Photoresponse of Visible Light Active CM-n-TiO2, HM-n-TiO2, CM-n-Fe2O3, and CM-p-WO3 towards Water Splitting Reaction

<table>The respective plot of <svg height="21.0875" id="M155" style="vertical-align:-3.56265pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 66.775002 21.0875" width="66.775002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,16.588)"><use xlink:href="#x5B"></use></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,5.927,16.588)"><use xlink:href="#x1D702"></use></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,14.324,16.588)"><use xlink:href="#x28"></use></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,20.206,16.588)"><use xlink:href="#x210E"></use></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,28.977,16.588)"><use xlink:href="#x1D708"></use></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,38.021,16.588)"><use xlink:href="#x29"></use></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,43.902,16.588)"><use xlink:href="#x5D"></use></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,49.762,8.425)"><use xlink:href="#x31"></use></g><g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,55.474,8.425)"><use xlink:href="#x2F"></use></g><g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,60.376,8.425)"><use xlink:href="#x32"></use></g>
</svg> versus <svg height="12.4375" id="M156" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 17.9375 12.4375" width="17.9375" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.162)"><use xlink:href="#x210E"></use></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,8.834,12.162)"><use xlink:href="#x1D708"></use></g>
</svg> to determine the bandgap energies of both oven-made n-Fe2O3 and flame-made CM-n-Fe2O3 films [<a href="/journals/ijp/2012/749135/#B23">23</a>].</table>

International Journal of Photoenergy

fig24

Figure 24

Figure 24: Photoresponse of Visible Light Active CM-n-TiO2, HM-n-TiO2, CM-n-Fe2O3, and CM-p-WO3 towards Water Splitting Reaction