Review Article
The Current State of Targeted Agents in Rectal Cancer
Table 1
Pivotal randomized clinical trials of bevacizumab in mCRC.
| Author | Phase | Study design (regimen) | +Bev/− | Results | Comment | Reference |
| 1st line | | | | | | | Hurwitz | III | IFL ± bevacizumab | 402/411 | 20.3 versus 15.6 mo OS | RR,PFS,OS benefit | [9] | Scappaticci | II | 5FU/LV ± bevacizumab | 104/105 | 9.2 versus 5.5 mo PFS | No difference in OS, IFL was included in control group | [14] | Czito | III | IFL ± bevacizumab | 249/251 | 17.9 versus 14.6 mo OS | RR,PFS,OS benefit | [15] | Saltz | III | CAPOX or FOLFOX ± bevacizumab | 699/701 | 9.4 versus 8.0 mo PFS | No difference in OS | [16] | 2nd line | | | | | | | Giantonio | III | FOLFOX ± bevacizumab | 286/291 | 12.9 versus 10.8 mo OS | RR,PFS,OS benefit, No benefit in Bev alone group | [17] |
|
|
RR: Response rate, PFS: Progression-free survival, OS: Overall survival.
|