Application of Phosphoproteomics to Find Targets of Casein Kinase 1 in the Flagellum of <i>Chlamydomonas</i>

Boesger, Jens; Wagner, Volker; Weisheit, Wolfram; Mittag, Maria

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/581460

International Journal of Plant Genomics

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 | Article ID 581460 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/581460

Application of Phosphoproteomics to Find Targets of Casein Kinase 1 in the Flagellum of Chlamydomonas

Jens Boesger,¹Volker Wagner,¹Wolfram Weisheit,¹and Maria Mittag¹

Academic Editor: Jaroslav Doležel

Received02 Aug 2012

Accepted10 Nov 2012

Published18 Dec 2012

Abstract

The green biflagellate alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii serves as model for studying structural and functional features of flagella. The axoneme of C. reinhardtii anchors a network of kinases and phosphatases that control motility. One of them, Casein Kinase 1 (CK1), is known to phosphorylate the Inner Dynein Arm I1 Intermediate Chain 138 (IC138), thereby regulating motility. CK1 is also involved in regulating the circadian rhythm of phototaxis and is relevant for the formation of flagella. By a comparative phosphoproteome approach, we determined phosphoproteins in the flagellum that are targets of CK1. Thereby, we applied the specific CK1 inhibitor CKI-7 that causes significant changes in the flagellum phosphoproteome and reduces the swimming velocity of the cells. In the CKI-7-treated cells, 14 phosphoproteins were missing compared to the phosphoproteome of untreated cells, including IC138, and four additional phosphoproteins had a reduced number of phosphorylation sites. Notably, inhibition of CK1 causes also novel phosphorylation events, indicating that it is part of a kinase network. Among them, Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 is of special interest, because it is involved in the phosphorylation of key clock components in flies and mammals and in parallel plays an important role in the regulation of assembly in the flagellum.

1. Introduction

Eukaryotic cilia or flagella are microtubule-based organelles that are highly conserved in protein composition and structural organization from protozoa to mammals. They are structurally characterized by nine microtubular doublets surrounding two central microtubular singlets [1]. Substructures like dynein arms and radial spokes are associated with the axoneme and important for motility in the flagellum. Matrix proteins that are not tightly associated with the flagellar membrane or the axoneme serve diverse functions in the flagellum and can be involved in intraflagellar transport [2].

Since many years, the green biflagellate alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, whose genome has been sequenced, is used as a model to study flagella structure, assembly, formation, and motility [3]. C. reinhardtii uses flagella for motility in aqueous environments, for attaching to surfaces and for cell-cell recognition during mating. A proteomic analysis of Chlamydomonas flagella revealed more than 600 proteins [4] that include, for example, motor and signal transduction components as well as proteins with homologues associated with human diseases (e.g., polycystic kidney disease, retinal degeneration, hydrocephalus, or changes in the left-right symmetry of organs) collectively known as ciliopathies [5]. But in many cases, Flagellar Associated Proteins (FAPs) still have unknown function.

Among the proteins in the flagellum, 21 protein kinases and 11 protein phosphatases were found pointing to regulation by reversible protein phosphorylation in this organelle. Phosphorylation events on specific amino acids residues can affect protein function, its intracellular localization, its activity, and its affinity to interaction partners (for review see [6]). But the identification of substrates for kinases in the phosphoregulatory pathway is still a challenge. In C. reinhardtii, several proteomes and phosphoproteomes of subcellular compartments (reviewed in [7, 8]) were analyzed including environmentally modulated photosynthetic membranes [9], the eyespot [10], and the flagellum [11]. The flagellum phosphoproteome was first studied under physiological conditions without postincubation of isolated flagellar proteins with ATP to increase the phosphorylation status. 126 in vivo phosphorylation sites were found belonging to 32 different structural and motor proteins, several kinases, and proteins with protein interaction domains [11]. Furthermore, a dynamic phosphorylation pattern and clustering of phosphorylation sites were found in some cases, indicating the specific control of proteins by reversible phosphorylation in the flagellum. In another study, flagellum phosphoproteins were examined during flagella shortening. In this case, postincubation with ATP was undertaken. Thereby, half of the identified phosphoproteins were only detected in shortening flagella [12].

The axoneme of Chlamydomonas flagella anchors multiple inner arm dyneins and a network of kinases and phosphatases that control motility by reversible protein phosphorylation [13]. One of the involved flagellum kinases is Casein Kinase 1 (CK1) [14–16]. In pharmacological experiments using a specific CK1 inhibitor (CKI-7), it was shown that CK1 regulates dynein activity and flagellum motility by phosphorylation of the Inner Dynein Arm I1 Intermediate Chain 138 (IC138) [14, 15]. Moreover, silencing of CK1 results in alterations of circadian phototaxis (shortening of the period), defects in flagella formation, and in hatching of the daughter cells [17]. Interestingly, alterations in the expression of several other key players of the clock machinery of C. reinhardtii named Rhythm of Chloroplast (ROC) and a homologue of Constans (CrCO) have in parallel severe effects on hatching, flagella formation, and/or movement, underlining that these processes are interconnected in C. reinhardtii [17–19].

Regarding the multiple functions of CK1 in flagella formation and motility along with its regulatory role in the circadian system in C. reinhardtii, we were interested in the identification of CK1 targets in flagella beside IC138. In a comparative phosphoproteomic approach using wild-type cells with and without CKI-7 treatment, we determined the targets of CK1 in the flagellum. In the CKI-7-treated cells, several phosphoproteins were missing or were identified with a reduced number of phosphorylation sites, compared to untreated wild-type cells. Also novel phosphopeptides or additional phosphorylation sites of known phosphopeptides were identified in the CKI-7-treated cells, suggesting that CK1 is part of a signaling network in the flagellum.

2. Materials and Methods

Standard molecular biology methods were done according to [20].

2.1. Cell Culture

C. reinhardtii strain 137c (nit1 nit2) was used with whom the flagellar proteome and phosphoproteome were analyzed [4, 11]. Cells were grown in TAP medium [21] under a 12 h light-12 h dark cycle (LD 12 : 12) with a light intensity of 71 μE m⁻² sec⁻¹ (1 E = 1 mol of photons) at 24°C. The beginning of the light period is defined as time zero (LD0) and the beginning of the dark period is LD12. In some cases, cells were released after growth in LD into constant conditions (LL) of dim light (15 μE m⁻² sec⁻¹).

2.2. Crude Extract Preparation and Immunodetection

Protein extracts were prepared as described previously [11]. The concentration of proteins was measured according to [22]. Immunoblots were done with antibodies against phosphoSer (Qiagen) and phosphoThr (Cell Signaling Technology) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Polyclonal antibodies against the C-terminal part of CK1 (amino acids 131–333 out of 333; ID JGI Vs3: 137286) were also used [23]. For this, the C-terminal part of CK1 was expressed and purified from E. coli according to the Qiagen protocol. Antibodies were raised by the “Pineda-Antikörper-Service,” Berlin, Germany. Immunoblots were done as described [11] using the polyclonal anti-CK1 antibody in a dilution of 1 : 5,000.

2.3. Densitometry Analysis

Quantifications were done with the Image Master 2D Elite (version 4.01) software from GE Healthcare (formerly Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

2.4. Measurement of Swimming Velocity of C. reinhardtii Cells

Measurement of swimming velocity was done by using a hemocytometer and a differential interference contrast microscope with a total magnification of 400 including a personal computer with a digital video recording system to measure displacement versus time. The swimming velocity was determined manually by measuring the linear displacement of cells on the scale of the micrometer. 10 samples were measured to obtain the average velocity of a given sample.

2.5. Cell Growth, CKI-7 Treatment, Isolation of Flagella, Protein Digestion, and Enrichment of Phosphopeptides by Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC)

Cells were grown in a LD cycle and harvested at the end of the night (LD24) at a cell density of cells mL⁻¹ by centrifugation (700 g, 5 min, 4°C).Cells were resuspended in one-half volume of minimal medium [21] and then the culture was kept under dim light conditions for 29 h representing subjective day (LL29), before cells were harvested (700 g, 15 min, 4°C). In some cases, the CK1 inhibitor, CKI-7, (N-(2-Aminoethyl)-5-chloroisoquinoline-8-sulfonamide; Toronto Research Chemicals Inc.) [24], was added to the culture to a final concentration of 50 μM following the shift to LL conditions. Isolation of the matrix membrane axoneme fraction (MMA) of flagella, tryptic digestion of MMA proteins, and enrichment of flagellum phosphopeptides by IMAC were done as previously described [11].

2.6. Peptide Identification by Nano-Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry (nLC-ESI-MS) and Data Analysis

nLC-ESI-MS and data analysis were carried out as described before [11]. Briefly, phosphopeptides were subjected to nLC-ESI-MS using an UltiMate 3000 nano-HPLC (Dionex Corporation) with a flow rate of 300 nL min⁻¹ coupled online with a linear ion trap ESI-MS (Finnigian LTQ, Thermo Electron Corp.). The instrument was run by the data-dependent neutral loss method, cycling between one full MS and MS/MS scans of the four most abundant ions. After each cycle, these peptide masses were excluded from the analysis for 10 sec. The detection of a neutral loss fragment (98, 49, or 32.66 Da) in the MS² scans triggered an MS³ scan of the neutral loss ion representing the dephosphorylated peptide.

Data analysis was done using the Proteome Discoverer software (Version 1.0) from Thermo Electron Corp. including the SEQUEST algorithm [25]. The software parameters were set to detect a modification of 79.96 Da in Ser, Thr, or Tyr in MS² and MS³ spectra. For the database searches with MS³ data, modifications of −18.00 Da on Ser and Thr residues representing the neutral loss were additionally used. Further, detection of a modification of 16 Da on Met representing its oxidized form was enabled and carboxyamidomethylation of Cys residues was enabled as a static modification. Peptide mass tolerance was set to 1.5 Da in MS mode. In MS² and MS³ modes, fragment ion tolerance was set up to 1 Da. The parameters for all database searches were set to achieve a false discovery rate (FDR) of not more than 1% for each individual analysis. Data were searched against the flagellar proteome database [4] (http://labs.umassmed.edu/chlamyfp/index.php). Additionally, NCBI and the Joint Genome Institute C. reinhardtii databases (Version 2 and Version 3) were used for data evaluation.

3. Results

3.1. The Effects of the CK1 Inhibitor CKI-7 on the Phosphorylation Pattern of Flagellum Proteins and the Swimming Velocity of C. reinhardtii

CK1 was found in the proteome of the flagellum [4] and was also shown immunologically to be enriched in flagella in wild-type strain SAG 73.72 [17]. For the comparative phosphoproteome analysis, flagella were isolated from strain 137c along with the dibucaine method [11]. We first examined the enrichment of CK1 in flagella of 137c using the applied conditions by immunodetection along with anti-CK1 antibodies (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). Levels of CK1 were significantly enriched in the flagella fraction, especially compared to cell bodies lacking flagella. Thus, the procedure used for identification of the phosphoproteome maintains the enrichment of CK1 in flagella and is thus suited to screen for its targets.

Figure 1

Enrichment of CK1 in flagella and the influence of CK1 inhibition on the phosphorylation status of flagellum proteins and swimming velocity of C. reinhardtii cells. (a) Cells were grown in TAP in a 12 h light-12 h dark cycle and then released to dim light (LL) according to Section 2. Cells were harvested at LL29 and flagella were isolated and a whole cell crude extract (CE), a flagellar extract (FL), and an extract from cell bodies lacking flagella (CB) were prepared. 25 μg proteins per fraction were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-CK1 antibodies according to Section 2. (b) For quantifications, the amount of CK1 detected in the whole cell crude extract was set to 100%. Quantifications were done with three biological replicates using the ImageMaster 2D Elite Vs.4.01 software (GE Healthcare). (c) Changes in the phosphorylation pattern of flagellum proteins in cells treated with and without CKI-7. Cells were grown as described above (a) in the presence or absence of CKI-7 and harvested at LL29 before isolation of flagella. Proteins from the MMA fraction of the flagellum (25 μg each lane) were separated by 9% SDS-PAGE along with a molecular mass standard and immunoblotted with specific antibodies against phosphoSer according to Section 2. Changes in the phosphorylation status of proteins after CKI-7 treatment are indicated by “+” and “−” signs, respectively. (d) Swimming velocity of 137c cells in the absence (−CKI-7) or presence of CK1 inhibitor (+CKI-7). Cells were grown at 23°C in a LD cycle. Measurements of swimming velocity were done with a hemocytometer and a differential interference contrast microscope with a total magnification of 400 including a personal computer with a video recording system to measure displacement versus time (). Error bars represent the SEM.

In the next step, we examined to what degree the CK1-specific inhibitor, CKI-7 [24], which was already used for studying CK1 in C. reinhardtii [15], influences the phosphorylation pattern of flagellum proteins. Therefore, we grew cells with and without CKI-7 treatment, respectively, and compared the flagellum phosphoproteins from both aliquots by immunodetection with antiphosphoSer antibodies (Figure 1(c)). As expected, several phosphorylated protein bands were reduced to a significant extent or absent in the CKI-7-inhibited cells (Figure 1(c), labeled with “−”). At the same time, some phosphoprotein bands were stronger (Figure 1(c), labeled with “+”). These data show that inhibition of CK1 has a dual effect. On the one hand, the phosphorylation of CK1 targets drops strongly down or is fully stopped by its inhibition; on the other hand, inactive CK1 seems to lead to the activation of other kinases resulting in the phosphorylation of other proteins.

As mentioned before, flagellum kinases affect motility. We also studied if the inhibition by CKI-7 results in changes in swimming velocity. To analyze the swimming behavior, we compared the swimming velocity of the C. reinhardtii strain 137c with cells that were cultivated with CKI-7 as described (see Section 2). Cells were spotted on a hemocytometer and the swimming velocity was measured using a differential interference contrast microscope including a personal computer with a video recording system (see Section 2). The assay revealed that the swimming speed of CK1-inhibited cells is significantly lower (75.6 μm/s; 4,1 SEM) compared to untreated cells (122.2 μm/s; 2.5 SEM) (Figure 1(d)). These data show that CK1-mediated phosphorylation events in flagella influence motility and swimming speed of C. reinhardtii cells.

3.2. The Flagellum Phosphoproteome of CKI-7-Treated Cells

The targets of CK1 in the flagellum are of high interest with regard to flagella formation as well as for clock control events. They are largely unknown. An exception is IC138 that is suggested as a direct target of CK1 based on experimental data (summarized in [25]).

In a next step, the direct and indirect targets of CK1 were analyzed by a functional proteome approach. For that purpose, we compared the already existing phosphoproteome [11] with one investigated exactly under the same conditions with the single exception that CK1 is inhibited. Since strong silencing of CK1 by RNAi results in defects in flagella formation, flagellum material cannot be obtained in a significant amount from such strains [17]. Therefore, inhibition of CK1 with CKI-7 was used. Cells were grown under a light-dark cycle and the inhibitor was added for a 29 h period right at the moment when the cells were released to constant dim light. LL29 was also used as harvesting time point in the previous analysis [11].

We avoided to add high amounts of ATP to isolated flagella and to postincubate them at elevated temperatures to induce kinase activities in vitro, as done in another study [12]. We found that this treatment leads to severe phosphorylation events that include most likely phosphorylation steps that would not take place in vivo under physiological conditions See Supplemental Figures 1(a), 1(b) in Supplementary Material available online at doi: 1155/2012/581460.

The further analysis of the phosphoproteome in CKI-7-treated cells was carried out with the same procedure and criteria as applied before for the flagellum phosphoproteome [11]. Three independent isolations of flagella of CKI-7-inhibited cells were carried out and subjected to phosphopeptide purification along with liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (for details, see [11]). Previously identified phosphopeptides or phosphorylation sites within a phosphopeptide ( listed in Table S1 in [11]) that had not been detected in any of the three analyses were considered to be either direct or indirect targets of CK1. The phosphoproteins to which these phosphopeptides belong are listed in Table 1. Novel phosphopeptides belonging to novel phosphoproteins that had not been identified in the former analysis and additional phosphopeptides or phosphorylation sites of already identified phosphoproteins are listed in Table 2. Details about all newly identified peptides and phosphorylation sites can be found in Supplemental Table S1. In three cases, (TEKTIN, FAP18, and FAP262), all previous identified phosphorylation sites were detected again, but in some phosphopeptides with different combinatory phosphorylation patterns (data not shown).

In the CKI-7-treated cells, phosphopeptides from 14 phosphoproteins were missing (Table 1). Four additional phosphoproteins were identified again but with a reduced number of phosphorylation sites. These are labeled by indices along with the missing sites in Table 1. Among these 18 phosphoproteins, six known structural proteins are present including IC138 that was suggested to be a direct target of CK1 [26]. All missing structural phosphoproteins as well as those with a reduced number of phosphorylation sites are indicated in yellow color with a red frame in Figure 2(a). Moreover, seven FAPs with conserved domains are affected in the CKI-7-treated phosphoproteome as well as five FAPs without any conserved domains.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 2

Analysis of CK1 targets in the flagellum. (a) Diagram of flagellum phosphoproteins in wild-type and CK1-inhibited cells. A cross-section of a flagellum from C. reinhardtii (left panel) and a more detailed view (red rectangle) are shown according to [11]. Structural phosphoproteins in CKI-7-inhibited cells, and such with a reduced number of phosphorylation sites are indicated in yellow color with a red frame. Novel phosphopeptides of structural proteins or additional phosphorylation sites of known phosphopeptides from structural phosphoproteins that were identified in the CKI-7-inhibited proteome are indicated by yellow color with a blue frame. Structural proteins with previously identified phosphopeptides, whose phosphorylation sites were detected again, are indicated in yellow without frame. Abbreviations are: C1 central pair projection (C1P), C2 central pair projection (C2P), PF6 protein (PF6), Hydin (H), Radial Spoke Protein17 (RSP17); Outer Dynein Arm Docking Complex (DC); Inner Dynein Arm Intermedite Chain138 (IC138), Tectin (T) as well as an Intraflagellar Transport Protein43 (IFT43). (b) and (c) Positions of identified phosphopeptides in the predicted domains of RSP11 (b) and GSK3 (c). Identified phosphopeptides are indicted by black boxes. The amino acid positions are mentioned. “p” indicates in vivo phosphorylation sites. RIIa, regulatory subunit of cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase A; Ser/Thr Kin, Ser/Thr protein kinase catalytic domain. (d) and (e) Hypothetical model of GSK3 de-/activation via reversible phosphorylation triggered by CK1. (d) Regulatory signaling involves an additional kinase. The noninhibited active form of CK1 inactivates another still unknown kinase by phosphorylation. This kinase is needed in its active nonphosphorylated form for activating GSK3. (e) If CK1 is inhibited by CKI-7, the unknown kinase is not phosphorylated and thus active. This active kinase phosphorylates in turn GSK3, which is then activated.

Also novel phosphopeptides or additional phosphorylation sites of known phosphopeptides were identified in the proteome of CKI-7-treated cells, suggesting that CK1 is part of a signaling network in the flagellum. They belong to either 15 new phosphoproteins or six already known phosphoproteins (Table 2, Supplemental Table 1). Among them, some structural components are present, indicated by yellow color with a blue frame in Figure 2(a). Thereby, Radial Spoke Protein 11 (RSP11) is of special interest. It has an RIIa domain, which is a regulatory subunit of cAMP Dependent Protein Kinase A (PKA) and bears a phosphorylation site (Figure 2(b)). Two other kinases were also found in this category. One of them is Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 (GSK3). The level of active GSK3 is postulated to be regulated via phosphorylation of a conserved Tyr correlating with flagellar length [27]. Exactly this Tyr that is situated in the Ser/Thr kinase domain of GSK3 is phosphorylated as well as a Ser in its surroundings (Supplemental Table 1; Figure 2(c)). Notable GSK3 is also clock relevant, for example, in Drosophila [28]. Moreover, a Mitogen Activated Kinase, MAK7, was found with additional phosphorylation sites.

4. Discussion

The identification of targets of CK1 in the flagellum will help understanding flagella formation as well as clock control events related to flagella [17–19]. The fact that several phosphorylated flagellar protein bands disappear in CKI-7-treated cells suggests that CK1 has multiple targets in the flagellum. Among the 32 phosphoproteins of the flagellum, 14 were missing in the flagellum phosphoproteome when the CKI-7 inhibitor was used or represented with a reduced number of phosphorylation sites (four cases, Table 1). Missing phosphorylation sites cannot be automatically considered as direct targets of CK1. It could be that the phosphorylation of an amino acid residue by CK1 represents a trigger that then allows a consequent phosphorylation of another amino acid residue in the surroundings by another kinase. An example for consequent phosphorylation steps of different kinases is mentioned below and involves PKA, GSK3, and CK1. Also, CK1 may activate or deactivate another kinase by reversible phosphorylation. In the current study, the previously identified kinases along with their phosphorylation sites were found again [11]. Only in case of FAP262 that bears a Ser/Thr kinase domain, a different combinatory phosphorylation pattern was observed, which might be relevant. But it could also be that some of the missing phosphoproteins in the FAP category whose functions are not known may have kinase activity. Networks that consist of interconnected kinases along with protein phosphatases are not unusual in signaling. In line with this, we found also 21 new phosphoproteins along with novel phosphopeptides or phosphorylation sites, including three kinase-related proteins. The presence of new phosphorylation sites in flagella of CKI-7-inhibited cells was already predictable from the appearance of novel flagellar phosphoprotein bands detected with anti-phosphoSer antibodies (Figure 1(c)). In this category, we identified two phosphoproteins involved in carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism, respectively (Table 2). One of them, phosphoglucomutase, catalyzes the bidirectional conversion of glucose-1-phosphate to glucose-6-phosphate. Glucose-1-phosphate can be transferred into glycolysis by this way. The flagellum contains all enzymes of the late glycolytic pathway; they are able to generate ATP for direct use in the flagellum [4]. In mammals, the activity of phosphoglucomutase is regulated by phosphorylation [29]. The other metabolically relevant enzyme in this category is S-adenosylmethionine synthetase, a key enzyme of methionine metabolism. In rat liver, the activity of the S-adenosylmethionine synthetase is regulated by Protein Kinase C [30].

One of the direct targets of CK1 was suggested to be IC138, the Inner Dynein Arm I1 Intermediate Chain 138. It was shown that phosphorylation of IC138 correlates with the inhibition of dynein activity and that PKA beside CK1 as well as the Protein Phosphatases PP2A and PP1 are involved there (summarized in [26]). IC138 was identified in CK1 active cells with one phosphopeptide that is situated at its N-terminus including variable phosphorylation sites [11]. None of these phosphorylation sites were detected after CKI-7 treatment, underlining that IC138 is a direct and/or indirect target of CK1. A pharmacological analysis using CKI-7 revealed the impact of CK1 on IC138 phosphorylation [14]. This mechanism authorizes CK1 to regulate dynein activity and control flagellum motility. Also an analysis of mutants lacking the IC138 subcomplex revealed strains that swim forward with reduced swimming velocities [31, 32]. Interestingly, the swimming speed of the CKI-7-treated cells was reduced to a similar degree in comparison to the mutant strains that are lacking IC138, suggesting that the generation of flagellum motility is regulated by a CK1-mediated phosphorylation of IC138 as suggested before [14, 15].

Another structural phosphoprotein previously identified with two phosphopeptides and variable phosphorylation sites is ODA-DC1. The outer dynein arm docking complex (ODA-DC), which is composed of three proteins, designated DC1, DC2, and DC3, is associated with microtubules and targets the outer dynein arms to its binding site on the flagellum axoneme [33]. In both previously identified phosphopeptides certain phosphorylation sites are missing in CKI-7-inhibited cells (Table 1; indices a, b) pointing out that they are CK1 targets. ODA-DC2 had been also identified in the previous study [11] with one phosphopeptide and variable phosphorylation sites, which were all found again in the current study. But now a novel phosphopeptide with phosphorylation on Ser-278 was present in CKI-7 cells, underlining that CK1 seems to be indirectly involved in regulating further kinases.

Radial spokes represent a major structural feature of axonemes and they are essential for flagellum beating. Each radial spoke consists of a thin stalk, which is attached to the A-tubule of the axonemal doublet microtubules and a head projecting toward the central apparatus [34]. The radial spoke of C. reinhardtii is composed of at least 23 proteins, and not all of them have been characterized at the molecular level [35]. RSP17, which is located in the spoke stalk, was identified in the flagellum phosphoproteome analysis with two different phosphopeptides [11]. The absence of both phosphopeptides in CKI-7-treated cells suggests that RSP17 is at the same time a direct and/or indirect target of CK1. Functional domains in radial spoke proteins reveal their role in mediating signaling pathways. For instance, RSP11 consists of a regulatory subunit (RIIa) of PKA [35]. However, RSP11 lacks the cAMP-binding domains of the RII regulatory subunit. We could identify RSP11 in the CKI-7-treated cells as a new phosphoprotein with one in vivo phosphorylation site at Thr-35, which is located directly in the RIIa domain (Figure 2(b)). The interaction between RII and A-kinase anchoring protein motifs (AKAP) can be regulated by phosphorylation of RII [36, 37]. A pharmacological analysis using an inhibitor and the RII regulatory subunits had detected an axonemal PKA activity [38]. But PKA could not be found in the flagellar proteome in contrast to CK1, PP1, and PP2A [4]. Thus, it was hypothesized that C. reinhardtii could express a PKA with an unconventional structure [39]. The identified phosphorylation site within the RII subunit of RSP11 may be relevant in this context.

An additional flagellum kinase is GSK3 whose enzymatic activity is inhibited by lithium causing flagellar elongation [27]. It is known that GSK3 has a Tyr-phosphorylated, active form and is enriched in flagella. GSK3 is associated with the axoneme in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. The level of active GSK3 correlates with flagellar length [27]. We could identify the Tyr-240-phosphorylated GSK3 as well as a Ser-239-phosphorylated alternative in the CKI-7-treated cells (Figure 2(c)), suggesting that inhibition of CK1 causes activation of GSK3. Both in vivo phosphorylation sites are located in the catalytic kinase domain, which could play important roles in the regulation of the activity of GSK3 within signaling pathways. Notably, interplay between CK1 and GSK3 is known for Hedgehog signaling pathways [40]. Thereby, the Cubitus Interruptus (Ci-155) transcriptional activator is involved. Ci-155 proteolysis depends on phosphorylation at three sites of PKA. Then, these phosphoSer prime further phosphorylation at GSK3 and CK1 sites. This principle is a good example for consecutive phosphorylation steps of different kinases as mentioned before.

Several studies have shown that reversible phosphorylation of Tyr causes increases and decreases in GSK3 kinase activity, respectively [41, 42]. For the interplay of CK1 and GSK3 in the C. reinhardtii flagella, one can imagine a regulatory mechanism, involving, for example, an additional kinase. In a hypothetical model (Figure 2(d)), the noninhibited, active CK1 inactivates another kinase by phosphorylation, which is responsible for the activation of GSK3 by Tyr-phosphorylation. If CKI-7 inhibits CK1 (Figure 2(e)), the additional kinase can stay active, because it is not phosphorylated by CK1 and consequently GSK3 gets converted to the phosphorylated active form.

GSK3 plays also an important role in the regulation of circadian systems. Shaggy (SGG), for example, the Drosophila homologue of GSK3, is a central player in determining period length in flies by phosphorylation of clock components [43]. In mammals, GSK3 is proposed to phosphorylate Clock (CLK), which is a core transcription factor that is essential for circadian behavior. Phosphorylation of CLK controls its activity and degradation [44]. Especially kinases and phosphatases, which are relevant in regulating circadian clocks in other organisms, are well conserved in Chlamydomonas [45]. Interestingly, many output rhythms that can be measured like phototaxis, chemotaxis, and stickiness to glass and mating during the cell cycle involve flagella. It is remarkable that kinases like CK1 or GSK3 as well as phosphatases like PP1 and PP2A are physically located in the axoneme [4, 26]. This underlines the important regulatory function of these components in the flagellum regarding circadian rhythms.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) in the USA and the Kazusa Institute in Japan for the free delivery of EST and genome sequences. This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grants Mi 373 to MM) and the BMBF (Project GoFORSYS, Grant no. 0315260A, work package to MM).

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Figure 1: Influences on the phosphorylation pattern of flagellum proteins by ATP treatment of isolated flagella.

Supplemental Table 1: Newly identified phosphopeptides or phosphorylation sites of already known phosphopeptides in CKI-7-treated cells.

Supplementary Material

References

G. J. Pazour and G. B. Witman, “The vertebrate primary cilium is a sensory organelle,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 105–110, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Rosenbaum and G. B. Witman, “Intraflagellar transport,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 813–825, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Merchant, S. E. Prochnik, O. Vallon et al., “The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions,” Science, vol. 318, no. 5848, pp. 245–251, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Pazour, N. Agrin, J. Leszyk, and G. B. Witman, “Proteomic analysis of a eukaryotic cilium,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 103–113, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. F. Marshall, “The cell biological basis of ciliary disease,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 17–21, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Reinders and A. Sickmann, “Modificomics: posttranslational modifications beyond protein phosphorylation and glycosylation,” Biomolecular Engineering, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 169–177, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Rolland, A. Atteia, P. Decottignies et al., “Chlamydomonas proteomics,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 285–291, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Wagner, J. Boesger, and M. Mittag, “Sub-proteome analysis in the green flagellate alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii,” Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. V. Vener, “Environmentally modulated phosphorylation and dynamics of proteins in photosynthetic membranes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1767, no. 6, pp. 449–457, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Wagner, K. Ullmann, A. Mollwo, M. Kaminski, M. Mittag, and G. Kreimer, “The phosphoproteome of a Chlamydomonas reinhardtii eyespot fraction includes key proteins of the light signaling pathway,” Plant Physiology, vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 772–788, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Boesger, V. Wagner, W. Weisheit, and M. Mittag, “Analysis of flagellar phosphoproteins from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 922–932, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Pan, B. Naumann-Busch, L. Wang et al., “Protein phosphorylation is a key event of flagellar disassembly revealed by analysis of flagellar phosphoproteins during flagellar shortening in Chlamydomonas,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 3830–3839, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Porter and W. S. Sale, “The 9 + 2 axoneme anchors multiple inner arm dyneins and a network of kinases and phosphatases that control motility,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 151, no. 5, pp. F37–F42, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Yang and W. S. Sale, “Casein kinase I is anchored on axonemal doublet microtubules and regulates flagellar dynein phosphorylation and activity,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 25, pp. 18905–18912, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gokhale, M. Wirschell, and W. S. Sale, “Regulation of dynein-driven microtubule sliding by the axonemal protein kinase CK1 in Chlamydomonas flagella,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 186, no. 6, pp. 817–824, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Wirschell, R. Yamamoto, L. Alford, A. Gokhale, A. Gaillard, and W. S. Sale, “Regulation of ciliary motility: conserved protein kinases and phosphatases are targeted and anchored in the ciliary axoneme,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 510, no. 2, pp. 93–100, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Schmidt, G. Geßner, M. Luff et al., “Proteomic analysis of the eyespot of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii provides novel insights into its components and tactic movements,” The Plant Cell, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1908–1930, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Matsuo, K. Okamoto, K. Onai, Y. Niwa, K. Shimogawara, and M. Ishiura, “A systematic forward genetic analysis identified components of the Chlamydomonas circadian system,” Genes and Development, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 918–930, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Serrano, R. Herrera-Palau, J. M. Romero, A. Serrano, G. Coupland, and F. Valverde, “Chlamydomonas CONSTANS and the evolution of plant photoperiodic signaling,” Current Biology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 359–368, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Sambrook and D. W. Russel, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2001.
E. H. Harris, The Chlamydomonas Sourcebook, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1989.
V. Neuhoff, K. Philipp, H. G. Zimmer, and S. Mesecke, “A simple, versatile, sensitive and volume-independent method for quantitative protein determination which is independent of other external influences,” Hoppe-Seyler's Zeitschrift für Physiologische Chemie, vol. 360, no. 11, pp. 1657–1670, 1979.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Schulze, S. Schreiber, D. Iliev et al., “The heme-binding protein SOUL3 of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii influences size and position of the eyespot,” Molecular Plant. In press.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Preuss, J. Y. Fan, M. Kalive et al., “Drosophila doubletime mutations which either shorten or lengthen the period of circadian rhythms decrease the protein kinase activity of casein kinase I,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 886–898, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Link, J. Eng, D. M. Schieltz et al., “Direct analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 676–682, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Wirschell, T. Hendrickson, and W. S. Sale, “Keeping an eye on I1:I1 dynein as a model for flagellar dynein assembly and regulation,” Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 569–579, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. F. Wilson and P. A. Lefebvre, “Regulation of flagellar assembly by glycogen synthase kinase 3 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1307–1319, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Harms, M. W. Young, and L. Saez, “CK1 and GSK3 in the Drosophila and mammalian circadian clock,” Novartis Foundation Symposium, vol. 253, pp. 267–277, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Gururaj, C. J. Barnes, R. K. Vadlamudi, and R. Kumar, “Regulation of phosphoglucomutase 1 phosphorylation and activity by a signaling kinase,” Oncogene, vol. 23, no. 49, pp. 8118–8127, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Pajares, C. Durán, F. Corrales, and J. M. Mato, “Protein kinase C phosphorylation of rat liver S-adenosylmethionine synthetase: dissociation and production of an active monomer,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 303, no. 3, pp. 949–955, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
T. W. Hendrickson, C. A. Perrone, P. Griffin et al., “IC138 is a WD-repeat dynein intermediate chain required for light chain assembly and regulation of flagellar bending,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 5431–5442, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. VanderWaal, R. Yamamoto, K. Wakabayashi et al., “bop5 mutations reveal new roles for the IC138 phosphoprotein in the regulation of flagellar motility and asymmetric waveforms,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 2862–2874, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Takada, C. G. Wilkerson, K. I. Wakabayashi, R. Kamiya, and G. B. Witman, “The outer dynein arm-docking complex: composition and characterization of a subunit (Oda1) necessary for outer arm assembly,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1015–1029, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Curry and J. L. Rosenbaum, “Flagellar radial spoke: a model molecular genetic system for studying organelle assembly,” Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 224–232, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Yang, D. R. Diener, C. Yang et al., “Radial spoke proteins of Chlamydomonas flagella,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 119, part 6, pp. 1165–1174, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Keryer, Z. Luo, J. C. Cavadore, J. Erlichman, and M. Bornens, “Phosphorylation of the regulatory subunit of type IIβ cAMP-dependent protein kinase by cyclin B/p34(cdc2) kinase impairs its binding to microtubule-associated protein 2,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 12, pp. 5418–5422, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Manni, J. H. Mauban, C. W. Ward, and M. Bond, “Phosphorylation of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) regulatory subunit modulates PKA-AKAP interaction, substrate phosphorylation, and calcium signaling in cardiac cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 35, pp. 24145–24154, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Gaillard, L. A. Fox, J. M. Rhea, B. Craige, and W. S. Sale, “Disruption of the A-kinase anchoring domain in flagellar radial spoke protein 3 results in unregulated axonemal cAMP-dependent protein kinase activity and abnormal flagellar motility,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 2626–2635, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. H. Harris, The Chlamydomonas Sourcebook, vol. 3, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2009.
M. A. Price and D. Kalderon, “Proteolysis of the Hedgehog signaling effector Cubitus interruptus requires phosphorylation by Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 and Casein Kinase 1,” Cell, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 823–835, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Kim, J. Liu, and A. R. Kimmel, “The novel tyrosine kinase ZAK1 activates GSK3 to direct cell fate specification,” Cell, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 399–408, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Murai, M. Okazaki, and A. Kikuchi, “Tyrosine dephosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 is involved in its extracellular signal-dependent inactivation,” FEBS Letters, vol. 392, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Panda, J. B. Hogenesch, and S. A. Kay, “Circadian rhythms from flies to human,” Nature, vol. 417, no. 6886, pp. 329–335, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Spengler, K. K. Kuropatwinski, M. Schumer, and M. P. Antoch, “A serine cluster mediates BMAL1-dependent CLOCK phosphorylation and degradation,” Cell Cycle, vol. 8, no. 24, pp. 4138–4146, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Mittag, S. Kiaulehn, and C. H. Johnson, “The circadian clock in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. What is it for? What is it similar to?” Plant Physiology, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 399–409, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2012 Jens Boesger et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2351

Downloads

881

Citations