About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Anesthesiology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 586592, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/586592
Clinical Study

Double Lumen Tubes: Usage and Performance by Frequent and Infrequent Users

1Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23507, USA
2Departments of Anesthesiology and Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Nashville, TN 37232, USA

Received 10 August 2011; Accepted 5 September 2011

Academic Editors: M. Şentürk and S. J. Verbrugge

Copyright © 2011 Sachin Jha and Jesse M. Ehrenfeld. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. M. Ehrenfeld, J. L. Walsh, and W. S. Sandberg, “Right- and left-sided mallinckrodt double-lumen tubes have identical clinical performance,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1847–1852, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  2. P. D. Slinger, “Fiberoptic bronchoscopic positioning of double-lumen tubes,” Journal of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 486–496, 1989. View at Scopus
  3. J. H. Campos, E. A. Hallam, T. Van Natta, and K. H. Kernstine, “Devices for lung isolation used by anesthesiologists with limited thoracic experience: Comparison of double-lumen endotracheal tube, and arndt wire-guided endobronchial blocker,” Anesthesiology, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 261–266, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Eden, M. Grach, Z. Goldik et al., “The implementation of an anesthesia information management system,” European Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 882–889, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  5. J. Balust and A. MacArio, “Can anesthesia information management systems improve quality in the surgical suite?” Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 215–222, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus