Clinical Study

System Integration and Its Influence on the Quality of Life of Children with Complex Needs

Table 6

Summary of regression analysis of final model predicting the child’s followup physical function with only significant interactions.

Independent VariablesBeta95% CI of Beta -value

High Functioning Team (yes = 1, no = 0) .278
Child Gender (male = 1, female = 0) .103
T1 Physical Function .0001
T1 Psychosocial Function .0001
Child Hyperactivity .070
Child Emotional Disorder .863
Response Rate .007
Group Observed Integration Mean .752
Hostile Parenting .047
Family Function .982
MPOC: Respectful and Supportive Care .101
MPOC: Coordinated and Comprehensive Care .587
T1 Physical Functio .009
        Child Hyperactivity
T1 Physical Functio .021
        Group Observed Integration Mean
T1 Physical Functio .015
         Hostile Parenting
T1 Physical Functio .026
        Child Gender (male = 1, female = 0)
T1 Physical Functio .005
        Hostile Parenting
T1 Physical Functio .002
        MPOC: Respectful and Supportive Care
T1 Psychosocial Functio .001
        Well Functioning Team (yes = 1, no = 0)
Child Hyperactivit .006
        MPOC: Respectful and Supportive Care
Child Emotional Disorde .000
        Hostile Parenting
Child Emotional Disorde .008
        MPOC: Coordinated and Comprehensive Care
The % of Respondents on the Tea .003
         Child's Gender (male = 1, female = 0)
The % of Respondents on the Tea .033
        Hostile Parenting
The % of Respondents on the Tea .0001
        MPOC: Coordinated and Comprehensive Care
Group Observed Integration Mea .005
        Hostile Parenting
Hostile Parentin .040
        Well Functioning Team (yes = 1, no = 0)
MPOC: Respectful and Supportive Car .000
        Well Functioning Team (yes = 1, no = 0)

-square = 0.8868
MPOC: Measures of Processes of Care, T1: Time 1.