- About this Journal
- Abstracting and Indexing
- Aims and Scope
- Article Processing Charges
- Articles in Press
- Author Guidelines
- Bibliographic Information
- Citations to this Journal
- Contact Information
- Editorial Board
- Editorial Workflow
- Free eTOC Alerts
- Publication Ethics
- Submit a Manuscript
- Subscription Information
- Table of Contents
ISRN Astronomy and Astrophysics
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 725697, 8 pages
The Dark Matter Halo Density Profile, Spiral Arm Morphology, and Supermassive Black Hole Mass of M33
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 2801 S. University Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72204-1099, USA
2Arkansas Center for Space and Planetary Sciences, 202 Old Museum Building, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
Received 28 January 2011; Accepted 3 March 2011
Academic Editor: N. Caon
Copyright © 2011 Marc S. Seigar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We investigate the dark matter halo density profile of M33. We find that the HI rotation curve of M33 is best described by an NFW dark matter halo density profile model, with a halo concentration of and a virial mass of . We go on to use the NFW concentration of M33, along with the values derived for other galaxies (as found in the literature), to show that correlates with both spiral arm pitch angle and supermassive black hole mass.
The currently favored cosmological model, lambda+ cold dark matter (CDM), is remarkably successful at reproducing the large-scale structure of the Universe [1, 2]. However, small-scale observations have proven harder to explain. High-resolution N-body simulations of CDM structure formation predict that the central density profiles of dark matterhalos should rise steeply at small radii, with (, henceforth NFW, [4, 5]). Observations of rotation curves of late-type disk galaxies and dwarf galaxies, on the other hand, have shown that quite often, mass distributions with lower than predicted densities or with constant density cores, where (i.e., a pseudoisothermal profile), are preferred [6–13]. This is known as the cusp/core problem. One possibility is that these observations are pointing to a real problem with CDM cosmology, perhaps indicating that the dark matter is not cold but rather warm , in which case, it is easier to produce constant density cores at the centers of dark matter halos. Another possibility is that these late-type galaxies have constant density cores because of their late formation  and that earlier-type bulge-dominated galaxies (which form at earlier times) will tend to conform to the standard expectations of the theory. This is because the central mass densities of galaxies tend to reflect the density of the Universe at their formation time .
In this paper, we have chosen to model the HI rotation curve of M33 from Crobelli and Salucci . Due to its proximity, M33 can be studied in exquisite detail, and it, therefore, provides a crucial testing ground of our ideas of galaxy formation. Its Hubble classification is SA(s)cd , meaning that it is of particularly late type, with little or no bulge. This is reflected in the central supermassive black hole mass of , and black hole masses tend to be related to the central bulge mass [19, 20]. In this paper we model the rotation curve of M33 with both a pseudoisothermal profile dark matter halo density model and an NFW dark matter halo density model. We then use parameters derived from these fits to look at relations between the dark matter halo and other galaxy properties, such as supermassive black hole mass and spiral arm pitch angle.
This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the observed data and data analysis. Section 3 describes how the rotation curve is modeled and how we derive the baryonic and dark matter halo contributions to the rotation curve. Section 4 discusses our results, and Section 5 summarizes our findings. Throughout this paper, we assume a flat CDM cosmology with and a Hubble constant km s−1 Mpc−1.
2. Observations and Data Reduction
We have made use of the Spitzer/IRAC 3.6-μm image of M33. The IRAC observations were taken as part of the Gehrz Guaranteed Time Observer Program ID 5. The mapping sequence for each epoch consisted of 148 positions per channel. Each position was observed with three 12 s frames dithered with the standard, small, cycling pattern. The FWHM of the point-spread function (PSF) at 3.6-μm is or 6.9 pc at the distance of M33. The final mosaic spans an area of ~. We adopt a distance to M33 of kpc (e.g., ), and it has a redshift of .
For dynamical measurements, we make use of the HI rotation curve of Corbelli and Salucci . We also make use of the inclination corrected HI linewidth from HyperLeda (http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr/) of km s−1 (e.g., ).
For the determination of the spiral arm morphology we have made use of an band image from the digital sky survey (DSS).
2.1. Measurement of Spiral Arm Pitch Angle
Spiral arm pitch angles are measured using a two-dimensional fast Fourier decomposition technique, which employs a program described in Schröder et al. . Logarithmic spirals are assumed in the decomposition.
The amplitude of each Fourier component is given by where and are polar coordinates, is the intensity at position , represents the number of arms or modes, and is the variable associated with the pitch angle , defined by . Throughout this work, we measure the pitch angle of the component.
The image was first projected to face on. Mean uncertainties of position angle and inclination as a function of inclination were discussed by Considère and Athanassoula . For a galaxy with low inclination, there are clearly greater uncertainties in assigning both a position angle and an accurate inclination. These uncertainties are discussed by Block et al.  and Seigar et al. [27, 28] who took a galaxy with low inclination (<30°) and one with high inclination (>60°) and varied the inclination angle used in the correction to face on. They found that for the galaxy with low inclination, the measured pitch angle remained the same. M33 has a relatively low inclination of ~30°, and so the uncertainty in the inclination angle in this case does not result in a large error in the pitch angle we measure for M33. Our deprojection method assumes that spiral galaxy disks are intrinsically circular in nature.
3. Mass Modeling
3.1. The Baryonic Contribution
Our goal is to determine a mass model for M33 from the direct fitting of mass models to its rotation curve. We perform a bulge-disk decomposition in order to estimate the baryonic contribution. We then determine several different models and try to recreate the nuclear spiral by minimizing reduced-.
We first extract the surface brightness of M33 using the Spitzer 3.6-μm image and the IRAF ELLIPSE routine, which fits ellipses to an image using an iterative method described by Jedrzejewski . In order to mask out foreground stars, SEXTRACTOR  was used. An inclination correction was then applied to the surface brightness profile [31, 32] as follows: where is the surface brightness when viewed at some inclination , μ is the corrected surface brightness, is the major axis, is the minor axis, and is a factor dependent on whether the galaxy is optically thick or thin; if then the galaxy is optically thin; if , then the galaxy is optically thick (e.g., [31, 32]). Graham  showed that is a good value to use for the near-infrared band. Adopting a simple reddening law, where extinction falls as the square of wavelength, it can be shown that a value of is appropriate at 3.6-μm , and we adopt this value here.
The resulting surface brighntess profile Figure 1 reaches a surface brightness of mag arcsec−2 at a radius of ~13.2 kpc (equivalent to 54.0 arcmin). From this surface brightness profile, we perform a one-dimensional bulge-disk decomposition, which employs the Sérsic model for the bulge component and an exponential law for the disk component (e.g., [32, 35–39]; see  for a review). The Sérsic [41, 42] model is most commonly expressed as a surface brightness profile such that where is the surface brightness at the effective radius that encloses half of the total light from the model [43, 44]. The constant is defined in terms of the parameter , which described the overall shape of the light profile. When , the Sérsic model is equivalent to a de Vaucouleurs [45, 46] model, and when , it is equivalent to an exponential model. The parameter has been approximated by , for [47, 48]. The exponential model for the disk surface brightness profile can be written as follows: where is the disk central surface brightness and is the disk exponential scalelength. The results of our surface brightness fitting are summarized in Table 1.
We now assign masses to the disk and bulge of M33. The stellar mass-to-light ratio in the band is a well-calibrated quantity  which depends on color. Seigar et al.  extended this to a 3.6-μm image of M31 using the population synthesis codes of Bruzual and Charlot  and Maraston . Using their results, we find a central mass-to-light ratio of with a gradient of −0.014 kpc−1. This results in a disk mass of and a bulge mass of for M33.
A concern in using the 3.6-μm Spitzer waveband to determine the underlying stellar mass is the effect of emission from hot dust in this waveband although this is probably only important in or near HII regions. In order to place some constraint on this, we have chosen to explore the emission from dust in the near-infrared band at 2.2 μm. Using near-infrared spectroscopy at 2.2 μm, it has been shown that hot dust can account for up to 30 per cent of the continuum light observed at this wavelength in areas of active star formation, that is, spiral arms . When averaged over the entire disk of a galaxy, this reduces to a 2 percent effect if one assumes that spiral arms can be up to 12° in width. At 3.6 μm, this would, therefore, result in 3 percent of emitted light from dust.
Another concern for the 3.6-μm waveband would be the contribution from the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) emission feature at 3.3 μm. However, an infrared space observatory (ISO) spectroscopic survey of actively star-forming galaxies by Helou et al.  found that the 3.3-μm feature was very weak when they analysed the average 2.5–11.6-μm spectrum of 45 galaxies. The contribution of the PAH feature to the 3.6-μm Spitzer waveband is therefore, not a major concern.
One other important contribution to the baryonic mass of M33 is the gas mass. Corbelli and Salucci  have shown that beyond a radius of 10 kpc, the gas contributes about the same to the rotation curve as the stars. Since the best current estimate of the gas distribution comes from Corbelli and Salucci , we have chosen to adopt their model for the distribution of gas mass in M33.
3.2. The Dark Halo Contribution
A range of allowed dark matter halo masses and density profiles is now explored, using two models for dark matter halo density profiles, the pseudoisothermal model (e.g., , see ), and the Navarro, Frenk, and White (; hereafter NFW) profile. A pseudoisothermal density profile is given by which in terms of rotational velocity becomes where is the core radius and . The NFW profile is given by where is a characteristic “inner” radius, is the present critical density, and is a characteristic overdensity. This overdensity is defined as where = is the concentration parameter and The circular velocity associated with this density is given by Battaglia et al.  and is where is the circular velocity at the virial radius and . This NFW profile is a two-parameter function and completely specified by choosing two independent parameters, for example, the virial mass (or virial radius ) and concentration (see  for a discussion). Similarly, given a virial mass and the dark matter circular velocity at any radius, the halo concentration is completely determined.
We now proceed by finding the best-fitting NFW and pseudoisothermal (or constant density core) dark matter halo density profiles that describe the complete HI rotation curve of M33 as observed by Crobelli and Salucci . The result of this is shown in Figure 2. The pseudoisothermal fit is shown as the solid blue line, with best-fitting parameters of km s−1 and kpc, and a reduced- value of , where μ is the degrees of freedom. The NFW fit is shown as a dotted red line, with best-fitting parameters and , with a reduced- value of . As can be seen from Figure 2, the pseudoisothermal model (or core model in the figure) underestimates the rotation velocities beyond ~7 kpc. However, the NFW fit more closely recreates the observed data. This is also clear from the values of reduced-. We therefore, conclude that the NFW model best represents these data, and this is consistent with the results of Corbelli and Salucci . This is somewhat surprising for a late type, bulgeless galaxy like M33, since these late-type galaxies are often shown to have constant density cores (e.g., [10, 11]).
Table 2 lists the best-fit parameters of the best-fit NSF and pseudoisothermal models based upon direct fitting to the HI rotation curve data.
It is probably worthwhile noting that our best-fitting NFW model yields a concentration parameter, . This is somewhat lower than the concentration parameter of reported by Corbelli and Salucci . Furthermore, we derive a virial mass of , which is significantly lower than the virial mass of found by . Here, we discuss some reasons that could account for these apparent differences. Since we use the same gas distribution as in Crobelli and Salucci , the only difference can come from the stellar mass component. The main difference between our stellar mass component, and that of Crobelli and Salucci , is that ours is determined from a Spitzer 3.6-μm observed in 2007, and that of Crobelli and Salucci  is determined from a band image reported by . The band image from 1994 was taken when near-infrared arrays were really in their infancy, and so, it is probably more important to rely on the more modern datasets when possible. Furthermore, Crobelli and Salucci  assume a distance to M33 of 0.7 Mpc, whereas we use the more accurate measurement of 0.84 Mpc from Magrini et al. . As a result of this underestimatation in the distance to M33, Crobelli and Salucci  has underestimated the size of the visible galaxy by a factor of ~17 percent and this in turn has probably affected the total mass of M33 that they derive. Taking into account the different distances to M33, the disk scalelength of kpc used by Crobelli and Salucci  would become kpc if they had used the more accurate distance of 0.84 Mpc. This is still lower than the scalelngth of kpc that we report here. In converting this light distribution into stellar mass, we have then used a combination of the stellar mass-to-light ratios from Bell et al.  and the population synthesis codes from Maraston . These papers provide the best estimates currently available for determining the stellar mass-to-light ratios, and they were not available to Corbelli and Salucci when they performed their analysis. One final difference between our results and those of Crobelli and Salucci  is that we include the bulge mass although considering the bulge-to-disk ratio of this is unlikely to have a significant effect on the mass models. As a result, we conclude that the differences between our results and those of Crobelli and Salucci  are caused by the different treatment of the disk starlight, updated stellar mass-to-light ratios, and more recent data.
Finally, it should be noted that Corbelli and Walterbos  revealed that M33 has a weak central bar. This could potentially have the affect of inducing noncircular motions in the central regions, that is, within 1 kpc. However, Kuzio de Naray and Kaufmann  have shown that, even in the case of barred galaxies, it is difficult to confuse an NFW dark matter halo profile with that of a pseudoisothermal profile. In other words, our result that M33 is best described by an NFW profile still holds, and given that the potential of the stellar bar is weak, the concentration is unlikely to change significantly.
In the following discussion, we use the NFW concentration parameter to reveal some interesting relationships.
Seigar et al. [27, 28, 60] have demonstrated that a relationship exists between spiral arm pitch angle and rotation curve shear Rotation curve shear is defined as: where is the first Oort constant, is the angular velocity, and is the velocity measured at radius . Using this equation it is possible to determine the shear from a rotation curve. We have performed such an analysis on the HI rotation curve for M33 and found a value for its shear of . We have also measured the spiral arm pitch angle for M33, which turns out to be . This pitch angle is in good agreement with previous measurements [62, 63]. Figure 3 shows the relationship between spiral arm pitch angle and rotation curve shear. One can easily see that the pitch angle and shear values for M33 are consistent with the overall relationship.
Given the spiral arm pitch angles of a number of other galaxies, we can also now compare this quantity with the NFW concentration parameters for the galaxies listed in Table 3. Figure 4 shows a plot of NFW concentration as a function of spiral arm pitch angle in degrees. This plot may only be for 5 galaxies, but a relatively strong correlation appears to exist between these two quantities. Indeed, Pearson's linear correlation coefficient is 0.95 for this plot although the significance at which the null hypothesis of zero correlation is disproved in onlt 54 percent, probably due to low number statistics. Nevertheless, an interesting correlation seems to exist between spiral arm morphology and dark matter concentration, and this could be further studied by targeting more galaxies in an observational campaign. Indeed, these data seem consistent with the suggestion that pitch angle and mass concentration are related [27, 28].
Finally Figure 5 shows a plot of supermassive black hole mass as a function of NFW concentration parameter. Unfortunately, here, we only have data for three galaxies. Nevertheless, a hint of a correlation is starting to show, and seeing that such a correlation has been suggested by Seigar et al. , as well as Satyapal et al.  and Booth and Schaye , this plot is somewhat intriguing. This hint of a correlation should, of course, be expanded on by studying more galaxies along the Hubble sequence from type Sa to Sd.
We have shown that the HI rotation curve of M33 can be best modeled with a dark matter halo that follows a NFW profile with low NFW concentration of . Using the NFW concentration parameter from this fit, we find that interesting correlations between (1) spiral arm pitch angle and NFW concentration and (2) central supermassive black hole mass and NFW concentration start to appear. Although the second correlation is only for three galaxies, on the surface, it appears to be in disagreement with the argument made by Kormendy and Bender  that the dark matter halos of galaxies have no affect on the masses of supermassive black holes found in their centers. These correlations are very intriguing and our results warrant further investigation, as we have been limited to data that was available for just a few galaxies.
This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The author wishes to thank the reviewers who helped to improve the content of this paper.
- G. R. Blumenthal, S. M Faber, R. Flores, and J. R. Primack, “Contraction of dark matter galactic halos due to baryonic infall,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 301, pp. 27–34, 1986.
- V. Springel, S. D. M. White, A. Jenkins et al., “Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars,” Nature, vol. 435, no. 7042, pp. 629–636, 2005.
- J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, “A universal density profile from hierarchical clustering,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 490, no. 2, pp. 493–508, 1997.
- J. F. Navarro, E. Hayashi, C. Power et al., “The inner structure of ΛCDM haloes—III. Universality and asymptotic slopes,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 349, no. 3, pp. 1039–1051, 2004.
- J. Diemand, M. Zemp, B. Moore, J. Stadel, and C. M. Carollo, “Cusps in cold dark matter haloes,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 264, no. 2, pp. 665–673, 2005.
- R. A. Swaters, B. F. Madore, F. C. Van Den Bosch, and M. Balcells, “The central mass distribution in dwarf and low surface brightness galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 583, no. 2, pp. 732–751, 2003.
- G. Gentile, P. Salucci, U. Klein, D. Vergani, and P. Kalberla, “The cored distribution of dark matter in spiral galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 351, no. 3, pp. 903–922, 2004.
- G. Gentile, A. Burkert, P. Salucci, U. Klein, and F. Walter, “The dwarf galaxy DDO 47 as a dark matter laboratory: testing cusps hiding in triaxial halos,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 634, no. 2, pp. L145–L148, 2005.
- J. D. Simon, A. D. Bolatto, A. Leroy, L. Blitz, and E. L. Gates, “High-resolution measurements of the halos of four dark matter-dominated galaxies: deviations from a universal density profile,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 621, no. 2, pp. 757–776, 2005.
- R. K. De Naray, S. S. McGaugh, W. J. G. De Blok, and A. Bosma, “High-resolution optical velocity fields of 11 low surface brightness galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, vol. 165, no. 2, pp. 461–479, 2006.
- R. K. De Naray, S. S. McGaugh, and W. J. G. De Blok, “Mass models for low surface brightness galaxies with high-resolution optical velocity fields,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 676, no. 2, pp. 920–943, 2008.
- F. Shankar, A. Lapi, P. Salucci, G. De Zotti, and L. Danese, “New relationships between galaxy properties and host halo mass, and the role of feedbacks in galaxy formation,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 643, no. 1, pp. 14–25, 2006.
- M. Spano, M. Marcelin, P. Amram, C. Carignan, B. Epinat, and O. Hernandez, “GHASP: an Hα kinematic survey of spiral and irregular galaxies—V. Dark matter distribution in 36 nearby spiral galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 383, no. 1, pp. 297–316, 2008.
- A. R. Zentner and J. S. Bullock, “Inflation, cold dark matter, and the central density problem,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 4, Article ID 043003, 12 pages, 2002.
- R. H. Wechsler, J. S. Bullock, J. R. Primack, A. V. Kravtsov, and A. Dekel, “Concentrations of dark halos from their assembly histories,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 568, no. 1, pp. 52–70, 2002.
- E. Corbelli and P. Salucci, “The extended rotation curve and the dark matter halo of M33,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 311, no. 2, pp. 441–447, 2000.
- G. de Vaucouleurs, A. de Vaucouleurs, H. G. Corwin Jr., R. J. Buta, G. Paturel, and R. Fouqué, The Third Reference Catalog of Bright Galaxies, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
- K. Gebhardt, T. R. Lauer, J. Kormendy, et al., “M33: a galaxy with no supermassive black hole,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 122, pp. 2469–2476, 2001.
- J. Magorrian, S. Tremaine, D. Richstone et al., “The demography of massive dark objects in galaxy centers,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 115, no. 6, pp. 2285–2305, 1998.
- N. Häring and H.-W. Rix, “On the black hole mass-bulge mass relation,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 604, no. 2, p. L89, 2004.
- L. Magrini, E. Corbelli, and D. Galli, “The building up of the disk galaxy M 33 and the evolution of the metallicity gradient,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 470, no. 3, pp. 843–855, 2007.
- G. Paturel, C. Petit, PH. Prugniel et al., “HYPERLEDA. I: identification and designation of galaxies,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 412, no. 1, pp. 45–55, 2003.
- M. F. S. Schröder, M. G. Pastoriza, S. O. Kepler, and I. Puerari, “The distribution of light in the spiral galaxy NGC 7412,” Search Results Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, vol. 108, pp. 41–54, 1994.
- S. Considére and E. Athanassoula, “Analysis of spiral components in 16 galaxies,” Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 365–404, 1988.
- C. Garcia-Gomez and E. Athanassoula, “Analysis of the distribution of H II regions in external galaxies. II—analysis of the spiral structure,” Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 431–464, 1993.
- D. L. Block, I. Puerari, J. A. Frogel, P. B. Eskridge, A. Stockton, and B. Fuchs, “Cosmic masks still dance,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 269-270, no. 1–4, pp. 5–29, 1999.
- M. S. Seigar, D. L. Block, I. Puerari, N. E. Chorney, and P. A. James, “Dust-penetrated arm classes: insights from rising and falling rotation curves,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 359, no. 3, pp. 1065–1076, 2005.
- M. S. Seigar, D. L. Block, I. Puerari, N. E. Chorney, and P. A. James, “Constraining dark matter halo profiles and galaxy formation models using spiral arm morphology. I. Method outline,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 645, no. 2, pp. 1012–1023, 2006.
- R. I. Jedrzejewski, “CCD surface photometry of elliptical galaxies. I—observations, reduction and results,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 226, pp. 747–768, 1987.
- E. Bertin and S. Arnouts, “SExtractor: software for source extraction,” Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 393–404, 1996.
- R. S. de Jong, “Near-IR photometry of 86 galaxies. II,” Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, vol. 118, p. 557, 1996.
- M. S. Seigar and P. A. James, “The structure of spiral galaxies—I. Near-infrared properties of bulges, discs and bars,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 299, no. 3, pp. 672–684, 1998.
- A. W. Graham, “A K-band central disc surface brightness correlation with scalelength for early-type disc galaxies, and the inclination correction,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 326, no. 2, pp. 543–552, 2001.
- M. S. Seigar, A. J. Barth, and J. S. Bullock, “A revised Λ CDM mass model for the Andromeda Galaxy,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 389, no. 4, pp. 1911–1923, 2008.
- Y. C. Andredakis, R. F. Peletier, and M. Balcells, “The shape of the luminosity profiles of bulges of spiral galaxies,” Search Results Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 275, no. 3, p. 874, 1995.
- H. G. Khosroshahi, Y. Wadadekar, and A. Kembhavi, “Correlations among global photometric properties of disk galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 533, no. 1, pp. 162–171, 2000.
- M. D’Onofrio, “2D modelling of the light distribution of early-type galaxies in a volume-limited sample—II. Results for real galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 326, no. 4, pp. 1517–1532, 2001.
- A. W. Graham, “An investigation into the prominence of spiral galaxy bulges,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 820–840, 2001.
- C. Möllenhoff and J. Heidt, “Surface photometry of spiral galaxies in NIR: structural parameters of disks and bulges,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 368, no. 1, pp. 16–37, 2001.
- A. W. Graham and S. P. Driver, “A concise reference to (projected) sérsic 1/n quantities, including concentration, profile slopes, petrosian indices, and kron magnitudes,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 118–127, 2005.
- J. L. Sérsic, “Influence of the atmospheric and instrumental dispersion on the brightness distribution in a galaxy,” Boletin de la Asociacion Argentina de Astronomia, vol. 6, p. 41, 1963.
- J. L. Sérsic, “Atlas de Galaxies Australes. Observatorio Astronomico,” Cordoba, 1968.
- L. Ciotti, “Stellar systems following the R exp 1/m luminosity law,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 249, no. 1, pp. 99–106, 1989.
- N. Caon, M. Capaccioli, and M. D'Onofrio, “On the shape of the light profiles of early type galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 265, no. 4, p. 1013, 1993.
- G. de Vaucouleurs, “Recherches sur ies nebuleuses extragalactiques,” Annales d'Astrophysique, vol. 11, p. 247, 1948.
- G. de Vaucouleurs, “Classification and morphology of external galaxies,” Handbuch der Physik, vol. 53, pp. 275–310, 1959.
- M. Capaccioli, “Photometry of early-type galaxies and the R exp 1/4 law,” in The World of Galaxies, H. G. Corwin and L. Bottinelli, Eds., pp. 208–227, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1989.
- P. H. Prugniel and F. Simien, “The fundamental plane of early-type galaxies: non-homology of the spatial structure,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 321, no. 1, pp. 111–122, 1997.
- E. F. Bell, D. H. McIntosh, N. Katz, and M. D. Weinberg, “A first estimate of the baryonic mass function of galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 585, no. 2, pp. L117–L120, 2003.
- G. Bruzual and S. Charlot, “Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 344, no. 4, pp. 1000–1028, 2003.
- C. Maraston, “Evolutionary population synthesis: models, analysis of the ingredients and application to high-z galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 362, no. 3, pp. 799–825, 2005.
- P. A. James and M. S. Seigar, “The nature of near-infrared emission from spiral galaxies,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 350, no. 3, pp. 791–796, 1999.
- G. Helou, N. Y. Lu, M. W. Werner, S. Malhotra, and N. Silbermann, “The mid-infrared spectra of normal galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 532, no. 1, pp. L21–L24, 2000.
- R. Bender, J. Kormendy, G. Bower et al., “HST STIS spectroscopy of the triple nucleus of M31: two nested disks in keplerian rotation around a supermassive black hole,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 631, no. 1, pp. 280–300, 2005.
- G. Battaglia, A. Helmi, H. Morrison et al., “The radial velocity dispersion profile of the Galactic halo: constraining the density profile of the dark halo of the Milky Way,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 364, no. 2, pp. 433–442, 2005.
- J. S. Bullock, T. S. Kolatt, A. Dekel, et al., “Profiles of dark haloes: evolution, scatter and environment,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 555, no. 1, pp. 240–257, 2001.
- M. W. Regan and S. N. Vogel, “The near-infrared structure of M33,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 434, no. 2, pp. 536–545, 1994.
- E. Corbelli and R. A. M. Walterbos, “Bar imprints on the inner gas kinematics of M33,” The American Astronomical Society, vol. 669, pp. 315–326, 2007.
- R. K De Naray and T. Kaufmann, “Recovering cores and cusps in dark matter haloes using mock velocity field observations,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.3471.
- M. S. Seigar, D. L. Block, and I. Puerari, “Dust penetrated arm classes—insights from rising and falling rotation curves”,” in Penetrating Bars Through Masks of Cosmic Dust: The Hubble Tuning Fork Strikes a New Note, L. Block, I. Puerari, K. C. Freeman, R. Groess, and E. K. Block, Eds., Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004.
- M. S. Seigar, D. Kennefick, J. Kennefick, and C. H.S. Lacy, “Discovery of a relationship between spiral arm morphology and supermassive black hole mass in disk galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 678, no. 2, pp. L93–L96, 2008.
- A. Sandage and R. M. Humphreys, “On the warped optical plane of M33,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 236, pp. L1–L5, 1980.
- D. L. Block, K. C. Freeman, T. H. Jarrett et al., “Very luminous carbon stars in the outer disk of the Triangulum spiral galaxy,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 425, no. 3, pp. L37–L40, 2004.
- M. S. Seigar, “A cosmologically motivated description of the dark matter halo profile for the low surface brightness galaxy, Malin 1,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, vol. 120, no. 871, pp. 945–951, 2008.
- L. Moore and Q. A. Parker, “Malin 1: a deeper look,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 165–169, 2006.
- H. Arp, “A technique for faint photography applied to the radio source in fornax,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 139, p. 1378, 1964.
- R. Braun, “The distribution and kinematics of neutral gas in M31,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 372, no. 1, pp. 54–66, 1991.
- A. Klypin, H. Zhao, and R. S. Somerville, “ΛCDM-based models for the Milky Way and M31. I. Dynamical models,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 573, no. 2, pp. 597–613, 2002.
- A. M. Ghez, S. Salim, S. D. Hornstein et al., “Stellar orbits around the galactic center black hole,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 620, no. 2, pp. 744–757, 2005.
- S. Satyapal, D. Vega, R. P. Dudik, N. P. Abel, and T. Heckman, “Spitzer uncovers active galactic nuclei missed by optical surveys in seven late-type galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 677, no. 2, pp. 926–942, 2008.
- C. M. Booth and J. Schaye, “Dark matter haloes determine the masses of supermassive black holes,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 405, no. 1, pp. L1–L5, 2010.
- J. Kormendy and R. Bender, “Supermassive black holes do not correlate with dark matter haloes of galaxies,” Nature, vol. 469, no. 7330, pp. 377–380, 2011.