Review Article

Colorectal Liver Metastases

Table 2

Scoring systems.
(a) Nordlinger prognostic system

RiskNNo. of risk factors2-year survival

Low3050–279%
Intermed7383-460%
High2305–743%

Risk factors are (1) age > 60 years, (2) extension of primary CRC into serosa, (3) node-positive primary CRC, (4) time interval from primary CRC to CRLM < 2 years, (5) size of largest CRLM ≥ 5 cm, (6) number of CRLM ≥ 4, (7) margin less than 1 cm [16].
(b) Fong prognostic system

Clinical risk score for tumor recurrence
Survival
%
Risk factors1 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr5 yrMedian (months)

0937972606074
1917666544451
2897360514047
3866742252033
4704538292520
5714527141422

Risk factors are (1) node-positive primary CRC, (2) time interval from primary CRC to CRLM < 1 year, (3) number of CRLM > 1, (4) size of largest CRLM > 5 cm, (5) CEA > 200 ng/mL (reproduced from [9]).
(c) Schindl prognostic system

RiskNPrognostic scoreMedian survival (months)5-year survival (%)

Good330–103662
Mod17211–253420
Poor65>25110

Prognostic score = [(4 × Dukecode) + (6 × Metcode3) + (6 × lnAlkphos) + (2 × lnCEA) − Albumin] + 22, where Dukecode indicates Dukes stage A/B (score, 0) or C (score, 1), Metcode3, 1 to 3 metastases (score, 0) or more than 3 metastases (score, 1), lnAlkphos, natural logarithmic function of the serum concentration of alkaline phosphatase (U/L), lnCEA, natural logarithmic function of the serum concentration of CEA (μg/L), and Albumin, the serum concentration of albumin (g/dL) [17].