About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 505426, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/505426
Research Article

How Does Nursing Staff Perceive the Use of Electronic Handover Reports? A Questionnaire-Based Study

1Telemedicine Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
2Tromsø Telemedicine Laboratory, University Hospital of North Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
3Divison of Addiction and Specialized Psychiatry, University Hospital of North Norway, 9291 Tromsø, Norway

Received 1 December 2010; Revised 28 March 2011; Accepted 13 April 2011

Academic Editor: George Demiris

Copyright © 2011 Torbjørg Meum et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. British Medical Association, Safe handover: Safe Patients. Guidance on Clinical Handover for Clinicians and Managers, British Medical Association, London, UK, 2004.
  2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, OSSIE Guide to Clinical Handover Improvements., Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, Australia, 2010.
  3. I. Ekman and K. Segesten, “Deputed power of medical control: the hidden message in the ritual of oral shift reports,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1006–1011, 1995. View at Scopus
  4. R. Wynn, Provider-Patient Interaction, Norwegian Academic Press, Kristiansand, Norway, 1999.
  5. S. Bergvik, R. Wynn, and T. Sørlie, “Nurse training of a patient-centered information procedure for CABG patients,” Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 227–233, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. W. Levinson, “Physician-patient communication: a key to malpractice prevention,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 272, no. 20, pp. 1619–1620, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. S. Entman, C. A. Glass, G. B. Hickson, P. B. Githens, K. Whetten-Goldstein, and F. A. Sloan, “The relationship between malpractice claims history and subsequent obstetric care,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 272, no. 20, pp. 1588–1591, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. P. Kerr, “A qualitative study of shift handover practice and function from a socio-technical perspective,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 125–134, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. M. Nadzam, “Nurses' role in communication and patient safety,” Journal of Nursing Care Quality, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 184–188, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  10. D. Dowding, “Examining the effects that manipulating information given in the change of shift report has on nurses in planning ability,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 836–846, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Payne, M. Hardey, and P. Coleman, “Interactions between nurses during handovers in elderly care,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 277–285, 2000. View at Scopus
  12. A. Sexton, C. Chan, M. Elliott, J. Stuart, R. Jayasuriya, and P. Crookes, “Nursing handovers: do we really need them?” Journal of Nursing Management, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37–42, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Meissner, H.-M. Hasselhorn, M. Estryn-Behar, O. Nézet, J. Pokorski, and D. Gould, “Nurses' perception of shift handovers in Europe—results from the European Nurses' Early Exit Study,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 535–542, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  14. K. Mäkelä, I. Virjo, P. Kalliola et al., “Electronic patient record systems and the general practitioner: an evaluation study,” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, vol. 11, 2, pp. S66–S68, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  15. A. M. Uslu and J. Stausberg, “Value of the electronic patient record: an analysis of the literature,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 675–682, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  16. S. J. Wang, B. Middleton, L. A. Prosser et al., “A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 397–403, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Moen, “A nursing perspective to design and implementation of electronic patient record systems,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 36, no. 4-5, pp. 375–378, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. M. Keenan, D. Tschannen, and M. L. Wesley, “Standardized nursing terminologies can transform practice,” Journal of Nursing Administration, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 103–106, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  19. R. Wallum, “Using care plans to replace the handover,” Nursing Standard, vol. 9, no. 32, pp. 24–26, 1995. View at Scopus
  20. J. Kennedy, “An evaluation of non-verbal handover,” Professional Nurse, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 391–394, 1999. View at Scopus
  21. J. A. Menke, C. W. Broner, D. Y. Campbell, M. Y. McKissick, and J. A. Edwards-Beckett, “Computerized clinical documentation system in the pediatric intensive care unit,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 1, article 3, 2001.
  22. T. Meum, G. Wangensteen, H. Iglesund, G. Ellingsen, and E. Monteiro, “Standardization—the iron cage of nurses’ work?” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 157, pp. 85–90, 2010.
  23. M. Gordon, “Historical perspective: the National Conference Group for Classification of Nursing Diagnoses,” Nursing Diagnosis, vol. 9, no. 2, Supplement, pp. 27–31, 1998. View at Scopus
  24. F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” Management Information Systems Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989. View at Scopus
  25. V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view,” Management Information Systems Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003. View at Scopus
  26. W. R. King and J. He, “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model,” Information and Management, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 740–755, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. P. Bagozzi, “The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift,” Journal of the Association of Information Systems, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 243–254, 2007. View at Scopus
  28. R. J. Holden and B.-T. Karsh, “The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 159–172, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  29. A. Obstfelder, K. H. Engeseth, and R. Wynn, “Characteristics of successfully implemented telemedical applications,” Implementation Science, vol. 2, article 25, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  30. P. Benner, “Designing formal classification systems to better articulate knowledge, skills, and meanings in nursing practice,” American Journal of Critical Care, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 426–430, 2004. View at Scopus
  31. E. Coiera, “When conversation is better than computation,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 277–286, 2000. View at Scopus