About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Algebra
VolumeΒ 2011Β (2011), Article IDΒ 270814, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/270814
Research Article

𝔛-Gorenstein Projective Modules

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology of Fez, University S.M. Ben Abdellah Fez, P.O. Box 2202, Morocco

Received 13 May 2011; Accepted 5 July 2011

Academic Editors: H. Chen and J. MinÑč

Copyright Β© 2011 Mohammed Tamekkante. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We introduce and study the 𝔛-Gorenstein projective modules, where 𝔛 is a projective class. These modules are a generalization of the Gorenstein projective modules.

1. Introduction

Throughout the paper, all rings are associative with identity, and an 𝑅-module will mean right 𝑅-module. As usual, we use pd𝑅(𝑀) to denote, respectively, the classical projective dimension of 𝑀.

An important motivation for the study of homological dimensions dates back to 1956, when Auslander and Buchsbaum [1] and Serre [2] proved the following.

Theorem A. Let 𝑅 be a commutative Noetherian local ring 𝑅 with residue field π‘˜. The following conditions are equivalent: (1)𝑅 is regular; (2)π‘˜ has finite projective dimension; (3)every 𝑅-module has finite projective dimension.

This result opened the door to the solution of two long-standing conjectures of Krull. Moreover, it introduced the theme that finiteness of a homological dimension for all modules characterizes rings with special properties. Later work has shown that modules of finite projective dimension over a general ring share many properties with modules over a regular ring. This is an incitement to study homological dimensions of individual modules.

In line with these ideas, Auslander and Bridger [3] introduced in 1969 the 𝐺-dimension. It is a homological dimension for finitely generated modules over a Noetherian ring, and it gives a characterization of the Gorenstein local rings [4, Section 3.2]. Namely, 𝑅 is Gorenstein if π‘˜ has finite 𝐺-dimension, and only if every finitely generated 𝑅-module has finite 𝐺-dimension.

In Section 2, we recall the notion of the Gorenstein projective modules, and we put the point on its place in the theory of homological dimensions as a generalization of the classical projective modules. So, we recall some fundamental results about the Gorenstein projective modules and dimensions.

In Section 3, which is the main section of this paper, we show that every time we choose a projective class 𝔛 (Definition 3.1), we can consider a generalization of (Gorenstein) projective modules via 𝔛. In the general case these generalizations are different.

2. The Gorenstein Projective Modules

In the early 1990s, the 𝐺-dimension was extended beyond the realm of finitely generated modules over a Noetherian ring. This was done by Enochs and Jenda who introduced the notion of the Gorenstein projective modules [5]. The same authors and their collaborators, studied these modules in several subsequent papers. The associated dimension was studied by Christensen [6] and Holm [7].

Definition 2.1. An 𝑅-module 𝑀 is called Gorenstein projective if there exists an exact sequence of projective 𝑅-modules P:β‹―βŸΆπ‘ƒ1βŸΆπ‘ƒ0βŸΆπ‘ƒ0βŸΆπ‘ƒ1βŸΆβ‹―(2.1) such that 𝑀≅Im(𝑃0→𝑃0) and such that the functor Hom𝑅(βˆ’,𝑄) leaves P exact whenever 𝑄 is a projective 𝑅-module. The resolution P is called a complete projective resolution.

It is evident that every projective module is Gorenstein projective. While, the converse is not true [8, Example 2.5].

Basic categorical properties are recorded in [7, Section 2]. Recall that a class 𝔛 of 𝑅-modules is called projectively resolving [7] if 𝒫(𝑅)βŠ†π”› and for every short exact sequence 0β†’π‘‹ξ…žβ†’π‘‹β†’π‘‹ξ…žξ…žβ†’0 with π‘‹ξ…žξ…žβˆˆπ”›, the conditions π‘‹ξ…žβˆˆπ”› and π‘‹βˆˆπ”› are equivalent.

Proposition 2.2 (see [7, Theorem 2.5]). The class of Gorenstein projective 𝑅-modules is closed under direct sums and summands.

In [9], the authors define a particular subclass of the class of the Gorenstein projective modules.

Definition 2.3. A module 𝑀 is said to be special Gorenstein projective if there exists an exact sequence of free modules of the form F:β‹―βŸΆπΉπ‘“βŸΆπΉπ‘“βŸΆπΉπ‘“βŸΆπΉβŸΆβ‹―(2.2) such that 𝑀≅Im(𝑓) and such that Hom𝑅(βˆ’,𝑃) leaves the sequence 𝐅 exact whenever 𝑃 is projective. The resolution 𝐅 is called a complete free resolution.

Every projective module is a direct summand of a free one. A parallel result for the Gorenstein projective modules holds.

Proposition 2.4 (see [9, Corollary 2.4]). A module 𝑀 is Gorenstein projective if and only if it is a direct summand of a special Gorenstein projective module.

An (augmented) Gorenstein projective resolution of a module 𝑀 is an exact sequence β‹―β†’πΊπ‘–β†’πΊπ‘–βˆ’1→⋯→𝐺0→𝑀→0, where each module 𝐺𝑖 is Gorenstein projective. Note that every module has a Gorenstein projective resolution, as a free resolution is trivially a Gorenstein projective one.

Definition 2.5. The Gorenstein projective dimension of a module 𝑀≠0, denoted by Gpd𝑅(𝑀), is the least integer 𝑛β‰₯0 such that there exists a Gorenstein projective resolution of 𝑀 with 𝐺𝑖=0 for all 𝑖>𝑛. If no such 𝑛 exists, then Gpd𝑅(𝑀) is infinite. By convention, set Gpd𝑅(𝑀)=∞.

In [7], Holm gave the following fundamental functorial description of the Gorenstein dimension.

Theorem 2.6 (see [7, Theorem 2.22]). Let 𝑀 be an 𝑅-module of finite Gorenstein projective dimension. For every integer 𝑛β‰₯0, the following conditions are equivalent: (1)Gpd𝑅(𝑀)≀𝑛;(2)Ext𝑖𝑅(𝑀,𝑃)=0 for all 𝑖>0 and all projective module 𝑃;(3)Ext𝑖𝑅(𝑀,𝑄)=0 for all 𝑖>0 and all 𝑅-modules 𝑄 with finite pd𝑅(𝑄);(4) for every exact sequence 0β†’πΎπ‘›β†’πΊπ‘›βˆ’1→⋯→𝐺0→𝑀→0, if 𝐺0;…;πΊπ‘›βˆ’1 are Gorenstein projective, then also 𝐾𝑛 is Gorenstein projective.

The Gorenstein projective dimension is a refinement of the projective dimension; this follows from [7, Proposition 2.27].

Proposition 2.7. For every 𝑅-module 𝑀, Gpd𝑅(𝑀)≀pd𝑅(𝑀) with equality if pd𝑅(𝑀) is finite.

3. 𝔛-Gorenstein Projective Modules

Notation 3. By 𝒫(𝑅) and 𝒒𝒫(𝑅) we denote the classes of all projective and Gorenstein projective 𝑅-modules, respectively. Given a class 𝔛 of 𝑅-modules, we set: βŸ‚βˆžξ€½π”›=π‘€βˆ£Ext𝑖𝑅(𝑀,𝑋)=0βˆ€π‘‹βˆˆπ”›andallξ€Ύ.𝑖>0(3.1)

We define the projective class as follows.

Definition 3.1. Let 𝑅 be a ring. A class 𝔛 of 𝑅-modules is a projective class, if it is projectively resolving and closed under direct sum.

Remark 3.2. For any ring 𝑅, any projective class is closed under direct summands (by [7, Proposition 1.4]).

The main purpose of this section, which is the main section of this paper, is to see that every time we chose a projective class 𝔛, we can consider a generalization of (Gorenstein) projective modules via 𝔛. In the general case these generalizations are different.

Definition 3.3. Let 𝑅 be a ring, and let 𝔛 be a projective class over 𝑅. The 𝔛-projective dimension of an 𝑅-module 𝑀, π”›βˆ’pd𝑅(𝑀), is defined by declaring that π”›βˆ’pd𝑅(𝑀)≀𝑛 if and only if 𝑀 has an 𝔛-resolution of length 𝑛.

Note that, by the definition of the 𝔛-projective dimension, for each module 𝑀 we have π”›βˆ’pd𝑅(𝑀)≀pd𝑅(𝑀). On the other hand, we have the following.

Proposition 3.4. Let 𝑅 be a ring and 𝔛 a projective class over 𝑅. Then, π”›βˆ’pd𝑅(𝑀)≀𝑛 if and only if for each exact sequence 0βŸΆπ‘‹π‘›βŸΆπ‘‹π‘›βˆ’1βŸΆβ‹―βŸΆπ‘‹0βŸΆπ‘€βŸΆ0,(3.2) where π‘‹π‘–βˆˆπ”› for each 𝑖=0,…,π‘›βˆ’1, the module 𝑋𝑛 belongs in 𝔛.

Proof. The condition β€œif” is clear. So, we have to prove the β€œonly if” condition. Assume that π”›βˆ’pd𝑅(𝑀)≀𝑛, and let 0βŸΆπ‘‹π‘›βŸΆπ‘‹π‘›βˆ’1βŸΆβ‹―βŸΆπ‘‹0βŸΆπ‘€βŸΆ0(3.3) be an exact sequence, where π‘‹π‘–βˆˆπ”› for each 𝑖=0,…,π‘›βˆ’1. Since π”›βˆ’pd𝑅(𝑀)≀𝑛, there exists an exact sequence 0βŸΆπ‘‹ξ…žπ‘›βŸΆπ‘‹ξ…žπ‘›βˆ’1βŸΆβ‹―βŸΆπ‘‹ξ…ž0βŸΆπ‘€βŸΆ0,(3.4) where π‘‹ξ…žπ‘–βˆˆπ”› for each 𝑖=0,…,𝑛. Since the class 𝔛 is projectively resolving and closed under arbitrary sums and under direct summands, by using [3, Lemma 3.12], π‘‹π‘›βˆˆπ”› since π”›ξ…žπ‘›βˆˆπ”›.

We introduce the 𝔛-Gorenstein projective modules as follows.

Definition 3.5. Let 𝑅 be a ring, and let 𝔛 be a projective class over 𝑅. An 𝑅-module 𝑀 is called 𝔛-Gorenstein projective if there exists an exact sequence of projective modules P:β‹―βŸΆπ‘ƒ1βŸΆπ‘ƒ0βŸΆπ‘ƒ0βŸΆπ‘ƒ1βŸΆβ‹―(3.5) such that 𝑀≅Im(𝑃0→𝑃0) and such that the functor Hom𝑅(βˆ’,𝑋) leaves 𝐏 exact whenever π‘‹βˆˆπ”›. The complex 𝐏 is called an 𝔛-complete projective resolution.

Remark 3.6. Let 𝔛 be a projective class over a ring 𝑅. Then, we have the following:(1)every projective module is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective;(2)every 𝔛-Gorenstein projective module is Gorenstein projective; (3)the class of all 𝔛-Gorenstein projective module is closed under direct sums by definition.(4)if P:⋯→𝑃1→𝑃0→𝑃0→𝑃1β†’β‹― is an 𝔛-complete projective resolution then, by symmetry, all the images, all the kernels, and all the cokernels of 𝐏 are 𝔛-Gorenstein projective;(5)if 𝔛=𝒫(𝑅) then, the 𝔛-Gorenstein projective modules are just the Gorenstein projective modules.

The next example shows that there exists a Gorenstein projective module which is not 𝔛-Gorenstein projective for a given projective class 𝔛.

Example 3.7. Consider the local quasi-Frobenius ring 𝑅=π‘˜[𝑋]/(𝑋2), where π‘˜ is a field. Let (𝑋) be the residue class of 𝑋 in 𝑅. Let 𝔛 be any projective class which contain (𝑋). Then, (𝑋) is a Gorenstein projective module which is not 𝔛-Gorenstein projective.

Proof. First, note that there is always a projective class which contain any module 𝑀. A trivial case is 𝔛=𝑅Mod.
Since 𝑅 is quasi-Frobenius, (𝑋) is Gorenstein projective [10, Theorem 2.2]. Moreover, the short sequence 0β†’(𝑋)β†ͺπ‘…π‘“βˆ’β†’(𝑋)β†’0, where 𝑓 is the multiplication by 𝑋 is exact. Then, if we suppose that (𝑋) is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective, then Ext1𝑅((𝑋),(𝑋))=0. Thus, (𝑋) is a direct summand of 𝑅 and so projective. Then, (𝑋) is free since 𝑅 is local. However, 𝑋2=0. Then, (𝑋) cannot be free.

The next result is a direct consequence of the definition of 𝔛-Gorenstein projective modules.

Proposition 3.8. Given a projective class 𝔛, an 𝑅-module 𝑀 is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective if and only if (1)Ext𝑖𝑅(𝑀,𝑋)=0 for all π‘‹βˆˆπ”› and all 𝑖>0 (i.e., π‘€βˆˆβŸ‚βˆžπ”›) and(2) there exists an exact sequence 0→𝑀→𝑃0→𝑃1β†’β‹―, where all 𝑃𝑖 are projectives and Hom𝑅(βˆ’,𝑋) leaves this sequence exact whenever π‘‹βˆˆπ”›.

The next result shows that an 𝔛-projective module with finite π”›βˆ’pd𝑅(βˆ’) is projective.

Proposition 3.9. Let 𝔛 be a projective class over 𝑅, and let 𝑀 be an 𝔛-Gorenstein projective module. Then, (1)Ext𝑖𝑅(𝑀,𝐺)=0 for all module 𝐺 with π”›βˆ’pd𝑅(𝐺)<∞ and all 𝑖>0.(2)either 𝑀 is projective or π”›βˆ’pd𝑅(𝑀)=∞.

Proof. (1) Since 𝑀 is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective, Ext𝑖𝑅(𝑀,𝑋)=0 for all π‘‹βˆˆπ”› and all 𝑖>0. Thus, by dimension shifting,we obtain the desired result.
(2) Suppose that π”›βˆ’pd𝑅(𝑀)<∞ and consider a short exact sequence 0→𝐾→𝑃→𝑀→0 where 𝑃 is projective. It is clear that π”›βˆ’pd𝑅(𝐾)<∞. Then, by (1), Ext1𝑅(𝑀,𝐾)=0. Hence, this short exact sequence splits, and then 𝑀 is a direct summand of 𝑃. Hence, it is projective.

Proposition 3.10. Let 𝑅 be a ring. If 𝔛=𝒒𝒫(𝑅), then an 𝑅-module 𝑀 is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective if and only if it is projective.

Proof. First note that 𝔛=𝒒𝒫(𝑅) is a projective class [7, Theorem 2.5] and it clear that every projective module is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective. Now, suppose that 𝑀 is an 𝔛-Gorenstein projective module. It is trivial that 𝑀 is also a Gorenstein projective module. Now, consider an exact sequence 0β†’π‘€ξ…žβ†’π‘ƒβ†’π‘€β†’0, where 𝑃 is projective. Since 𝒒𝒫(𝑅) is resolving, π‘€ξ…ž is also Gorenstein projective. Then, π‘€ξ…žβˆˆπ”›. Thus, Ext1𝑅(𝑀,π‘€ξ…ž)=0. So, the short exact sequence splits and so, 𝑀 is a direct summand of 𝑃 and therefore projective.
The converse implication is immediate.

Next we set out to investigate how 𝔛-Gorenstein projective modules behave in short exact sequences.

Theorem 3.11. Let 𝔛 be a projective class over a ring 𝑅. The class of all 𝔛-Gorenstein projective modules is projectively resolving. Furthermore, it is closed under arbitrary direct sums and under direct summands.

Proof. It is clear that every projective module is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective. So, consider any short exact sequence of 𝑅-modules 0β†’π‘€ξ…žβ†’π‘€β†’π‘€ξ…žξ…žβ†’0, where π‘€ξ…žξ…ž is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective.
First suppose that π‘€ξ…ž is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective. We claim that 𝑀 is also 𝔛-Gorenstein projective. Since βŸ‚βˆžπ”› is projectively resolving (by [11, Lemma 2.2.9]) and by Proposition 3.8, we get that 𝑀 belongs to βŸ‚βˆžπ”›. Thus, to show that 𝑀 is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective, we only have to prove the existence of an exact sequence 0→𝑀→𝑃0→𝑃1β†’β‹―, where all 𝑃𝑖 are projectives and Hom𝑅(βˆ’,𝑋) leaves this sequence exact whenever π‘‹βˆˆπ”› (by Proposition 3.8). By assumption, there exist exact projective resolutionsπŒξ…ž=0βŸΆπ‘€ξ…žβŸΆπ‘ƒξ…ž0β†’π‘ƒξ…ž1βŸΆβ‹―,πŒξ…žξ…ž=0βŸΆπ‘€ξ…žξ…žβŸΆπ‘ƒ0ξ…žξ…žβŸΆπ‘ƒ1ξ…žξ…žβŸΆβ‹―,(3.6) where Hom(βˆ’,𝑋) keeps the exactness of these sequences whenever π‘‹βˆˆπ”› and all the cokernels of πŒξ…ž and πŒξ…žξ…žπ”›-Gorenstein projectives (such a sequences exists by the definition of 𝔛-Gorenstein projective modules). Consider the following diagram: 270814.eq.001(3.7)Since π‘€ξ…žξ…ž is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective, we have Ext1𝑅(π‘€ξ…žξ…ž,π‘ƒξ…ž0)=0. Hence, the following sequence is exact. 270814.eq.002(3.8)Thus, there exists an 𝑅-morphism π›ΎβˆΆπ‘€β†’π‘ƒξ…ž0 such that π‘“ξ…ž=π›Ύβˆ˜π›Ό.
It is easy to check that the morphism π‘“βˆΆπ‘€β†’π‘ƒξ…ž0βŠ•π‘ƒ0ξ…žξ…ž defined by setting 𝑓(π‘š)=(𝛾(π‘š),π‘“ξ…žξ…žβˆ˜π›½(π‘š)) for each π‘šβˆˆπ‘€ completes the above diagram and makes it commutative. Then, using the snake lemma, we get the following commutative diagram:270814.eq.003(3.9) Since coker(π‘“ξ…ž) and coker(π‘“ξ…žξ…ž) are 𝔛-Gorenstein projectives, they belong toβŸ‚βˆžπ”› which is projectively resolving (by [11, Lemma 2.2.9]). Then, coker(𝑓) belongs also toβŸ‚βˆžπ”›. Accordingly, Hom𝑅(βˆ’,𝑋) keeps the exactness of the short exact sequence 0β†’π‘€β†’π‘ƒξ…ž0βŠ•π‘ƒ0ξ…žξ…žβ†’coker(𝑓)β†’0 whenever π‘‹βˆˆπ”›. By induction, we can construct a commutative diagram with the form: 270814.eq.004(3.10)such that Hom𝑅(βˆ’,𝑋) leaves 𝐌 exact whenever π‘‹βˆˆπ”›. Consequently, 𝑀 is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective.
Now suppose that 𝑀 is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective, and we claim that π‘€ξ…ž is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective. As above 𝑀 belongs to βŸ‚βˆžπ”›. Hence, we have to prove that 𝑀 satisfies condition (2) of Proposition 3.8. To do it, pick a short exact sequence 0→𝑀→𝑃→𝑋→0 where 𝑃 is projective and 𝑋 is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective (such a sequence exists by Remark 3.6(4)), and consider the following push-out diagram: 270814.eq.005(3.11)
The first part of this proof, applying to the short exact sequence 0β†’π‘€ξ…žξ…žβ†’π‘Œβ†’π‘‹β†’0, shows that π‘Œ is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective. Hence, it admits a right projective resolution Y:0β†’π‘Œβ†’πΉ0→𝐹1β†’β‹― which remains exact by Hom𝑅(βˆ’,𝑋) whenever π‘‹βˆˆπ”›. In addition, the short exact sequence 0β†’π‘€ξ…žβ†’π‘ƒβ†’π‘Œβ†’0 remains exact by Hom𝑅(βˆ’,𝑋) whenever π‘‹βˆˆπ”› since π‘Œ is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective. Finally, it is easy to check that: 270814.eq.006(3.12)is also exact by Hom𝑅(βˆ’,𝑋) whenever π‘‹βˆˆπ”›.
The closing of the class of 𝔛-Gorenstein projective modules under direct sums is clear by the definition of these modules, while its closing under direct summands is deduced from [7, Proposition 1.4].

Corollary 3.12. Let 𝔛 be a projective class over a ring 𝑅. Let 0β†’πΊξ…žβ†’πΊβ†’π‘€β†’0 be an exact sequence where πΊξ…ž and 𝐺 are 𝔛-Gorenstein projective modules and where Ext1𝑅(𝑀,𝑃)=0 for all projective modules 𝑃. Then, 𝑀 is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective.

Proof. Pick a short exact sequence 0β†’πΊξ…žβ†’π‘ƒβ†’πΊξ…žξ…žβ†’0 where 𝑃 is projective and πΊξ…žξ…ž is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective. Consider the following push-out diagram.270814.eq.007(3.13)

Using Theorem 3.11, 𝑋 is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective. On the other hand, since Ext1𝑅(𝑀,𝑃)=0, the short exact sequence 0→𝑃→𝑋→𝑀→0 splits. Thus, 𝑀 is a direct summand of 𝑋. Consequently, 𝑀 is 𝔛-Gorenstein projective, as a direct summand of an 𝑋-Gorenstein projective module (by Theorem 3.11).

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank the referees for the valuable suggestions and comments.

References

  1. M. Auslander and D. A. Buchsbaum, β€œHomological dimension in Noetherian rings,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 42, pp. 36–38, 1956. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH
  2. J. P. Serre, β€œSur la dimension homologique des anneaux et des modules noethériens,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Algebraic Number Theory, pp. 175–189, Science Council of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, 1956. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  3. M. Auslander and M. Bridger, Stable Module Theory, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, No. 94, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA, 1969.
  4. M. Auslander, Anneaux de Gorenstein, et Torsion en Algèbre Commutative, Séeminaire d’Algèbre Commutative dirigé par Pierre Samuel, 1966/67. Texte rédigé, d’après des expos és de Maurice Auslander, par Marquerite Mangeney, Christian Peskine et Lucien Szpiro. Ecole Normale Supérieure de Jeunes Filles, Secrétariat Mathématique, Paris, France, 1976, http://www.numdam.org. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  5. E. E. Enochs and O. M. G. Jenda, β€œGorenstein injective and projective modules,” Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 220, no. 4, pp. 611–633, 1995. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH Β· View at MathSciNet
  6. L. W. Christensen, Gorenstein Dimensions, vol. 1747 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2000. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar
  7. H. Holm, β€œGorenstein homological dimensions,” Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, vol. 189, no. 1–3, pp. 167–193, 2004. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH Β· View at MathSciNet
  8. D. Bennis and N. Mahdou, β€œStrongly Gorenstein projective, injective, and flat modules,” Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, vol. 210, no. 2, pp. 437–445, 2007. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH Β· View at MathSciNet
  9. M. Tamekkante, β€œSpecial gorenstein projective modules via a matrix approach,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 241–250, 2010.
  10. D. Bennis, N. Mahdou, and K. Ouarghi, β€œRings over which all modules are strongly Gorenstein projective,” The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 749–759, 2010. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH
  11. R. Göbel and J. Trlifaj, Approximations and Endomorphism Algebras of Modules, vol. 41 of De Grutyter Expositions in Mathematics, de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, 2006. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar