Copyright © 2008 David Kuykendall et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

1. X. Dong, “NPR1, all things considered,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 547–552, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
2. Z. Mou, W. Fan, and X. Dong, “Inducers of plant systemic acquired resistance regulate NPR1 function through redox changes,” Cell, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 935–944, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
3. H. Cao, X. Li, and X. Dong, “Generation of broad-spectrum disease resistance by overexpression of an essential regulatory gene in systemic acquired resistance,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 6531–6536, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
4. L. Friedrich, K. Lawton, R. Dietrich, M. Willits, R. Cade, and J. Ryals, “NIM1 overexpression in Arabidopsis potentiates plant disease resistance and results in enhanced effectiveness of fungicides,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1114–1124, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
5. M. Chern, H. A. Fitzgerald, P. E. Canlas, D. A. Navarre, and P. C. Ronald, “Overexpression of a rice NPR1 homolog leads to constitutive activation of defense response and hypersensitivity to light,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 511–520, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
6. W.-C. Lin, C.-F. Lu, J.-W. Wu, et al., “Transgenic tomato plants expressing the Arabidopsis NPR1 gene display enhanced resistance to a spectrum of fungal and bacterial diseases,” Transgenic Research, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 567–581, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
7. R. Makandar, J. S. Essig, M. A. Schapaugh, H. N. Trick, and J. Shah, “Genetically engineered resistance to fusarium head blight in wheat by expression of Arabidopsis NPR1,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 123–129, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
8. J. M. McGrath, R. S. Shaw, B. G. de los Reyes, and J. J. Weiland, “Construction of a sugar beet BAC library from a hybrid with diverse traits,” Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
9. D. Kuykendall, T. Murphy, J. Shao, and J. M. McGrath, “Nucleotide sequence analyses of a sugar beet genomic NPR1-class disease resistance gene,” Journal of Sugar Beet Research, vol. 44, pp. 35–49, 2007.
10. L. K. Mosavi, T. J. Cammett, D. C. Desrosiers, and Z.-Y. Peng, “The ankyrin repeat as molecular architecture for protein recognition,” Protein Science, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1435–1448, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
11. U. Conrath, G. J. M. Beckers, V. Flors, et al., “Priming: getting ready for battle,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1062–1071, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
12. R. L. Bargabus-Larson and B. J. Jacobsen, “Biocontrol elicited systemic resistance in sugarbeet is salicylic acid independent and NPR1 dependent,” Journal of Sugar Beet Research, vol. 44, pp. 17–33, 2007.
13. H.-M. Ku, T. Vision, J. Liu, and S. D. Tanksley, “Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 16, pp. 9121–9126, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
14. I. Dominguez, E. Graziano, C. Gebhardt, et al., “Plant genome archaeology: evidence for conserved ancestral chromosome segments in dicotyledonous plant species,” Plant Biotechnology Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 91–99, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
15. G. E. Coe and G. J. Hogaboam, “Registration of US H20 sugarbeet,” Crop Science, vol. 11, no. 6, p. 942, 1971.
16. A. C. J. Frijters, Z. Zhang, M. van Damme, G.-L. Wang, P. C. Ronald, and R. W. Michelmore, “Construction of a bacterial artificial chromosome library containing large EcoRI and HindIII genomic fragments of lettuce,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 94, no. 3-4, pp. 390–399, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
17. S. F. Altschul, W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman, “Basic local alignment search tool,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 403–410, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
18. M. Borodovsky and J. McIninch, “GENMARK: parallel gene recognition for both DNA strands,” Computers and Chemistry, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 123–133, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
19. A. V. Lukashin and M. Borodovsky, “GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1107–1115, 1998.
20. J. Schultz, F. Milpetz, P. Bork, and C. P. Ponting, “SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 5857–5864, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
21. G. A. Tuskan, S. DiFazio, S. Jansson, et al., “The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray),” Science, vol. 313, no. 5793, pp. 1596–1604, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
22. S. B. Cannon, J. A. Crow, M. L. Heuer, et al., “Databases and information integration for the Medicago truncatula genome and transcriptome,” Plant Physiology, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 38–46, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
23. N. D. Young, S. B. Cannon, S. Sato, et al., “Sequencing the genespaces of Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus,” Plant Physiology, vol. 137, no. 4, pp. 1174–1181, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
24. C. Almoguera, A. Rojas, J. Díaz-Martín, P. Prieto-Dapena, R. Carranco, and J. Jordano, “A seed-specific heat-shock transcription factor involved in developmental regulation during embryogenesis in sunflower,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 46, pp. 43866–43872, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
25. D. Kuykendall, J. Shao, and K. Trimmer, “Coe1 in Beta vulgaris L. has a Tnp2-domain DNA transposase gene within putative LTRs and other retroelement-like features,” International Journal of Plant Genomics, vol. 2008, Article ID 360874, 7 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
26. D. Schulte, D. Cai, M. Kleine, L. Fan, S. Wang, and C. Jung, “A complete physical map of a wild beet (Beta procumbens) translocation in sugar beet,” Molecular Genetics and Genomics, vol. 275, no. 5, pp. 504–511, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
27. A. R. Rhoads and F. Friedberg, “Sequence motifs for calmodulin recognition,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 331–340, 1997.
28. M. Bähler and A. Rhoads, “Calmodulin signaling via the IQ motif,” FEBS Letters, vol. 513, no. 1, pp. 107–113, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
29. V. S. Reddy, G. S. Ali, and A. S. N. Reddy, “Genes encoding calmodulin-binding proteins in the Arabidopsis genome,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 12, pp. 9840–9852, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
30. M. Charpenteau, K. Jaworski, B. C. Ramirez, A. Tretyn, R. Ranjeva, and B. Ranty, “A receptor-like kinase from Arabidopsis thaliana is a calmodulin-binding protein,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 379, no. 3, pp. 841–848, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
31. T. Yang and B. W. Poovaiah, “An early ethylene up-regulated gene encoding a calmodulin-binding protein involved in plant senescence and death,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 49, pp. 38467–38473, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
32. E. Perruc, M. Charpenteau, B. C. Ramirez, et al., “A novel calmodulin-binding protein functions as a negative regulator of osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings,” The Plant Journal, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 410–420, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
33. W. Hua, L. Zhang, S. Liang, R. L. Jones, and Y.-T. Lu, “A tobacco calcium/calmodulin-binding protein kinase functions as a negative regulator of flowering,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 30, pp. 31483–31494, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
34. A. S. N. Reddy, V. S. Reddy, and M. Golovkin, “A calmodulin binding protein from Arabidopsis is induced by ethylene and contains a DNA-binding motif,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 279, no. 3, pp. 762–769, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
35. V. S. Reddy, G. S. Ali, and A. S. N. Reddy, “Characterization of a pathogen-induced calmodulin-binding protein: mapping of four ${\text{Ca}}^{2+}$-dependent calmodulin-binding domains,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 143–159, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
36. C. Y. Park, W. D. Heo, J. H. Yoo, et al., “Pathogenesis-related gene expression by specific calmodulin isoforms is dependent on NIM1, a key regulator of systemic acquired resistance,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 207–213, 2004.
37. B. Kloss, J. L. Price, L. Saez, et al., “The Drosophila clock gene double-time encodes a protein closely related to human casein kinase I$\varepsilon$,” Cell, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 97–107, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
38. M. Petronczki, J. Matos, S. Mori, et al., “Monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores at meiosis I requires casein kinase 1,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 1049–1064, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
39. Z. Gu, J. Wang, J. Huang, and H. Zhang, “Cloning and characterization of a novel rice gene family encoding putative dual-specificity protein kinases, involved in plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses,” Plant Science, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 470–477, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar