Clinical Study

A 5-Year Retrospective Review of Fungal Keratitis at Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia

Table 2

Treatment modalities and outcome according to each fungal isolates.

Type of fungal (n)Vision at presentationVision posttreatment
<6/186/18–1/60CF-PLNPL Treatmentless than 6/186/18–1/60CF-PLNPL

Hyaline
Fusarium sp. (19)649G. Natamycin if available, G. Amphotericin. B, Oral & Gut Fluconazole. 5 PK, 1 evisceration10342
Aspergillus sp. (4)13G. Natamycin, Voriconazole, Amphotericin B
Oral Fluconazole. 1 scleral patch, 2 PK
31
Scedosporium sp. (1)
1Gutt Amphotericin B & Voriconazole. Oral Voriconazole. 1
Trichoderma sp. (1)1Gutt. Ciprofloxacin (Provisional diagnosis: marginal keratitis) 1
Epidermophyton sp. (1)1Gutt. Amphotericin B & Fluconazole. Oral Fluconazole. 1

Yeast
Candida albicans (2)
(1 immunocompromised
patient with bilateral involvement)
11Gutt Amphotericin B11
Candida parapsilosis (2)11Gutt Amphotericin B11
(infected cornea graft)Repeat penetrating keratoplasty
Candida tropicalis (1)1Gutt Amphotericin B1
(Ocular ischaemic syndrome)

Dermatiaceous
Curvularia sp. (2)2Gutt. Amphotericin B2

Nonsporulating fungi (3)12Gutt. Amphotericin B21

Unidentified hyaline (4)13All required systemic + topical treatment
Natamycin in one case. One required PK.
22

Unidentified yeast (1)1Gutt Amphotericin B1

Abbreviations: CF: counting finger, PK: penetrating keratoplasty, NPL: no perception of light, PL: perception of light.