Research Article
Bisphenyl-Polymer/Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Composite Compared to Titanium Alloy Bone Implant
Table 2
Resistivitya of different engineering and biological materials (Ωm).
| Material | Type | Resistivity |
| Titanium pure | Conductor | 4.2–5.2 × 10−7 [18] | Titanium-6Al-4V alloy | Conductor | 1.7 × 10−8 [18] | Bisphenol-polymer/carbon Fiber Composite | Semiconductor | 5 [19] | Bone longitudinal | Semiconductor | 46 [9] | Bone radial | Semiconductor | 150 [9] | Physiologic saline | Semiconductor | 0.72 [9] | Silicon pure | Semiconductor | 3000 [26] | Silicon phosphorous Doped | Semiconductor | 20–80 [27] | Lipid phosphate headgroup/water interface | Semiconductor | 100 [28] | Carbon fibers | Conductor | 0.95–1.8 × 10−5 [18] | Thermoset bisphenyl polymer | Insulator | 1010–1013 [18] | General metals | Conductors | ~10−6–10−9 [18] | Pure quartz fiber | Insulator | 1020 [29] |
|
|
aResistivity = 1/conductivity.
|