Review Article

20 Years of Research on Socioeconomic Inequality and Children's—Unintentional Injuries Understanding the Cause-Specific Evidence at Hand

Table 2

Individual-level studies for childhood road traffic injuries: summary of methodological features and results ( ).

Author & year country (city/region)OutcomesAge group data source SES measureAnalysis covariatesResults: the level of 95% is used for all confidence intervals (CI)

Cho et al. 2007 South Korea (whole country)Death due to transport accident (all types) stratified by sex and age group10–14 and 15–19 years R: death register, health insurance beneficiary datasetParental income (based on insurance contribution – 3 levels)Cox proportional hazards model NoneBoys with parents in the third income tertile have significantly higher mortality in transport accidents than those in the first tertile. Boys 10–14 (RR=2.66; CI 1.8–3.9), 15–19 (RR=2.15; CI 1.6–2.8). There were no significant differences for girls
Donroe et al. 2009 Peru (Lima)RTI as pedestrian, severe enough to require medical consultation0–18 years I: household survey with guardian or with child if aged 12 years and overPoverty (2 levels, parental education (2 levels)Logistic regression Sex, age, other SES, overcrowding, number of children in the homeChildren in poor households have increased odds for pedestrian injury (OR=1.59; CI 1.2–2.2) compared to those in more affluent households. Children with parents with low level of education have increased odds for pedestrian injuries compared to children with parents with high education (RR=1.91; CI 1.4–2.7)
Edwards et al. 2006 United Kingdom (England and Wales)Deaths as pedestrian, car occupant, cyclist0–15 years R: Population based death register Family occupational status (8 levels)Death rates (95% CI) NoneChildren from family with the least favourable occupational status had 20.6 (CI 10.6–39.9) times higher deaths as pedestrians, 5.5 (CI 3.1–9.6) times higher deaths as car occupants and 27.5 (CI 6.4–118.2) times higher for deaths as cyclists than children in the most advantaged families
Engström et al. 2002 Sweden (whole country)Hospitalisations and deaths combined, RTI (all types) stratified by age0–4, 5–9, 10–14, 15–19 years R: population and housing censuses, hospital discharge register, death registerParental social class (4 levels)Logistic regression, slope index of inequality, relative index of inequality Parents’ country of birth, single parent home, receipt of welfare benefitsChildren of unskilled workers have higher odds for traffic injuries than children with parents that are intermediate and high level employees: 5–9 years (adjusted RR=1.36; CI 1.2–1.5), 10–14 years (adjusted RR=1.23; CI 1.1–1.3), 15–19 years (adjusted RR=1.52; CI 1.4–1.6)
Hasselberg & Laflamme 2005 Sweden (whole country)Hospitalisations, RTI as car driver16–23 years R: population and housing censuses, hospital discharge registerHousehold social class (4 levels) Parental education (3 levels)Logistic regression NoneCar drivers who were injured several times show a similar social distribution to that of drivers sustaining just one. However, drivers from self-employed households show greater odds of injury repletion compared to drivers with parents that are intermediate and high level salaried employees (OR=1.65; CI 1.0–2.7)
Hasselberg & Laflamme 2004 Sweden (whole country)Hospitalisations, RTI as pedestrian, bicyclist and car passenger1–14 years R: population and housing censuses, hospital discharge registerHousehold social class (7 levels) Household disposable income (quartiles) Parental education (3 levels)Poisson regression, population attributable risk Child’s age, mother’s age at deliveryLow socioeconomic position of the household increases the risk of being injured in traffic as pedestrian (RR=1.39; CI 1.2–1.7), bicyclist (RR=1.34; CI 1.3–1.4) and car passenger (RR=1.31; CI 1.1–1.6). This association is also shown for other measures of SEP such as low disposable income and low level of education. The highest population-attributable risks were related to family disposable income and were indicated for pedestrians and car passengers (19%–20%)
Hasselberg & Laflamme 2003 Sweden (whole country)Hospitalisations, RTI as car driver16–23 years R: population and housing censuses, hospital discharge registerHousehold social class (7 levels) Household disposable income (quartiles) Parental education (3 levels)Poisson regression, population attributable risk Child’s age, mother’s age at deliveryThe long-term effects of low parental social class (OR=1.62; CI 1.4–1.9) and low education (OR=1.76; CI 1.52–2.03) on RTIs are evident in the case of young drivers. Level of family disposable income is not related to RTI among young car drivers
Hasselberg et al. 2001 Sweden (whole country)Hospitalisations, RTI as pedestrian, bicyclist, moped user, mc-user, car driver2–24 years R: population and housing censuses, hospital discharge registerHousehold social class (7 levels)Logistic regression, population attributable risk Child’s age, mother’s age at deliveryChildren of unskilled workers have higher odds for injuries as pedestrians (OR=1.30; CI 1.1–1.5), bicyclists (OR=1.34; CI 1.3–1.4), moped users (OR=1.80; CI 1.6–2.0), motorcyclists (OR=1.80; CI 1.6–2.0) and car drivers (OR=1.75; CI 1.6–2.0)
Laflamme et al. 2004 Sweden Stockholm CountyHospitalisations and deaths combined, RTI as protected and unprotected road user0–19 years R: population housing censuses, hospital discharge registerHousehold socioeconomic statusRelative index of inequality, Chi-squared testEqualisation for older boys as bicycle users (13–15 years RII=1.64;0.9–3.0, 16–18 years RII=1.16; CI 0.5–2.7)
Laflamme & Engström 2002 Sweden (whole country)Hospitalisations, RTI as pedestrian, bicyclist, motor vehicle passenger, motor vehicle driver0–4, 5–9, 10–14, 15–19 years R: population housing censuses, hospital discharge registerHousehold socioeconomic status (4 levels)Regression analysis SexSignificantly higher odds for children (aged 5–9 and 15–19 years) of unskilled workers for pedestrian injuries than for those in higher socioeconomic groups (5–9 years RR=2.33; CI 1.7–3.1, 15–19 years RR1.55; CI 1.2–2.0
Murray 1998 Sweden (whole country)Police reported traffic accidents among young motor vehicle drivers16–22 years R: national road administration database, population and housing censusSocial class (8 levels), school achievement (based on school marks in the school-leaving certificate) -test, difference of proportions NoneThe school achievement and school attainment were lower among young people involved in injuries compared to a sample of young people not involved in RTIs ( )
Roberts 1997 United Kingdom (England and Wales)Death rates RTI (all types), cyclist and pedestrian in a collision with motor vehicle0–15 years R: death registerSocial class of father (6 levels)Poisson regression NoneChildren in social class V are more likely to suffer traffic accidents compared to those in social class I (motor vehicle accidents, OR=1.11; CI 1.1–1.2, cyclists, OR=1.30; CI 1.2–1.4, pedestrian, OR=1.47; CI 1.4–1.5)
Roberts & Power 1996 United Kingdom (England and Wales)Death rates for motor vehicle accidents and pedestrian accidents.0–15 years R: population censuses, death registerSocial class of the father (6 levels)Poisson regression NoneChildren in disadvantaged families have more RTI in both periods (1979–83 and 1989–92) compared to children in more advantaged households ( ). The decline in mortality due to motor vehicle injuries and pedestrian injuries was smaller in the manual working class (23% decline; CI 16–28) than in the nonmanual working class (34% decline; CI 24–43)
Zambon & Hasselberg 2006 Sweden (whole country)Police reported road traffic crash as a motorcycle driver16–23 years R: population and housing census, hospital discharge register, national road administration databaseHousehold social class (5 levels)Logistic regression, population attributable riskLow socioeconomic position increases the motorcycle injury risk of both minor (OR=1.66; CI 1.5–1.9) and severe (OR=1.64; CI 1.3–2.1) outcomes to an equal extent, without giving rise to a higher risk of severe outcomes

Note R=register; I=interview; Q=self-administered questionnaire.