About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Astronomy and Astrophysics
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 640817, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/640817
Research Article

Statistical Effects in the Solar Activity Cycles during AD 1823–1996

1A.F. Ioffe Physico-Technical Institute, St. Petersburg 194021, Russia
2Metla, Eteläranta 55, FI-96301, Rovaniemi, Finland

Received 10 February 2011; Accepted 8 March 2011

Academic Editors: P. P. Avelino and M. Richmond

Copyright © 2011 Maxim Ogurtsov and Markus Lindholm. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Schwenn, “Space weather: the solar perspective,” Living Reviews in Solar Physics, vol. 3, p. 2, 2006.
  2. T. Pulkkinen, “Space weather: terrestrial perspective,” Living Reviews in Solar Physics, vol. 4, p. 1, 2007.
  3. Yu. I. Vitinsky, M. Kopecky, and G. V. Kuklin, Statistics of Sunspot Activity, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 1986.
  4. P. Charbonneau, “Multiperiodicity, chaos, and intermittency in a reduced model of the solar cycle,” Solar Physics, vol. 199, no. 2, pp. 385–404, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. D. H. Hathaway, R. M. Wilson, and E. J. Reichmann, “Group sunspot numbers: sunspot cycle characteristics,” Solar Physics, vol. 211, no. 1-2, pp. 357–370, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Dikpati, P. A. Gilman, and G. De Toma, “The waldmeier effect: an artifact of the definition of wolf sunspot number?” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 673, no. 1, pp. L99–L101, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Cameron and M. Schüssler, “A robust correlation between growth rate and amplitude of solar cycles: consequences for prediction methods,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 685, no. 2, pp. 1291–1296, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. B. B. Karak and A. R. Choudhuri, “The Waldmeier effect and the flux transport solar dynamo,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 410, pp. 1503–1512, 2011.
  9. D. V. Hoyt and K. H. Schatten, “Group sunspot numbers: a new solar activity reconstruction,” Solar Physics, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 189–219, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. Yu. A. Nagovitsyn, “To the description of long-term variations in the solar magnetic flux: the sunspot area index,” Astronomy Letters, vol. 31, pp. 557–562, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. Y. A. Nagovitsyn, V. G. Ivanov, E. V. Miletsky, and D. M. Volobuev, “ESAI database and some properties of solar activity in the past,” Solar Physics, vol. 224, no. 1-2, pp. 103–112, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. J. A. Eddy, “The maunder minimum,” Science, vol. 192, no. 4245, pp. 1189–1202, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  13. M. N. Gnevyshev and A. I. Ohl, “On the 22-year cycle in solar activity,” Astronomy Reports, vol. 25, pp. 18–20, 1948, Russian.
  14. M. Waldmeier, “Neue Eigenschaften der Sonnenflecken kurve (New qualities of the sunspot curves),” Astronomische Mitteilungen Zürich, vol. 14, pp. 105–130, 1935.
  15. R. H. Dicke, “Is there a chronometer hidden deep in the sun?” Nature, vol. 276, no. 5689, pp. 676–680, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. E. Friis-Christensen and K. Lassen, “Length of the solar cycle: an indicator of solar activity closely associated with climate,” Science, vol. 254, no. 5032, pp. 698–700, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  17. P. Hoyng, “Helicity fluctuations in mean field theory: an explanation for the variability of the solar cycle?” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 272, pp. 321–329, 1993.
  18. E. J. Chernosky, “A relationship between the length and activity of sunspot cycles,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, vol. 66, p. 241, 1954.
  19. R. M. Wilson, D. H. Hathaway, and E. J. Reichmann, “Estimating the size and timing of maximum amplitude for cycle 23 from its early cycle behavior,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 103, pp. 17411–17418, 1998.
  20. W. Ebisuzaki, “A method to estimate the statistical significance of a correlation when the data are serially correlated,” Journal of Climate, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 2147–2153, 1997.
  21. Y. A. Nagovitsyn, E. Y. Nagovitsyna, and V. V. Makarova, “The Gnevyshev-Ohl rule for physical parameters of the solar magnetic field: the 400-year interval,” Astronomy Letters, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 564–571, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. I. G. Usoskin and K. Mursula, “Long-term solar cycle evolution: review of recent developments,” Solar Physics, vol. 218, no. 1-2, pp. 319–343, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. I. G. Usoskin, K. Mursula, and G. A. Kovaltsov, “Lost sunspot cycle in the beginning of Dalton minimum: new evidence and consequences,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 29, no. 24, pp. 36–1, 2002.
  24. B. R. Durney, “On the differences between odd and even solar cycles,” Solar Physics, vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 421–426, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. V. Benevolenskaya, “Is the solar cycle still a puzzle?” in Proceedings of the IAU Symposium 233, V. Bothmer and A. A. Hady, Eds., pp. 215–221, Cambridge University Press, Cairo, Egypt, March-April 2006.