About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Photoenergy
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 250397, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/250397
Research Article

High Efficiency of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Based on Ruthenium and Metal-Free Dyes

1Department of Electrical Engineering, Nation Cheng Kung University, No. 1, Daxue Rd., East Dist., Tainan City 70101, Taiwan
2Nano-Powder and Thin Film Technology Center, ITRI South, Room 603, Buildig. R2, No. 31, Gongye 2nd Road, Annan District, Tainan 70955, Taiwan

Received 8 September 2013; Accepted 12 October 2013

Academic Editor: Teen-Hang Meen

Copyright © 2013 Che-Lung Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The influence of using different concentrations of triazoloisoquinoline based small molecule as coadsorbent to modify the monolayer of a TiO2 semiconductor on the performance of a dye-sensitized solar cell is studied. The co-adsorbent significantly enhances the open-circuit photovoltage ( ), the short circuit photocurrent density ( ) the solar energy conversion efficiency ( ). The co-adsorbent 4L is applied successfully to prepare an insulating molecular layer with N719 and achieve high energy conversion efficiency as high as 8.83% at 100 mW cm−2 and AM 1.5 at 1 to 0.25 (N719 : co-adsorbent) molar ratio. The resulting efficiency is about 6% higher than that of a nonadditive device. The result shows that the organic small molecule 4L (2-cyano-3-(5-(4-(3-oxo-[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-a]isoquinoline-2(3H)-yl)phenyl)thiophene-2-yl)acrylic acid) is the promising candidates for improvement of the performance of dye-sensitized solar cell.

1. Introduction

Dye-sensitized solar cells have attracted considerable academic and industrial research interest since Regan and Grätzel’s report in 1991 [1]. Usually these cells consist of a working electrode which is coated with a dye-sensitized mesoporous film of nanocrystalline particles of TiO2, a Pt-coated counterelectrode, and an electrolyte containing a suitable redox couple. The function of such devices is based on the electron injection from the photoexcited state of the dye molecule into the conduction band of the TiO2, followed by regeneration of the dye by an iodide/triiodide redox couple. Typically, high power conversion efficiencies of more than 11% have been achieved by using ruthenium complex and acetonitrile based electrolytes [2]. However, organic additives play a key role in the characteristics of both electrolytes and devices and have been explored extensively with regard to improving the efficiency of DSSC [35].

A few reports have described the use of organic additives for a compact layer, comprised of the dye and coadsorbent [6, 7]. Chenodeoxycholic acid (DCA) is frequently added to the dye solution to enhance the open-circuit photovoltage , the short circuit photocurrent density , and the efficiency of DSSC [8, 9]. The , , and FF of the DSSC are affected by DCA due to the suppression of dark current at the semiconductor/electrolyte junction, since DCA blocks the surface states Ti(IV) ions that are active in the charge transfer [10]. Due to the insulating molecular layer, the charge recombination process can be shielded, and this increases the , , and . Several approaches have been developed for this purpose, such as the use of pyridinium additives [11], pyrimidine additives [12], dipolar carboxylic acid derivatives [13], zwitterionic coadsorbents [14], and guanidinium cations [4]. In this paper, we synthesize a new triazoloisoquinoline-based organic small molecule used as co-adsorbents to modify the monolayer of a TiO2 semiconductor. We discuss the concentration effect of co-adsorbents and investigate the possibility of using triazoloisoquinoline-based organic small molecule as co-adsorbents in DSSC.

2. Experimental

2.1. General Procedure for Preparation of Solar Cells

Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO, 10   square−1) glass plates were cleaned using detergent solution, water, and ethanol in an ultrasonic bath overnight. The screen-printing procedure was repeated with TiO2 paste ( 15–20 nm colloidal particles, Ti-Nanoxide T series, Solaronix SA) to obtain a transparent nanocrystalline film of thickness around 12 μm. The 100 nm colloidal particles were prepared in a basic environment according to the literature [15] and dispersed in -terpineol with ethyl cellulose for scattering TiO2 paste. A scattering layer around 4 μm was deposited by using this scattering TiO2 paste and a final thickness of 16 μm was attained. The TiO2 electrodes were gradually annealed at 450°C for 30 min in an oven in an air atmosphere. After sintering, the electrodes were further treated with 0.2 M TiCl4 aqueous solution at room temperature for 12 h, then washed with water and ethanol, and annealed at 450°C for 30 min. When the temperature decreased to 70°C after sintering, the electrodes were immersed into dye solution, which included 0.5 mM N719 and different concentrations of co-adsorbent in tert-butanol/acetonitrile (AN) (1 : 1 in volume). The dye solutions were kept at 25°C for more than 18 h to allow the dye to adsorb to the TiO2 surface. After the adsorption of the dyes, the electrode was rinsed with the same solvent. The dye-loaded TiO2 film as the working electrode and Pt-coated TCO as the counterelectrode (about 20 nm) were separated by a hot-melt Surlyn sheet (25 μm) and sealed together by pressing them under heat. The electrolytes were introduced into the gap between the working and counterelectrodes from two holes predrilled on the back of the counterelectrode. Finally, the two holes were sealed with a Surlyn film covering a thin glass slide under heat. The cells were evaluated by using 0.6 M [BMI][I], 0.1 M GuNCS, 0.3 M I2, and 0.5 M TBP in a AN/VN (85/15, v/v) solvent as the redox electrolyte.

2.2. Photovoltaic Measurement

The current-voltage characteristics in the dark and under illumination were measured with a Keithley 2400 sourcemeter. The photocurrent was measured in a nitrogen-filled glove box under a solar simulator (Oriel 96000 150 W) with AM 1.5 G-filtered illumination (100 mW cm−2). The spectra-mismatch factor of the simulated solar irradiation was corrected using a Schott visible-color glass-filtered (KG5 color filter) Si diode (Hamamatsu S1133). The active area of the device was 0.25 cm2.

2.3. Dye Loading Measurement

The TiO2 films were put into the dye solution (N719, 3 × 10−4 M in tert-butanol and acetonitrile, 1 : 1, v/v) for 24 h. Subsequently, the TiO2 films were washed with acetonitrile after the adsorption process and then dried in N2 flow. Dye loading measurements were conducted by desorbing the dye molecules from the dye-anchored films in NaOH ethanolic solution. The loading amount was calculated from the absorbance of the completely desorbed dye solutions by the spectrophotometer.

2.4. Synthesis
2.4.1. Synthesis of 2-(4-(4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane-2-yl)phenyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-a]isoquinoline-3(2H)-one (2)

In a round-bottom flask, compound 1 (5.6 g, 16.3 mmol), 4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-2-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane-2-yl)-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (4.4 g, 17.1 mmol), and potassium acetate (4.8 g, 49.0 mmol) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) under nitrogen atmosphere. After adding a catalyst of dichloro-[1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocenyl]palladium(II) (Pd(dppf)Cl2), the mixed solution was heated at 80°C for 6 hours with vigorous stirring. It was then poured into EtOAc-water for extraction. The organic phase was concentrated and adsorbed on silica gel and purified by column chromatography using hexane/EtOAc mixture (5 : 1) as the eluant: white powder; yield 5.32 g (84.2%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, d6-DMSO): 8.31 (d, 1H,  Hz), 8.17 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.84 (d, 3H,  Hz), 7.77~7.66 (m, 3H), 7.02 (d, 1H,  Hz), 1.32 (s, 12H).

2.4.2. Synthesis of 5-(4-(3-Oxo-[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-a]isoquinoline-2(3H)-yl)phenyl)thiophene-2-carbaldehyde (3)

In a three-necked round-bottomed flask (25 mL) equipped with a reflux condenser, compound 2 (1.71 g, 4.4 mmol), 5-bromothiophene-2-carbaldehyde (1.0 g, 5.2 mmol), and 2 M potassium carbonate solution were added to a suspension of Pd(PPh3)4 (3.0 mol%) in tetrahydrofuran (30 mL) at ambient temperature under nitrogen. The reaction mixture was heated to 80°C with rapid stirring for 16 hours. After cooling, the resulting solution was poured into water. The separated solid was filtered and thoroughly washed with water-acetone and dried: pale yellow powder; yield 1.0 g (61.6%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, d6-DMSO): 9.23 (s, 1H), 8.32 (d, 1H,  Hz), 8.24 (d, 2H,  Hz), 8.07 (d, 1H,  Hz), 8.01 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.86~7.67 (m, 5H), 7.04 (d, 1H,  Hz).

2.4.3. Synthesis of 2-Cyano-3-(5-(4-(3-oxo-[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-a]isoquinoline-2(3H)-yl)phenyl)thiophene-2-yl)acrylic Acid (4L)

In a three-neck bottle, compound 3 (1.2 g, 3.3 mmol), 2-cyanoacetic acid (0.6 g, 6.5 mmol), and piperidine (0.08 g, 0.98 mmol) were dissolved in chloroform. The mixed solution was refluxed for 16 hours with rapid stirring. After cooling, the resulting solution was poured into EtOAc-MeOH. The separated solid was filtered and thoroughly washed with EtOAc and MeOH and dried: pale orange powder; yield 1.2 g (85.0%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, d6-DMSO): 8.32 (d, 1H,  Hz), 8.23 (s, 1H), 8.20 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.93 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.89~7.67 (m, 6H), 7.03 (d, 1H,  Hz); ESI-MS 437 (M-H+); Anal. Calcd for C24H14N4O3S: C, 65.74; H, 3.22; N, 12.78. Found: C, 65.96; H, 3.28; N, 12.60.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis

The synthetic route of the co-adsorbent is shown in Figure 1. 2-(4-bromophenyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-a]isoquinoline-3(2H)-one (1) was obtained as reported earlier [16]. 4L was synthesized by Suzuki coupling of compound 2 with 5-formylthiophene-2-ylboronic acid, followed by Knoevenagel condensation reaction with cyanoacrylic acid in the presence of piperidine. This product was well characterized by spectroscopic analyses.

250397.fig.001
Figure 1: Synthetic route of co-adsorbent 4L.
3.2. The Double-Layer TiO2 Film

Recently, an enhancement in light absorption via application of light scattering has been studied for DSSCs [17, 18]. To take advantage of the light-scattering effect of TiO2 particles, light absorption can be enhanced in TiO2 films by increasing the absorption path length of photons, which can effectively improve the photocurrent output of cells. In order to obtain a high photoelectric conversion efficiency in DSSCs, a double-layer TiO2 film was fabricated, composed of a light-scattering layer and a transparent layer. The transparent layer was prepared by commercial TiO2 paste and the light-scattering layer was deposited by home-made scattering TiO2 paste. First, TiCl4 solution was converted to Ti(OH)4 gel after ammonia neutralization and H2O2 was used to hydrolyze Ti(OH)4 to form TiO2 sol. Subsequently, the result solution was refluxed 35–40 hours for crystallization, and the anatase type TiO2 organic sol was obtained. This solution was concentrated by rotary evaporator and dispersed in -terpineol with ethyl cellulose for scattering TiO2 paste. After screen-printing, the thickness of the double-layer film was about 16 μm. Figure 2(a) shows the surface morphology of the light-scattering layer, revealing their well-connected network and the porous nature of TiO2 film. The average sizes of the nanostructures were about 100 nm in diameter. This results in a good scattering effect because of the elongated optical path length. Figure 2(b) shows the surface morphology of light-scattering layer after TiCl4 posttreatment. From the SEM image, one can see that the necking of the TiO2 particles and the surface roughness are enhanced and resulting in higher dye adsorption amount. As summarized in Table 1, it was found that the dye amount on a film of Film 3-TiCl4 posttreatment is higher than those of Films 1 and 2. It is well known that the short-circuit current density is mainly determined by the initial number of photogenerated electrons, and the initial number of photogenerated electrons could be significantly affected by the dye amount on the TiO2 films. This result agrees well with recent experiments [19, 20]. In order to maximize the light harvesting efficiency, we fabricate the structure of Film 3 for the follow-up discussion of co-adsorbent effect.

tab1
Table 1: The amount of adsorbed N719 dye for different TiO2 structures.
fig2
Figure 2: SEM images of (a) light-scattering layer of double layer TiO2 films and (b) TiCl4 posttreatment of light-scattering layer.
3.3. The Concentration Effect of Coadsorbents

After optimization of the devices, the photovoltaic characteristics of the small molecule as co-adsorbent for DSSCs were evaluated with a sandwich DSSC cell (as shown in Figure 3) using 0.6 M [BMI][I], 0.1 M GuNCS, 0.3 M I2, and 0.5 M TBP in a AN/VN (85/15, v/v) solvent as the redox electrolyte. Details of the device preparation and characterization are described in the experimental section, and all the essential properties of these cells are listed in Figure 3 and Table 2. Under the standard AM 1.5 G irradiation, the maximum efficiency for the N719-sensitized solar cell-device B with an active area of 0.25 cm2 was calculated to be 8.36%, with a of 15.65 mA cm−2, a of 0.76 V, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.70. However, the solar cells based on the μm transparent layer which was sensitized by N719-4L with 1 to 0.25 molar ratio yielded a remarkably high photocurrent density of 16.39 mA cm−2, an open circuit voltage of 0.77 V, and a fill factor of 0.70, corresponding to an overall power conversion efficiency of 8.83%. This result is also in agreement with the observation of the incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency (IPCE) action spectra of DSSCs presented in Figure 4. With the increase in 4L concentration, the overall power conversion efficiency shows a downward trend. Compared to device A with a single dyestuff-N719, devices C and D based on a high 4L molar ratio exhibit lower values of 8.21% and 8.10%. It is well known that co-adsorbents will compete with N719 for adsorption on the TiO2 surface. This result shows that N719 and co-adsorbent 4L are in balance at a 1 to 0.25 molar ratio. In this concentration of cosensitizers, N719 may occupy positions on the TiO2 surface, and coadsorbent 4L then anchors to the blank to create a perfect insulating molecular layer. Because of this layer, the charge recombination process can be shielded, and the incident photo-to-electron conversion efficiency can be enhanced, and this increases , , and . On the other hand, devices C and D show downward trend at and FF values in comparison with device A. This indicates that co-adsorbent 4L has considerable superiority at 1 to 0.50 and 1 to 1 molar ratios, with some N719 molecules having lost their positions on TiO2 and being replaced by co-adsorbent 4L. This increases the opportunities for stacking of small organic molecule-4L and decreases the contribution of N719 to the incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency [2022]. These photovoltaic performance results indicate that coadsorption with 4L and N719 in an appropriate concentration is effective in improving solar cell performance.

tab2
Table 2: Photovoltaic parameters of the DSSCs with N719 : 4L in different molar ratios under AM 1.5 G sunlighta.
250397.fig.003
Figure 3: Photocurrent density-voltage characteristics of solar cells sensitized by N719 (Device A), N719 : 4L (1 : 0.25) (Device B), N719 : 4L (1 : 0.5) (Device C), and N719 : 4L (1 : 1) (Device D) with 12.0 + 4.0 μm double layers nanocrystalline TiO2 electrodes.
250397.fig.004
Figure 4: IPCE action spectra of solar cells sensitized by N719 (Device A), N719 : 4L (1 : 0.25) (Device B), N719 : 4L (1 : 0.5) (Device C), and N719 : 4L (1 : 1) (Device D) with 12.0 + 4.0 μm double layers nanocrystalline TiO2 electrodes.

4. Conclusions

A new triazoloisoquinoline-based co-adsorbent has been prepared and applied in DSSC. This study demonstrates that coadsorption of N719 sensitizer with triazoloisoquinoline-based organic small molecule onto nanocrystalline TiO2 films significantly increases the photovoltage and photocurrent, thus enhancing the total conversion efficiency. After optimization of the structure of the TiO2 layer, the cell produced in this work achieved an energy conversion efficiency as high as 8.83% at 100 mW cm−2 and AM 1.5 G at 1 to 0.25 (N719 : co-adsorbent) molar ratio. This improved conversion efficiency is attributed to the insulating molecular layer, which was composed of small molecule 4L and N719, and the charge recombination process can be shielded. This breakthrough will contribute to promoting organic small molecule as co-adsorbents in DSSC.

References

  1. B. O'Regan and M. Grätzel, “A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films,” Nature, vol. 353, no. 6346, pp. 737–740, 1991. View at Scopus
  2. M. Gratzel, “Conversion of sunlight to electric power by nanocrystalline dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 164, pp. 3–14, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. N. de Freitas, A. F. Nogueira, and M.-A. de Paoli, “New insights into dye-sensitized solar cells with polymer electrolytes,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 30, pp. 5279–5294, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Gorlov and L. Kloo, “Ionic liquid electrolytes for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Dalton Transactions, no. 20, pp. 2655–2666, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. Li, L. Wang, B. Kang, P. Wang, and Y. Qiu, “Review of recent progress in solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 549–573, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. K. Nazeeruddin, A. Kay, I. Rodicio, and M. Gratzel, “Conversion of light to electricity by cis-X2bis(2,2′-bipyridyl-4,4′-dicarboxylate)ruthenium(II) charge-transfer sensitizers (X = Cl-, Br-, I-, CN-, and SCN-) on nanocrystalline TiO2 electrodes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 115, no. 14, pp. 6382–6390, 1993. View at Scopus
  7. H. Paulsson, A. Hagfeldt, and L. Kloo, “Molten and solid trialkylsulfonium iodides and their polyiodides as electrolytes in dye-sensitized nanocrystalline solar cells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 107, no. 49, pp. 13665–13670, 2003. View at Scopus
  8. J.-H. Yum, P. Walter, S. Huber et al., “Efficient far red sensitization of nanocrystalline TiO2 films by an unsymmetrical squaraine dye,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, no. 34, pp. 10320–10321, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. Tian, X. Yang, J. Cong et al., “Tuning of phenoxazine chromophores for efficient organic dye-sensitized solar cells,” Chemical Communications, no. 41, pp. 6288–6290, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Ito, H. Miura, S. Uchida et al., “High-conversion-efficiency organic dye-sensitized solar cells with a novel indoline dye,” Chemical Communications, no. 41, pp. 5194–5196, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J.-C. Chang, C.-H. Yang, H.-H. Yang et al., “Pyridinium molten salts as co-adsorbents in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Solar Energy, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 174–179, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Kusama and H. Arakawa, “Influence of pyrimidine additives in electrolytic solution on dye-sensitized solar cell,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 171–179, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Ruhle, M. Greenshtein, S.-G. Chen et al., “Molecular adjustment of the electronic properties of nanoporous electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 40, pp. 18907–18913, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Wang, C. Gratzel, S.-J. Moon et al., “Surface design in solid-state dye sensitized solar cells: effects of zwitterionic co-adsorbents on photovoltaic performance,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 19, no. 13, pp. 2163–2172, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. M. Lin, S. L. Liu, and Y. H. Tseng, “Photocatalytic titanium oxide solution and method for producing the same,” TW I30690, 2005.
  16. C. Y. Chiu, C. N. Kuo, W. F. Kuo, and M. Y. Yeh, “Studies on the reaction of α-chlororformylarylhydrazine hydrochloride with N-heterocyclic comounds,” Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society, vol. 49, p. 239, 2002.
  17. S. Hore, C. Vetter, R. Kern, H. Smit, and A. Hinsch, “Influence of scattering layers on efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 90, no. 9, pp. 1176–1188, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Ito, T. N. Murakami, P. Comte et al., “Fabrication of thin film dye sensitized solar cells with solar to electric power conversion efficiency over 10%,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 516, no. 14, pp. 4613–4619, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. M. Sommeling, B. C. O'Regan, R. R. Haswell et al., “Influence of a TiCl4 post-treatment on nanocrystalline TiO2 films in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 39, pp. 19191–19197, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M.-S. Wu, C.-H. Tsai, J.-J. Jow, and T.-C. Wei, “Enhanced performance of dye-sensitized solar cell via surface modification of mesoporous TiO2 photoanode with electrodeposited thin TiO2 layer,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 56, no. 24, pp. 8906–8911, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. X.-F. Wang, H. Tamiaki, L. Wang et al., “Chlorophyll-a derivatives with various hydrocarbon ester groups for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells: static and ultrafast evaluations on electron injection and charge collection processes,” Langmuir, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 6320–6327, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F. Gao, Y. Cheng, Q. Yu et al., “Conjugation of selenophene with bipyridine for a high molar extinction coefficient sensitizer in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 2664–2669, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus