About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Photoenergy
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 568904, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/568904
Research Article

Effect of Annealing Temperature on CuInSe2/ZnS Thin-Film Solar Cells Fabricated by Using Electron Beam Evaporation

Department of Electrical, Electronics, and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

Received 17 October 2012; Accepted 10 December 2012

Academic Editor: Sudhakar Shet

Copyright © 2013 H. Abdullah and S. Habibi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

CuInSe2 (CIS) thin films are successfully prepared by electron beam evaporation. Pure Cu, In, and Se powders were mixed and ground in a grinder and made into a pellet. The pallets were deposited via electron beam evaporation on FTO substrates and were varied by varying the annealing temperatures, at room temperature, 250°C, 300°C, and 350°C. Samples were analysed by X-ray diffractometry (XRD) for crystallinity and field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) for grain size and thickness. I-V measurements were used to measure the efficiency of the CuInSe2/ZnS solar cells. XRD results show that the crystallinity of the films improved as the temperature was increased. The temperature dependence of crystallinity indicates polycrystalline behaviour in the CuInSe2 films with (1 1 1), (2 2 0)/(2 0 4), and (3 1 2)/(1 1 6) planes at 27°, 45°, and 53°, respectively. FESEM images show the homogeneity of the CuInSe2 formed. I-V measurements indicated that higher annealing temperatures increase the efficiency of CuInSe2 solar cells from approximately 0.99% for the as-deposited films to 1.12% for the annealed films. Hence, we can conclude that the overall cell performance is strongly dependent on the annealing temperature.

1. Introduction

Among various materials for thin film solar cells, copper indium diselenide (CuInSe2) has emerged as a promising material due to its use as a solar radiation absorber. In recent years, interest has increased regarding the use of copper indium selenide (CIS) compounds, which are elements of the I-III-VI2 group, as materials for thin film photovoltaic solar cells because of their high theoretical efficiency of approximately 24.8% [1]. CuInSe2 is a promising material for thin film solar cells because of its extraordinary radiation stability [2]. CuInSe2 films possess certain exceptional material characteristics including a band-gap, absorption coefficient and minority carrier diffusion length which are particularly suitable for photovoltaic applications. Because these films can be prepared with n- and p-type conductivity, there is potential for both a homo- and heterojunction [3]. CuInSe2 is also favoured because it is more environmentally benign than CIS. These materials have remarkably stable electrical properties over a wide range of stoichiometries [4]. Recently, CIS solar cells have been produced with efficiencies as high as 15.4%, and have demonstrated good long-term stability and stable device performance [5]. To achieve further commercial success for CuInSe2-based photovoltaics and to reduce the cost of these solar cells, it is necessary to mass-produce quality CuInSe2 films via a low-cost, eco-friendly, and easily scalable process [6]. Evaporation techniques are typically used to produce good film stoichiometry for elements and simple compounds [7]. Among II-VI compounds, zinc sulfide (ZnS) and zinc selenide (ZnSe) are suitable for many applications [8]. ZnS has a large band gap of approximately 3.7 eV, high refractive index, high precision dielectric constant, and broad band of wavelengths [9]. At certain temperatures, ZnS can change phase fromcubic to wurtzite [10]. ZnS can be used in the fabrication of optoelectronic devices, photoconductors and window materials for thin film heterojunction solar cells [11]. The aim of this research is to study the dependence of CuInSe2 : ZnS solar cell efficiencies, structures, and morphologies on the annealing temperature of the CuInSe2 films. In this study, CuInSe2 films with an annealing temperature of room temperature (27°C), 250°C, 300°C, or 350°C were examined for changes in morphology and structure by FESEM and XRD analysis. To study the effects of the annealing temperature on the overall CuInSe2 : ZnS solar cell efficiency, I-V measurements were performed for thin films with annealing temperatures of 27°C and 100°C.

2. Experimental Details

CuInSe2 layers were produced by annealing CuInSe2 pellets onto FTO glass substrates via electron beam evaporation. ZnS layers were made using the chemical bath deposition (CBD) technique with a 3 h deposition time. The CuInSe2 pellets were made from a mixture of Cu, In and Se powders, while ZnS films were fabricated from a Zn(CH3COO)2, TEA, NH3, C6H5Na3O7 and thiourea solution. CuInSe2 films were varied by using annealing temperatures of room temperature, 250°C, 300°C, and 350°C to study the effect of the annealing temperature on the morphology, structure and the efficiency of the solar cells. The flow of the cell fabrication is outlined in Figure 1. The surface morphology was studied with field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) while the crystallinity of the CuInSe2 films was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD). I-V data were collected by Gamry Instruments G300 with a light intensity of 110 mW/cm2. Figure 2 shows a diagram of the prepared samples with ZnS and CuInSe2 films on top of a glass substrate with an FTO layer.

568904.fig.001
Figure 1: Flow chart of overall process in fabrication of CuInSe2 : ZnS solar cell by electron beam evaporation and chemical bath deposition (CBD) method.
568904.fig.002
Figure 2: Cross-section of prepared samples with ZnS and CuInSe2 films.

3. Results and Discussions

Figure 2 shows the cross-section of prepared samples with ZnS and CuInSe2 films on top of glass substrate and FTO layer while Figure 3 shows FE-SEM images of CuInSe2 films deposited with an annealing temperature of 27°C, 250°C, 300°C, or 350°C. From the results obtained, CuInSe2 films were deposited uniformly over the substrate. These layers covered the entire surface of the substrate even without annealing, but the nonannealed films resulted in grains having less homogeneity. The grains became smaller and more densely arranged when temperature increased from 300°C to 350°C than when the temperature was increased from 250°C to 300°C. FE-SEM also shows an increase in grain size due to the roughness that developed when the growth rate was increased with an increase in annealing temperature [12]. The average particle size and film thicknesses are shown in Table 1.

tab1
Table 1: Particle size of CuInS2 for each annealing temperature.
fig3
Figure 3: FESEM images of CIS samples prepared at temperature (a) room temperature, (b) 250°C, (c) 300°C, and (d) 350°C.

As shown in Table 1, the average particle sizes were 156.33 nm, 137.70 nm, 139.53 nm, and 163.77 nm for annealing temperatures of 27°C, 250°C, 300°C, and 350°C, respectively. After the heat treatment, single grains of CuInSe2 were developed and the morphology of the films became denser. The thicknesses measured 172.67 nm, 109.76 nm, 121.33 nm, and 133.23 nm for the annealing temperatures of 27°C, 250°C, 300°C, and 350°C, respectively. These show that at room temperature, CuInSe2 films have the greatest thickness, and after annealing, the thickness decreases from 172.67 nm to 109.76 nm. This thickness change occurs because the smaller grains deposited on the film upon thermal treatment have less energy and have lost some of the weak binding between the grains and the substrate. These grains leave the substrate after annealing, but with increased annealing temperatures up to 300°C and 350°C, the denser grains become larger serve to increase the thickness of the film. The average size of the grains measured was approximately 100 nm. The similar phenomenon has also been studied by Zhang et al. 2010 [13]. We can conclude from these results that annealing temperature, particle size and film morphology are all proportionally related.

The diffraction patterns for CuInSe2 samples annealed at temperatures of 27°C, 250°C, 300°C, and 350°C are shown in Figure 4. From analysis of the XRD patterns, it was observed that the CuInSe2 crystallinity increased from amorphous structure to a polycrystalline structure as the annealing temperature increased. As shown in Figure 4, the CuInSe2 films are amorphous at room temperature. There are three dominant peaks corresponding to (112), (220)/(204), and (312)/(116) orientations at a of 27°, 45°, and 53°, respectively. These peaks have also been studied by Bindu et al. [6], Soon et al. [14], Yang and Chen [12], and Jeong et al. [15]. At an annealing temperature of 250°C, three peaks, which contained both CuInSe2 and FTO, could be observed with (112) and (220)/(204) orientations, as reported by Bernéde and Assmann [16]. At a temperature of 300°C, CuInSe2 peaks were dominant and the FTO peaks slowly disappeared. When the temperature was increased to 350°C, CuInSe2 peaks appeared at three locations () of 27°, 45°, and 53°. The peaks became sharper after the annealing temperature was increased, showing that the crystal sizes were larger than 1 nm [17]. The intensity of the peaks decreased with increasing annealing temperature, showing that the amount of the binary compound CuSe decreases during the annealing process. Higher and sharper peaks also appeared, showing that the primary crystal structure was successfully increased after the annealing process.

568904.fig.004
Figure 4: XRD results of CIS films prepared at temperature (a) room temperature, (b) 250°C, (c) 300°C, and (d) 350°C.

Figure 4 also shows that the main phase of the deposited CuInSe2 film has a chalcopyrite structure [18].

A qualitative estimation of the crystal size was obtained from Scherrer’s formula: where is the shape factor, is the wavelength (0.154 nm), is the full-width at half-maximum of the main peak, and is the main peak position [19]. The crystal size was calculated and is shown in Table 2. The average crystal size of CuInSe2 was 2.63 nm, 2.55 nm, and 3.05 nm for CuInSe2 (111), 8.99 nm, 7.49 nm, and 7.05 nm for the (220)/(204) plane, and 3.70 nm for the (312)/(116) plane. The grain size increased in the (111) plane and decreased in the (220)/(204) plane proportionally with the increasing annealing temperature. At the higher temperatures of 300°C and 350°C, the FTO peak disappeared and a peak corresponding to the (312)/(116) plane is observed, showing that the growth of the ternary compound CuInSe2. This analysis shows that the crystalline structure of CuInSe2 films can be changed from an amorphous to a polycrystalline phase with heat treatment.

tab2
Table 2: Crystal size and diffraction angle for each of annealing temperature.

CuInSe2 : ZnS solar cells were fabricated by depositing ZnS thin films on top of CuInSe2 films via the chemical bath deposition (CBD) method with a deposition time of 3 h. Figure 5 shows the I-V curves for CuInSe2 : ZnS solar cells for the CuInSe2 films annealed at temperatures of 27°C and 100°C. These temperatures have been chosen for the I-V measurements and are merely included to study the effect of annealing treatments on the overall solar cell efficiency. As shown in Figure 5, the effect of the changes in annealing temperature on the solar cell efficiencies was analysed and the results indicate that there was a difference in current density and open-circuit voltage of the samples before and after annealing. After annealing, , decreased from 8.65 mA/cm2 to 1.92 mA/cm2 while , increased from 0.20 V to 1.96 V. This could be due to the surface morphology of the samples prior to annealing as was shown by FESEM. This condition enhanced the electron-hole pair recombination rate in the film which affected the overall cell performance. The cell with the thicker layer had a lower efficiency, despite having greater photon absorption due to a simultaneous decrease in internal quantum efficiency [20]. As shown in Table 3, which presents the calculated efficiency along with , the fill factor, FF and , annealing increases the efficiency of CuInSe2 : ZnS solar cells from 0.99% to 1.12%.

tab3
Table 3: Efficiency of CuInSe2 : ZnS solar cell at produced room temperature and annealing temperature of 100°C.
568904.fig.005
Figure 5: I-V measurement CIS : ZnS solar cell with room temperature (27°C) and 100°C.

4. Conclusions

This study used electron beam evaporation, with annealing temperatures of 27°C, 250°C, 300°C, and 350°C, and the chemical bath deposition (CBD) method, with a 3 h deposition time, to produce CuInSe2 : ZnS solar cells. XRD analysis suggested that the diffraction of CuInSe2 films changed from an amorphous to a polycrystalline phase after annealing at 27°, 45° and 53° at (112), (220)/(204), and (312)/(116) orientations, respectively. FESEM results showed that the CuInSe2 particles were in better arrays after annealing and had sizes of 156.33 nm, 137.70 nm, 139.53 nm, and 163.77 nm. The thicknesses measured were 172.67 nm, 109.76 nm, 121.33 nm, and 133.23 nm for annealing temperatures of 27°C, 250°C, 300°C, and 350°C, respectively. From these data, we conclude that as the annealing temperature increases, the particle size and thickness also increase. I-V measurements indicated that annealing increases the efficiency of solar cells from 0.99% to 1.12%. These results show the dependence of both the efficiency and the structural and morphological characteristics of CuInSe2 layers on annealing temperature.

References

  1. O. Tesson, M. Morsli, A. Bonnet, V. Jousseaume, L. Cattin, and G. Massé, “Electrical characterisation of CuInSe2 thin films for solar cells applications,” Optical Materials, vol. 9, no. 1–4, pp. 511–515, 1998. View at Scopus
  2. A. V. Postnikov and M. V. Yakushev, “Lattice dynamics and stability of CuInSe2,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 451-452, pp. 141–144, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. L. Chopra and S. R. Das, Thin Film Solar Cells, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1983.
  4. M. Altosaar, M. Danilson, M. Kauk et al., “Further developments in CIS monograin layer solar cells technology,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 87, no. 1–4, pp. 25–32, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Markvart and L. Castaner, Practical Handbook of Photovoltaics: Fundamentals and Applications, Elsevier, 2003.
  6. K. Bindu, C. S. Kartha, K. P. Vijayakumar, T. Abe, and Y. Kashiwaba, “CuInSe2 thin film preparation through a new selenisation process using chemical bath deposited selenium,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 67–79, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Y. Ono, Electroluminescent Displays, World Scientific, Technology & Engineering, 1995.
  8. P. Roy, J. R. Ota, and S. K. Srivastava, “Crystalline ZnS thin films by chemical bath deposition method and its characterization,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 515, no. 4, pp. 1912–1917, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. U. Ubale, V. S. Sangawar, and D. K. Kulkarni, “Size dependent optical characteristics of chemically deposited nanostructured ZnS thin films,” Bulletin of Materials Science, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 147–151, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Moore and W. L. Zhong, “Growth of anisotropic one-dimensional ZnS nanostructures,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 16, pp. 3898–3905, 2006.
  11. X. D. Gao, X. M. Li, and W. D. Yu, “Morphology and optical properties of amorphous ZnS films deposited by ultrasonic-assisted successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction method,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 468, no. 1-2, pp. 43–47, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. H. Yang and Y. T. Chen, “Solvothermal preparation and spectroscopic characterization of copper indium diselenide nanorods,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 35, pp. 17370–17374, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Z. Zhang, J. Li, M. Wang, M. Wei, G. Jiang, and C. Zhu, “Influence of annealing conditions on the structure and compositions of electrodeposited CuInSe2 films,” Solid State Communications, vol. 150, no. 47-48, pp. 2346–2349, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. H. Kang, Y. K. Kim, D. S. Choi, and Y. E. Sung, “Characterization of electrodeposited CuInSe2 (CIS) film,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 51, no. 21, pp. 4433–4438, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. J. Jeong, H. G. Ahn, Y. J. Kim, H. H. Yang, and G. C. Park, “The properties of CuInSe2 by DC/RF magnetron sputtering and thermal evaporation method,” Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Materials, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 89–92, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. C. Bernède and L. Assmann, “Polycrystalline CuInSe2 thin films synthesized by microwave irradiation,” Vacuum, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 885–893, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Tzvetkova, N. Stratieva, M. Ganchev, I. Tomov, K. Ivanova, and K. Kochev, “Preparation and structure of annealed CuInSe2 electrodeposited films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 311, no. 1-2, pp. 101–106, 1997. View at Scopus
  18. Z. W. Zhang, J. Li, J. L. Liu, and C. F. Zhu, “Synthesis and characterization of supported CuInSe2 nanorod arrays on rigid substrates,” Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 115–120, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Z. H. Li, E. S. Cho, and S. J. Kwon, “Properties of the Cu(In,Ga)Se2 absorbers deposited by electron-beam evaporation method for solar cells,” Current Applied Physics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. V. A. Akhavan, M. G. Panthani, B. W. Goodfellow, D. K. Reid, and B. A. Korgel, “Thickness-limited performance of CuInSe2 nanocrystal photovoltaic devices,” Optics Express, vol. 18, no. 19, pp. A411–A420, 2010. View at Scopus