Enhanced Photoreduction Activity of Carbon Dioxide over Co3O4/CeO2 Catalysts under Visible Light Irradiation

Huang, Ying; Yan, Chang-Feng; Guo, Chang-Qing; Huang, Shi-Lin

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/230808

International Journal of Photoenergy

On this page

Abstract Introduction Experimental Results and Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 | Article ID 230808 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/230808

Enhanced Photoreduction Activity of Carbon Dioxide over Co₃O₄/CeO₂ Catalysts under Visible Light Irradiation

Ying Huang,^1,2Chang-Feng Yan ,^1,2Chang-Qing Guo,¹and Shi-Lin Huang¹

Academic Editor: Franca Morazzoni

Received10 Dec 2014

Revised31 Mar 2015

Accepted16 Apr 2015

Published21 May 2015

Abstract

A series of new two semiconductor catalysts, Co₃O₄/CeO₂, were prepared by glycine-nitrate combustion method for photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide to produce methanol and ethanol under visible light ( nm) irradiation. The catalysts were characterized by BET, UV-vis spectra, XRD, SEM, PL, and XPS and the results indicated that the catalyst with 5 wt.% of Co₃O₄ has the highest yield among all kinds of tests with the methanol yield of 1.52 μmol·g⁻¹·h⁻¹ and the ethanol yield of 4.75 μmol·g⁻¹·h⁻¹, which are about 2.34 and 1.71 times as large as those of CeO₂. However, methanol and ethanol can hardly be detected for Co₃O₄ under the same condition because of its too narrow band gap. The improvement of the photoreduction activity of Co₃O₄ doped CeO₂ was caused by the separation of electron-hole pairs of Co₃O₄/CeO₂ and charge transfer between Co₃O₄ and CeO₂, mimicking the Z-scheme in photosynthesis.

1. Introduction

Carbon dioxide, one of the major greenhouse gases which is largely formed by fossil fuels consumption, can be conversed back to fuel with water or hydrogen by thermochemical or photocatalytic approach [1]. Photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide to methanol or other organic fuels, which is a process to both reduce carbon dioxide emissions and resolve energy crisis, has been proved to be a prospective way to convert solar energy by using semiconductor catalysts, like TiO₂ [2–4], CdS [5], SiC [6], g-C₃N₄ [7, 8], and graphene oxide [9, 10]. Due to shortages of narrow band gap of single semiconductor catalyst, two-semiconductor ones such as Co₃O₄/CeO₂ are expected to be explored in order to improve photocatalytic properties and to widen the responsive wavelength range for visible light, thus enhancing the total efficiency of photocatalysis.

Among various semiconductor photocatalysts, CeO₂ has some properties similar to titania catalyst such as wide band gap, nontoxicity, and high stability [11]. However, the main light absorption region of CeO₂ lies in the near ultraviolet and its low quantum efficiency and high recombination rate of electrons holes also constrain its development [12]. Due to the special f and d electron orbital structure of cerium atom, some metal oxide semiconductors like TiO₂ [13], Bi₂O₃ [14], and Cu₂O [11] can be easily doped with pure CeO₂ to enhance visible light absorption and quantum efficiency. Cobalt-based catalysts have been recently reported as photocatalysts for water oxidation [15–18], hydrogen production [19], and organic pollutants degradation [20–22]. Co is significantly less abundant than other transition metals like Fe, Mn, and Ni, but it is emerging as a potential metal for catalytic processes because of its light harvesting and electron mediating properties [19]. Cobalt oxides, for example, CoO and Co₃O₄, are p-type semiconductors with interesting electronic and magnetic properties [23]. The p-n heterojunction semiconductor structure combined with cobalt oxide and other n-type semiconductors such as BiVO₄ [23] or WO₃ [20] has been investigated as an effective way to improve the photocatalytic activities under visible light irradiation. In this case, CeO₂ as an n-type semiconductor with wide band gap may possibly bring out a similar heterojunction structure with Co₃O₄ to enhance the efficiency of visible light absorption by shortening the band gap, in which such p-n heterojunction structure can hardly work to reduce carbon dioxide according to the band theory because the conduction band potential of Co₃O₄ is too positive to start the reduction. However, CeO₂ is also a good reducing agent because of its relatively more negative reductive potential (around −0.5 eV) and Co₃O₄ doped CeO₂ with shorter band gap (2.07 eV) can act as a good cocatalyst, sensitizer, and oxidation agent of the composite with high positive potential (+2.44 eV) in the Z-scheme reaction mimicking photosynthesis. Recent studies on Z-scheme without mediators or so-called direct Z-scheme were carried out to explain charge separation at the interface between two semiconductors in a hybrid photocatalyst [24–27]. Further application of Co₃O₄/CeO₂ photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide to methanol and ethanol in the Z-scheme model has not been reported, which could enhance photocatalytic activity.

In this paper, a series of Co₃O₄/CeO₂ catalysts were prepared by glycine-nitrate combustion method for photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide to methanol and ethanol under visible light ( nm) irradiation. The structures of catalysts were characterized by XRD, UV-vis absorption spectra, BET analysis, and SEM testing. And a series of measurements, such as XPS and PL, were carried out for the mechanism of improvement of the photoreduction activity of Co₃O₄ doped CeO₂.

2. Experimental

2.1. Preparation of Co₃O₄/CeO₂ Catalysts

The Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O and Ce(NO₃)₃·6H₂O were mixed in the appropriate molar ratios with a minimum volume of distilled water to form a transparent solution. Then the glycine solution was slowly dropped to the metal nitrate aqueous solution during stirring. The glycine to nitrate ratio was set to 0.3 as the literature described [28]. The resulting solution was then kept stirring for an hour in order to gain transparent sol. Afterwards, the crucible was dried at 75°C in an oven for more than six hours until a transparent moisture-sensitive glassy material was obtained. This glassy material with fine mesh was heated in a muffle furnace up to around 180°C, and then it generated spontaneous combustion with large amounts of gases evolution and a foamy voluminous powder. Then the powder was calcined at 300°C or 400°C or 500°C or 600°C for an hour to burn off any carbonaceous residues in the catalyst. In addition, CeO₂ was prepared by the same method without adding Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O.

2.2. Catalyst Characterization

Specific surface area, average pore diameter, total pore volume, and pore size distribution of the samples were determined from the adsorption and desorption isotherms of nitrogen at 77 K after outgassing procedure under vacuum at 250°C for 10 h, using a Quantachrome Autosorb-1 instrument. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed with the PANalytical X’Pert diffractometer (X’Pert PRO MPD, PW3040/60) within the 2-θ ranging from 5° to 80° by a speed of 6° per minute with Cu-Kα (λ = 0.154060 nm) radiation (40 kV, 40 mA). The crystallite size was calculated by the Scherrer equation from the XRD spectra. The surface morphology was observed by the field emission-scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, S-4800). UV-vis spectroscopy in the 300 nm–1000 nm was measured with a Lambda 750 Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was conducted on a thermo ESCALAB 250XI multifunctional imaging electron spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) equipped with an Al Kα radiation source. Fluorescence spectra were obtained using a photoluminescence (PL) spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, LS-55). The concentration of methanol and ethanol was detected by a gas chromatograph (GC-7890II), equipped a flame ionization detector and a stainless steel packed column (PorapakQ, 2 mm × 1 m).

2.3. Photocatalytic Reaction Testing

The photocatalytic reaction was performed in a continuous-flow reactor system as shown in Figure 1. A 300W Xe lamp located in the center of the quartz cool trap was the light source and the UV light wavelength below 400 nm was filtered by a 2.0 M sodium nitrite solution layer between light source and reacting liquid [4]. Prior to experiment, sodium carbonate (3.18 g) and sodium sulfite (3.78 g) were dissolved in 300 mL deionized water. In this paper, sodium sulfite and sodium sulfide play a role as the sacrifice agent to scavenge photogenerated holes. Then the solution was injected into the reactor. Before irradiation, ultrapure carbon dioxide was bubbled through the solution in the reactor for at least 30 minutes to ensure that all dissolved oxygen was eliminated while adsorption and desorption of carbon dioxide in the solution and on the photocatalyst reached the equilibrium. 300 mg of catalyst powder was then added into above solution in the reactor for a five-hour irradiation. The solution of about 1 mL in the reactor was withdrawn as a sample each hour.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Samples with Different Cobalt Loading

Figure 2 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of Co₃O₄/CeO₂ photocatalysts prepared by glycine-nitride combustion method and calcined at 400°C, along with CeO₂ and Co₃O₄ which were prepared at the same conditions. Diffraction peaks corresponding to the hexagonal phases of CeO₂ are present for all Co₃O₄/CeO₂ photocatalysts with different mass faction of Co₃O₄ loading. Six main reflections belong to a typical fcc fluorite structure of CeO₂ (ICSD-169029), corresponding, respectively, to the , , , , , and planes. And ten main reflections belong to Co₃O₄ (ICSD-069366) as shown in Figure 2. With the increase of the Co₃O₄ from 1 wt.% to 20 wt.%, the diffraction peaks of CeO₂ become weaker, which indicates a continuous decrease in the crystallization degree of CeO₂. The diffraction peaks of Co₃O₄ are hard to be detected in all Co₃O₄/CeO₂ catalysts. The reasons why the strong Co oxides peaks absence had been discussed in our previous work [29], which may be attributed to (1) highly dispersed Co₃O₄ on the surface of ceria, (2) the formation of Co-Ce-O solid solution, or (3) a combination of two points stated above. However, some weak diffraction peaks for Co₃O₄ can still be noted, which suggests the existence of Co₃O₄ on the surface of particles. Either high dispersion of Co₃O₄ on the surface of CeO₂ or formation of Co-Ce-O solid solution indicates CeO₂ doped with Co₃O₄ instead of mixed oxides formed.

The UV-vis spectra of the catalysts are shown in Figure 3. The light absorption of all catalysts covers the visible region. The band gap of CeO₂ is estimated to be 2.93 eV from the plot of the versus photon energy () [4, 6] as shown in the inset of Figure 3(a), which is 0.27 eV narrower than that of the commercial CeO₂ with the band gap of 3.2 eV. It has been reported that CeO₂, as an n-type semiconductor, has band gap varying from 2.7 to 3.4 eV depending on the preparation method [30]. The red shift of the CeO₂ sample might be attributed to trivalent ionic cerium compounds. Similarly, the band gap of Co₃O₄ is estimated to be 2.0 eV, which is matched with the reported band gap (2.07 eV) [20]. In contrast to CeO₂, the Co₃O₄/CeO₂ have strong absorption in the visible region () and the visible light absorbance increases along with the addition of Co₃O₄ (Figure 3(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

In order to investigate the electronic environment and oxidation state of the CeO₂ sample, XPS analysis was performed. Eight peaks for Ce 3d of CeO₂ sample are shown in Figure 4(a), which are different from those of the reported CeO₂ with six peaks at binding energies 882.5, 888.7, 898.2, 900.7, 907.6, and 916.5 (±0.2) eV [31, 32]. Other authors have proved that the shape of Ce 3d peaks changes after normalizing the intensity of Ce 3d peaks for Ce₂O₃ and CeO₂ [32] when Ce₂O₃ is mixed or doped with CeO₂. And the peaks can be divided into more than six peaks, which may be attributed to the presence of Ce³⁺ [33]. Among all of these ten peaks in Figure 4(a), , , , , , and are attributed to the presence of Ce(IV), and , , , and are attributed to the presence of Ce(III) [34]. Three peaks for O 1s of CeO₂ sample are shown in Figure 4(b). Two peaks at 529.7 and 531.3 eV are attributed to O-Ce(IV) bond and O-Ce(III) bond, respectively [34], which indicates the existence of both CeO₂ and Ce₂O₃ [35]. In this case, Ce₂O₃ with much shorter band gap of 2.4 eV can shorten the band gap of CeO₂ and enhance the visible light absorption, which is in line with the UV-vis spectra.

(a)

(b)

Table 1 displays the specific surface area, the pore volume, the total pore volume of pure CeO₂ and Co₃O₄, and the catalysts with Co₃O₄ loading of 2 wt.%, 5 wt.%, and 8 wt.%. As the Co₃O₄ loading increases from 0 wt.% to 100 wt.%, the surface areas decrease from 100.14 to 24.47 m²/g, and the total pore volume decreases as well. It can be attributed to the mutual filling of the pore structure during the forming of Co₃O₄ and CeO₂ which can be proved by the pore diameter distribution in Figure 5. And pore size distribution of Co₃O₄/CeO₂ catalysts that smaller than 10 nm decreases sharply compared to that of Co₃O₄ or CeO₂ and mainly is distributed in mesopore region from 10 to 50 nm. When the Co₃O₄ loading increased from 2 wt.% to 8 wt.%, there is no distinct difference in specific surface area, average pore diameter, and total pore volume, which indicates that addition of Co₃O₄ in the Co₃O₄ loading range has little effect on the corresponding structure of Co₃O₄/CeO₂ catalysts. The sample with 5 wt.% Co₃O₄ loading has biggest specific surface area and uniform pore diameter distribution among all the tested Co₃O₄/CeO₂ catalysts. In addition, larger specific surface area, smaller pore volume, and total pore volume compared to those of commercial CeO₂ suggest that CeO₂ prepared by glycine-nitrate combustion method is a more potential carrier for catalysis.

The average methanol and ethanol yields, denoted as the average production rate of methanol and ethanol for each hour over the photocatalysts, are shown in Table 2. The photocatalytic activity of CeO₂ can be well improved via loading Co₃O₄ on CeO₂ by glycine-nitrate combustion method. No methanol and ethanol conversion was detected for Co₃O₄ catalyst under visible light irradiation because of its conduction band maximum being too positive to reduce carbon dioxide to methanol or ethanol. The sample with 5 wt.% Co₃O₄ has the best performance to produce both methanol and ethanol, which can be attributed to its better specific surface area, the proper pore volume, and pore size (Table 1). Increasing the Co₃O₄ loading from 0 to 5 wt.%, the methanol yield increased from 0.68 to 1.52 μmol·g⁻¹·h⁻¹ and the ethanol yield increased from 2.77 to 4.75 μmol·g⁻¹·h⁻¹. Further increasing the Co₃O₄ loading (>5 wt.%) leads to the decrease of the methanol and ethanol yields because of the significant decrease of the crystallization degree of CeO₂ shown in Figure 2. Photocatalytic activities of the sample with 5 wt.% Co₃O₄ were tested in different solutions. It is obvious that solution containing 0.1 M Na₂CO₃ and 0.1 M Na₂SO₃ has the best performance among (0.1 M Na₂CO₃ + 0.1 M Na₂SO₃), (0.1 M NaOH + 0.1 M Na₂SO₃), and (0.1 M Na₂CO₃ + 0.1M Na₂S), which indicates that extra carbon source () and better sacrifice reagent () can greatly enhance the photocatalytic activities for methanol and ethanol generation as shown in Table 2.

3.2. Effects of Calcination Temperature on the Photocatalytic Activity

Calcination temperature also affects the surface structures of catalysts. The samples with 5 wt.% of Co₃O₄ loading were calcined at 300°C, 400°C, and 500°C, respectively. As shown in Table 3, the specific surface area decreases with the increase of calcination temperature. And the pore diameter distribution becomes uneven when catalyst calcined at 500°C. Pore diameter bigger than 984 nm can be found from Figure 6, which indicates that the particle was melted and the pore collapsed.

Figure 7 shows the SEM images of the 5.0 wt.% Co₃O₄/CeO₂ catalysts prepared by calcining the spontaneous combusted precursor at temperatures of 300 to 600°C when CeO₂ calcined at 400°C. The shape of CeO₂ particle becomes very irregular. However, more pores can be seen on the surface of the CeO₂ particles (Figures 7(i) and 7(j)) compared to those of the Co₃O₄/CeO₂ catalysts (Figures 7(a)–7(h)). It can explain why the CeO₂ has larger surface area than the other samples. The particle size of the Co₃O₄/CeO₂ catalysts, however, increased greatly with the calcination temperature higher than 400°C, as shown in Figures 7(c) and 7(d). However, the particles of the sample calcined at 300°C are more irregular and the pores on the surface are bigger than those of the sample calcined at 400°C, which is in good correspondence to BET analysis results.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

In Figure 3, XRD peaks for Co₃O₄ of Co₃O₄/CeO₂ catalysts are absent, however, the peaks appear when the calcination temperature is higher than 400°C as shown in Figure 8. And the CeO₂ crystallite size of catalysts was estimated by using the Scherrer equation, and the order is 500 (41.8 nm) > 300 (37.5 nm) > 400 (35.4 nm) as shown in Table 3. The diffraction peak at 48.6° corresponding to hexagonal Co-Ce-O phase (JCPDS file 65-5917) [36] becomes stronger with increase of calcination temperature, which suggests that the treatment by combustion method strengthens the Co-Ce interaction and the calcination temperature improves the crystallization structure of catalysts. Thus, the CeO₂ crystallite size is getting smaller under calcination temperature of 400°C than under 300°C. And the enlarged size of CeO₂ crystallite under 500°C is caused by sintering of particles which is in line with the SEM.

In order to determine the amount of Ce(III) in cerium oxides, the deconvolution method of the Ce3d features [34, 37] has been used. The amounts of Ce(III) and Ce(IV) were calculated from the components of the Ce 3d core level using the following equations [37]:The calculated result shows that the amount of Ce(III) increases from 3.7% to 6.5%, the amount of Ce(IV) decreases from 32.0% to 25.9%, and the ratio of Ce(III) to Ce(IV) increases with the calcination temperature increase from 300°C to 500°C. These may be attributed to the reduction of carbon species which come from pyrolysis of residual glycine. The ratios of O to Ce atoms in CeO₂ and Ce₂O₃ lattice are 2 and 1.5, respectively. The measured results (Table 4) suggest that the oxygen amount on the surface of particles meets stoichiometric ratio with Ce(IV) and Ce(III) for the CeO₂ sample; however, it is far from sufficient for the Co-doped samples, which means that oxygen vacancies can be significantly formed on the surface of CeO₂ crystallite after cobalt is doped. Thus, the catalytic activity can be largely enhanced [38]. Among the Co-doped samples, the percentages of cobalt on surface of particle are almost constant, which indicates that the amount of oxygen vacancies decreases with the increase of calcination temperature. It is attributed to reduction of Co species on the surface during the generation of hexagonal Co-Ce-O phase [36].

Figure 9(a) shows the XPS spectra for Co 2p in 5 wt.% Co₃O₄/CeO₂ prepared by calcining the spontaneous combusted precursor at temperatures form 300°C to 500°C. The doublet peaks, corresponding to Co 2p_3/2 and a satellite peak, for all the samples, were found at and 782.6 eV in Co 2p scanning pattern, which indicates the generation of Co₃O₄ on the surface of catalysts, which is in line with XRD analysis (Figure 8). Other researchers have reported that the satellite peak is absent in the diamagnetic Co³⁺ compound [39, 40]; however, it grows along with the increase of calcination temperature, which indicates the transformation of Co³⁺ to Co²⁺ species [41]. Whereas the binding energies of Co 2p_3/2 and the satellite peak are slightly higher than the reported binding energies at ~780.0 and ~786.0 eV [41–43], respectively, this shift toward higher energies may be caused by the conjunction with Ce orbits. Binding energies of Co 3s and Ce 4d have been shown in Figure 9(b) to present the connection between Co and Ce orbits. Binding energy of Co 3s shifts toward higher energy from 110.9 (handbook [44]) to 111.4 or 111.1 eV, while binding energy of Ce 4d shifts toward lower energy from 110.0 (handbook [44]) to 107.7 or 107.5 eV, which suggests the formation of a kind of conjunction structure, and this structure becomes stable after calcining at temperature higher than 400°C.

(a)

(b)

Figure 10 shows that catalysts calcined at 400°C have highest methanol and ethanol yield among all, which can be well explained by the BET and SEM analysis. The order of the photocatalytic activities arranged as the calcination temperature is CeO₂, which is in line with that of XPS quantitative analysis.

3.3. Separation of Electron-Hole Pairs on Co₃O₄/CeO₂ Catalysts

The separation efficiency of electron-hole pairs of the composite photocatalyst is always the key factor to enhance the photocatalytic activity [26], which is mainly resulting from the addiction of cocatalyst. Ce³⁺ species formed on the surface of the composite might contribute to the separation of electron-hole pairs thus enhancing the photocatalytic activity [45] and further evidences will be discussed later. And doping Co₃O₄ can contribute to enhancing the visible absorption and it plays a role as a kind of cocatalyst to increase methanol and ethanol yields of photocatalytic reaction.

Two widely used equations for band edge calculation are showed below: is the conduction band edge of a semiconductor at the point of zero charge. is the absolute electronegativity of the semiconductor, expressed as the geometric mean of the absolute electronegativity of the constituent atoms, which is defined as the arithmetic mean of the atomic electron affinity and the first ionization energy. is the energy of free electrons on the hydrogen scale (~4.5 eV). is the band gap of the semiconductor [46, 47]. values for Co₃O₄ and CeO₂ are 5.93 and 5.53 eV, respectively. So the of Co₃O₄ and CeO₂ are calculated to be +0.43 and −0.44 eV, respectively, and the of Co₃O₄ and CeO₂ are estimated to be +2.43 and +2.49 eV, respectively. These results are close to those of the reported references [20, 30]. Figure 11(a) shows an assumption which was made to explain the separation of electron-hole pairs of Co₃O₄/CeO₂ catalysts. Photoelectron on the surface of Co₃O₄ transfers to the CeO₂ to avoid recombining to holes, which may also partly trap in the holes on CeO₂ and tend to reduce the recombination of electron-hole pairs on CeO₂. It works like a Z-scheme reaction. However, if the separation of electron-hole pairs works as p-n heterojunction, no methanol and ethanol would be produced because the conduction band potential of Co₃O₄ is too positive to reduce carbon dioxide (Figure 11(b)).

In order to confirm that the enhancement of photocatalytic activity is due to charge transfer between Co₃O₄ and CeO₂, PL measurements were carried out. Figure 12 shows the spectra of CeO₂, Co₃O₄, 5 wt.% Co₃O₄/CeO₂, and mixture of 5 wt.% Co₃O₄ and CeO₂ while the 5 wt.% Co₃O₄/CeO₂ sample was prepared as a reference sample. The excitation wavelength was 425 nm. CeO₂ sample has a strong PL emission at about 630 nm, which indicates rapid recombination of electrons and holes. The other samples have a PL peak at the same position with a peak intensity order of CeO₂ > mixture > 5 wt.% . The weak PL intensity of 5 wt.% Co₃O₄ and CeO₂ mixture could be attributed to the decrease of CeO₂ content. Although the sample contains only 5 wt.% of Co₃O₄, it has similar PL peak intensity and shape to Co₃O₄. It suggests that Co₃O₄ can remarkably reduce the recombination of electrons and holes, and the charge transfer between Co₃O₄ and its carrier CeO₂ does exist, in which the result is in line with the XPS measurement (Figure 9(b)).

4. Conclusions

The Co₃O₄/CeO₂ photocatalysts with mesoporous structure were synthesized by glycine-nitrate combustion method to improve photocatalytic activity of carbon dioxide reduction. The experimental results indicate that the modification of Co₃O₄ can not only decrease the specific surface area and pore diameter but also greatly increase the visible light absorbance and the photocatalytic activity of CeO₂. The Co₃O₄/CeO₂ photocatalysts with 5 wt.% of Co₃O₄ loading calcined at 400°C were found to be the best catalysts for carbon dioxide reduction in 0.1 M Na₂CO₃ + 0.1 M Na₂SO₃ solution. The largest average yields of methanol and ethanol were 1.52 and 4.75 μmol·g⁻¹·h⁻¹, respectively. Furthermore, doping Co₃O₄ on the surface of CeO₂ can help to promote separation of electron-hole and electron transfer between these two semiconductors. PL spectra revealed that Z-scheme charge transfer, one of the factors to enhance photocatalytic activity, occurred on the surface of Co₃O₄/CeO₂ catalysts under visible light irradiation.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of CAS Renewable Energy Key Lab., Guangdong Science and Technology Project (2013B050800007), and Guangzhou Science and Technology Project (2013J4500027).

References

Y. Izumi, “Recent advances in the photocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels with water and/or hydrogen using solar energy and beyond,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 257, no. 1, pp. 171–186, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Liu, N. Hoivik, K. Wang, and H. Jakobsen, “Engineering TiO₂ nanomaterials for CO₂ conversion/solar fuels,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 105, pp. 53–68, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. S. Wu and H.-M. Lin, “Photo reduction of CO₂ to methanol via TiO₂ photocatalyst,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 115–119, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, H. Liu, D. Luo et al., “Adsorption of CO₂ on heterostructure CdS(Bi₂S₃)/TiO₂ nanotube photocatalysts and their photocatalytic activities in the reduction of CO₂ to methanol under visible light irradiation,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 180, pp. 151–158, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, J. T. Chen, H. L. Li et al., “Photoreduction of CO₂ to methanol over Bi₂S₃/CdS photocatalyst under visible light irradiation,” Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 413–417, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Li, Y. Lei, Y. Huang et al., “Photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide to methanol by Cu₂O/SiC nanocrystallite under visible light irradiation,” Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 145–150, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Mao, T. Peng, X. Zhang, K. Li, L. Ye, and L. Zan, “Effect of graphitic carbon nitride microstructures on the activity and selectivity of photocatalytic CO₂ reduction under visible light,” Catalysis Science & Technology, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1253–1260, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Maeda, K. Sekizawa, and O. Ishitani, “A polymeric-semiconductor-metal-complex hybrid photocatalyst for visible-light CO₂ reduction,” Chemical Communications, vol. 49, no. 86, pp. 10127–10129, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X.-J. Lv, W.-F. Fu, C.-Y. Hu, Y. Chen, and W.-B. Zhou, “Photocatalytic reduction of CO₂ with H₂O over a graphene-modified NiO_x-Ta₂O₅ composite photocatalyst: coupling yields of methanol and hydrogen,” RSC Advances, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1753–1757, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-C. Hsu, I. Shown, H.-Y. Wei et al., “Graphene oxide as a promising photocatalyst for CO₂ to methanol conversion,” Nanoscale, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 262–268, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hu, F. Zhou, L. Wang, and J. Zhang, “Preparation of Cu₂O/CeO₂ heterojunction photocatalyst for the degradation of Acid Orange 7 under visible light irradiation,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 794–797, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Cai, Y. Liao, Z. Peng, Y. Long, Z. Wei, and Q. Deng, “Photocatalytic performance of TiO₂ catalysts modified by H₃PW₁₂O₄₀, ZrO₂ and CeO₂,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 997–1004, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, B. Li, C. Zhang et al., “Ordered mesoporous CeO₂-TiO₂ composites: highly efficient photocatalysts for the reduction of CO₂ with H₂O under simulated solar irradiation,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 130, pp. 277–284, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Li and B. Yan, “CeO₂-Bi₂O₃ nanocomposite: two step synthesis, microstructure and photocatalytic activity,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 355, no. 13, pp. 776–779, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Zhang, A. Yamakata, K. Maeda et al., “Cobalt-modified porous single-crystalline LaTiO₂N for highly efficient water oxidation under visible light,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 134, no. 20, pp. 8348–8351, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. K. Ma, K. Maeda, T. Hisatomi, M. Tabata, A. Kudo, and K. Domen, “A redox-mediator-free solar-driven Z-scheme water-splitting system consisting of modified Ta₃N₅ as an oxygen-evolution photocatalyst,” Chemistry: A European Journal, vol. 19, no. 23, pp. 7480–7486, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. del Pilar-Albaladejo and P. K. Dutta, “Topotactic transformation of zeolite supported cobalt(II) hydroxide to oxide and comparison of photocatalytic oxygen evolution,” ACS Catalysis, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ye, H. S. Park, and A. J. Bard, “Screening of electrocatalysts for photoelectrochemical water oxidation on W-doped BiVO₄ photocatalysts by scanning electrochemical microscopy,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, no. 25, pp. 12464–12470, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Mangrulkar, M. M. Joshi, S. N. Tijare, V. Polshettiwar, N. K. Labhsetwar, and S. S. Rayalu, “Nano cobalt oxides for photocatalytic hydrogen production,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 13, pp. 10462–10466, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Chakraborty, M. Shanjeda Akter, M. Ahsanul Haque, G. M. Arifuzzaman Khan, and M. Shamsul Alam, “Synthesis of Co₃O₄/WO₃ nanoheterojunction photocatalyst for the decomposition of organic pollutants under visible light irradiation,” Journal of Cluster Science, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 701–713, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-H. Hsieh, G.-J. Lee, C.-Y. Chen et al., “Hydrothermal synthesis of mesoporous Bi₂O₃/Co₃O₄ microsphere and photocatalytic degradation of orange II dyes by visible light,” Topics in Catalysis, vol. 56, no. 9-10, pp. 623–629, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Sun, S. Liu, G. Zhou, H. M. Ang, M. O. Tadé, and S. Wang, “Reduced graphene oxide for catalytic oxidation of aqueous organic pollutants,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 5466–5471, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Long, W. Cai, J. Cai, B. Zhou, X. Chai, and Y. Wu, “Efficient photocatalytic degradation of phenol over Co₃O₄/BiVO₄ composite under visible light irradiation,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 41, pp. 20211–20216, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Kondo, N. Murakami, C. Ye, T. Tsubota, and T. Ohno, “Development of highly efficient sulfur-doped TiO₂ photocatalysts hybridized with graphitic carbon nitride,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 142-143, pp. 362–367, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Katsumata, Y. Tachi, T. Suzuki, and S. Kaneco, “Z-scheme photocatalytic hydrogen production over WO₃/g-C₃N₄ composite photocatalysts,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, no. 41, pp. 21405–21409, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. M. He, L. H. Zhang, X. X. Wang et al., “Enhanced photodegradation activity of methyl orange over Z-scheme type MoO₃-g-C₃N₄ composite under visible light irradiation,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, no. 26, pp. 13610–13619, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. F. Chen, Y. F. Hu, L. Ji, X. L. Jiang, and X. L. Fu, “Preparation and characterization of direct Z-scheme photocatalyst Bi₂O₃/NaNbO₃ and its reaction mechanism,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 292, pp. 357–366, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hajarpour, K. Gheisari, and A. Honarbakhsh Raouf, “Characterization of nanocrystalline Mg_0.6Zn_0.4Fe₂O₄ soft ferrites synthesized by glycine-nitrate combustion process,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 329, pp. 165–169, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-F. Yan, H. Chen, R.-R. Hu et al., “Synthesis of mesoporous Co–Ce oxides catalysts by glycine-nitrate combustion approach for CO preferential oxidation reaction in excess H₂,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 39, no. 32, pp. 18695–18701, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Matějová, K. Kočí, M. Reli et al., “Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic properties of cerium doped TiO₂: on the effect of Ce loading on the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 152-153, pp. 172–183, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Zhang, S. Liu, X. Fu, and Y.-J. Xu, “A simple strategy for fabrication of ‘plum-pudding’ type Pd@CeO₂ semiconductor nanocomposite as a visible-light-driven photocatalyst for selective oxidation,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, no. 46, pp. 22901–22909, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sharma, P. Singh, and M. S. Hegde, “Electrocatalysis and redox behavior of Pt²⁺ ion in CeO₂ and Ce_0.85Ti_0.15O₂: XPS evidence of participation of lattice oxygen for high activity,” Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 2185–2197, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Abiaad, R. Bechara, J. Grimblot, and A. Aboukais, “Preparation and characterization of CeO₂ under an oxidizing atmosphere—thermal-analysis, Xps, and Epr study,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 5, pp. 793–797, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Beche, G. Peraudeau, V. Flaud, and D. Perarnau, “An XPS investigation of (La₂O₃)_1-x (CeO₂)_2x (ZrO₂)₂ compounds,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1045–1050, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Chen, S. W. Lee, T. H. Kim, and B. Y. Hur, “Photocatalytic decomposition of benzene with plasma sprayed TiO₂-based coatings on foamed aluminum,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2231–2239, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Bao, Z. Zhao, Y. Dai et al., “Supported Co₃O₄-CeO₂ catalysts on modified activated carbon for CO preferential oxidation in H₂-rich gases,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 119-120, pp. 62–73, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Romeo, K. Bak, E. Fallah, F. Le Normand, and L. Hilaire, “XPS study of the reduction of cerium dioxide,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 508–512, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Krishnan, T. S. Sreeremya, E. Murray, and S. Ghosh, “One-pot synthesis of ultra-small cerium oxide nanodots exhibiting multi-colored fluorescence,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 389, no. 1, pp. 16–22, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kang, M. W. Song, and C. H. Lee, “Catalytic carbon monoxide oxidation over CoO_x/CeO₂ composite catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 251, no. 1, pp. 143–156, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. F. Liotta, G. Di Carlo, G. Pantaleo, A. M. Venezia, and G. Deganello, “Co₃O₄/CeO₂ composite oxides for methane emissions abatement: relationship between Co₃O₄-CeO₂ interaction and catalytic activity,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 66, no. 3-4, pp. 217–227, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. E. Gómez, I. S. Tiscornia, A. V. Boix, and E. E. Miró, “CO preferential oxidation on cordierite monoliths coated with Co/CeO₂ catalysts,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 19, pp. 14812–14819, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Óvári, S. Krick Calderon, Y. Lykhach et al., “Near ambient pressure XPS investigation of the interaction of ethanol with Co/CeO₂(1 1 1),” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 307, pp. 132–139, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Idriss, C. Diagne, J. P. Hindermann, A. Kiennemann, and M. A. Barteau, “Reactions of acetaldehyde on CeO₂ and CeO₂-supported catalysts,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 219–237, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. V. Crist, Handbooks of Monochromatic XPS Spectra. The Elements and Native Oxides, XPS International, Mountain View, Calif, USA, 1999.
M. M. Khan, S. A. Ansari, D. Pradhan, D. H. Han, J. Lee, and M. H. Cho, “Defect-induced band gap narrowed CeO₂ nanostructures for visible light activities,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 53, pp. 9754–9763, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
S. F. Chen, Y. F. Hu, L. Ji, X. Jiang, and X. Fu, “Preparation and characterization of direct Z-scheme photocatalyst Bi₂O₃/NaNbO₃ and its reaction mechanism,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 292, pp. 357–366, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chen, Y. Hu, S. Meng, and X. Fu, “Study on the separation mechanisms of photogenerated electrons and holes for composite photocatalysts g-C₃N₄-WO₃,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 150-151, pp. 564–573, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2015 Ying Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2315

Downloads

1680

Citations

International Journal of Photoenergy

Enhanced Photoreduction Activity of Carbon Dioxide over Co3O4/CeO2 Catalysts under Visible Light Irradiation

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Experimental

2.1. Preparation of Co3O4/CeO2 Catalysts

2.2. Catalyst Characterization

2.3. Photocatalytic Reaction Testing

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Samples with Different Cobalt Loading

3.2. Effects of Calcination Temperature on the Photocatalytic Activity

3.3. Separation of Electron-Hole Pairs on Co3O4/CeO2 Catalysts

4. Conclusions

Conflict of Interests

Acknowledgments

References

Copyright

Enhanced Photoreduction Activity of Carbon Dioxide over Co₃O₄/CeO₂ Catalysts under Visible Light Irradiation

2.1. Preparation of Co₃O₄/CeO₂ Catalysts

3.3. Separation of Electron-Hole Pairs on Co₃O₄/CeO₂ Catalysts