.
The purpose of this paper was to prepare TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides. Since tetrabutyl titanate and aluminum isopropoxide were mixed together as precursor in order to make the sol containing both titanium and aluminum, the oxides of titanium and aluminum were thoroughly distributed in the prepared binary oxides. The FT-IR spectra reveal that there was no chemical reaction between titanium dioxide and aluminum oxide.
Figure 4 shows XPS spectra of mesoporous TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides prepared at PEG1000 concentration of 0.030 mol/L in the sols. The binding energy peaks of and are approximately at 458.5 eV and 464.2 eV, which are attributed to the typical XPS spectra of Ti4+ . The symmetrical binding energy peaks of and indicate that the titanium was in its full oxidation state and there was no reduced titanium existing in TiO2-Al2O3 oxides. The Al2p peak of the TiO2-Al2O3 composite occurring at the binding energy of 75.1 eV is expected for Al3+ in aluminum oxide [28, 29]. The O1s spectrum observed at 529.5 eV is agreed with the electronic binding of O2- in Ti-O and Al-O , and the binding energy of 531.8 eV is assigned to O2- of OH adsorbed on the surface of the sample . Therefore, it can be concluded that TiO2 and Al2O3 existed in the binary oxides. As indicated before in XRD patterns, there was no other species formed in the materials.
BET specific surface area, pore volume, and pore size of mesoporous TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides are listed in Table 1. When PEG1000 concentration increased from 0 to 0.048 mol/L, the BET specific surface area of the samples grew from 99.2 to 140.1 m2·g−1, and the average pore size decreased from 22.4 to 10.9 nm. Further increase of PEG1000 concentration led to the reverse trend. The addition of PEG1000 template during sol-gel process resulted in small pore size and large specific surface area in the materials.
The PEG1000 molecules which were captured in the gel were consequently burnt out during calcination process, leaving pores inside the binary oxides. The pore skeleton was composed of titanium and aluminum oxides. The pores shrank at high temperature to some extent depending on stability of the pores structure during thermal treatment. As calculated from XRD results, high concentration of PEG1000 in the sols was responsible for more pores forming in the prepared binary oxides, leading to small crystalline size of anatase TiO2. The aggregation of smaller crystallites is responsible for the formation of smaller pores in the materials . The sample prepared using 0.060 mol/L PEG1000 had smaller surface area than the sample prepared using 0.048 mol/L PEG1000. The PEG1000 molecules might combine and form large micelles at high concentration. As a result, the prepared sample can therefore have larger pore size and smaller surface area than the optimized one.
Figure 5 shows N2 desorption isotherms (A) and pore size distribution (B) of mesoporous TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides prepared at of 0.03 mol/L. With the increase of relative pressure in Figure 5(a), the adsorption of N2 on the materials amplified relevantly. When the relative pressure was about 0.6 to 0.8, the increment of adsorption was significant because of capillary condensation in the pores of the material. Figure 5(b) clarifies the mesoporous structures of the material. The mesopore size inside the material was below 50 nm, and pore diameter mainly distributed in the range of 5–10 nm. As calculated by BET equation and BJH method, BET specific surface area, pore volume, and average pore size of the material prepared at of 0.03 mol/L were 128.4 m2·g−1, 0.39 cm3·g−1, and 14.6 nm, respectively.
The effects of on the adsorption and photocatalytic activity of mesoporous TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides are shown in Figure 6. Methyl orange adsorption and photocatalytic degradation rates on the material prepared without using PEG1000 were 9.9% and 35.0%, respectively. With increasing PEG1000 concentration, methyl orange adsorption on the samples climbed up to the maximum value of 24.2% at of 0.048 mol/L. Further increase of PEG1000 concentration led to dropping off of methyl orange adsorption on the material. It indicates that adsorption ability of the samples was in accordance with the BET specific surface area. The larger the specific surface area is, the more adsorption capacity the sample has.
Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange was improved slightly with the increase of PEG1000 concentration up to the maximum rate of 36.1% at of 0.03 mol/L. After that, methyl orange degradation rate declined obviously after using excessive amount of PEG1000 template in the sols. Although the specific surface area and adsorption capacity of the sample prepared at = 0.048 mol/L were the maximum, photocatalytic activity of the sample was only 27.0%. The sample prepared at of 0.03 mol/L had the optimal photocatalytic activity of 36.1% after 30 min of irradiation, and methyl orange adsorption rate on this material was 18.6%. Photocatalytic activity of the samples is related to several main factors. The samples can all adsorb a certain amount of methyl orange molecules, which is essential for the subsequent degradation process. The difference in surface area does not have as much effect on photocatalytic activity as that on adsorption capacity. On the other hand, the growth of TiO2 nanocrystals was hindered by PEG1000 addition, leading to lowered degradation activity for the samples prepared at high .
Although adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange can all be regarded as decoloration of the dye in the water, the mechanisms are quite different. After physical adsorption on the materials, the dye remains on the surface of the materials in its initial form. On the other hand, photogenerated electrons and holes and the subsequently produced oxidizing species such as hydroxyl radicals contact with the adsorbed organic substances and initiate deep oxidation of the dye. The TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides prepared in this paper had high adsorption abilities due to their porous structure and the addition of Al2O3 into TiO2 could also contribute significantly. However, what is more valuable is the photocatalytic activity of the materials because the adsorbed dye can be fully oxidized only through photocatalytic degradation.
The effect of the concentration of mesoporous TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides (prepared at = 0.03 mol/L) used for methyl orange decoloration was investigated, as shown in Figure 7. Both of adsorption and photocatalytic degradations of methyl orange on TiO2-Al2O3 increased sharply along with increasing photocatalyst concentration. The degradation rate increased much faster at low photocatalyst concentration. The photocatalyst particles might aggregate at high concentration. In spite of the constant increase of adsorption at higher TiO2-Al2O3 oxides concentration, the enhancement rate of degradation was slowed down when photocatalyst concentration was higher than 600 mg/L. When using 600 mg/L of mesoporous TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides, methyl orange photocatalytic degradation and adsorption rates were 36.1% and 18.6%, respectively. As indicated before, the degradation rate was achieved in 30 min, and deep oxidation of the dye can be expected with prolonged irradiation time.
Figure 8 shows the UV-Vis spectra of methyl orange solution during photocatalytic degradation on TiO2-Al2O3 oxides. The binary oxides were prepared at of 0.03 mol/L, and photocatalyst concentration was 600 mg/L for decoloration of the dye. The main absorption peaks near 468 nm and 270 nm are assigned to benzene ring and azo-structure of methyl orange molecule. The absorption peaks shrank sharply under UV-light irradiation. Fully degradation of the dye was achieved after 3 h of reaction. The main absorption peaks of methyl orange disappeared after methyl orange molecules broke into small parts during photocatalytic degradation. The high adsorption and photocatalytic activity of the material are attributed to large surface area, mesoporous structure, and small crystallite size.
Mesoporous TiO2-Al2O3 binary oxides were synthesized by sol-gel method using PEG1000 as template agent. The effects of PEG1000 concentration on the physicochemical properties of the materials were investigated. The specific surface area and adsorption capacity of the TiO2-Al2O3 oxides were larger than the sample prepared without PEG1000. The TiO2-Al2O3 oxides prepared with of 0.03 mol/L had optimal photocatalytic activity and high adsorption capacity, which are contributed to large surface area, mesoporous structure, and small crystallite size.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 41071161 and 41130524), National Key Basic Research Foundation of China (2011CB403202), and Liaoning Science and Technology Project (2010229002).
- M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 69–96, 1995.
- A. Fujishima, T. N. Rao, and D. A. Tryk, “Titanium dioxide photocatalysis,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2000.
- M. I. Litter, “Heterogeneous photocatalysis: transition metal ions in photocatalytic systems,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 23, no. 2-3, pp. 89–114, 1999.
- K. Rajeshwar, M. E. Osugi, W. Chanmanee et al., “Heterogeneous photocatalytic treatment of organic dyes in air and aqueous media,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 171–192, 2008.
- G. Plantard, T. Janin, V. Goetz, and S. Brosillon, “Solar photocatalysis treatment of phytosanitary refuses: efficiency of industrial photocatalysts,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 115-116, pp. 38–44, 2012.
- D. M. Antonelli and J. Y. Ying, “Synthesis of hexagonally packed mesoporous TiO2 by a modified sol-gel method,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 34, no. 18, pp. 2014–2017, 1995.
- U. Bach, D. Lupo, P. Comte et al., “Solid-state dye-sensitized mesoporous TiO2 solar cells with high photon-to-electron conversion efficiencies,” Nature, vol. 395, no. 6702, pp. 583–585, 1998.
- H. Yoshitake, T. Sugihara, and T. Tatsumi, “Preparation of wormhole-like mesoporous TiO2 with an extremely large surface area and stabilization of its surface by chemical vapor deposition,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1023–1029, 2002.
- Q. Sheng, S. Yuan, J. Zhang, and F. Chen, “Synthesis of mesoporous titania with high photocatalytic activity by nanocrystalline particle assembly,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 177–184, 2006.
- X. Chen, T. Yu, X. Fan et al., “Enhanced activity of mesoporous Nb2O5 for photocatalytic hydrogen production,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 253, no. 20, pp. 8500–8506, 2007.
- Z. Wang, Z. Li, H. Zhang, and C. Wang, “Improved photocatalytic activity of mesoporous ZnO-SiO2 coupled nanofibers,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 257–260, 2009.
- J. Jiao, Q. Xu, and L. Li, “Porous TiO2/SiO2 composite prepared using PEG as template direction reagent with assistance of supercritical CO2,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 316, no. 2, pp. 596–603, 2007.
- B. Neppolian, Q. Wang, H. Yamashita, and H. Choi, “Synthesis and characterization of ZrO2-TiO2 binary oxide semiconductor nanoparticles: application and interparticle electron transfer process,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 333, no. 2, pp. 264–271, 2007.
- M. R. Bayati, A. Z. Moshfegh, F. Golestani-Fard, and R. Molaei, “(WO3)x-(TiO2)1-x nano-structured porous catalysts grown by micro-arc oxidation method: characterization and formation mechanism,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 203–207, 2010.
- X. Su, J. Zhao, Y. Li et al., “Solution synthesis of Cu2O/TiO2 core-shell nanocomposites,” Colloids and Surfaces A, vol. 349, no. 1-3, pp. 151–155, 2009.
- M. Stodolny and M. Laniecki, “Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous Ta2O5-TiO2 photocatalysts for water splitting,” Catalysis Today, vol. 142, no. 3-4, pp. 314–319, 2009.
- T. Miwa, S. Kaneco, H. Katsumata et al., “Photocatalytic hydrogen production from aqueous methanol solution with CuO/Al2O3/TiO2 nanocomposite,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 35, no. 13, pp. 6554–6560, 2010.
- H. Choi, E. Stathatos, and D. D. Dionysiou, “Sol-gel preparation of mesoporous photocatalytic TiO2 films and TiO2/Al2O3 composite membranes for environmental applications,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 63, no. 1-2, pp. 60–67, 2006.
- C. Anderson and A. J. Bard, “Improved photocatalytic activity and characterization of mixed TiO2/SiO2 and TiO2/Al2O3 materials,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 101, no. 14, pp. 2611–2616, 1997.
- W. Li, S. Li, M. Zhang, and K. Tao, “The effect of phosphorus on nano-sized TiO2 particles dispersed on Al2O3,” Colloids and Surfaces A, vol. 272, no. 3, pp. 189–193, 2006.
- Y. Kim and M. Yoon, “TiO2/Y-zeolite encapsulating intramolecular charge transfer molecules: a new photocatalyst for photoreduction of methyl orange in aqueous medium,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 168, no. 1-2, pp. 257–263, 2001.
- Q. Li, H. Su, and T. Tan, “Synthesis of ion-imprinted chitosan-TiO2 adsorbent and its multi-functional performances,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 212–218, 2008.
- G. Martra, V. Augugliaro, S. Coluccia et al., “Photocatalytic oxidation of gaseous toluene on polycrystalline TiO2: FT-IR investigation of surface reactivity of different types of catalysts,” Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, vol. 130, pp. 665–670, 2000.
- N. Venkatachalam, M. Palanichamy, and V. Murugesan, “Sol-gel preparation and characterization of alkaline earth metal doped nano TiO2: efficient photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 273, no. 1-2, pp. 177–185, 2007.
- M. Huang, C. Xu, Z. Wu, Y. Huang, J. Lin, and J. Wu, “Photocatalytic discolorization of methyl orange solution by Pt modified TiO2 loaded on natural zeolite,” Dyes and Pigments, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 327–334, 2008.
- C. J. Doss and R. Zallen, “Raman studies of sol-gel alumina: finite-size effects in nanocrystalline AlO(OH),” Physical Review B, vol. 48, no. 21, pp. 15626–15637, 1993.
- X. Zhang, M. Zhou, and L. Lei, “Preparation of anatase TiO2 supported on alumina by different metal organic chemical vapor deposition methods,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 282, no. 1-2, pp. 285–293, 2005.
- M. R. Bayati, H. R. Zargar, A. Talimian, A. Ziaee, and R. Molaei, “Characterization of Al2O3-TiO2 nano porous solar absorbers derived via MAO/sol-gel hybrid process,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 205, no. 7, pp. 2483–2489, 2010.
- Y. Xin, K. Huo, T. Hu, G. Tang, and P. K. Chu, “Mechanical properties of Al2O3/Al bi-layer coated AZ91 magnesium alloy,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 517, no. 17, pp. 5357–5360, 2009.
- Y. Xu, B. Lei, L. Guo, W. Zhou, and Y. Liu, “Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of manganese doped TiO2 immobilized on silica gel,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 78–82, 2008.
- Y. Xie, X. Zhao, Y. Li, Q. Zhao, X. Zhou, and Q. Yuan, “CTAB-assisted synthesis of mesoporous F-N-codoped TiO2 powders with high visible-light-driven catalytic activity and adsorption capacity,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 181, no. 8, pp. 1936–1942, 2008.
- M. Zhou, J. Yu, and H. Yu, “Effects of urea on the microstructure and photocatalytic activity of bimodal mesoporous titania microspheres,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 313, no. 1-2, pp. 107–113, 2009.