Addressing Inequities in Access to Health Products through the Use of Social Marketing, Community Mobilization, and Local Entrepreneurs in Rural Western Kenya

Table 4

Proportion of NICHE respondents ever receiving a household visit from a SWAP vendor, and frequency of purchases from vendors at FU2, by socioeconomic quintile, Nyando District, Kenya, 2007–2009. Q0: poorest quintile; Q4: least poor quintile.

	Q1 (𝑛=130)	Q2 (𝑛=144)	Q3 (𝑛=112)	Q4 (𝑛=130)	Q5 (𝑛=128)	P (Cochran-Armitage test for trend)
Visited by a SWAP vendor? (𝑛=644)	52 (40%)	66 (46%)	43 (39%)	69 (53%)	51 (40%)	0.62
Purchased anything from a SWAP vendor? (𝑛=281)^†	44 (85%)	60 (91%)	42 (98%)	63 (91%)	47 (92%)	0.22
Purchased WaterGuard (𝑛=644)^¥	21 (16%)	32 (22%)	26 (23%)	41 (32%)	33 (26%)	0.02
Purchased ITNs (𝑛=644)^¥	2 (2%)	6 (4%)	3 (3%)	11 (8%)	9 (7%)	0.005
Purchased Sprinkles (𝑛=644)^¥	40 (31%)	54 (38%)	36 (32%)	59 (45%)	40 (31%)	0.51

^†Among households visited by a SWAP vendor.
^¥Among all households in quintile.