About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Algebra
VolumeΒ 2011Β (2011), Article IDΒ 247403, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/247403
Research Article

A New Proof of the Existence of Free Lie Algebras and an Application

Dipartimento di Matematica, UniversitΓ  degli Studi di Bologna, Piazza di Porta San Donato 5, 40126 Bologna, Italy

Received 23 March 2011; Accepted 20 April 2011

Academic Editors: K.Β Dekimpe and J.Β Kakol

Copyright Β© 2011 Andrea Bonfiglioli and Roberta Fulci. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The existence of free Lie algebras is usually derived as a consequence of the PoincarΓ©-Birkhoff-Witt theorem. Moreover, in order to prove that (given a set 𝑋 and a field 𝕂 of characteristic zero) the Lie algebra β„’(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©) of the Lie polynomials in the letters of 𝑋 (over the field 𝕂) is a free Lie algebra generated by 𝑋, all available proofs use the embedding of a Lie algebra 𝔀 into its enveloping algebra 𝒰(𝔀). The aim of this paper is to give a much simpler proof of the latter fact without the aid of the cited embedding nor of the PoincarΓ©-Birkhoff-Witt theorem. As an application of our result and of a theorem due to Cartier (1956), we show the relationships existing between the theorem of PoincarΓ©-Birkhoff-Witt, the theorem of Campbell-Baker-Hausdorff, and the existence of free Lie algebras.

1. Introduction

We begin with the main definition we will be concerned with in this paper. In the sequel, 𝕂 will denote a fixed field, and all linear objects (linear maps, algebras, spans, etc.) will be tacitly meant with respect to 𝕂.

Definition 1.1. Let 𝑋 be any nonempty set. We say that 𝐿 is a free Lie algebra generated by 𝑋 if 𝐿 is a Lie algebra, and there exists a map πœ™βˆΆπ‘‹β†’πΏ satisfying the following property. For every Lie algebra 𝔀 and for every map π‘“βˆΆπ‘‹β†’π”€, there exists exactly one Lie algebra morphism π‘“πœ™ such that the diagram below commutes 247403.fig.00a(1.1) When π‘‹βŠ‚πΏ set-theoretically and the above property is satisfied with the inclusion map πœ„βˆΆπ‘‹β†ͺ𝐿 replacing πœ™, 𝐿 will be called a free Lie algebra over 𝑋.
It is easy to see that a free Lie algebra generated by 𝑋—if it existsβ€”is unique up to (Lie algebra) isomorphism. The existence of a free Lie algebra generated by a set can be proved in a standard way (see [1, Chapitre II, Section  2, n.1] and [2, Section  0.2]). As for the existence of a free Lie algebra over a set, it is natural to expect that (given a field 𝕂 of characteristic zero) the Lie 𝕂-algebra of the Lie polynomials in the letters of 𝑋 is a free Lie algebra over 𝑋. To prove this fact, however, more profound results are required, as we will explain below.
In the sequel, if 𝑉 is a vector space, we denote by 𝒯(𝑉) its tensor algebra and by β„’(𝑉) the smallest Lie-subalgebra of 𝒯(𝑉) containing 𝑉. The aim of this paper is to prove the following result.

Theorem 1.2. Let 𝕂 be a field of characteristic zero, and let π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ© be the free vector space generated by 𝑋, then β„’(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©) is a free Lie algebra over 𝑋.

Classically, the above theorem is derived from the theorem of PoincarΓ©, Birkhoff, and Witt (henceforth referred to as PBW), which we here recall for the reading convenience and to fix some notation.

Theorem of PoincarΓ©-Birkhoff-Witt
Let 𝕂 be a field of characteristic zero, and let 𝔀 be a Lie algebra. We denote by 𝒰(𝔀) the universal enveloping algebra of 𝔀 and by 1 the unit element of 𝒰(𝔀). Let πœ‹ denote the natural projection πœ‹βˆΆπ’―(𝔀)→𝒰(𝔀), and let us set πœ‡βˆΆ=πœ‹|𝔀. Suppose that 𝔀 is endowed with an indexed (linear) basis {π‘₯𝑖}π‘–βˆˆπΌ, where 𝐼 is totally ordered by the relation β‰Ό, then the following elements form a linear basis for 𝒰(𝔀): ξ€·π‘₯1,πœ‡π‘–1ξ€Έξ€·π‘₯β‹―πœ‡π‘–π‘›ξ€Έ,whereπ‘›βˆˆβ„•,𝑖1,…,π‘–π‘›βˆˆπΌ,𝑖1≼⋯≼𝑖𝑛.(1.2)
As a by-product of this theorem, we have the following crucial result.

Corollary 1.3. The function πœ‡βˆΆπ”€β†’π’°(𝔀) is injective.

The above corollary is the essential tool one needs in order to prove Theorem 1.2. To the best of our knowledge, all the books using free Lie algebras prove Theorem 1.2 by making use of Theorem PBW (or, precisely, of Corollary 1.3); see Bourbaki [1, Chapitre II, Section 3, n.1, ThΓ©orΓ¨me 1] (where it employed [3, Chapitre I, Section 2, n.7, Corollaire 3 du ThΓ©orΓ¨me 1] which is the PBW Theorem); see Reutenauer [2, Theorem 0.5] (where the injectivity of 𝔀β†ͺ𝒰(𝔀) is used); see also Hochschild [4, Chapter X, Section 2], Humphreys [5, Chapter V, Section 17.5], Jacobson [6, Chapter V, Section 4], and Varadarajan [7, Section 3.2].

For the sake of completeness, let us briefly recall the argument which uses PBW.

Lemma 1.4. Let 𝑉 be a vector space, then β„’(𝑉) satisfies the following property: for every Lie algebra 𝔀 and for every linear map πΉβˆΆπ‘‰β†’π”€, there exists exactly one Lie algebra morphism πΉβˆΆβ„’(𝑉)→𝔀 prolonging 𝐹.

Proof. The universal property of 𝒯(𝑉) allows us to prove the existence of exactly one morphism of associative algebras 𝐹 such that the following diagram commutes: 247403.fig.00b(1.3) It is easily seen that 𝐹(𝑑)βˆˆπœ‡(𝔀) for every π‘‘βˆˆβ„’(𝑉), so that we can compose the restriction of 𝐹 to β„’(𝑉) with πœ‡βˆ’1βˆΆπœ‡(𝔀)→𝔀 (the function πœ‡βˆ’1 is well posed on πœ‡(𝔀) thanks to Corollary 1.3). The map πΉβˆΆβ„’(𝑉)βŸΆπ”€,𝐹=πœ‡βˆ’1βˆ˜ξ‚€ξ‚πΉ|β„’(𝑉)(1.4) satisfies all the requirements in the statement of the lemma.

Let us now prove Theorem 1.2 with the aid of Lemma 1.4 above. Let 𝑋 be any set and let 𝔀,𝑓 be as in Definition 1.1. Let us denote by πœ™ the inclusion map 𝑋β†ͺβ„’(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©). We apply Lemma 1.4 with 𝑉=π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ© and 𝐹 obtained by prolonging the function 𝑓 by linearity on 𝑉, then the Lie algebra morphism πΉβˆΆβ„’(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©)→𝔀 is easily seen to satisfy the requirements of π‘“πœ™ in Definition 1.1, and Theorem 1.2 is proved.

The aim of this paper is to provide a new proof of Theorem 1.2, independently of PBW and of Corollary 1.3. This will be done in Sections 2 and 3.

The remainder of the paper (Section 4) provides a motivation for the first part. The occasion to search for a proof of Theorem 1.2 which is alternative to the usual one arose whenβ€”in our studies in monograph [8]β€”we came across a nonstandard demonstration of Theorem PBW due to Cartier [9]. Cartier’s proof uses the Theorem of Campbell, Baker, and Hausdorff (CBH, shortly) in order to prove PBW. In its turn, CBH is usually proved by means of Theorem PBW (see, e.g., Bourbaki [1, Chapitre II, Section  3, n.1, Corollaire 2], Hochschild [4, Proposition  2.1], Jacobson [6, Theorem  9, Chapter V], and Serre [10, 11]). So Cartier shows that, beside the usual argument PBW⟹CBH,(1.5) surprisingly, the reverse path can be followed too.

In order to make this reverse path β€œCBHβ‡’PBW” fully consistent, it is necessary to provide a proof of CBH which is independent of PBW. (Seemingly, apart from Hausdorff's original argument [12], an algebraic proof of CBH independent of PBW was not available at the time of Cartier's paper [9], dated 1956. Twelve years later, Eichler [13] gave another proof, using only free Lie algebras, and then seven years after Eichler, DjokoviΔ‡ [14] provided another one, using formal power series computations. More recently, Reutenauer [2, Section  3.4] has proved CBH with a rigorous algebraic formalization of the early ideas by Pascal, Baker, Campbell, and Hausdorff. See [8, Chapters 1, 4] for more details on all these topics.) Cartier provides this proof in [9], making use of free Lie algebras generated by a finite set. As long as the existence of free Lie algebras is again a consequence of PBW, clearly it cannot be exploited to prove Theorem PBW itself. Hence, in [9] a proof of the existence of free Lie algebras generated by finite sets is given, independently of PBW, and relying only on the ideas contained in the classical proof of the theorem of Dynkin, Specht, and Wever.

By making use of these ideas, we here provide a proof, with no prerequisites, of the existence of free Lie algebras over arbitrary sets, thus generalizing the result in [9]. We hope that a new proof, which is alternative to all those presented in books, is welcome, especially since it makes no use of such a deep result as the Theorem of PoincarΓ©, Birkhoff, and Witt. As an application, we are able to highlight the full interdependence of PBW and CBH and the existence of free Lie algebras (see Section 4), whichβ€”to the best of our knowledgeβ€”has never been pointed out in the specialized literature so far (see Theorem 4.1 and Corollary 4.3).

2. The Free Lie Algebra Generated by a Set

In the present short section, included for the sake of completeness and to fix the notation used throughout, we recall an argument, which dates back to Bourbaki [1, Chapitre II, Section 2, n.1] (see also Reutenauer [2, Section 0.2]) proving directly the existence of free Lie algebras generated by a set.

For π‘›βˆˆβ„•, 𝑛β‰₯1, consider the set 𝑀𝑛(𝑋) (also denoted by 𝑀𝑛, for short) of all (roughly speaking) the noncommutative, nonassociative words of length 𝑛 on the elements of 𝑋. The 𝑀𝑛s can be defined inductively by means of disjoint unions (denoted by ∐) of Cartesian products in the following way: 𝑀1(𝑋)∢=𝑋,𝑀2(𝑋)∢=𝑋×𝑋,𝑀3𝑀(𝑋)∢=(𝑋×𝑋)×𝑋𝑋×(𝑋×𝑋),𝑛(𝑋)∢=𝑖+𝑗=𝑛𝑀𝑖(𝑋)×𝑀𝑗(𝑋),𝑛β‰₯2.(2.1) Let βˆπ‘€(𝑋)∢=𝑛β‰₯1𝑀𝑛(𝑋). We can define a (noncommutative, nonassociative) binary operation on 𝑀(𝑋) as follows. For any 𝑀,π‘€β€²βˆˆπ‘€(𝑋), say, π‘€βˆˆπ‘€π‘› and π‘€β€²βˆˆπ‘€π‘›ξ…ž, we denote by 𝑀⋅𝑀′ the unique element of 𝑀𝑛+π‘›ξ…ž corresponding to (𝑀,𝑀′) in the canonical injections π‘€π‘›Γ—π‘€π‘›ξ…žβŠ‚π‘€π‘›+π‘›ξ…žβŠ‚π‘€(𝑋). This binary operation endows 𝑀(𝑋) with the structure of a magma, called the free magma generated by 𝑋. Let us now set Lib(𝑋)∢=π•‚βŸ¨π‘€(𝑋)⟩, the free vector space generated by the free magma 𝑀(𝑋). (The free vector space generated by a set 𝑀 is here thought of as the 𝕂-vector space of the functions from 𝑀 to 𝕂 vanishing outside a finite set; equivalently, it will be treated as the set of formal (finite) linear combinations of elements of 𝑀, where 𝑀 is a basis for π•‚βŸ¨π‘€βŸ©.) The canonical map 𝑀(𝑋)β†ͺLib(𝑋) (sending π‘€βˆˆπ‘€(𝑋) to the characteristic function of {𝑀} in 𝑀(𝑋)) will be simply denoted by set inclusion. The operation on 𝑀(𝑋) extends by linearity to an operation on Lib(𝑋) turning it into a nonassociative algebra, called the free (nonassociative) algebra generated by 𝑋. We have the following result, whose proof is standard and hence omitted.

Lemma 2.1. Let 𝑋 be a set, then, for every 𝕂-algebra 𝐴 and every function π‘“βˆΆπ‘‹β†’π΄, there exists a unique algebra morphism π‘“βˆΆLib(𝑋)→𝐴 prolonging 𝑓.

Given an (not necessarily associative) algebra (𝑀,βˆ—), we say that π‘†βŠ†π‘€ is a (two-sided) magma ideal in 𝑀 if 𝑆 is a vector subspace of 𝑀 such that π‘ βˆ—π‘š and π‘šβˆ—π‘  belong to 𝑆, for every π‘ βˆˆπ‘† and every π‘šβˆˆπ‘€. Moreover, if π»βŠ†π‘€ is any set, the smallest (two-sided) magma ideal in 𝑀 containing 𝐻 will be said to be the magma ideal generated by 𝐻 in 𝑀.

Let us now consider the algebra Lib(𝑋) and 𝐴∢={𝑄(π‘Ž)=π‘Žβ‹…π‘Ž,𝐽(π‘Ž,𝑏,𝑐)=π‘Žβ‹…(𝑏⋅𝑐)+𝑏⋅(π‘β‹…π‘Ž)+𝑐⋅(π‘Žβ‹…π‘)βˆ£π‘Ž,𝑏,π‘βˆˆLib(𝑋)}.(2.2) We henceforth denote by π”ž the magma ideal generated by 𝐴 in Lib(𝑋). We next consider the quotient vector space Lie(𝑋)∢=Lib(𝑋)/π”ž and the natural projection πœ‹βˆΆLib(𝑋)β†’Lie(𝑋). Then the map [πœ‹]Lie(𝑋)Γ—Lie(𝑋)⟢Lie(𝑋),(πœ‹(π‘Ž),πœ‹(𝑏))⟼(π‘Ž),πœ‹(𝑏)∢=πœ‹(π‘Žβ‹…π‘),π‘Ž,π‘βˆˆLib(𝑋)(2.3) is well posed, and it endows Lie(𝑋) with a 𝕂-algebra structure, which turns out to be a Lie algebra over 𝕂 (see the very definition of 𝐴).

Proposition 2.2. Let 𝑋 be any set and, with the above notation, let us set πœ‘βˆΆ=πœ‹|π‘‹βˆΆπ‘‹β†’Lie(𝑋) then (1)Lie(𝑋), together with the map πœ‘, is a free Lie algebra generated by 𝑋 (according to Definition 1.1);(2)the set {πœ‘(π‘₯)}π‘₯βˆˆπ‘‹ is independent in Lie(𝑋), whence πœ‘ is injective; (3)the set πœ‘(𝑋)  Lie-generates Lie(𝑋), that is, the smallest Lie subalgebra of Lie(𝑋) containing πœ‘(𝑋), coincides with Lie(𝑋).

The proof of this proposition is derived by collecting together various results appearing in [1, Chapitre II, Section 2], with the additional care of transposing them to a nonassociative setting (see, e.g., [8, Theorem 2.54] for all the details).

3. The Isomorphism Lie(𝑋)≃ℒ(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©)

From now on, we turn to prove Theorem 1.2 without using neither Theorem PBW nor Corollary 1.3. The arguments are more delicate than those in the preceding section.

We fix throughout a field 𝕂 of characteristic zero. We denote by β„’(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©) the smallest Lie subalgebra of 𝒯(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©) (the tensor algebra of the vector space π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©) containing 𝑋. Let πœ‘ be as in Proposition 2.2. Being Lie(𝑋) a free Lie algebra generated by 𝑋, there exists a unique Lie algebra morphism Φ∢Lie(𝑋)βŸΆβ„’(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©)suchthatΞ¦(πœ‘(π‘₯))=π‘₯,foreveryπ‘₯∈X.(3.1) Our main task is to show that Ξ¦ is an isomorphism, without using PBW theorem. This will immediately prove that β„’(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©) is a free Lie algebra over 𝑋, according to Definition 1.1. We will do this by means of some auxiliary functions.

Lemma 3.1. With the above notation, one has the grading ⨁Lie(𝑋)=𝑛β‰₯1𝐡𝑛, where 𝐡1=span(πœ‘(𝑋)), and, for any 𝑛β‰₯2, 𝐡𝑛=𝐡1,π΅π‘›βˆ’1ξ€»ξ€½[πœ‘]=span(π‘₯),π‘¦βˆΆπ‘₯βˆˆπ‘‹,π‘¦βˆˆπ΅π‘›βˆ’1ξ€Ύ.(3.2)

Proof. It is easy to prove the grading ⨁Lib(𝑋)=𝑛Lib𝑛(𝑋), where Lib𝑛(𝑋) is the span of 𝑀𝑛(𝑋). On the other hand, a simple argument shows that π”ž is also the magma ideal generated by the elements 𝑀⋅𝑀,𝑀+π‘€ξ…žξ€Έβ‹…ξ€·π‘€+π‘€ξ…žξ€Έβˆ’π‘€β‹…π‘€βˆ’π‘€ξ…žβ‹…π‘€ξ…ž,ξ€·π‘€π‘€β‹…ξ…žβ‹…π‘€ξ…žξ…žξ€Έ+π‘€ξ…žβ‹…ξ€·π‘€ξ…žξ…žξ€Έβ‹…π‘€+π‘€ξ…žξ…žβ‹…ξ€·π‘€β‹…π‘€ξ…žξ€Έ,(3.3) with 𝑀,π‘€ξ…ž,π‘€ξ…žξ…žβˆˆπ‘€(𝑋). As a consequence, we have an analogous grading β¨π”ž=π‘›π”žπ‘›, with π”žπ‘›βŠ†Lib𝑛(𝑋), for every π‘›βˆˆβ„•. This gives ⨁Lie(𝑋)=𝑛𝐢𝑛, where 𝐢𝑛=Lib𝑛(𝑋)/π”ž is spanned by the 𝑛-degree commutators of the elements of πœ‘(𝑋) (bracketing is taken in arbitrary order). In its turn, we obviously have 𝐢𝑛=𝐡𝑛, where 𝐡𝑛 is the span of the β€œnested” brackets ξ€Ίπœ‘ξ€·π‘₯1ξ€Έβ‹―ξ€Ίπœ‘ξ€·π‘₯π‘›βˆ’1ξ€Έξ€·π‘₯,πœ‘π‘›β‹―ξ€»ξ€Έξ€»,forπ‘₯1,…,π‘₯π‘›βˆˆX.(3.4) Finally, it is a simple proof to check that [𝐡𝑛,π΅π‘š]βŠ†π΅π‘›+π‘š for every 𝑛,π‘š.

Thanks to Lemma 3.1, the following auxiliary map is well posed: ξƒ©ξ“π›ΏβˆΆLie(𝑋)⟢Lie(𝑋),𝛿𝑛𝑏𝑛ξƒͺξ“βˆΆ=π‘›π‘›π‘π‘›ξ€·π‘π‘›βˆˆπ΅π‘›ξ€Έ,βˆ€π‘›βˆˆβ„•.(3.5) In the remainder of the section, for any vector space 𝑉, we denote by End(𝑉) the set of the endomorphisms of 𝑉. By the universal properties of the free vector space π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ© and of tensor algebras, there exists a unique morphism of unital associative algebras πœƒβˆΆπ’―(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©)β†’End(Lie(𝑋)), such that πœƒ(π‘₯)=adπœ‘(π‘₯), for every π‘₯βˆˆπ‘‹.

Finally, there exists a unique linear map π‘”βˆΆπ’―(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©)β†’Lie(𝑋) such that, for every π‘₯1,…,π‘₯π‘˜βˆˆπ‘‹ and every π‘˜β‰₯2, it holds 𝑔(1𝕂)=0, 𝑔(π‘₯1)=πœ‘(π‘₯1), and 𝑔(π‘₯1βŠ—β‹―βŠ—π‘₯π‘˜)=[πœ‘(π‘₯1)β‹―[πœ‘(π‘₯π‘˜βˆ’1),πœ‘(π‘₯π‘˜)]].

The diagram below gives an idea of the setting we are working in 247403.fig.00c(3.6)

We are now ready for the following result (see also Cartier [9, Lemma 1, page 242], where finite 𝑋s are considered); part (c) of the lemma is the core of a result due to Dynkin [15].

In the following statement, we denote by 𝒯+(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©) the ideal of 𝒯(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©) whose elements have vanishing zero-degree component.

Lemma 3.2. With all the above notation, one has the following: (a)𝛿 is a derivation of the Lie algebra Lie(𝑋) and π›Ώβˆ˜πœ‘β‰‘πœ‘ on 𝑋, (b)𝑔(π‘₯𝑦)=πœƒ(π‘₯)(𝑔(𝑦)), for every π‘₯βˆˆπ’―(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©), π‘¦βˆˆπ’―+(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©), (c)πœƒβˆ˜Ξ¦β‰‘ad on Lie(𝑋), that is, πœƒ(Ξ¦(πœ‰))(πœ‚)=[πœ‰,πœ‚], for every πœ‰,πœ‚βˆˆLie(𝑋),(d)π‘”βˆ˜Ξ¦β‰‘π›Ώ on Lie(𝑋).

Proof. (a) Take elements ⨁𝑑,π‘‘β€²βˆˆLie(𝑋)=𝑛β‰₯1𝐡𝑛 (see Lemma 3.1), βˆ‘π‘‘=𝑛𝑑𝑛, π‘‘ξ…ž=βˆ‘π‘›π‘‘ξ…žπ‘›, with 𝑑𝑛,π‘‘ξ…žπ‘›βˆˆπ΅π‘› for every 𝑛β‰₯1, and 𝑑𝑛,π‘‘ξ…žπ‘› are definitively equal to 0, then we have 𝛿𝑑,π‘‘ξ…žξ“ξ€»ξ€Έ=𝛿𝑛β‰₯1𝑖+𝑗=𝑛𝑑𝑖,π‘‘ξ…žπ‘—ξ€»=𝑛β‰₯1𝑛𝑖+𝑗=𝑛𝑑𝑖,π‘‘ξ…žπ‘—ξ€»=𝑛β‰₯1𝑖+𝑗=𝑛(𝑑𝑖+𝑗)𝑖,π‘‘ξ…žπ‘—ξ€»=𝑛β‰₯1𝑖+𝑗=𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑖,π‘‘ξ…žπ‘—ξ€»+𝑛β‰₯1𝑖+𝑗=𝑛𝑑𝑖,π‘—π‘‘ξ…žπ‘—ξ€»=𝑖𝑖𝑑𝑖,ξ“π‘—π‘‘ξ…žπ‘—ξƒ­+𝑖𝑑𝑖,ξ“π‘—π‘—π‘‘ξ…žπ‘—ξƒ­=𝛿(𝑑),π‘‘ξ…žξ€»+𝑑𝑑,π›Ώξ…ž.ξ€Έξ€»(3.7) Moreover, from the definition of the 𝐡𝑛s in Lemma 3.1, we have πœ‘(𝑋)βŠ‚π΅1, so 𝛿(πœ‘(π‘₯))=πœ‘(π‘₯),foreveryπ‘₯∈X.(3.8)
 (b) An inductive argument: if π‘₯=π‘˜βˆˆπ•‚=𝒯0(𝑉), (b) is trivially true, 𝑔(π‘˜π‘¦)=π‘˜π‘”(𝑦) (since 𝑔 is linear) and πœƒ(π‘˜)(𝑔(𝑦))=π‘˜IdLie(𝑋)(𝑔(𝑦))=π‘˜π‘”(𝑦).(3.9) Thus, we are left to prove (b) when both π‘₯,𝑦 belong to 𝒯+(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©); moreover, by linearity, we can assume without loss of generality that π‘₯=𝑣1βŠ—β‹―βŠ—π‘£π‘˜ and 𝑦=𝑀1βŠ—β‹―βŠ—π‘€β„Ž with β„Ž,π‘˜β‰₯1, and the 𝑣s and 𝑀s are elements of 𝑋, 𝑔𝑣(π‘₯𝑦)=𝑔1βŠ—β‹―βŠ—π‘£π‘˜βŠ—π‘€1βŠ—β‹―βŠ—π‘€β„Žξ€Έξ€·πœ‘ξ€·π‘£=ad1ξ€·πœ‘ξ€·π‘£ξ€Έξ€Έβˆ˜β‹―βˆ˜adπ‘˜πœ‘ξ€·π‘€ξ€Έξ€Έξ€·ξ€Ί1ξ€Έξ€Ίπœ‘ξ€·π‘€,β€¦β„Žβˆ’1𝑀,πœ‘β„Žβ€¦ξ€·π‘£ξ€Έξ€»ξ€»ξ€Έ=πœƒ1βŠ—β‹―βŠ—π‘£π‘˜π‘”ξ€·π‘€ξ€Έξ€·1βŠ—β‹―βŠ—π‘€β„Žξ€Έξ€Έ=πœƒ(π‘₯)(𝑔(𝑦)).(3.10)
 (c) Let πœ‰βˆˆLie(𝑋, then (c) follows if we show that πœƒ(Ξ¦(πœ‰)) and ad(πœ‰) coincide (note that they are both endomorphisms of Lie(𝑋)). In its turn, this is equivalent to the identity of πœƒβˆ˜Ξ¦ with the map ad∢Lie(𝑋)⟢End(Lie(𝑋)),πœ‰βŸΌad(πœ‰).(3.11) Now observe that both ad and πœƒβˆ˜Ξ¦ are Lie algebra morphisms (indeed, Ξ¦ is a Lie algebra morphism by construction, and πœƒ is a Lie algebra morphism since it is a unital associative algebra morphism). Hence, the equality of ad and πœƒβˆ˜Ξ¦ follows if we prove that they are equal on a system of Lie generators for Lie(𝑋), namely, on πœ‘(𝑋) (recall Proposition 2.2-(3.8)), for every π‘₯βˆˆπ‘‹, we indeed have (πœƒβˆ˜Ξ¦)(πœ‘(π‘₯))=πœƒ(π‘₯)=ad(πœ‘(π‘₯)).(3.12)
 (d) It suffices to show that π‘”βˆ˜Ξ¦ is a derivation of Lie(𝑋); we have [][]=[]+[].(π‘”βˆ˜Ξ¦)πœ‰,πœ‚=𝑔(Ξ¦(πœ‰),Ξ¦(πœ‚))=𝑔(Ξ¦(πœ‰)Ξ¦(πœ‚)βˆ’Ξ¦(πœ‚)Ξ¦(πœ‰))=πœƒ(Ξ¦(πœ‰))𝑔(Ξ¦(πœ‚))βˆ’πœƒ(Ξ¦(πœ‚))𝑔(Ξ¦(πœ‰))πœ‰,𝑔(Ξ¦(πœ‚))𝑔(Ξ¦(πœ‰)),πœ‚(3.13)

In the third and fourth equalities, we used (b) and (c), respectively. Since π‘”βˆ˜Ξ¦ and 𝛿 are derivations of Lie(𝑋) coinciding on πœ‘(𝑋), (d) follows.

Theorem 3.3. Let 𝕂 be field of characteristic zero.
If Ξ¦ is as in (3.1), Ξ¦ is an isomorphism of Lie algebras.

Proof. From the very definition of 𝛿 and the fact that 𝕂 has characteristic zero, it follows that 𝛿 is injective.
From the identity π‘”βˆ˜Ξ¦β‰‘π›Ώ (see (d) in Lemma 3.2) and the injectivity of 𝛿, we immediately infer the injectivity of Ξ¦. Since Ξ¦ is clearly surjective (indeed, Lie(𝑋) and β„’(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©) are Lie generated by πœ‘(𝑋) and 𝑋, respectively), the theorem is proved.

In order to explicitly show the relationship of the arguments we employed to prove Theorem 1.2 with the so-called Theorem of Dynkin, Specht, and Wever, we seize the opportunity to show that the latter is implicitly contained in Theorem 3.3 and Lemma 3.2. (See e.g., ([4], [18], Proposition  2.2), ([6], [20], Chapter  V, Section  4, Theorem  8), and ([2], [26], Theorem  1.4), ([10, 11], [29], Chapter  IV, Section  8, LA  4.15). For the original proofs, see [15–17].) Despite its well-known importance, we state it as a corollary of the former results.

Corollary 3.4 (Dynkin, Specht, and Wever). Let 𝕂 be a field of characteristic zero. Consider the linear map π‘ƒβˆΆπ’―(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©)β†’β„’(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©) such that 𝑃1𝕂π‘₯=0,𝑃1ξ€Έ=π‘₯1,𝑃π‘₯1βŠ—β‹―βŠ—π‘₯π‘˜ξ€Έ=π‘˜βˆ’1ξ€Ίπ‘₯1ξ€Ίπ‘₯,β€¦π‘˜βˆ’1,π‘₯π‘˜ξ€»β€¦ξ€»,βˆ€π‘˜β‰₯2,(3.14) for any π‘₯1,…,π‘₯π‘˜βˆˆπ‘‹. Then 𝑃 is a projection, that is, 𝑃 is surjective and it is the identity on β„’(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©).
Consequently, one has the following characterization of Lie elements: β„’(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©)={π‘‘βˆˆπ’―(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©)βˆ£π‘ƒ(𝑑)=𝑑}.(3.15)

Proof. The well-posedness and surjectivity of 𝑃 are obvious. To prove that 𝑃 is the identity on β„’(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©), it suffices to test it on a homogeneous bracket, say 𝑑=[π‘₯1,…,[π‘₯π‘˜βˆ’1,π‘₯π‘˜]…], with π‘˜βˆˆβ„• and π‘₯1,…,π‘₯π‘˜βˆˆπ‘‹. It is clear that it holds 𝑃(𝑑)=π‘˜βˆ’1(Ξ¦βˆ˜π‘”)(𝑑). As a consequence, being Ξ¦ invertible (by Theorem 3.3),𝑃(𝑑)=π‘˜βˆ’1ξ€·Ξ¦βˆ˜π‘”βˆ˜Ξ¦βˆ˜Ξ¦βˆ’1ξ€Έ(𝑑)=π‘˜βˆ’1ξ€·Ξ¦βˆ˜π›Ώβˆ˜Ξ¦βˆ’1ξ€Έ(𝑑)=π‘˜βˆ’1Ξ¦ξ€·π‘˜Ξ¦βˆ’1ξ€Έ(𝑑)=𝑑.(3.16) In the second equality, we used (d) of Lemma 3.2; in the third, we used the definition of 𝛿 and the fact that Ξ¦βˆ’1(𝑑)=[πœ‘(π‘₯1),…,[πœ‘(π‘₯π‘˜βˆ’1),πœ‘(π‘₯π‘˜)]…]βˆˆπ΅π‘˜.

4. The Relationship between the Theorems of PBW and of CBH

The deep intertwinement between PBW and CBH and the existence of free Lie algebras can be visualized in the following chain of equivalent statements.

Theorem 4.1. Consider the following six statements (all linear structures are understood to be over a field of characteristic zero): (a)the set {πœ‡(π‘₯𝑖)}π‘–βˆˆπΌ is independent in 𝒰(𝔀);(b)any Lie algebra 𝔀 can be embedded in its enveloping algebra 𝒰(𝔀); (c)for every set 𝑋, there exists a free Lie algebra over 𝑋;(d)for every finite set 𝑋, there exists a free Lie algebra over 𝑋;(e)free Lie algebras over finite sets do exist, and the Campbell-Baker-Hausdorff theorem holds;(f)the PoincarΓ©-Birkhoff-Witt theorem holds. Then these results can be proved each by the aid of the other in the following circular sequence: (a)⟹(b)⟹(c)⟹(d)⟹(e)⟹(f)⟹(a).(4.1)

Remark 4.2. Notice that statement (c) was proved in Section 3 above, without any prerequisite nor the aid of any of the other statements in Theorem 4.1. In particular, the isomorphism of Lie(𝑋) (the free Lie algebra generated by 𝑋) with β„’(π•‚βŸ¨π‘‹βŸ©) (the Lie algebra of the Lie polynomials in the letters of 𝑋) can be proved independently of (b) and (f), as we announced.

Proof. (a)β‡’(b): this is obvious by the definition πœ‡(π‘₯𝑖)=πœ‹(π‘₯𝑖),
(b)β‡’(c): this is the usual approach to the existence of free Lie algebras over a set recalled in the Introduction,
(c)β‡’(d): this is obvious,
(d)β‡’(e): the derivation of the Campbell-Baker-Hausdorff theorem from the existence of free Lie algebras over finite sets appears in Eichler's proof [13],
(e)β‡’(f): the proof of PBW from CBH (with the joint use of free Lie algebras over finite sets) is contained in Cartier's paper [9],
(f)β‡’(a): this is obvious.

As by-products of the previous theorem, we highlight the following corollaries, containing some probably unexpected facts.

Corollary 4.3. The following are consequences of Theorem 4.1. Again, all linear structures are on a field of characteristic zero. (a)The linear independence of the πœ‡(π‘₯𝑖)s is sufficient (besides being necessary) for the system in (1.2) to form a basis of 𝒰(𝔀). (b)The sole embedding 𝔀β†ͺ𝒰(𝔀) proves the PoincarΓ©-Birkhoff-Witt theorem. (c)The existence of free Lie algebras over finite sets is sufficient for the existence of all free Lie algebras over arbitrary sets. (d)The existence of free Lie algebras proves the PoincarΓ©-Birkhoff-Witt theorem (not only the reverse fact is true).

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank F. Caselli for useful remarks on a former version of the paper.

References

  1. N. Bourbaki, β€œÉléments de Mathématique, Fasc. XXXVII: Groupes et Algèbres de Lie, Chap. II: Algèbres de Lie, Chap. III: Groupes de Lie,” in Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles, vol. 1349, Hermann, Paris, France, 1972.
  2. C. Reutenauer, Free Lie Algebras, vol. 7 of London Mathematical Society Monographs, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1993.
  3. N. Bourbaki, β€œÉléments de Mathématique, Fasc. XXVI: Groupes et Algèbres de Lie, Chap. I: Algèbres de Lie,” in Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles, vol. 1285, Hermann, Paris, France, 1960.
  4. G. P. Hochschild, The Structure of Lie Groups, Holden-Day, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1965.
  5. J. E. Humphreys, Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory, vol. 9 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1980.
  6. N. Jacobson, Lie Algebras, vol. 10 of Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Interscience Publishers, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1962.
  7. V. S. Varadarajan, Lie groups, Lie Algebras, and Their Representations, vol. 102 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1984.
  8. A. Bonfiglioli and R. Fulci, Topics in Noncommutative Algebra. The Theorem of Campbell, Baker, Hausdorff and Dynkin, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2011.
  9. P. Cartier, β€œDémonstration algébrique de la formule de Hausdorff,” Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, vol. 84, pp. 241–249, 1956. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  10. J. P. Serre, Lie Algebras and Lie Groups, Lectures Given at Harvard University, W. A. Benjamin, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 1964.
  11. J. P. Serre, Lie Algebras and Lie Groups, vol. 1500 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 1965.
  12. F. Hausdorff, β€œDie symbolische exponentialformel in der gruppentheorie,” Leipzig Berichte, vol. 58, pp. 19–48, 1906.
  13. M. Eichler, β€œA new proof of the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula,” Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan, vol. 20, pp. 23–25, 1968. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH
  14. D. Ž. Djoković, β€œAn elementary proof of the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff-Dynkin formula,” Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 209–211, 1975. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH
  15. E. B. Dynkin, β€œCalculation of the coefficients in the Campbell-Hausdorff formula,” Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, vol. 57, pp. 323–326, 1947.
  16. W. Specht, β€œDie linearen Beziehungen zwischen höheren Kommutatoren,” Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 51, pp. 367–376, 1948. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH
  17. F. Wever, β€œOperatoren in lieschen ringen,” Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, vol. 187, pp. 44–55, 1949. View at Zentralblatt MATH