About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Photoenergy
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 803126, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/803126
Research Article

Study of Small Molecule Organic Solar Cells Performance Based on Boron Subphthalocyanine Chloride and C60

1Institute of Microelectronics, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
2Department of Electronic Engineering, Fortune Institute of Technology, Kaohsiung 83160, Taiwan
3Department of Applied Physics, National University of Kaohsiung, Nanzih, Kaohsiung 81148, Taiwan

Received 15 September 2013; Accepted 3 October 2013

Academic Editor: Teen-Hang Meen

Copyright © 2013 Jhong-Ciao Ke et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The small molecule organic solar cells based on boron subphthalocyanine chloride (SubPc) and C60 by varying the SubPc layer thickness from 3 nm to 21 nm were fabricated. The maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 1.47% was obtained at the 9 nm SubPc layer under 100 mW/cm2 AM1.5G illumination, which is attributed to reach the optimal balance between the light absorption efficiency and the carrier collection efficiency in the device. To increase the open-circuit voltage ( ) of device, the molybdenum oxide (MoO3) and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) were inserted between the indium tin oxide and the SubPc layer, respectively. Finally, the of device increased from 0.46 V to 1 V by using MoO3 buffer layer, resulting in the fact that the PCE of device increased from 1.47% to 2.52%.

1. Introduction

Solar cells are considered as an important source of renewable energy to solve the shortage of energy today. Various solar cells have been developed and one of the most promising solar cells is organic solar cells (OSCs). OSCs have received much attention recently due to several potential applications, including compatibility with flexible substrates, low-manufacturing cost, and roll-to-roll fabrication process [13]. In organic materials, light absorption leads to the formation of excitons (bound electron-hole pairs) rather than the free electron-hole pairs. The excitons dissociation occurred at the donor-acceptor interfaces, using the difference of energy level to overcome the binding energy of excitons, leading to the free electron and hole in device which can be extracted to the electrodes. Since Tang reported the first two-layer heterojunction OSC [4], the power conversion efficiency of OSCs had increased steadily in the recent years by using new materials and the different device structures [58]. The shortage of organic materials is narrow absorption range in visible region, which leads to the low short-circuit current density ( ). Therefore, to get the highest for the best performance, optimizing the device structure is necessary [9, 10].

Boron subphthalocyanine chloride (SubPc) is a promising donor material for the small molecule OSCs due to its deep highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energy level, which can get the higher of device. In this paper, we used SubPc as donor and changed the thickness of SubPc layer to investigate the influences on performance and to obtain the optimal thickness of SubPc for the best efficiency. In addition, the variation of device with different SubPc layer thicknesses and anode buffer layers is also investigated in detail.

2. Experimental

The indium tin oxide (ITO)/glass substrates (with a sheet resistance of 7 Ω/sq) are sequentially cleaned by ultrasonic treatment in acetone, isopropyl alcohol, and deionized water and blown by N2 gas before deposition. The layer of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) was formed by a spin-coating method. The spin coatings were performed at a rotation rate of 3500 rpm for 20s. The organic materials in the device were MoO3 (99%), SubPc (99%), C60 (99.95%), and BCP (99%), which were used without further purification. All layers in OSC were deposited at a deposition rate of 0.02~0.04 nm/s below the pressure of 6.4 × 10−4 Pa. The Ag as a cathode was deposited at a deposition rate of 0.2~0.3 nm/s by thermal evaporation through a shadow mask, giving an active area of 6 mm2. The thickness of thin film was monitored by an oscillating quartz thickness monitor. The configurations of device and the energy level in this study are shown in Figure 1.

803126.fig.001
Figure 1: The configuration of device and the energy level diagram in the study.

The current-voltage characteristics are measured with a Keithley 2400 sourcemeter, under an illumination of 100 mW/cm2 with an AM1.5G sun simulator. The intensity of irradiation was measured by an optical power meter. All measurements were carried out in air without any encapsulation.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 showed the current density-voltage ( - ) characteristics of device (ITO/SubPc (3~21 nm)/C60 (30 nm)/BCP (10 nm)/Ag) with different SubPc layer thicknesses. The performance parameters and the series resistance ( ) were listed in Table 1. The SubPc layer thickness of device has not only influence on the amount of light absorption but also influence on the ability of carrier transportation in device. Both of light absorption and the increased as the SubPc layer thickness increased. In Table 1, the of device increased from 3.70 mA/cm2 to 5.79 mA/cm2 when the SubPc layer thickness from 3 nm to 9 nm, which is attributed to the more light absorption with thicker SubPc layer. However, the advantage of SubPc as an electron donor in device was not revealed, high value, which will be discussed later. It was found that the of device with 12 nm SubPc layer is nearly four times than that of device with 9 nm SubPc layer, indicating that the carrier extracted from SubPc to ITO became hard as the thickness of SubPc layer exceeds 9 nm. It might result from the short diffusion length of SubPc which is only about 8 nm [11]. As a result, the of device continually decreased from 5.79 mA/cm2 to 3.47 mA/cm2 corresponding to the SubPc layer thickness from 9 to 21 nm. The fill factor (FF) of device is associated with the , and the change of FF is consistent with the variation. As the of device increased, the FF of device decreased. Finally, the optimal balance between light absorption and carrier transportation was obtained at 9 nm SubPc, resulting in higher efficiency of 1.47% at 9 nm SubPc than that of device with other SubPc layer thicknesses.

tab1
Table 1: Photovoltaic performance parameters of devices (ITO/SubPc (3~21 nm)/C60 (30 nm)/BCP (10 nm)/Ag) with different SubPc layer thicknesses.
803126.fig.002
Figure 2: The - characteristics of devices (ITO/SubPc/C60 (30 nm)/BCP (10 nm)/Ag) with different SubPc layer thichnesses (3~21 nm).

The of device increased as the SubPc layer thickness increased from 3 nm to 15 nm and then saturation at  V from 15 nm to 21 nm. The tendency of variation is in agreement with the result obtained by Kim and Yim [12]. To investigate the origin of which varied as a function of SubPc layer thickness, the surface morphologies of different SubPc layer thicknesses deposited on ITO/glass substrate were measured. Figure 3 showed the height profiles of bare ITO, 3 nm SubPc, 6 nm SubPc, and 9 nm SubPc deposited on ITO, respectively. It can be seen that the roughness of bare ITO is as high as 7 nm, resulting in that the vacancy of ITO cannot be fully covered by the 3 nm or 6 nm SubPc layer (as shown in Figures 3(b) and 3(c)). As a result, the contact between the ITO and the C60 after depositing C60 on SubPc layer cannot be avoided, causing that the of device with 3 nm and 6 nm SubPc is only at 0.34 V and 0.32 V, respectively. In contrast, the 9 nm SubPc layer is thicker enough to cover the roughness of ITO, which can avoid the contact between ITO and C60, resulting in that the of device with 9 nm SubPc layer is enhanced to 0.46 V. However, the of device still continually increased from 0.46 V to 0.59 V as the SubPc layer thickness increased from 9 nm to 15 nm. It results from the carrier accumulation in SubPc layer, which can be realized from the which dramatically increased, resulting in the increase of electric potential in SubPc layer. The of device was maintained in a value at SubPc layer thickness from 15 nm to 21 nm, and it is due to the fact that the amount of carrier accumulated in SubPc layer is saturated. That is to say, the balance of carrier generation and recombination was achieved at SubPc layer thickness above 15 nm, leading to that the amount of carrier is the same in SubPc layer.

fig3
Figure 3: The height profiles of (a) bare ITO, (b) ITO/SubPc (3 nm), (c) ITO/SubPc (6 nm), and (d) ITO/SubPc (9 nm).

However, the of device based on SubPc and C60 is still lower than that of other studies which also used the same materials. In theorem, the maximum of OSCs is limited by the energy difference between the HOMO energy level of donor and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy level of acceptor [13], and the in device is determined by difference of work function of electrodes within the maximum [14]. From Figure 1, the energy level difference between HOMO of SubPc and the LUMO of C60 is 1.1 V. The of devices with different SubPc layer thicknesses ranges from 0.32 V to 0.59 V, which is far from 1.1 V. The results were attributed to the low work function of ITO typically at 4.7 V. To improve the work function of ITO, the MoO3 layer and the PEDOT:PSS inserted between the ITO and the SubPc layer in the device with optimal SubPc layer thickness of 9 nm, respectively. The performance parameters were summarized in Table 2. The of device was enhanced to 0.77 V and 1 V by inserting the PEDOT:PSS and the MoO3 layer, respectively. The surface morphologies of bare ITO, ITO/PEDOT:PSS, and ITO/MoO3 were measured to further clarify whether the enhancement is attributed to the roughness of ITO. Figure 4 showed the AFM images of bare ITO, ITO/PEDOT:PSS, and ITO/MoO3 corresponding to the root mean square roughness of 3.73 nm, 2.08 nm, and 3.92 nm, respectively. It can be seen that the MoO3 cannot smooth the ITO surface, indicating that the enhancement of was not related to the roughness of ITO. As a result, the improvement of can be ascribed to the work function of ITO modification by the PEDOT:PSS and the MoO3. In addition, the of device using MoO3 as a buffer layer is higher than that of device with PEDOT:PSS buffer layer due to the fact that the HOMO energy level of MoO3 is deeper than that of PEDOT:PSS. The PEDOT:PSS layer was not optimized here, causing that the efficiency of device decreased from 1.47% to 1.13% by using PEDOT:PSS buffer layer. Eventually, the advantage of small molecule OSC based on the SubPc and the C60, high , was achieved by depositing the MoO3 layer on the ITO, resulting in the efficiency improvement from 1.47% to 2.56%.

tab2
Table 2: Photovoltaic performance parameters of device (ITO/PEDOT:PSS or MoO3/SubPc (9 nm)/C60 (30 nm)/BCP (10 nm)/Ag) with different buffer layers.
fig4
Figure 4: The surface morphologies of (a) bare ITO, (b) ITO/PEDOT:PSS, and (c) ITO/MoO3.

4. Conclusions

The performances of devices with different SubPc layer thicknesses have been investigated. The maximum and FF were achieved simultaneously at 9 nm SubPc, which is attributed to reach the optimal balance between the light absorption efficiency and the carrier collection efficiency in device, resulting in the efficiency of 1.47%. In addition, to obtain the highest of device not only needs the deepest HOMO level of donor but also needs the highest work function of anode. The of device by using MoO3 as a buffer layer is better than that of device using PEDOT:PSS. As a result, the is greatly improved from 0.46 V to 1 V by inserting the MoO3 layer between the ITO and SubPc layer, leading to an increase in efficiency of device from 1.47% to 2.52%.

Acknowledgment

This work was partially supported by the National Science Council of China under Contract No. NSC102-2221-E-390-019-MY2.

References

  1. J. Y. Kim, K. Lee, N. E. Coates et al., “Efficient tandem polymer solar cells fabricated by all-solution processing,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5835, pp. 222–225, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. C. Krebs, S. A. Gevorgyan, B. Gholamkhass et al., “A round robin study of flexible large-area roll-to-roll processed polymer solar cell modules,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 93, no. 11, pp. 1968–1977, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. C. Krebs, H. Spanggard, T. Kjær, M. Biancardo, and J. Alstrup, “Large area plastic solar cell modules,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 106–111, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. W. Tang, “Two-layer organic photovoltaic cell,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 183–185, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. F. Bailey-Salzman, B. P. Rand, and S. R. Forrest, “Near-infrared sensitive small molecule organic photovoltaic cells based on chloroaluminum phthalocyanine,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 91, no. 1, p. 013508, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Dai, X. Jiang, H. Wang, and D. Yan, “Organic photovoltaic cells with near infrared absorption spectrum,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 91, no. 25, Article ID 253503, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Yu, J. Gao, J. C. Hummelen, F. Wudl, and A. J. Heeger, “Polymer photovoltaic cells: enhanced efficiencies via a network of internal donor-acceptor heterojunctions,” Science, vol. 270, no. 5243, pp. 1789–1791, 1995. View at Scopus
  8. J. Xue, B. P. Rand, S. Uchida, and S. R. Forrest, “A hybrid planar-mixed molecular heterojunction photovoltaic cell,” Advanced Materials, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Chen, Y. Tang, X. Fan et al., “Improvement of the efficiency of CuPc/C60-based photovoltaic cells using a multistepped structure,” Organic Electronics: Physics, Materials, Applications, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 724–728, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. M. Schultes, P. Sullivan, S. Heutz, B. M. Sanderson, and T. S. Jones, “The role of molecular architecture and layer composition on the properties and performance of CuPc-C60 photovoltaic devices,” Materials Science and Engineering C, vol. 25, no. 5-8, pp. 858–865, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. R. Lunt, N. C. Giebink, A. A. Belak, J. B. Benziger, and S. R. Forrest, “Exciton diffusion lengths of organic semiconductor thin films measured by spectrally resolved photoluminescence quenching,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105, no. 5, Article ID 053711, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Kim and S. Yim, “Influence of surface morphology evolution of SubPc layers on the performance of SubPc/C60 organic photovoltaic cells,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 99, no. 19, Article ID 193303, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. P. Rand, D. P. Burk, and S. R. Forrest, “Offset energies at organic semiconductor heterojunctions and their influence on the open-circuit voltage of thin-film solar cells,” Physical Review B, vol. 75, no. 11, Article ID 115327, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. F. Lo, T. W. Ng, T. Z. Liu et al., “Limits of open circuit voltage in organic photovoltaic devices,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 96, no. 11, Article ID 113303, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus