About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Population Research
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 340719, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/340719
Research Article

Cultural Inheritance and Fertility Outcomes: An Analysis from Evolutionary and Interdisciplinary Perspectives

1Virginia Commonwealth University, Sociology Program, L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs, Richmond, VA 23284, USA
2Department of Sociology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
3Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
4University of Wisconsin-Superior, Superior, WI 54880, USA

Received 28 May 2012; Accepted 23 November 2012

Academic Editor: Pranitha Maharaj

Copyright © 2013 Li Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. C. Watkins, From Provinces Into Nations: Demographic Integration in Western Europe, 1870-1960, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1991.
  2. P. Boling, “Demography, culture, and policy: understanding Japan's low fertility,” Population and Development Review, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 307–326, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. L. Cornell, “Infanticide in early modern Japan? Demography, culture, and population growth,” Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 22–50, 1996. View at Scopus
  4. R. Murphy, “Fertility and distorted sex ratios in a rural Chinese county: culture, state, and policy,” Population and Development Review, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 595–626, 2003. View at Scopus
  5. N. Thomas, “Economic security, culture and fertility: a reply to Cleland,” Population Studies, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 353–359, 1993. View at Scopus
  6. W. Durham, Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif, USA, 1991.
  7. C. J. Lumsden and E. O. Wilson, Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1981.
  8. A. R. Rogers, “Does biology constrain culture,” American Anthropologist, vol. 90, pp. 819–831, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. N. Tinbergen, The Study of Instinct, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1951.
  10. L. Cronk, “Is there a role for culture in human behavioral ecology?” Ethology and Sociobiology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 181–205, 1995. View at Scopus
  11. M. V. Flinn, “Culture and the evolution of social learning,” Evolution and Human Behavior, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 23–67, 1997. View at Scopus
  12. P. J. Richerson and R. Boyd, Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2005.
  13. L. L. Cavalli-Sforza and M. W. Feldman, Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1981.
  14. J. Harris, The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn out the Way They Do, New York Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  15. J. Bongaarts, “The fertility-inhibiting effects of the intermediate fertility variables,” Studies in Family Planning, vol. 13, no. 6-7, pp. 179–189, 1982. View at Scopus
  16. H. M. Hervitz, “Selectivity, adaptation, or disruption? A comparison of alternative hypotheses on the effects of migration on fertility: the case of Brazil,” International Migration Review, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 293–317, 1985. View at Scopus
  17. W. D. Mosher, D. P. Johnson, and M. C. Horn, “Religion and fertility in the United States: the importance of marriage patterns and Hispanic origin,” Demography, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 367–379, 1986. View at Scopus
  18. C. A. Bachrach, “Cohabitation and reproductive behavior in the U.S,” Demography, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 623–637, 1987. View at Scopus
  19. A. K. Blanc, “The impact of changing family patterns on reproductive behavior: nonmarital cohabitation and fertility in Norway,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Minneapolis, Minn, USA, 1984.
  20. E. Carlson, “Couples without children: premarital cohabitation in France,” in Contemporary Marriage: Comparative Perspectives on A Changing Institution, K. Davis, Ed., Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY, USA, 1986.
  21. L. S. Loomis and N. S. Landale, “Nonmarital cohabitation and childbearing among black and white American women,” Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 191–200, 1994.
  22. R. K. Raley, “Increasing fertility in cohabiting unions: evidence for the second demographic transition in the United States?” Demography, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2001. View at Scopus
  23. L. L. Bumpass and J. A. Sweet, “Children's experience in single-parent families: implications of cohabitation and marital transitions,” Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 256–260, 1989. View at Scopus
  24. A. Cherlin, Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1992.
  25. A. Berrington, “Transition to adulthood in Britain,” in Transition in Adulthood in Europe, M. Corijn and E. Klijzing, Eds., pp. 67–102, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001.
  26. M. C. Chang, R. Freedman, and T. H. Sun, “Trends in fertility, family size preferences, and family planning practice: Taiwan, 1961–85,” Studies in Family Planning, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 320–337, 1987. View at Scopus
  27. H. P. Kohler, F. C. Billari, and J. A. Ortega, “The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s,” Population and Development Review, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 641–680, 2002. View at Scopus
  28. I. Kowalska and W. Wroblewska, “Transition to adulthood in Poland,” in Transitions to Adulthood in Europe, M. Corijn and E. Klijzing, Eds., pp. 257–277, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001.
  29. J. R. Alford, C. L. Funk, and J. R. Hibbing, “Are political orientations genetically transmitted?” American Political Science Review, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 153–167, 2005. View at Scopus
  30. T. J. Bouchard, M. McGue, D. Lykken, and A. Tellegen, “Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: genetic and environmental influences and personality correlates,” Twin Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 88–98, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. L. J. Eaves, N. G. Martin, and A. C. Heath, “Religious affiliation in twins and their parents: testing a model of cultural inheritance,” Behavior Genetics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 1990. View at Scopus
  32. M. S. Alvard, “The adaptive nature of culture,” Evolutionary Anthropology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 136–149, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. Bradshaw and C. G. Ellison, “Do genetic factors influence religious life? Findings from a behavior genetic analysis of twin siblings,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 529–544, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. E. Bloom and J. Trussell, “What are the determinants of delayed childbearing and permanent childlessness in the United States?” Demography, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 591–611, 1984. View at Scopus
  35. M. Jurecki-Tiller, The influence of religion on childbearing: fertility, reproductive biology and belief in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints [Dissertation thesis], Department of Anthropology, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA, 2004.
  36. S. McLanahan and L. Bumpass, “Intergenerational consequences of family disruption,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 94, pp. 130–152, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. R. R. Rindfuss, P. Morgan, and G. Swicegood, First Birth in America, University of California Press, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, 1988.
  38. L. Zhang, “Religious affiliation, religiosity, and male and female fertility,” Demographic Research, vol. 18, pp. 233–262, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. B. N. Ballard, Patterns of intended and actual fertility among sub-groups of foreign-born and native-born Latinas [M.S. thesis], Department of Sociology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Tex, USA, 2004.
  40. C. G. Ellison, S. Echevarría, and B. Smith, “Religion and abortion attitudes among U.S. Hispanics: findings from the 1990 Latino national political survey,” Social Science Quarterly, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 192–208, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. Freedman, P. K. Whelpton, and J. W. Smith, “Socio-economic factors in religious differentials in fertility,” American Sociological Review, vol. 26, pp. 608–614, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. S. G. Singley and N. S. Landale, “Incorporating origin and process in migration-fertility frameworks: the case of Puerto Rican women,” Social Forces, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 1437–1464, 1998. View at Scopus
  43. W. D. Manning, “Cohabitation, marriage, and entry into motherhood,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 57, pp. 191–200, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. F. Althaus, “Children from disrupted families begin having sex, and children, at early age,” Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 240–242, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Berrington and I. Diamond, “Marital dissolution among the 1958 British birth cohort: the role of cohabitation,” Population Studies, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 19–38, 1999. View at Scopus
  46. National Center for Health Statistics, Public Use Data File Documentation, National Survey of Family Growth Cycle 6: 2002, User's Guide, Hyattsville, Md, USA, 2004.
  47. J. S. Long and J. Freese, Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, Stata Press, College Station, Tex, USA, 2006.
  48. J. Blake, “Fertility control and the problem of voluntarism,” in Proceedings of the 22nd Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs, pp. 279–283, London, UK, 1973.
  49. K. O. Mason, “Explaining fertility transitions,” Demography, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 443–454, 1997. View at Scopus
  50. M. O. Borg, “The income-fertility relationship: effect of the net price of a child,” Demography, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 301–310, 1989. View at Scopus
  51. W. P. Butz and M. P. Ward, “Will US fertility remain low? A new economic interpretation,” Population and Development Review, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 663–688, 1979. View at Scopus
  52. E. Muller and R. Cohn, “The relation of income to fertility decisions in Taiwan,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 25, pp. 325–347, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. D. L. Poston Jr., “Social and economic development and the fertility transitions in Mainland China and Taiwan,” Population and Development Review, vol. 26, supplement, pp. 40–60, 2000.
  54. A. Thornto, “The relationship between fertility and income, relative income, and expected well-being,” in Research in Population Economics, J. Simon, Ed., vol. I, JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn, USA, 1978.
  55. D. L. Lack, Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds, Methuen Publishers, London, UK, 1968.
  56. H. Kaplan, J. B. Lancaster, W. T. Tucker, and K. G. Anderson, “Evolutionary approach to below replacement fertility,” American Journal of Human Biology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 233–256, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus