About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Photoenergy
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 939237, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/939237
Research Article

Feasibility of Carbonaceous Nanomaterial-Assisted Photocatalysts Calcined at Different Temperatures for Indoor Air Applications

Department of Environmental Engineering, Kyungpook National University, University Road, Bukgu, Daegu 702-701, Republic of Korea

Received 5 June 2012; Revised 2 July 2012; Accepted 16 July 2012

Academic Editor: Jiaguo Yu

Copyright © 2012 Wan-Kuen Jo and Kun-Hwan Kim. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study examined the characteristics and photocatalytic activity of multiwall carbon nanotube-assisted TiO2 (MWNT-TiO2) nanocomposites calcined at different temperatures to assess their potential indoor air applications. It was confirmed that the composites calcined at low temperatures (300 and 400°C) contained TiO2 nanoparticles bound intimately to the MWNT networks. Meanwhile, almost no MWNTs were observed when the calcination temperature was increased to 500 and 600°C. The MWNT-TiO2 composites calcined at low temperatures showed higher photocatalytic decomposition efficiencies for aromatic hydrocarbons at indoor concentrations than those calcined at high temperatures. The mean efficiencies for benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and o-xylene (BTEX) by the composite calcined at 300°C were 32, 70, 79, and 79%, respectively, whereas they were 33, 71, 78, and 78% for the composite calcined at 400°C, respectively. In contrast, the efficiencies decreased to close to zero when the calcination temperature was increased to 600°C. Moreover, the MWNT-TiO2 exhibited superior photocatalytic performance for the decomposition efficiencies compared to TiO2 under conventional UV-lamp irradiations. Consequently, these carbonaceous nanomaterial-assisted photocatalysts can be applied effectively to indoor air applications depending upon the calcination temperature.

1. Introduction

The photocatalytic process using titanium dioxide (TiO2) has become an attractive advanced oxidation technology for addressing a variety of environmental problems owing to its potential to oxidize a wide range of environmental pollutants and long-term thermodynamic stability under certain operating conditions [1, 2]. However, the current bottleneck for TiO2 photocatalysis lies in its low quantum yield and low photodegradation efficiency. Therefore, a range of modifying methods were attempted to enhance the photocatalytic properties of TiO2 for the decomposition of several environmental pollutants. The methods include nonmetallic doping, metallic doping, cocatalysts, dye sensitization, and adsorbent assistance [38].

Among these methods, carbonaceous adsorbent-assisted photocatalysts have attracted considerable attention because of their superior performance. Initially, granular- and fibrous-type activated carbons (ACs) were used as TiO2 supporters for certain environmental applications [911]. Later, other types of carbonaceous nanomaterials (particularly carbon nanotubes (CNTs)) were suggested as alternative supporters of mainly TiO2 due to the combined effect of the electronic and adsorption properties [7, 12, 13]. CNTs are generally classified into multi- and single-wall carbon nanotubes (MWNTs and SWNTs). The unique electronic properties of CNTs can retard the electron-hole recombination time, thereby enhancing the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 [7, 13]. In addition, CNTs have the potential to provide reactive surface areas approaching those provided by ACs and to adsorb hydrophobic species, which are barely adsorbed by TiO2 nanoparticles [14]. Accordingly, many studies [1519] applied MWNT- or SWNT-assisted TiO2 photocatalysts (MWNT- or SWNT-TiO2) for the purification of environmental pollutants and reported these nanomaterials to have superior performance to that of stand-alone TiO2. Unlike other types of photocatalysts, there are few reports on the effects of the calcination temperature of CNT-assisted TiO2 photocatalysts on the gas-phase pollutant decomposition. In particular, the calcination temperature can be an important parameter associated with the photocatalytic activity for certain photocatalysts [2024]. This suggests that the photocatalytic activity of CNT-assisted TiO2 nanomaterials can vary with the calcination temperature.

Accordingly, this study examined the characteristics and heterogeneous photocatalytic activity of MWNT-assisted TiO2 (MWNT-TiO2) photocatalysts prepared at different calcination temperatures to assess the feasibility of their indoor air applications. Although SWNTs have a higher specific surface area, they are more expensive than MWNTs [25]. Therefore, this study used MWNTs as a cost-effective TiO2 assistant material. The target environmental pollutants included four organic vapors (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene (also known as BTEX)), which are toxic or potentially toxic to humans [26]. These compounds are an important class of pollutants found frequently at high concentrations in a range of indoor environments [27]. The characteristics of BTEX have prompted the development of control means to minimize the health impacts of indoor air exposure. For indoor air applications, the surveyed concentration of each compound was chosen to be within the indoor air concentration (IAC) range (<1 ppm) [27].

2. Methods

2.1. Synthesis Route and Properties of MWNT-Assisted Photocatalyst

The MWNT-TiO2 nanomaterials were synthesized using a sol-gel method. For this method, 0.7 g of MWNT (95.9%, Carbon Nano-material Technology) was added to 50 mL of ethanol (99.9% Merck) and sonicated for 20 min. Subsequently, 15.5 mL of tetrabutyl orthotitanate (TBOT, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the MWNT-ethanol solution. This mixture was sonicated for 30 min to achieve better mixing and stirred vigorously for 30 min. Afterwards, 4 mL of nitric acid (69 wt%, Junsei) and 20 mL of deionized water were added to the solution to catalyze the hydrolysis and condensation. The resulting mixture was stirred vigorously until a homogeneous gel was formed. The gel was aged in air for 4 d at room temperature, crushed into fine powders, and dried at 80°C in an oven for 12 h. The powders were calcined at 300, 400, 500, or 600°C for 5 h. The calcined CNT-TiO2 powders were coated on the inner surface of the pyrex reactor, using the method reported by Xagas et al. [28].

Before the coating procedure, the as-prepared MWNT-TiO2 powders were examined for their surface and morphological properties. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were determined on a Rigaku D/max-2500 diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation operated at 40 kV and 100 mA. Thermal gravity analysis (TGA) was done using a TA Instrument SDT Q600 TG/DTA in order to determine the carbon content in the MWNT-TiO2 powders. The particle morphology was observed using a Hitachi S-4300&EDX-350 FE-scanning electron microscope (SEM) at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV. X-ray photoelectron spectroscope (XPS) measurements were done using a Thermo VG Scientific Escalab 250 spectrometer with monochromatized Al Ka excitation. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis was performed on a PerkinElmer Spectrum GX spectrophotometer at a resolution of 4 cm−1 in the spectral range of 400−4,000 cm−1, using a KBR pellet for sample preparation.

2.2. Application of MWNT-Assisted TiO2 Nanocomposites to BTEX Decomposition

The experimental setup is illustrated in Figure 1. An annular-geometry reactor was used to evaluate the as-prepared MWNT-TiO2 nanomaterials for the decomposition of gas-phase BTEX. The reactor consisted of a pyrex tube coated on the inner surface with a thin film of the MWNT-TiO2 nanomaterials. A conventional cylindrical lamp or a hexahedral tube installed with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) was inserted inside another pyrex tube (outside diameter, 25 mm), whose outer surface served as the inner surface of the annular reactor. The gas flowed through the annular region. This design was particularly suited for research, because it provided a well-characterized reactive catalyst surface along the length of the reactor body and allowed uniform light distribution. Moreover, the reactor was designed to direct the flow of incoming air toward the UV light to increase the air turbulence inside the reactor, thereby enhancing the distribution of target compounds onto the catalytic surface of the reactor. The humidity was adjusted by passing zero-grade air through a charcoal filter, followed by a humidification device in a water bath. The relative humidity (RH) was measured in front of the photocatalytic reactor inlet using a humidity meter (T & D Thermo Recorder TR-72S). The flow rate (FR) measurement was carried out using identical rotameters (0–10 L min−1) calibrated to a dry test meter (URG 3000-020C). The air stream was heated externally to help vaporize the BTEX injected into the mixing chamber through a syringe pump (Kd Scientific Model 210). The air stream was then finally fed to the photocatalytic reactor. The desired concentration of the standard gas was controlled by adjusting the FR and BTEX injection rate.

939237.fig.001
Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the experimental setup.

The major photocatalytic parameters were the input concentration (IC), RH, light source, FR, and hydraulic diameter (HD, which is defined as the inside diameter of the annular reactor tube minus the outside diameter of the lamp). The IC was fixed to 0.1 ppm for each component of BTEX to simulate the IAC condition. The RH was adjusted to 50%, which was within the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers comfort range (40−60%). UV radiation was supplied using a conventional 8-W fluorescent black light (Sankyo Denki F8T5/BLB) with a maximum spectral intensity at 352 nm or 42 0.06-W UV-LEDs (Moksan MS-L512UVP) with a maximum spectral intensity at 380 nm. The FR was adjusted to 1.0 or 4.0 L min−1, giving a residence time of 7.2 and 1.8 s, respectively. The former FR was used to compare the decomposition efficiencies of the MWNT-TiO2 composites irradiated using the two light-source types. The latter FR was used to examine the effects of the calcination temperature on the photocatalytic decomposition efficiency of the nanocomposites. The HD of the reactor was 10 mm.

Air measurements were performed by collecting air samples periodically at the inlet and outlet of the photocatalytic reactor and analyzing them by gas chromatography (GC, Hewlett-Packard 4890) or mass spectrometry (MS, Hewlett Packard MSD5973) coupled with a thermal desorption (TD, Donam TD-II) unit. Sampling was done by filling an evacuated Tedlar bag at a constant flow rate. The gas from this bag was then drawn through a 0.64 cm outside diameter and 18 cm long SS sorbent trap containing 0.4 g of Tenax TA using a constant flow-sampling pump (SKC Aircheck Sampler Model 224-PCXR8). The sampling time was varied from one to five min depending on the flow rate. All samples were taken at room temperature. The gaseous species collected on the sorbent trap were analyzed by TD/GC installed with a flame ionization detector or GC/MS. The quality control program involved an analysis of the laboratory blank traps and spiked samples. At the beginning of the day, a laboratory blank trap was analyzed for contamination but no trap contamination was identified. A spiked external standard was also analyzed daily to check the quantitative response. The method detection limits ranged from 0.3 to 0.5 ppb for BTEX, depending on the compounds.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Properties of MWNT-Assisted TiO2 Nanocomposites according to Calcination Temperature

The characteristics of the MWNT-assisted nanomaterials prepared at different calcination temperatures were investigated using a range of optical and analytical instruments. Figure 2 exhibits the XRD patterns of the MWNT-TiO2 composites calcined at four different temperatures (300, 400, 500, and 600°C, for MWNT-TiO2-300, MWNT-TiO2-400, MWNT-TiO2-500, and MWNT-TiO2-600, resp.). The anatase content of the composites decreased with increasing calcination temperature and the rutile and brookite contents increased. This pattern is consistent with that reported by Wang et al. [15]. In addition, the peak at 25.3°2θ became broader with decreasing calcination temperature. The broad peaks obtained from both the MWNT-TiO2-300 and MWNT-TiO2-400 were assigned to overlap of the peak at 26.0°2θ, which was assigned to MWNTs [14], with the anatase peak at 25.3°2θ [29]. The sharp peaks at approximately 25.3°2θ for both MWNT-TiO2-500 and MWNT-TiO2-600 were attributed to the low thermal stability of MWNTs [25]. MWNTs and certain unidentified chemical species might have been destroyed during the calcination processes under such high-temperature conditions. This assertion was supported by TGA (Figure 3), in that there were no significant weight losses for the MWNT-TiO2-500 and MWNT-TiO2-600. Consequently, TiO2 crystallites would be the major component of these composites, resulting in sharp peaks at approximately 25.3°2 .

939237.fig.002
Figure 2: X-ray diffraction pattern of MWNT-TiO2 at four different calcination temperatures (300, 400, 500, and 600°C).
939237.fig.003
Figure 3: Thermogravimetric analysis of MWNT-TiO2 at four different calcination temperatures (300, 400, 500, and 600°C).

Figure 3 also exhibits that for the MWNT-TiO2-300 and MWNT-TiO2-400, three-step weight losses were observed over the temperature range 20–800°C. An endothermic weight loss was observed between 20 and 500°C, which was attributed to the release of the residual TiO2 precursor and organic solvent. A second sharper weight loss (11 and 2.4% for the MWNT-TiO2-300 and MWNT-TiO2-400, resp.) was observed between 500 and 600°C and attributed to the thermal decomposition of MWNTs and the crystallization of amorphous TiO2 [14]. On the other hand, almost no weight loss was observed between 630 and 800°C, suggesting that TiO2 became the major component at this temperature range.

Unlike the MWNT-TiO2-300 and MWNT-TiO2-400, SEM images revealed almost no MWNTs in MWNT-TiO2-500 and MWNT-TiO2-600 (Figure 4). This supports the assertion that MWNTs might have been destroyed during the calcination processes at high temperatures. In contrast, TiO2 nanoparticles in MWNT-TiO2-300 and MWNT-TiO2-400 were bound intimately to the MWNT networks.

fig4
Figure 4: Scanning electron microscopy images of MWNT-TiO2 at four different calcination temperatures (300, 400, 500, and 600°C).

Figure 5 illustrates the XP spectra of the C 1s regions for the MWNT-TiO2 composites calcined at four different temperatures. The spectra of the MWNT-TiO2-300 and MWNT-TiO2-400 yielded four peaks at 283.6, 284.5, 286.3, and 288.8 eV, which were assigned to graphitic carbon atoms (46 and 35% for MWNT-TiO2-300 and MWNT-TiO2-400, resp.), –C–O, –C=O, and –COO bonds, respectively. The –COO bond was likely formed by the oxidation of MWNT surfaces during the composite synthesis process [30]. On the other hand, for the MWNT-TiO2-500 and MWNT-TiO2-600, the corresponding peaks exhibited much lower intensities, were just trace, or were not shown. This again was attributed to the destruction of MWNTs and other chemical species during the calcination processes at these high temperatures.

939237.fig.005
Figure 5: X-ray photoelectron spectra of MWNT-TiO2 at four different calcination temperatures (300, 400, 500, and 600°C).

Pure MWNT and MWNT-TiO2 powders calcined at different temperatures revealed different FTIR spectra (Figure 6). For both the pure and calcined nanocomposites, the main absorption peaks were located at 3440 and 1626 cm−1, which were assigned to the O–H stretching vibration of hydroxyl groups and the O–H bending of surface adsorbed water, respectively [31]. For the calcined MWNT-TiO2 powders, although their intensities differed according to the calcination temperature, other distinctive peaks were observed at low frequency bands <1,000 cm−1. These peaks were assigned to the Ti–O–Ti vibration of the network [32], confirming the presence of TiO2 in the calcined nanocomposites.

939237.fig.006
Figure 6: Fourier transform infrared spectra of MWNT-TiO2 at four different calcination temperatures (300, 400, 500, and 600°C).
3.2. BTEX Decomposition Efficiencies via MWNT-TiO2 Nanocomposites

The as-prepared MWNT-TiO2 nanomaterials were evaluated for the decomposition of gas-phase BTEX at an IAC level (0.1 ppm). Figure 7 illustrates the average photocatalytic decomposition efficiencies for BTEX determined using the MWNT-TiO2 unit with two light sources (conventional 8-W black-light and blue LED lamps) under the FR condition of 1.0 L min−1. Under similar operating conditions, the decomposition efficiencies determined using the conventional lamp/MWNT-TiO2 unit were higher those of the conventional lamp/Degussa P25 TiO2 unit, which were reported previously [33]. The mean efficiencies obtained from the conventional lamp/MWNT-TiO2 unit were 95% for benzene and ~100% for the other target compounds (TEX). Jo and Yang [33] reported the mean degradation efficiencies for BTEX obtained from the conventional lamp/Degussa P25 TiO2 unit of 56%, 76%, 92%, and 93%, respectively. Consequently, the MWNT-TiO2 composite revealed superior performance in the photocatalytic decompositions of IAC-level toxic aromatic pollutants to the commercially available reference photocatalyst, Degussa P25 TiO2. This was attributed to the combined electrical properties and adsorption capacity of the MWNT-TiO2 composite. MWNTs have a large electron-storage capacity to store photon-excited electrons in MWNT-TiO2 nanomaterials [25]. This electron-storage capacity would likely retard or hinder electron-hole recombination. In addition, at the interface of MWNT-TiO2, electrons transfer from the TiO2 with a higher than Fermi energy level to the MWNT with a lower Fermi energy level to adjust the Fermi energy levels [13]. This electron transfer can result in TiO2 with an excess negative charge and MWNT with an excess positive charge. Thus, the MWNT would act as an electron sink. Consequently, the formation of this MWNT-TiO2 junction would extend the recombination times of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs, thereby enhancing the photocatalytic activity of TiO2. MWNTs also have high adsorption capacity with typical specific surface areas of 200−400 m2 g−1 [25]. Therefore, MWNTs would assist the TiO2 powders by concentrating the pollutants and intermediates around the powders followed by subsequent migration of these species to the surface of the photocatalyst via diffusion [34]. Adsorption in MWNTs would occur in the aggregated pores, inside the tube, or on the external walls [25].

fig7
Figure 7: Time-series photocatalytic decomposition efficiencies determined via MWNT-TiO2 irradiated using two light-source types (conventional 8-W black light lamp and blue-LEDs): benzene (a), toluene (b), ethyl benzene (c), and o-xylene (d).

Figure 7 compares the decomposition performance of the MWNT-TiO2 units using the conventional lamp with that using the blue LEDs. The decomposition efficiencies for BTEX determined using the conventional lamp/MWNT-TiO2 unit were higher than those of the blue LEDs/MWNT-TiO2 unit. For the blue-LED/MWNT-TiO2 unit, the average efficiencies for BTEX were approximately zero, 5, 23, and 28%, respectively. TiO2 is a semiconductor photocatalyst with a band gap energy of 3.2 eV, meaning that only light with a wavelength ≤385 nm can overcome this barrier [35]. Since the conventional lamp and UV-LED exhibit the maximum light intensity at 352 and 380 nm, respectively, both light sources had sufficient energy to promote electrons from the valence band to the conduction band of TiO2. In general, the activity of the photocatalyst depends strongly on the photon flux on the surface of the catalyst as well as the light irradiation (energy per unit area) [36, 37]. In the present study, the conventional lamp revealed higher light intensity (3.4 mW cm−2) than that of the UV-LED (0.6 mW cm−2). Therefore, the higher decomposition efficiency for the conventional lamp/MWNT-TiO2 unit was attributed to the combined effects of the lower wavelength (higher energy) with higher light intensity.

Different calcination temperatures might yield different photocatalytic behaviors due to different morphological and electronic properties of MWNT-TiO2 nanomaterials. Figure 8 represents the decomposition efficiencies as a function of the calcination temperature under the conditions of FR = 4.0 L min−1 and conventional UV lamp irradiation. For the target compounds, MWNT-TiO2-300 and MWNT-TiO2-400 showed similar decomposition efficiency. The mean efficiencies for BTEX by the MWNT-TiO2-300 were 32, 70, 79, and 79%, respectively, whereas they were 33, 71, 78, and 78% for the MWNT-TiO2-400, respectively. On the other hand, when the calcination temperature was increased to 500°C, the decomposition efficiencies decreased to close to zero for both benzene and toluene and to 42 and 44% for ethyl benzene and o-xylene, respectively. When the temperature was increased to 600°C, the decomposition efficiencies were all approximately zero. Higher photocatalytic activities obtained from the MWNT-TiO2-300 and MWNT-TiO2-400 were attributed to the combined effects of MWNTs and TiO2 nanoparticles bound intimately to the MWNT networks, as confirmed by the morphological and optical properties of the photocatalysts. This assertion is supported by that the carbon materials can accept photogenerated electrons and separate efficiently the charge carriers, thereby enhancing the photocatalytic activity [3840].

fig8
Figure 8: Time-series photocatalytic decomposition efficiencies (PDEs) determined via MWNT-TiO2 according to the calcination temperatures: benzene (a), toluene (b), ethyl benzene (c), and o-xylene (d).

4. Conclusions

This study investigated the feasibility of carbonaceous nanomaterial-assisted photocatalysts calcined at different temperatures for indoor air applications. The MWNT-TiO2 composites calcined at different temperatures revealed different photocatalytic activities, morphologies, and surface properties. The optical and analytical results showed that for the composites calcined at low temperatures (≤400°C) TiO2 nanoparticles were bound intimately to the MWNT networks. However, no MWNTs were observed when the calcination temperature was increased to higher values. Consistently, the MWNT-TiO2 composites calcined at the low temperatures showed higher photocatalytic decomposition efficiencies for aromatic hydrocarbons at IAC levels than those calcined at high temperatures. Moreover, MWNT-TiO2 exhibited superior photocatalytic performance for the decomposition efficiencies to Degussa P25 TiO2 under conventional UV lamp irradiations, which was attributed to the combined electrical properties and adsorption capacity for the MWNT-TiO2 composite. Overall, these carbonaceous nanomaterial-assisted photocatalysts can be applied effectively to indoor air applications, depending on the calcination temperature.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (no. 2011-0027916).

References

  1. Y. Lu, D. Wang, Y. Wu, C. Ma, X. Zhang, and C. Yang, “Synergistic effect of nanophotocatalysis and nonthermal plasma on the removal of indoor HCHO,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2012, Article ID 354032, 8 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. G. Wang, L. Xu, J. Zhang, T. Yin, and D. Han, “Enhanced photocatalytic activity of TiO2 powders (P25) via calcination treatment,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2012, Article ID 265760, 9 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. G. Wang, B. Cheng, J. Zhang, L. Xu, and T. Yin, “Facile synthesis and photocatalytic property of titania/carbon composite hollow microspheres with bimodal mesoporous shells,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2012, Article ID 976389, 9 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. W. K. Jo and J. T. Kim, “Application of visible-light photocatalysis with nitrogen-doped or unmodified titanium dioxide for control of indoor-level volatile organic compounds,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 360–366, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Vinu, S. Polisetti, and G. Madras, “Dye sensitized visible light degradation of phenolic compounds,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 784–797, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. Yang, Z. Jiang, H. Shi et al., “Study on the photocatalysis of F-S co-doped TiO2 prepared using solvothermal method,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 96, no. 3-4, pp. 458–465, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Leary and A. Westwood, “Carbonaceous nanomaterials for the enhancement of TiO2 photocatalysis,” Carbon, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 741–772, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Veréb, Z. Ambrus, Z. Pap et al., “Comparative study on UV and visible light sensitive bare and doped titanium dioxide photocatalysts for the decomposition of environmental pollutants in water,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 417-418, pp. 26–36, 2012.
  9. W. Zhou, P. Zhang, and W. Liu, “Anatase TiO2 nanospindle/activated carbon (ac) composite photocatalysts with enhanced activity in removal of organic contaminant,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2012, Article ID 325902, 7 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. S. Liu and X. Chen, “Preparation and characterization of a novel activated carbon-supported N-doped visible light response photocatalyst (TiO2-xNy/AC),” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 453–459, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S.-Y. Ye, Q. M. Tian, X.-L. Song, and S.-C. Luo, “Photoelectrocatalytic degradation of ethylene by a combination of TiO2 and activated carbon felts,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Ahmmad, Y. Kusumoto, S. Somekawa, and M. Ikeda, “Carbon nanotubes synergistically enhance photocatalytic activity of TiO2,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1410–1413, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Woan, G. Pyrgiotakis, and W. Sigmund, “Photocatalytic carbon-nanotube-TiO2 composites,” Advanced Materials, vol. 21, no. 21, pp. 2233–2239, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Q. Wang, D. Yang, D. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z. Jiang, “Synthesis of anatase titania-carbon nanotubes nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic activity through a nanocoating-hydrothermal process,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1087–1096, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. Wang, P. Serp, P. Kalck, and J. L. Faria, “Visible light photodegradation of phenol on MWNT-TiO2 composite catalysts prepared by a modified sol-gel method,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 235, no. 1-2, pp. 194–199, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. Hu, X. Meng, X. Feng, Y. Ding, S. Zhang, and M. Yang, “Anatase TiO2 nanoparticles/carbon nanotubes nanofibers: preparation, characterization and photocatalytic properties,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 42, no. 17, pp. 7162–7170, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. Yao, G. Li, S. Ciston, R. M. Lueptow, and K. A. Gray, “Photoreactive TiO2/carbon nanotube composites: synthesis and reactivity,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 42, no. 13, pp. 4952–4957, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C.-Y. Kuo, “Prevenient dye-degradation mechanisms using UV/TiO2/carbon nanotubes process,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 239–244, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W.-C. Oh, A.-R. Jung, and W.-B. Ko, “Characterization and relative photonic efficiencies of a new nanocarbon/TiO2 composite photocatalyst designed for organic dye decomposition and bactericidal activity,” Materials Science and Engineering C, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1338–1347, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Matsumoto, N. Iyi, Y. Kaneko et al., “High visible-light photocatalytic activity of nitrogen-doped titania prepared from layered titania/isostearate nanocomposite,” Catalysis Today, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 226–232, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Suriye, P. Praserthdam, and B. Jongsomjit, “Control of Ti3+surface defect on TiO2 nanocrystal using various calcination atmospheres as the first step for surface defect creation and its application in photocatalysis,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 253, no. 8, pp. 3849–3855, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. A. Aramendía, V. Borau, J. C. Colmenares et al., “Modification of the photocatalytic activity of Pd/TiO2 and Zn/TiO2 systems through different oxidative and reductive calcination treatments,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 80, no. 1-2, pp. 88–97, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Zaleska, E. Grabowska, J. W. Sobczak, M. Gazda, and J. Hupka, “Photocatalytic activity of boron-modified TiO2 under visible light: the effect of boron content, calcination temperature and TiO2 matrix,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 89, no. 3-4, pp. 469–475, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Jia, X. Liang, Z. Su, T. Zhu, and S. Liu, “Synthesis and the effect of calcination temperature on the physical-chemical properties and photocatalytic activities of Ni,La codoped SrTiO3,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 178, no. 1–3, pp. 233–242, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. Serp, M. Corrias, and P. Kalck, “Carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in catalysis,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 253, no. 2, pp. 337–358, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. S. Chen, Y. C. Hseu, S. H. Liang, J. Y. Kuo, and S. C. Chen, “Assessment of genotoxicity of methyl-tert-butyl ether, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene to human lymphocytes using comet assay,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 153, no. 1-2, pp. 351–356, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. U. Schlink, A. Thiem, T. Kohajda, M. Richter, and K. Strebel, “Quantile regression of indoor air concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOC),” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 408, no. 18, pp. 3840–3851, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. P. Xagas, E. Androulaki, A. Hiskia, and P. Falaras, “Preparation, fractal surface morphology and photocatalytic properties of TiO2 films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 357, no. 2, pp. 173–178, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. W. K. Jo and J. T. Kim, “Decomposition of gas-phase aromatic hydrocarbons by applying an annular-type reactor coatedwith sulfur-doped photocatalyst under visible-light irradiation,” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 485–492, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. Y. Yen, Y. F. Lin, C. H. Hung et al., “The effects of synthesis procedures on the morphology and photocatalytic activity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/TiO2 nanocomposites,” Nanotechnology, vol. 19, no. 4, Article ID 045604, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. Dai, T. Peng, D. Ke, and B. Wei, “Photocatalytic hydrogen generation using a nanocomposite of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and TiO2 nanoparticles under visible light irradiation,” Nanotechnology, vol. 20, no. 12, Article ID 125603, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. Peng, D. Zhao, K. Dai, W. Shi, and K. Hirao, “Synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with mesoporous anatase wall and high photocatalytic activity,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 11, pp. 4947–4952, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. W. K. Jo and C. H. Yang, “Feasibility of a tandem photocatalytic oxidation-adsorption system for removal of monoaromatic compounds at concentrations in the sub-ppm-range,” Chemosphere, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 236–241, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Y. Shan, T. I. M. Ghazi, and S. A. Rashid, “Immobilisation of titanium dioxide onto supporting materials in heterogeneous photocatalysis: a review,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 389, no. 1-2, pp. 1–8, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. U. I. Gaya and A. H. Abdullah, “Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: a review of fundamentals, progress and problems,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. W. Wang and Y. Ku, “Photocatalytic degradation of gaseous benzene in air streams by using an optical fiber photoreactor,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 47–59, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. T. H. Lim and S. D. Kim, “Trichloroethylene degradation by photocatalysis in annular flow and annulus fluidized bed photoreactors,” Chemosphere, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 305–312, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. Yu, T. Ma, and S. Liu, “Enhanced photocatalytic activity of mesoporous TiO2 aggregates by embedding carbon nanotubes as electron-transfer channel,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 3491–3501, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Q. Xiang, J. Yu, and M. Jaroniec, “Synergetic effect of MoS2 and graphene as cocatalysts for enhanced photocatalytic H2 production activity of TiO2 nanoparticles,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 134, pp. 6575–6578, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. J. Yu, B. Yang, and B. Cheng, “Noble-metal-free carbon nanotube-Cd0.1Zn0.9S composites for high visible-light photocatalytic H2-production performance,” Nanoscale, vol. 4, pp. 2670–2677, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar