Research Article
Low-Dose UVA Radiation-Induced Adaptive Response in Cultured Human Dermal Fibroblasts
Table 3
Effects of lethal irradiation on fibroblast apoptosis after UVA preirradiation at different time intervals (%, ).
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a, compared with SIG, differences were significant (), b, compared with HDG, differences in corresponding phase points were significant (), c, compared with HDG, differences in corresponding phase points were significant (, , ); d, compared with HDG, differences in corresponding phase points were significant ( value in phases, resp., were 7.654, 12.64, 17.69, 21.24, 14.81, 13.21, and 15.84); e, compared with HDG, differences in corresponding phase points were significant ( value in phases, resp., were 5.279, 11.63, 7.698, 13.55, 12.85, 4.281, 4.845, and 24.88) f, compared with HDG, differences in corresponding phase points were significant ( value in phases, resp., were 6.774, 7.386, 5.047, 24.02, 3.792, 5.146, 9.548, and 16.49). One-way ANOVA, the proportion of apoptotic fibroblasts showed no difference among the ARG1 (7.2 J/cm2), ARG2 (14.4 J/cm2), and ARG3 (28.8 J/cm2), ; -test, no difference observed between ARG4 (57.6 J/cm2) and ARG3 (115.2 J/cm2), . |