About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Peptides
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 834525, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/834525
Research Article

In Vitro Selection of Cathepsin E-Activity-Enhancing Peptide Aptamers at Neutral pH

1Department of Functional Materials Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, 255 Shimo-Okubo, Saitama 338-8570, Japan
2City Area Program Saitama Metropolitan Area, Saitama Small and Medium Enterprises Development Corporation, 2-3-2 Kamiochiai, Chuo-Ku, Saitama 338-0001, Japan
3Rational Evolutionary Design of Advanced Biomolecules, Saitama (REDS) Group, Saitama Small Enterprise Promotion Corporation, no. 552 Saitama Industrial Technology Center, 3-12-18 Kami-Aoki, Kawaguchi, Saitama 333-0844, Japan
4Janusys Corporation, no. 508 Saitama Industrial Technology Center, 3-12-18 Kami-Aoki, Kawaguchi, Saitama 333-0844, Japan
5Proteolysis Research Laboratory, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan

Received 3 December 2010; Accepted 17 January 2011

Academic Editor: Brian Walker

Copyright © 2011 Madhu Biyani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Southan, “A genomic perspective on human proteases as drug targets,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 6, no. 13, pp. 681–688, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Turk, “Targeting proteases: successes, failures and future prospects,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 785–799, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. S. Putt, G. W. Chen, J. M. Pearson et al., “Small-molecule activation of procaspase-3 to caspase-3 as a personalized anticancer strategy,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 543–550, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. A. Zorn and J. A. Wells, “Turning enzymes on with small molecules,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 179–188, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Ottmann, P. Hauske, and M. Kaiser, “Activation instead of inhibition: targeting proenzymes for small-molecule intervention,” ChemBioChem, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 637–639, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. Hauske, C. Ottmann, M. Meltzer, M. Ehrmann, and M. Kaiser, “Allosteric regulation of proteases,” Chembiochem, vol. 9, no. 18, pp. 2920–2928, 2008. View at Scopus
  7. A. Wlodawer, M. Li, A. Gustchina et al., “Inhibitor complexes of the Pseudomonas serine-carboxyl proteinase,” Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 51, pp. 15602–15611, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. I. Redzynia, A. Ljunggren, A. Bujacz, M. Abrahamson, M. Jaskolski, and G. Bujacz, “Crystal structure of the parasite inhibitor chagasin in complex with papain allows identification of structural requirements for broad reactivity and specificity determinants for target proteases,” FEBS Journal, vol. 276, no. 3, pp. 793–806, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Kitamura, C. Yoshida, Y. Kinoshita et al., “Development of systemic in vitro evolution and its application to generation of peptide-aptamer-based inhibitors of cathepsin E,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 387, no. 5, pp. 1186–1198, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Nemoto, E. Miyamoto-Sato, Y. Husimi, and H. Yanagawa, “In vitro virus: bonding of mRNA bearing puromycin at the 3'-terminal end to the C-terminal end of its encoded protein on the ribosome in vitro,” FEBS Letters, vol. 414, no. 2, pp. 405–408, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. W. Roberts and J. W. Szostak, “RNA-peptide fusion for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 4825–4826, 1997.
  12. J. Yamaguchi, M. Naimuddin, M. Biyani et al., “cDNA display: a novel screening method for functional disulfide-rich peptides by solid-phase synthesis and stabilization of mRNA-protein fusions,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37, no. 16, article e108, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Naimuddin, K. Kitamura, Y. Kinoshita et al., “Selection-by-function: efficient enrichment of cathepsin E inhibitors from a DNA library,” Journal of Molecular Recognition, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 58–68, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Kawakubo, K. Okamoto, J. I. Iwata et al., “Cathepsin E prevents tumor growth and metastasis by catalyzing the proteolytic release of soluble TRAIL from tumor cell surface,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 22, pp. 10869–10878, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. S. DiPaola, J. Rinehart, J. Nemunaitis et al., “Characterization of a novel prostate-specific antigen-activated peptide-doxorubicin conjugate in patients with prostate cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1874–1879, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. B. P. Athauda and K. Takahashi, “Distinct cleavage specificity of human cathepsin E at neutral pH with special preference for Arg-Arg bonds,” Protein and Peptide Letters, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Bromme and K. Okamoto, “Human cathepsin O2, a novel cysteine protease highly expressed in osteoclastomas and ovary molecular cloning, sequencing and tissue distribution,” Biological Chemistry Hoppe-Seyler, vol. 376, no. 6, pp. 379–384, 1995. View at Scopus
  18. K. Kitamura, C. Yoshida, MD. Salimullah et al., “Rapid in vitro synthesis of pico-mole quantities of peptides,” Chemistry Letters, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1250–1251, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Kitamura, Y. Kinoshita, S. Narasaki, N. Nemoto, Y. Husimi, and K. Nishigaki, “Construction of block-shuffled libraries of DNA for evolutionary protein engineering: Y-ligation-based block shuffling,” Protein Engineering, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 843–853, 2003. View at Scopus
  20. P. J. Alaimo, M. A. Shogren-Knaak, and K. M. Shokat, “Chemical genetic approaches for the elucidation of signaling pathways,” Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 360–367, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Huang, I. Martinez-Ferrando, and P. A. Cole, “Enhanced interrogation: emerging strategies for cell signaling inhibition,” Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 646–649, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. R. Goode, R. K. Totten, J. T. Heeres, and P. J. Hergenrother, “Identification of promiscuous small molecule activators in high-throughput enzyme activation screens,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 2346–2349, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. Chothia, J. Gough, C. Vogel, and S. A. Teichmann, “Evolution of the protein repertoire,” Science, vol. 300, no. 5626, pp. 1701–1703, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. Chothia and J. Gough, “Genomic and structural aspects of protein evolution,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 419, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. A. Orengo and J. M. Thornton, “Protein families and their evolution—a structural perspective,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 74, pp. 867–900, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus