Research Article

Effect of the PB2 and M Genes on the Replication of H6 Influenza Virus in Chickens

Table 1

Experimental infection of 7 + 1 reassortant H6 viruses.

Virus
 
No. of positive trachea/total no. of birds 
for each bird
Day 3 Day 5

Parental strain
 A/teal/Hong  Kong/W312/97 (H6N1) 3/3 (3.5, 3.0, 3.7) 3/3 (4.0, 2.5, 3.7)
 A/duck/Shantou/5540/01  (H6N2) 0/3 (—, —, —) 0/3 (—, —, —)
Reassortants (W312 backbone)
 ST-PB2 0/3 (—, —, —) 0/3 (—, —, —)
 ST-PB1 3/3 (3.7, 4.0, 2.7) 3/3 (3.0, 3.5, 3.0)
 ST-PA 3/3 (3.5, 3.5, 3.0) 3/3 (3.5, 3.0, 3.5)
 ST-HA 0/3 (—, —, —) 2/3 (—, 1.0, 1.5)
 ST-NP 3/3 (2.7, 3.0, 2.7) 3/3 (3.0, 4.0, 3.3)
 ST-NA 3/3 (3.5, 3.5, 3.5) 3/3 (3.5, 3.5, 3.0)
 ST-M 0/3 (—, —, —) 0/3 (—, —, —)
 ST-NS 3/3 (3.3, 3.5, 4.0) 3/3 (3.5, 3.5, 3.7)
Chimeric PB2 gene
 WST-PB2 AflII 0/3 (—, —, —) 0/3 (—, —, —)
 STW-PB2 AflII 3/3 (3.5, 3.0, 3.5) 3/3 (3.5, 3.0, 3.5)
Chimeric M gene
 WM1-STM2 0/3 (—, —, —) 1/3 (1.0, —, —)
 STM1-WM2 3/3 (2.7, 3.0, 3.7) 3/3 (3.0, 3.0, 3.3)

— Indicates no HA was detected in allantoic fluid from eggs inoculated with original swab sample. Detection limit was 0.5 [ . No virus was recovered from cloacal samples on both days.